• Welcome and remember to subscribe to r/worldnewsvideo!

    If its a worthwhile post, please consider Upvoting and Crossposting to your favorite subreddits!

    This is a Subreddit that intends to document the world as it is.

    Please treat each other as you yourselves would like to be treated. Please do not promote or condone violence on our subreddit. We advise our users try their best to refrain from making mean spirited statements. Please report users who are engaging in uncivil behavior, spreading misinformation, or are complaining that a submission is "not worldnews." Feel free to visit our wiki page to read our expanded rules.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

  • "Most dangerous terrorists in the world"... Specifically which ones?

    "Most dangerous terrorists in the world"

    So Israel, right?

    Nah the US is at the top still.. nothing beats 2 atom bombs in civilian targets with no protection. Israel is sure trying tho, problem is it depends on the us to keep going at it so in the end it's all the US really.

    Tha joos!!!!!!!!

    This is has gotten so damn old.

    I don't condone what Israel is doing. You can literally see blood soaking the ground from space satellites over Darfur and there's not a peep from anyone. Seeing "Israel" in every post is not some coincidence.

    "Leave Bibi alooone" 😭

    Seeing "Israel" in every post is not some coincidence.

    Bad faith arguement.

    Who is funding what Isreal is doing? What is AIPAC and who is it effecting? It's not a coincidence. Reddit is predominantly US based and the US has a direct involvement in Isreal. The US has little to no involvement in Darfur, especially now that USAID got doge'd.

    the people you're replying to aren't talking about jews. neo-nazis will care about that but the rest of us just think israel is a fucked up state...so that's why we're talking about israel...

    Stop using "Jews" and "Israel" interchangeably.

    "And this kill-squad of yours, who kills people from a list every day, and their whole job is murdering other humans - who is it that they kill?"

    "Oh, they kill the most dangerous people in the world. If those dangerous people ever had the chance, they'd probably kill someone."

    Kill or be killed…

    Not the one in the white house and pentagon.

    So Trump is on the list?

    I actually met one of this guys and ended getting friend with him. Now obviously he couldn’t tell me names and stuff, but he was taking out people classed as terrorist and also saved a few hostages from getting killed by the terrorist. What I can tell you is that is not a really James Bond kind of things, not always at least, but many times he had to go with his team weeks through rough conditions/climate full camouflage and most of the time advancing only by dragging on flat, pissing/shitting on themselves, just so they can get close enough to take out who ever was on the list. He earned good money doing this. He tried to retire a few years a go, but he couldn’t, so he went back to do the same thing he was good at.

  • Oh like how the US keeps dismantling democracies ao they can install another dictator who will funnel money back to the US in forms of oil, actual money, whatever it is.

    Imperialism is the final stage of capitalism.

    And now my dinners ruined. Thanks.

    Hahaha Molly what

  • Source?

    He's currently all over Reddit because he has been working for the Russian government for about eight years and they use him to push disinformation on every podcast that will take him - people trust him implicitly because of the whistleblower stuff, even when he says crazy shit like "Crimea was on loan to Ukraine and Russia simply took it back".

    Im not disagreeing but do you have sources to back these claims?

    What do you need exactly? He's open about working for Sputnik (it's on his Wikipedia) and he made that exact claim about Crimea on Rogan a couple of weeks ago.

    Not that I'm defending the guy or anything but I was thinking about this: do we consider Snowden to be a Russian asset now too? By calling him a Russian asset are we discrediting everything he says? Conversely would someone from Russia who had a show on Voice of America or PBS be considered a CIA asset?

    I think from my point of view it's in Russia's interest to give someone like him a platform because it creates division in America but that doesn't mean what he is saying is disinformation right? (that is to say, this is just Russian active measures yeah?)

    Well according to the Russian disinformation site that is Google AI, Kiriakou never said "Crimea was on loan to Ukraine."

    I think that's why people are asking you for a source for these off-the-cuff remarks. There's a lot of disinformation and misquotes out there, especially when it comes to Russia. And people are all too willing to believe something without evidence, if it already fits the narrative that their government has programmed them to believe.

    I dunno... maybe Putin has weaponized google. But I'd like to see a direct source before I believe it just the same.

    Brother, do you think Google has the transcript of every podcast saved in memory? Of course not. You could have also scrolled down and found the multitude of Reddit threads on the first page of results where people are discussing Kiriakou spreading russian talking points.

    Here's a short of him saying, word for word, "Crimea was Russian until 1953, Kruschiev gave it to the Ukranians as a gift and then the Russians took it back in '14" on Rogan a couple of weeks ago: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/BK4CDgGkxn8

    Here's the timestamp for him saying it in the actual podcast: https://youtu.be/TZqADzuu73g?t=8514

    Here he is on Danny Jones two years ago, asked directly if Putin wants to "conquer Ukraine", he says no and then goes on to say that the US actually betrayed Putin regarding countries joining Nato, and so this action in Ukraine is essentially self defense because the US is forcing Putin's hand: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uVdwKm5o4A

    Which is literally on the wikipedia page for Russian disinformation about the invasion of Ukraine:

    Although it seeks to join, Ukraine is not a member of NATO; a collective security alliance of 32 member states, similar to the Russian-led CSTO. In 1999, Russia signed the Charter for European Security, affirming the right of each state to choose its security arrangements and join alliances if they wish.

