Yes, one may. The fourth consecutive comment is downvoted, and at times, the consecutive comments continue in the chain, even after the downvoted fourth.
In cases where the chain continues to an eighth consecutive comment, the 'rule of 4' is applied yet again, as one may consider consecutive comments that continue the comment chain of the original 'rule of 4' — after that original 'rule of 4' has been applied — to be another start/initiation comment for another 'rule of 4'. In that case, the second 'rule of 4' in a consecutive comment chain (comment thread with reply upon reply to form the 'rules') is flagged as the 'rule of 8' (subreddit: r/ruleof8).
It will go on in that manner, with consecutiveness, until it does die down. Each multiple of four in the comment chain will be downvoted and flagged with that appropriate multiple's 'rule' sub (i.e. r/ruleof4 for the first multiple of four; r/ruleof8 for the second; r/ruleof12 for the third; and so on).
P.S. I am planning an acquisition of r/ruleof12 (which is currently a 'dead sub') in a week's time.
Yes, one may. The fourth consecutive comment is downvoted, and at times, the consecutive comments continue in the chain, even after the downvoted fourth.
In cases where the chain continues to an eighth consecutive comment, the 'rule of 4' is applied yet again, as one may consider consecutive comments that continue the comment chain of the original 'rule of 4' — after that original 'rule of 4' has been applied — to be another start/initiation comment for another 'rule of 4'. In that case, the second 'rule of 4' in a consecutive comment chain (comment thread with reply upon reply to form the 'rules') is flagged as the 'rule of 8' (subreddit: r/ruleof8).
It will go on in that manner, with consecutiveness, until it does die down. Each multiple of four in the comment chain will be downvoted and flagged with that appropriate multiple's 'rule' sub (i.e. r/ruleof4 for the first multiple of four; r/ruleof8 for the second; r/ruleof12 for the third; and so on).
P.S. I am planning an acquisition of r/ruleof12 (which is currently a 'dead sub') in a week's time.
Yes, one may. The fourth consecutive comment is downvoted, and at times, the consecutive comments continue in the chain, even after the downvoted fourth.
In cases where the chain continues to an eighth consecutive comment, the 'rule of 4' is applied yet again, as one may consider consecutive comments that continue the comment chain of the original 'rule of 4' — after that original 'rule of 4' has been applied — to be another start/initiation comment for another 'rule of 4'. In that case, the second 'rule of 4' in a consecutive comment chain (comment thread with reply upon reply to form the 'rules') is flagged as the 'rule of 8' (subreddit: r/ruleof8).
It will go on in that manner, with consecutiveness, until it does die down. Each multiple of four in the comment chain will be downvoted and flagged with that appropriate multiple's 'rule' sub (i.e. r/ruleof4 for the first multiple of four; r/ruleof8 for the second; r/ruleof12 for the third; and so on).
P.S. I am planning an acquisition of r/ruleof12 (which is currently a 'dead sub') in a week's time.
Yes, one may. The fourth consecutive comment is downvoted, and at times, the consecutive comments continue in the chain, even after the downvoted fourth.
In cases where the chain continues to an eighth consecutive comment, the 'rule of 4' is applied yet again, as one may consider consecutive comments that continue the comment chain of the original 'rule of 4' — after that original 'rule of 4' has been applied — to be another start/initiation comment for another 'rule of 4'. In that case, the second 'rule of 4' in a consecutive comment chain (comment thread with reply upon reply to form the 'rules') is flagged as the 'rule of 8' (subreddit: r/ruleof8).
It will go on in that manner, with consecutiveness, until it does die down. Each multiple of four in the comment chain will be downvoted and flagged with that appropriate multiple's 'rule' sub (i.e. r/ruleof4 for the first multiple of four; r/ruleof8 for the second; r/ruleof12 for the third; and so on).
P.S. I am planning an acquisition of r/ruleof12 (which is currently a 'dead sub') in a week's time.
Yes, one may. The fourth consecutive comment is downvoted, and at times, the consecutive comments continue in the chain, even after the downvoted fourth.
In cases where the chain continues to an eighth consecutive comment, the 'rule of 4' is applied yet again, as one may consider consecutive comments that continue the comment chain of the original 'rule of 4' — after that original 'rule of 4' has been applied — to be another start/initiation comment for another 'rule of 4'. In that case, the second 'rule of 4' in a consecutive comment chain (comment thread with reply upon reply to form the 'rules') is flagged as the 'rule of 8' (subreddit: r/ruleof8).
It will go on in that manner, with consecutiveness, until it does die down. Each multiple of four in the comment chain will be downvoted and flagged with that appropriate multiple's 'rule' sub (i.e. r/ruleof4 for the first multiple of four; r/ruleof8 for the second; r/ruleof12 for the third; and so on).
P.S. I am planning an acquisition of r/ruleof12 (which is currently a 'dead sub') in a week's time.
