False. If there are no other lies in this sub, this post becomes a lie. Then it becomes a truth. Then it becomes a lie again. This infinitely continues. It’s not about time traveling and ruling the post as false.
If there are no other lies in this sub, this post becomes a lie. Then the statement that there is atleast one lie in this sub becomes true but it's only true while the post is false. Imagine the statement and the post itself as two different things
“Imagine the statement and the post itself as two different things” Now you are just talking nonsense. Why would I? If the content (the statement) is false, the post is false. If it isn’t, the post isn’t false either. It’s simple as that.
Okay, first of all everything in our lives depend on quantum physics and have a lot to do with it, and it seems like I actually need to teach you quantim physics
You assume:
If S is false, then it becomes a lie, and because it becomes a lie, it becomes true, and this continues.
This is the classical paradox loop, but in quantum physics, that’s wrong because a statement being true or false does NOT change the state of the system that determines its truth.
This is the same reason measuring a particle’s position does not send the universe into an infinite loop where the measurement changes the particle, which changes the measurement, which changes the particle…
Also the statement “There is at least one lie in this subreddit.” is an observable — a property of the system (the subreddit).
An observable doesn’t change the system; it only describes it.
Quantum logic says:
The content of a statement is not retroactively affected by its own truth value.
S describes the subreddit;
it does not change the subreddit.
So this state is also stable:
• S is false
• Because S is false, the subreddit contains exactly one lie
• But S says “at least one lie” → which is still FALSE, because S itself being false does not retroactively validate itself.
(this was translated because my English level is not enough to explain all this, after translating back it seems that everything was just how I said)
The post still violates rule 10 because of how it's worded. It's basically "There's atleast one lie, we just don't know where it is" which violates rule 10
and if there isn’t, then it’s still true because this post would be the one lie
Shit, you maybe have potentially caught me
paradoxes are a ban so... the sky is green
I don't really think that's a paradox though
r/notparadoxes
But if this post is a lie, it would make it true, which would then make it a lie, which would make it true again, which...
Only paradoxically
Donald Trump is a woman.
That may become true at any time, who knows
Donald trump is not a woman.
Just in case.
https://i.redd.it/59ur2cr4mu6g1.gif
If there is no other lie in this sub, (there is) this becomes a paradox
Then this post will become the lie and it’ll be true
that’s called a paradox
Nope, time is linear for us, we don't go back in time after we find out the post is true
False. If there are no other lies in this sub, this post becomes a lie. Then it becomes a truth. Then it becomes a lie again. This infinitely continues. It’s not about time traveling and ruling the post as false.
If there are no other lies in this sub, this post becomes a lie. Then the statement that there is atleast one lie in this sub becomes true but it's only true while the post is false. Imagine the statement and the post itself as two different things
“Imagine the statement and the post itself as two different things” Now you are just talking nonsense. Why would I? If the content (the statement) is false, the post is false. If it isn’t, the post isn’t false either. It’s simple as that.
I don’t have the time to teach you about quantum physics so just have this☺️
https://preview.redd.it/6helchwbbr6g1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1432bafced3a74e32eb444a5400a753a0bacd04b
A post’s truth value has absolutely nothing to do with quantum physics 🔥
Also chatgpt doesn’t actually understand what it’s saying, it works by predicting what the most likely word to come next is
Okay, first of all everything in our lives depend on quantum physics and have a lot to do with it, and it seems like I actually need to teach you quantim physics
You assume:
If S is false, then it becomes a lie, and because it becomes a lie, it becomes true, and this continues.
This is the classical paradox loop, but in quantum physics, that’s wrong because a statement being true or false does NOT change the state of the system that determines its truth.
This is the same reason measuring a particle’s position does not send the universe into an infinite loop where the measurement changes the particle, which changes the measurement, which changes the particle…
Also the statement “There is at least one lie in this subreddit.” is an observable — a property of the system (the subreddit). An observable doesn’t change the system; it only describes it.
Quantum logic says:
The content of a statement is not retroactively affected by its own truth value.
S describes the subreddit; it does not change the subreddit.
So this state is also stable: • S is false • Because S is false, the subreddit contains exactly one lie • But S says “at least one lie” → which is still FALSE, because S itself being false does not retroactively validate itself.
(this was translated because my English level is not enough to explain all this, after translating back it seems that everything was just how I said)
Truth, ive told a lie here
rule 10
zach king is the president of zambia
this post is now confirmed true
The post still violates rule 10 because of how it's worded. It's basically "There's atleast one lie, we just don't know where it is" which violates rule 10
idk what youre talking about, but this made me realize that the last 6 words are false, meaning it should be removed
fixed then