To avoid having your post removed &/or account banned for shitposting:
r/religiousfruitcake is about the absurd, fringe elements of organised religion. Posts about mundane beliefs and acts of worship (praying to God, believing in God, believing in afterlife, etc), are off topic.
We arent here to bash either specific religions or religion itself, because there are plenty of rational actors who happen to be religious. So if your post is "Christians are sTOoPid", or "Religion = dUmB", you're in the wrong sub and your post will probably be removed.
Dont use the title or body of your post to soapbox personal rhetoric about religion or any other subject.
Don't post videos or discussions of Fruitcakes who have been baited or antagonised. Social media excerpts must not involve any deliberate provocation / antagonism of Fruitcakes.
Dont post videos of physically violent personal attacks or any pics or videos containing gore
Satire, parodies, memes, videos, etc must be made by Fruitcakes, not by third parties about them. (exception for journalistic sources)
This information is on every post. Accounts that disregard it will be perma-banned. "I didn't get a warning" or "I didnt know" are not valid appeals. If in doubt, please read the full version of the rules
Glad I live in a place in the world that in 2025 that is uber for the cheesus, as an atheist I don't have to waste time thinking about giving someone tetanus with a piece of metal as a way of defending myself. A good "go fuck yourself" to a random person in public that feels the need to tell me about their cult works wonders for me.
I'm not going to lie, if the Mormons or Jehovah's witnesses had ever started off their speal by giving me a sword. I most definitely would have joined.
Yep. Just take it and thank them. These people are nuts. Its like when anyone asks if I've accepted Jesus as my personal lord and savior. I always look into their deranged wild eyes and tell them Im as saved as saved can be.
So if radical Muslims conquer places, they have the right to? That they are "strong"?
You know, for all of atheists like you decrying religion about their morality, it's ironic that individuals like you can still hold such Social Darwinist views about "strong killing the weak being okay and deserved".
You fit the image of a stereotypical atheist redditer.
Do you realize just how batshit insane and evil you sound?
I'd argue that actual strength lies in unity, not aggression. People who use violence and conquest are absolutely wrong, regardless of the victor. It's one thing to defend oneself from an attacker. It's another to hurt and murder others who aren't attacking.
You really don't get it, do you ? The government or the law can exercise its own right to prosecute my assailant. It's an entity just like me. But I won't consider my assailant in the wrong if he takes over. I won't crib, cry and complain because in my worldview my assailant exercised his right to take over. What happens to him after is not my concern.
Two things can be true at the same time.
Where in the world does the assailant have the "right"? What documentation or rule?
Even in nature, what is considered "strong" isn't strict. Animals that are the most physically strong don't rule everything as many smaller and physically-weaker specimens are able to thrive. In fact, many species that work together in groups and show compassion to one another have improved chances of thriving (in fact, individuals who act really aggressive in groups tend to be cast out, if not killed). There are many factors as to what helps or hinders species like luck, environment, climate/weather, etc.
Where in the world does the assailant have the "right"? What documentation or rule?
Right of conquest always existed. Before any government was born.
Even in nature, what is considered "strong" isn't strict. Animals that are the most physically strong don't rule everything as many smaller and physically-weaker specimens are able to thrive. In fact, many species that work together in groups and show compassion
Nature is a hundred times as brutal as humanity. The compassion you see is an exception.
You can acknowledge the fucked up issues with Islamic invasion in India, while also being against promoting violence against random Muslims/Muslims as a group
This is not a difficult concept.
There's a difference between disliking Islam, hell even hating Islam as an ideology, and promoting basically murdering random people for being Muslim. Most of which probably don't even follow most of/the worst parts of Islam.
But OP, aren’t you a halal fruitcake yourselves who thinks that muslims are always only victims and all ex-muslims shouldn’t exist because they want to kill all muslims? - your comment
I see them. You just have to expand some collapses comments and the thread is locked. From their comments over there I didn’t take them to be anything except against Muslims as an ex-Muslim, and against right-wing isis/zonist/white-supremacists. I didn’t dig into their profile.
