I just want a browser which is fast, private, and can block ads, redirecting by websites. Note 1st priority is privacy then speed and then everything else

I need it to be compatible with macOS and ios although I also don’t mind using 2 different browsers

  • [removed]

    Yes but it is not as secure as Tor browser and you may encounter disconnections while browsing

    Which browser are you talking about

    Will try tor, thanks for recommending

  • Mullvad Browser or Librewolf

    OP, these are desktop-only. for ios, safari + a content blocker (i recommend wBlock) is good.

    Is safari secure enough ? And do you have any experience with Firefox focus ?

    security ≠ privacy.

    no, because I personally use GrapheneOS.

    I can’t get wblock for some reason it shows cannot connect through the link you provided maybe it’s not supported in my region

    Yeah this one works, thanks

    Mullvad runs as an extension on Android

    dude, OP literally said this:

    I need it to be compatible with macOS and ios

    Bro how can you suggest Safari as a private browser? Do you really think it's private?

    basically everyone is WebKit on iOS, so it doesn't really matter. besides, its anti fingerprinting measures are good afaik.

    My man, you're suggesting that a closed-source browser is safe. Take a look at yourself. This is not safe at all. Don't mislead people like that. Everyone uses WebKit because Apple loves to play handicap. It's not the browser's fault. If you want its full power, switch to Android.

    closed-source does not make safari unsafe. it's not the license that dictates whether or not something is unsafe. safari’s webkit engine is the most heavily audited mobile engine because every ios browser depends on it, and its default anti-tracking and fingerprinting defenses are one of the strongest. it adds no extra telemetry. i do admit, i don't like safari because it is closed source. however, on ios, it is (in my opinion) the best option for strictly privacy.

    I think your logic is lost and you still miss the point, talking about fingerprint and all that, bro your data is wasted under their closed source code and you still say it's the best for strict privacy. This is a joke lol.

    closed source does not equal “your data is wasted.” you have no evidence. safari does not send identifiable browsing data to apple, and this is verifiable through network inspection and independent research. privacy is determined by what data leaves the device, not whether the code is open. safari blocks third-party cookies, strips tracking parameters, partitions storage, and spoofs your fingerprint by default.

  • For privacy in light of being open-source, try Brave, Firefox, etc.

    For web browsing,

    https://privacytests.org/

    But if you want to deal with

    https://fingerprint.com/demo/

    then multi-account containers, which is found in Firefox.

    Finally, for speed, Chromium-based browsers, which isn't Firefox.

  • late bow pen lunchroom vase fragile plucky joke squash safe

    This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

  • Opinioni su Orion per iOS?

  • brave browser, it will also block ads on ios

  • On Android Cromite it now supports extensions and full ublock origin works

  • SnowHaze for iOS is hands down the best browser for privacy, as well as the most customizable. It’s paid tier allows you to access Tor from SnowHaze itself rather than an onion browser

    I will give it a try, thanks for the recommendation

  • Orion is great

    2nd most important for them is speed. That is one of the slowest browses.

  • Don't use Safari if you want privacy, nothing about it is private at all. Also, it is a closed-source browser, so you can't trust them blindly with your information. Trust only open-source browsers, those you can verify and see the code. I personally use Firefox or its forks, with one backup Chromium browser, usually Ungoogled Chromium.

    Can I get ungoogled chromium on ios ?

    I don't think you can. In iOS, you have a limited selection of browsers that are restricted by Apple's WebKit. I understand the feeling. I was in Apple prison for 12 years until I discovered Android. Man, did I taste freedom!

    What browser do you use on android? and also would it change? a browser on ios would it have any less security/privacy if it was the exact same browser on ios or android?

    I use IronFox, a Firefox browser fork with enhanced privacy and security features. After running many tests considering trackers and privacy, I found that it's really the best for me. I advise everyone to try it. It also has extension support. Every browser on iOS is chained to Safari WebKit. This means that the Firefox engine Gecko and the Chrome engine Chromium cannot have their full power and features as their developers would like. I can't guarantee that a browser is more private or not, but you have a pretty good shot at being private on Android rather than iOS.

  • Brave.

    brave? really? you could've glazed its security in some other post, but you decide to recommend brave...for privacy. wonderful. here.

    LOL. The creator and funders of Brave are fundamentally against privacy.

    what does that have to do with anything exactly? something can be open source while not being good for privacy.

    You can find out from the code if they're not good for privacy.

    Only one point in your post refers to privacy, and that's putting in their ads in place of others. How's that an invasion of privacy?

    The rest refers to watering down anti-fingerprinting, etc. Same problem.

    If you want to refer to anti-privacy, consider taking user information without permission and using it. Where in the code does that take place?

    anti-fingerprinting is a privacy issue. the tor window leaking dns is a privacy issue. they removed fingerprinting protections.

    Fingerprinting is a privacy issue. It's up to the browser company to decide what to do with it. Here's what Brave did:

    https://privacytests.org/

    1. there's only one anti-fingerprinting test in that whole thing.

    2. yeah, no duh sherlock, it's not like they're the ones developing it. the point is that "privacy-oriented" doesn't hold up for them.