    Putin claimed that NATO broke a promise not to let any Eastern European countries join. This unwritten promise was allegedly made by American and German diplomats to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990, but the diplomats and NATO denied ever making any formal proposal. Such a promise was never included in any treaty, and the Soviet Union ceased to exist in 1991. From then until the Russian invasion, 14 Eastern European countries willingly joined NATO. Political scientist Filip Kostelka says many of these countries sought NATO membership "to protect themselves from the Russian threat. They did not need to be pushed". The last time a country bordering Russia had joined NATO prior to the invasion was in 2004.

    Putin has not always opposed NATO. According to Michael McFaul and Robert Person, this suggests Putin did not truly believe it to be a military threat. In 2002, Putin said Ukraine's relationship with NATO was not Russia's concern. Russia did not make threats about the Baltic states joining NATO in 2004. Putin said in 2005 that if Ukraine wanted to join NATO, "we will respect their choice, because it is their sovereign right to decide their own defence policy, and this will not worsen relations between our countries". It was not until his 2007 Munich speech that Putin openly opposed NATO enlargement. Nevertheless, Russia deepened co-operation with NATO in 2010, and the two continued to co-operate until Russia annexed Crimea in 2014.

    When Russia occupied Crimea and invaded the Donbas in 2014, Ukraine was officially a neutral country and was not seeking NATO membership. In December 2014, Ukraine's parliament voted to end this neutral status in response to Russia's aggression, and Ukraine only applied to join NATO in response to the 2022 invasion. Steven Pifer thus argues that Russia's own aggressive actions have done the most to push Ukraine towards NATO. When Russia invaded in 2022, Ukraine was a long way from membership. Members of the alliance have been wary of letting Ukraine join, partly due to Putin's warnings.

    So many words... with links too! And yet you still can't find the quote where he says Crimea was on loan from Ukraine.

    So I think we can safely assume it doesn't exist.

    Indeed. I have seen this guy 3 times in my feed but never was there a source to og video...strange

    Just search for it?

    Instead of asking the person who posted it and probably has more information about it?

    Hard to do without some information, you know, like a name lol. Not impossible but not everyone can research - even little things

    You know that he used to be a CIA spy and is talking about secrets on TikTok. It will be a short search.

    Back in my days, people had to bring the proof of what they were saying. Not go with massive trust me bro and DYOR.

    Proof can be forged. Do your own research, especially when it's available online.

  • Fun Fact...Anyone is always a few words away from being considered a "Terrorist" 😉

  • So is he on the list now?

  • Meanwhile if you bash trump or the Izzylites you're being added to a list.....

  • This week we should put Derrick on the list for not chipping in on pizza friday

  • Wow he's so vague it's got to be true.

  • The most dangerous terrorists in the world are in the white house. So..

  • obviously hitmen are real, people will do anything for money. why should murder be off the table? hell, it's a well known fact that the guy arrested for owning and operating the silk road hired a hitman to kill a guy that was blackmailing him

  • Who is this guy

  • Put me on the list, I’m tired

  • Yea the CIA definitely killed the MIT fusion scientist. No bigger terrorist than someone threatening corporate profits

  • Where’s a CIA hit man when we need him in this country?

  • If there really is a kill list like this and the terrorists are still out there, it suggests they’re choosing not to kill. Clearly killing isn’t their goal for those ones.

  • The most dangerous…. to who though?

  • This is absolute horseshit.

    This guy paints it as a shadowy organization of assassins rather than an expansion of surveillance and targeted drone strikes under the purview of the CIA reporting directly to the president.

    This program is under executive branch with more oversight, It does refer to streamlining kill lists. So my ticket is there’s probably different programs concerning assassinations. Some are more public than others. He’s probably referring to a program that’s not as public. Though with some drone weaponry. They have to send in somebody to confirm target and maybe even use some type of targeting aid. Some might call those assassin’s others might soldiers carrying out orders. They want to frame this interview to get the best amount of clicks. He calls them assassins in other cases they may be called contractors, soldiers, CIA agent, etc. But assassin get more clicks on YouTube.

  • Like the leadership of antifa

    We discussed this at our last meeting, some members were scared.

    Fun fact, having an antifa meeting in an abandoned chuck e cheese is pretty fun. The ball pit still smells like a community urinal though.

    LOL I think you got the joke. No one else did.

    Too busy laughing at you

    Who is that, exactly?

    I needed that chuckle today, thanks