Oh, so OP is one of those braindead halal fruitcakes that keeps lurking in exmuslim subs probably because we're 'the enemies'. Nevermind that the penalty for leaving islam jn a lot of islamic countries are either death or re-education camps.
Could even be a halal bot or something. He didn’t even care to reply, yet conveniently cherry picks a video or few and posts it across hundreds of subs.
So is this person an anti-muslim extremist, or a “halal-bot” - since they’re accused of both in short succession. If either, then I don’t really care to hear from them, just trying to find out what kinds of weirdos are using this sub for anything other than simply mocking religious fruitcakery.
I met a lady who lived through the "Bangladesh" situation and it was definitely one of the most terrifying and horrifying stories have heard in person and will definitely be something I cant get out of my head. I work in homeless support., so I hear the WORST stories but that one...Jesus. It was a start reminder that humans are still just savage animals.
Bro looks like this is the tenth melee weapon he's been handed by violent religious groups that month. Yesterday the Christians handed me a baseball bat with nails in it, last week the Muslims were handing out brass knuckles and one evening I caught two confused looking Shintoist trying to push an AK through my letterbox..
Really that's how you spread fake propaganda they literally said that use this for your protection if a situation like Bangladesh happens where muslim mob killed a Hindu guy by spreading fake blasphemy allegation
Why do they have to specify it's for 'cutting down muslims'. They could've just said to use it for your protection. You're blind if you don't see the overarching hate campaign that's been going on for decades
There is, indeed, a propaganda, when you notice that religious fanatics giving out swords for protection, is getting more visibility than what's happening in bangladesh. Media outlets outside India very conveniently ignore what's happening in bangladesh, but give good coverage to whatever's happening in India. There is, definitely, propaganda against India.
There's a reason so many of these guys run hasbara, often even pretending to be israeli: They share the same hatred and many of the same tactics as zionist settlers
Why is it illegal to be ready for self defense? The swords are for self defense INSIDE your house if goons barge in!
What should Hindus do? Wait for one more Direct Action Day?
You have no idea how bad it can get in a Hindu-minority area inside Bharat!
Why is it illegal to be ready for self defense? The swords are for self defense INSIDE your house if goons barge in!
What should Hindus do? Wait for one more Direct Action Day?
You have no idea how bad it can get in a Hindu-minority area inside Bharat!
Not by choice. Social media often restricts accounts based on the usage of certain contentious words. (E.g., the word I used is often associated with online bullying, go figure)
Im an atheist. Defending ourselves will never be apologized for. Ah well, soon civil war will come, they will be the ones starting it, and we will be vindicated. It always does wherever they go. I'm gonna point and laugh when the demographic shift kicks in and they come for you
As an atheist myself, I realize that even non-religious people are still subject to dogma, radicalization, and other things. The fact that you want death to all people of a group, including ones who are just living their lives peacefully, makes you vile.
I missed nothing. If "defending ourselves" includes murdering anyone who is a Muslim, even if they are innocent people who aren't bothering others, then count me out.
You know, for a while, I was starting to consider religious fanatics to be one of the biggest pains in the rear. But thanks to that dude, I am reminded that atheists can be just as horrid as they can still develop dogmatic and destructive beliefs.
Considering I've seen atheists who are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, saying theists shouldn't be allowed to run for office or be teachers/doctors, theists are inherently stupid and mentally ill etc, I've known this for a long, long time. Religion can fuel hatred and bigotry but it's not the only thing.
To avoid having your post removed &/or account banned for shitposting:
r/religiousfruitcake is about the absurd, fringe elements of organised religion. Posts about mundane beliefs and acts of worship (praying to God, believing in God, believing in afterlife, etc), are off topic.
We arent here to bash either specific religions or religion itself, because there are plenty of rational actors who happen to be religious. So if your post is "Christians are sTOoPid", or "Religion = dUmB", you're in the wrong sub and your post will probably be removed.