Sure
Sure
Sure
Sure
Sure
Sure
Sure
Sure
Sure
Sure
r/ruleof8
r/ruleof4butalreadyhere
*downdooted
*downdooted
*downdooted
*downdooted
*downdooted
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
No, not 67!! How could you!! Oh, also 8
I wish I could downvote this twice
you meant to say 9, also 10
r/ruleof8
r/ruleof4butalreadyhere
3
3
Yes, one may. The fourth consecutive comment is downvoted, and at times, the consecutive comments continue in the chain, even after the downvoted fourth.
In cases where the chain continues to an eighth consecutive comment, the 'rule of 4' is applied yet again, as one may consider consecutive comments that continue the comment chain of the original 'rule of 4' — after that original 'rule of 4' has been applied — to be another start/initiation comment for another 'rule of 4'. In that case, the second 'rule of 4' in a consecutive comment chain (comment thread with reply upon reply to form the 'rules') is flagged as the 'rule of 8' (subreddit: r/ruleof8).
It will go on in that manner, with consecutiveness, until it does die down. Each multiple of four in the comment chain will be downvoted and flagged with that appropriate multiple's 'rule' sub (i.e. r/ruleof4 for the first multiple of four; r/ruleof8 for the second; r/ruleof12 for the third; and so on).
P.S. I am planning an acquisition of r/ruleof12 (which is currently a 'dead sub') in a week's time.
Yes, one may. The fourth consecutive comment is downvoted, and at times, the consecutive comments continue in the chain, even after the downvoted fourth.
In cases where the chain continues to an eighth consecutive comment, the 'rule of 4' is applied yet again, as one may consider consecutive comments that continue the comment chain of the original 'rule of 4' — after that original 'rule of 4' has been applied — to be another start/initiation comment for another 'rule of 4'. In that case, the second 'rule of 4' in a consecutive comment chain (comment thread with reply upon reply to form the 'rules') is flagged as the 'rule of 8' (subreddit: r/ruleof8).
It will go on in that manner, with consecutiveness, until it does die down. Each multiple of four in the comment chain will be downvoted and flagged with that appropriate multiple's 'rule' sub (i.e. r/ruleof4 for the first multiple of four; r/ruleof8 for the second; r/ruleof12 for the third; and so on).
P.S. I am planning an acquisition of r/ruleof12 (which is currently a 'dead sub') in a week's time.
Yes, one may. The fourth consecutive comment is downvoted, and at times, the consecutive comments continue in the chain, even after the downvoted fourth.
In cases where the chain continues to an eighth consecutive comment, the 'rule of 4' is applied yet again, as one may consider consecutive comments that continue the comment chain of the original 'rule of 4' — after that original 'rule of 4' has been applied — to be another start/initiation comment for another 'rule of 4'. In that case, the second 'rule of 4' in a consecutive comment chain (comment thread with reply upon reply to form the 'rules') is flagged as the 'rule of 8' (subreddit: r/ruleof8).
It will go on in that manner, with consecutiveness, until it does die down. Each multiple of four in the comment chain will be downvoted and flagged with that appropriate multiple's 'rule' sub (i.e. r/ruleof4 for the first multiple of four; r/ruleof8 for the second; r/ruleof12 for the third; and so on).
P.S. I am planning an acquisition of r/ruleof12 (which is currently a 'dead sub') in a week's time.
Yes, one may. The fourth consecutive comment is downvoted, and at times, the consecutive comments continue in the chain, even after the downvoted fourth.
In cases where the chain continues to an eighth consecutive comment, the 'rule of 4' is applied yet again, as one may consider consecutive comments that continue the comment chain of the original 'rule of 4' — after that original 'rule of 4' has been applied — to be another start/initiation comment for another 'rule of 4'. In that case, the second 'rule of 4' in a consecutive comment chain (comment thread with reply upon reply to form the 'rules') is flagged as the 'rule of 8' (subreddit: r/ruleof8).
It will go on in that manner, with consecutiveness, until it does die down. Each multiple of four in the comment chain will be downvoted and flagged with that appropriate multiple's 'rule' sub (i.e. r/ruleof4 for the first multiple of four; r/ruleof8 for the second; r/ruleof12 for the third; and so on).
P.S. I am planning an acquisition of r/ruleof12 (which is currently a 'dead sub') in a week's time.
Yes, one may. The fourth consecutive comment is downvoted, and at times, the consecutive comments continue in the chain, even after the downvoted fourth.
In cases where the chain continues to an eighth consecutive comment, the 'rule of 4' is applied yet again, as one may consider consecutive comments that continue the comment chain of the original 'rule of 4' — after that original 'rule of 4' has been applied — to be another start/initiation comment for another 'rule of 4'. In that case, the second 'rule of 4' in a consecutive comment chain (comment thread with reply upon reply to form the 'rules') is flagged as the 'rule of 8' (subreddit: r/ruleof8).
It will go on in that manner, with consecutiveness, until it does die down. Each multiple of four in the comment chain will be downvoted and flagged with that appropriate multiple's 'rule' sub (i.e. r/ruleof4 for the first multiple of four; r/ruleof8 for the second; r/ruleof12 for the third; and so on).
P.S. I am planning an acquisition of r/ruleof12 (which is currently a 'dead sub') in a week's time.
Sure.