*(somewhere, Kutaka gained 400% stats due to Supreme overlord)*

*(Run,)*

Great question! Generally? We aren't. A lot of factors have to come together to warrant an investigation. Factors like showing common hallmarks of ai-writing, inordinate frequency (most people would really have to push to hit the 3 per day post limit with loreposts without ai assistance) and third party reports from active members of the sub might prompt a more thorough investigation into such posts.

If you, Torinn, reported a post for AI use and that post also showed some of the other signs listed above? We would do a more thorough investigation.

At that point, we would use AI checker tools, cross-referencing them against one another, while also testing them with a wide range of loreposts we KNOW to be both well organized and written by humans to verify as close to certainty as possible that such tools were being accurate.

Hypothetically.

Having played around with such tools to test their veracity against a vast number of users (20+ at this point) it is incredibly uncommon to find a single person to rate below 99-100% human. Even if they're the sort to meticulously spellcheck their work and even if they use AI to check for spelling errors or shorten their work.

If someone inserts typos, or uses an AI humanizer, it usually clocks at about 50% with some wiggle for which checker you're using.

You'll be happy to know that a brief look at your own posts shows you are 100% human. We hope to use such tools rarely, as the sheer amount of time and effort required to verify that they're doing their job correctly and check the veracity of appeals is... a lot. As such we would really only accept reports from flaired users and active contributors to the sub, or else the anti-ai brigaders would take over.