Dont use the title or body of your post to soapbox personal rhetoric about religion or any other subject.
Don't post videos or discussions of Fruitcakes who have been baited or antagonised. Social media excerpts must not involve any deliberate provocation / antagonism of Fruitcakes.
Dont post videos of physically violent personal attacks or any pics or videos containing gore
Satire, parodies, memes, videos, etc must be made by Fruitcakes, not by third parties about them. (exception for journalistic sources)
This information is on every post. Accounts that disregard it will be perma-banned. "I didn't get a warning" or "I didnt know" are not valid appeals. If in doubt, please read the full version of the rules
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
He looks like he just wants to accept their Temu "sword" in the hopes that they move onto someone more interested in their cause.
Yeah I’d be worried if I refused they’d assume i was “one of them.”
Me fr
To be fair temu actually has some legit swords if you know what to look for
A pointy end?
A shitty sword is still a pointy piece of metal. Yeah it won't last long and it'll break easily but it'll can still stab through someone.
Glad I live in a place in the world that in 2025 that is uber for the cheesus, as an atheist I don't have to waste time thinking about giving someone tetanus with a piece of metal as a way of defending myself. A good "go fuck yourself" to a random person in public that feels the need to tell me about their cult works wonders for me.
He looks like a kid who just got given socks for Christmas. This is a great example of how clearly not everyone wants to be an extremist
lol that shits going into the forgetting closet
He looks as excited as my kids when they win a $1 plastic sword at a carnival.
I would be like that. Yay, free sword!
I'm not going to lie, if the Mormons or Jehovah's witnesses had ever started off their speal by giving me a sword. I most definitely would have joined.
Maybe not joined, but they get to sit down at the table for sure. In the end, I’m the one with the sword.
Hey, man. Don't downplay toy swords like that. I won one at a Faire and it was a good prop for my costume (I used it as a wakizashi prop).
This sword here looks like garbage.
Yep. Just take it and thank them. These people are nuts. Its like when anyone asks if I've accepted Jesus as my personal lord and savior. I always look into their deranged wild eyes and tell them Im as saved as saved can be.
Saves a boatload of time and energy.
How dare they try to defend themselves from a religion that's been trying to wipe out their culture for 1400 years
Lol found a fruitcake
For real, that was so unexpected while scrolling thru the comments
Lol found a zombie
I bet you support the genocide of Palestinians...
[removed]
The F does that have to do with the Palestinian genocide? Who is the strong?
[removed]
So if radical Muslims conquer places, they have the right to? That they are "strong"?
You know, for all of atheists like you decrying religion about their morality, it's ironic that individuals like you can still hold such Social Darwinist views about "strong killing the weak being okay and deserved".
You fit the image of a stereotypical atheist redditer.
They do. Doesnt mean we don't have the similar right to defend and counterattack. History will decide who wins. And may the stronger side win.
This is beyond morality. This is something primordial. This always was and will always be. It's the one thing religion got right.
Do you realize just how batshit insane and evil you sound?
I'd argue that actual strength lies in unity, not aggression. People who use violence and conquest are absolutely wrong, regardless of the victor. It's one thing to defend oneself from an attacker. It's another to hurt and murder others who aren't attacking.
Congratulations, you are now waking up to most of human history. It's fucked up but it's the only way of looking at the world that makes any sense.
If i invade your house and beat you up, can I have it for myself then?
Yes. But you will have to keel me in combat. By right of conquest my house will become yours.
So the law shouldn't prosecute your assailant if they murder you and possess your house?
God, you are ridiculous...
You really don't get it, do you ? The government or the law can exercise its own right to prosecute my assailant. It's an entity just like me. But I won't consider my assailant in the wrong if he takes over. I won't crib, cry and complain because in my worldview my assailant exercised his right to take over. What happens to him after is not my concern. Two things can be true at the same time.
