This isn't exactly a huge problem yet, but I'm not waiting until it is.

DO NOT REPORT THE AUTOMOD REPLIES!!!!

It will, and has, clogged up the mod queue making things more difficult. If you have a problem with one of the Automod Wiki replies, like there's an inaccuracy or something, send a mod mail with details. If it's because you don't agree with it or you're just in a mood, go back to r/EnoughCommieSpam or r/tankiejerk or wherever you little rascals come from.
Spammy or abusive libs will be banned.

Thank you.

~Geoffrey

  • Notice how the only people to respond here are people complaining? (On the post about report abuse from libs)

  • Hell yeah, much needed, let em circle jerk and rant their bs among their fellow intellectually dishonest libtard subs

  • I don't disagree with what the auto mod posts but I think it posts too frequently, almost kind of spammy. Maybe if the messages it posts were shorter or something

  • But mods never reply, I got banned once, nobody told me for what, I tried to contact Ya'll but just got ignored, only after going to Your doscord did I get unbanned. You should really consider actualy reading Your mail.

    I wish there was an auto response thing for the reason. I should probably make them.

    We don’t respond because 90% of modmail is shitlibs being smug. I still read modmail and respond to genuine people.

    Don’t say I don’t do anything. I put my time in each day. I cleared up the entire mod queue to make moderating easier. I went through over 1000 items to do that.

    There's a difference between shitlibs, far right trolls, and people who are triggered by some outlandish tankie claims. I may not agree with everything on this sub, but that doesn't make me a shitlib, I also don't like when some people come here just to be dicks and go overboard on the opposite side.

    mods never reply

    2 mod replies in less than a hour lmao

    I was talking from personal expierience

  • Spammy or abusive libs will be banned.

    Botting of the One True™ party line was always going to provide a cover for purges, but if you are just publicly stating that moderation is done on an ideological basis, then drop the pretense and put it in the rules so it's clear that you're yet another tankie sub.

    "NOOOOOOOO. I WAAAAAANT TOOOO SPAAAAAM MYYY LIIIIBSHIIIIIIIIIIIT!!!!!" Is all I'm hearing.

    Tankies wouldn't report the Automod, libs would. If libs/anyone have a problem with what's written then they can make a modmail. Think about things before you post them. Plus, do you actually think that users are here under non-political pretenses? Tankies are here and libshits are too.

    I do think the bot reply kinda sucks. Best case scenario you're forcing one writer's perspective on every user without asking, worst case scenario you've created a literal russian propaganda bot.

    I'm thinking we restrict it to command use only. Like replying "!Holodomor" and it will appear

    The Soviet Famine of 1932-33/The Holodomor The famine of 1932-1933 in Soviet Union AKA the Holodomor remains one of the most politicized and misunderstood events in 20th-century history. Much of the modern discourse frames the famine as a deliberate genocide uniquely targeted at Ukrainians. However, professional historians across multiple countries have not reached such a consensus. What’s known with certainty is that the famine affected multiple regions of the USSR, not only Ukraine, the Volga, the North Caucasus, the Urals, Kazakhstan, and parts of Siberia all suffered food shortages. Kazakhstan actually experienced proportionally the highest mortality rate. The crisis emerged during the violent upheaval of collectivization, the breakdown of the grain procurement system, severe crop failures, and chaotic state policies struggling to industrialize a largely agrarian empire. Most mainstream historians including R. W. Davies, Stephen Wheatcroft, Mark Tauger, Hiroaki Kuromiya, Sheila Fitzpatrick, and Michael Ellman emphasize that, - The famine was not restricted to Ukraine - There is no documentary evidence of a Kremlin plan to exterminate Ukrainians - The tragedy resulted from a combination of poor policy, bad harvests, peasant resistance, administrative chaos, and environmental factors similar to previous famines.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    Perfect.

    Great idea, but will there be a command list in the sidebar so people know how to use it?

    That seems reasonable.

    If you're going to add more structural bias, can we at least get a single flair for the outgroup in exchange?

    I propose "Кочегар".

    Tankies wouldn't report the Automod, libs would.

    Tankies may not, but being annoyed by indiscriminate spam any time Holodomor, or whatever, is mentioned regardless of context isn't a matter of ideology. That the spam conflates a local instance with it's overall context just adds insult to injury.

    Plus, do you actually think that users are here under non-political pretenses?

    That's a very confusing sentence. Best I can tell you're observing that people have political opinions, which would be obvious and doesn't add anything.

    How about I return your "think before you post" on that one?

    The Soviet Famine of 1932-33/The Holodomor The famine of 1932-1933 in Soviet Union AKA the Holodomor remains one of the most politicized and misunderstood events in 20th-century history. Much of the modern discourse frames the famine as a deliberate genocide uniquely targeted at Ukrainians. However, professional historians across multiple countries have not reached such a consensus. What’s known with certainty is that the famine affected multiple regions of the USSR, not only Ukraine, the Volga, the North Caucasus, the Urals, Kazakhstan, and parts of Siberia all suffered food shortages. Kazakhstan actually experienced proportionally the highest mortality rate. The crisis emerged during the violent upheaval of collectivization, the breakdown of the grain procurement system, severe crop failures, and chaotic state policies struggling to industrialize a largely agrarian empire. Most mainstream historians including R. W. Davies, Stephen Wheatcroft, Mark Tauger, Hiroaki Kuromiya, Sheila Fitzpatrick, and Michael Ellman emphasize that, - The famine was not restricted to Ukraine - There is no documentary evidence of a Kremlin plan to exterminate Ukrainians - The tragedy resulted from a combination of poor policy, bad harvests, peasant resistance, administrative chaos, and environmental factors similar to previous famines.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    Depressing that this sub has gone full tankie under you guys. It was originally intended to be an unbiased historical appreciation sub that allowed for diverse beliefs, not an ideological echo-chamber.

    I enjoy the history of the USSR. I don’t think it was all sunshine and rainbows and that it should come back. I also don’t think atrocities should be denied.