Where in the world does the assailant have the "right"? What documentation or rule?
Even in nature, what is considered "strong" isn't strict. Animals that are the most physically strong don't rule everything as many smaller and physically-weaker specimens are able to thrive. In fact, many species that work together in groups and show compassion to one another have improved chances of thriving (in fact, individuals who act really aggressive in groups tend to be cast out, if not killed). There are many factors as to what helps or hinders species like luck, environment, climate/weather, etc.
Right of conquest always existed. Before any government was born.
Nature is a hundred times as brutal as humanity. The compassion you see is an exception.
Then if jihadist invade you and kill you, it wouldn’t matter to you since the land belongs to the strong?
By your same logic jihadists could invade your house and kill everyone because they're strong?
Certainly not by being aggressors
Dude
You can acknowledge the fucked up issues with Islamic invasion in India, while also being against promoting violence against random Muslims/Muslims as a group
This is not a difficult concept.
There's a difference between disliking Islam, hell even hating Islam as an ideology, and promoting basically murdering random people for being Muslim. Most of which probably don't even follow most of/the worst parts of Islam.
Horrible echoes of the Rawandan genocide.
Exactly what I was thinking. Disgusting, to say the least.
Damn that sucks.
But OP, aren’t you a halal fruitcake yourselves who thinks that muslims are always only victims and all ex-muslims shouldn’t exist because they want to kill all muslims? - your comment
Very sus profile you have.
He hid his posts and comments. Lol.
I see them. You just have to expand some collapses comments and the thread is locked. From their comments over there I didn’t take them to be anything except against Muslims as an ex-Muslim, and against right-wing isis/zonist/white-supremacists. I didn’t dig into their profile.
Oh, so OP is one of those braindead halal fruitcakes that keeps lurking in exmuslim subs probably because we're 'the enemies'. Nevermind that the penalty for leaving islam jn a lot of islamic countries are either death or re-education camps.
Could even be a halal bot or something. He didn’t even care to reply, yet conveniently cherry picks a video or few and posts it across hundreds of subs.
They did say ex-muslim want to kill muslims - over there in the comments the person is pointing to. But they were replying, at least over there.
He ignores all the dead Hindus.
The plot thickens…
As expected. Most atheist pages are rife with these cretins that are just to hate on one particular religion.
So is this person an anti-muslim extremist, or a “halal-bot” - since they’re accused of both in short succession. If either, then I don’t really care to hear from them, just trying to find out what kinds of weirdos are using this sub for anything other than simply mocking religious fruitcakery.
Domestic terrorists
"now give it back, we only have like 3 of these."
When Larry dies, Frank gets the sword next.
Moooooom, I’m supposed to get the sword next and they’re not giving it to me!
They only have enough for 7 doors.
Translation: The group's leader tells the guy to take the sword to avoid a "Bangladesh" like situation and cut down the muslims
I met a lady who lived through the "Bangladesh" situation and it was definitely one of the most terrifying and horrifying stories have heard in person and will definitely be something I cant get out of my head. I work in homeless support., so I hear the WORST stories but that one...Jesus. It was a start reminder that humans are still just savage animals.
Little error, he said, if Bangladesh like situation occurs, then for the safety of women, use this. To cut down Muslims.
It's the Muslims who are facing humiliation, killings and lynchings in India. People should check out the Hindutvafiles page on Reddit.
What did we do wrong? Let me guess, "The Attack"
Bro looks like this is the tenth melee weapon he's been handed by violent religious groups that month. Yesterday the Christians handed me a baseball bat with nails in it, last week the Muslims were handing out brass knuckles and one evening I caught two confused looking Shintoist trying to push an AK through my letterbox..
This is weird as fuck but I'd love to randomly be given a sword. Swords are cool
Strange men walking through the streets distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. /montypython
THIS IS NEAR MY HOUSE STOP
Word of advice: you shouldn't hint where you live.
Too late, I'm going door to door looking for u/sea_sundae_4286
😭
Let me in
i lied i live in Turkmenistan😆
Okay, I am on my way.
Do you also find yourself writing sexually charged poems about horses?
Did they also give you a free sword
not yet😒 waiting to add it to my toys collection
Lol 😂
U ok chief
wtf is UP
It's starting. What a lovely sight brings a tear to the eye. People finally getting the balls to put their foot down and say enough is enough.
User name checks out
Guy looks so unenthused.
This could've been a Monty Python skit, but alas
his reaction
wtf
Really that's how you spread fake propaganda they literally said that use this for your protection if a situation like Bangladesh happens where muslim mob killed a Hindu guy by spreading fake blasphemy allegation
Why do they have to specify it's for 'cutting down muslims'. They could've just said to use it for your protection. You're blind if you don't see the overarching hate campaign that's been going on for decades
There is, indeed, a propaganda, when you notice that religious fanatics giving out swords for protection, is getting more visibility than what's happening in bangladesh. Media outlets outside India very conveniently ignore what's happening in bangladesh, but give good coverage to whatever's happening in India. There is, definitely, propaganda against India.
A pirate theme, with eyepatches too, would be much more fun.
There's a reason so many of these guys run hasbara, often even pretending to be israeli: They share the same hatred and many of the same tactics as zionist settlers
Why is it illegal to be ready for self defense? The swords are for self defense INSIDE your house if goons barge in! What should Hindus do? Wait for one more Direct Action Day? You have no idea how bad it can get in a Hindu-minority area inside Bharat!
Hindu terrorism is growing
Hindu terrorism would grow while islamic terrorism grows. It's easy to defend terrorism as a defence tactic when the other group is super radical.
Why is it illegal to be ready for self defense? The swords are for self defense INSIDE your house if goons barge in! What should Hindus do? Wait for one more Direct Action Day? You have no idea how bad it can get in a Hindu-minority area inside Bharat!
If their gouvernement cannot use military to protect Hindus,& wipe out jihadi, then people need to arm them selves for protection
There she blows! "there she blows!"
Does it glow blue when in the presence of Mohammedians or something?
Those houses would make great zombie defense fortresses
"Hey man, yeah cool, thanks for the sword. The Muslims? Yeah yeah, sure. Thanks again."
Imagine sharing a country with these mor*ns!
Did you just censor moron?
Not by choice. Social media often restricts accounts based on the usage of certain contentious words. (E.g., the word I used is often associated with online bullying, go figure)
Uh... no? That's not how Reddit works?
Dude! Ugh! Just...find something else to do!
Lol. This is the majority now, unfortunately.
Which country doesn't have such people? Even the US has gun freaks everywhere.
[removed]
Always one on this sub. Loves to dish it out but can’t take that their own religion has complete and utter twats in it
Im an atheist. Defending ourselves will never be apologized for. Ah well, soon civil war will come, they will be the ones starting it, and we will be vindicated. It always does wherever they go. I'm gonna point and laugh when the demographic shift kicks in and they come for you
As an atheist myself, I realize that even non-religious people are still subject to dogma, radicalization, and other things. The fact that you want death to all people of a group, including ones who are just living their lives peacefully, makes you vile.
What part of 'defending ourselves' did you miss ?
I missed nothing. If "defending ourselves" includes murdering anyone who is a Muslim, even if they are innocent people who aren't bothering others, then count me out.
Ok you're out
Oh, I was never in to begin with.
You support murdering random Muslims?
You know, for a while, I was starting to consider religious fanatics to be one of the biggest pains in the rear. But thanks to that dude, I am reminded that atheists can be just as horrid as they can still develop dogmatic and destructive beliefs.
Considering I've seen atheists who are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, saying theists shouldn't be allowed to run for office or be teachers/doctors, theists are inherently stupid and mentally ill etc, I've known this for a long, long time. Religion can fuel hatred and bigotry but it's not the only thing.