Yeah, big time. A lot of AI bros will insist that it's improved so it's "not a problem anymore" because it's achieved reasonably accurate hands 60 - 80% of the time, but best case scenario you still got a 20% chance of a fucked up hand every time you generate an image. So, a lot of people re-roll that part of the image or just generate several so they can select a few without fucked hands, and then point to the ones they selected as evidence that the problem is gone
See right hand of the picture above (and about 6 zillion other AI generated pics). I'm just surprised that AI is still doing it - that the bug wasn't ironed out
Many states try to convince companies to relocate into their borders, so they can benefit from taxes and jobs, this has been happening for decades and is hardly a "economic civil war"
I don't understand how that's even possible -- did Google threaten them with a gun?
I can totally believe that Google refused to pay them unless they did it, but that's different than forcing them. Why didn't iHeartMedia just refuse the contract if they didn't like the content?
The article linked in the above article doesn't really explain it further:
The basis for the lawsuit is Google’s employment of iHeartMedia to record and broadcast advertisements in the Dallas-Fort Worth and the Greater Houston markets to promote a Google brand smartphone, the “Pixel 4.” Google provided the script for the ads which included personal endorsements for radio disk jockeys (DJs) to read, describing their personal use and enjoyment of the smartphone. At the time, however, the Pixel 4 had not yet been released, none of the DJs had actually used it, and Google refused to provide samples to iHeartMedia. iHeartMedia realized the script Google provided would be misleading to consumers and explained these concerns, but Google refused to acquiesce and insisted on the DJs recording “first-hand testimonials” for a product they had never used.
There's a bunch of shady tricks to get glowing testimonials and that isn't one of them. Telling people to lie their ass off is not "a grey area technique." It's just purely deceptive.
Yeah. Ok. They are just screaming that they want their cut from the tech bros. Once that happens, the vortex will widen to suction up even more of your PII and take away your rights that much faster.
Hello u/adriano26, please make sure you read the sub rules if you haven't already. (This is an automatic reminder left on all new posts.)
Check out the r/privacy FAQ
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Holy AI generated thumbnail
It's very funny to me that she looks exactly like a barbie except that terrifying hand
What is with AI and the 5 fingered hand thing ? Why is that still a thing ?
Yeah, big time. A lot of AI bros will insist that it's improved so it's "not a problem anymore" because it's achieved reasonably accurate hands 60 - 80% of the time, but best case scenario you still got a 20% chance of a fucked up hand every time you generate an image. So, a lot of people re-roll that part of the image or just generate several so they can select a few without fucked hands, and then point to the ones they selected as evidence that the problem is gone
5 fingered hand!??!! I sure hope not.
See right hand of the picture above (and about 6 zillion other AI generated pics). I'm just surprised that AI is still doing it - that the bug wasn't ironed out
My point is that most hands have 5 fingers
No they have 4 fingers and a thumb, not 5 fingers and no thumb (see pic)
Now let's argue about whether a thumb is a finger or not.
They support crackdowns with big tech privacy violations, yet they will force you to scan in your ID to download a weather app.
[deleted]
Many states try to convince companies to relocate into their borders, so they can benefit from taxes and jobs, this has been happening for decades and is hardly a "economic civil war"
Oh, look. The broken clock is right for once.
I dont trust texas about this tbh
Texas might be the only place you can trust going forward.
Nah considering all the stuff going on there I refuse to at all
I don't like Paxton, but that's a scum bag move.
I don't understand how that's even possible -- did Google threaten them with a gun?
I can totally believe that Google refused to pay them unless they did it, but that's different than forcing them. Why didn't iHeartMedia just refuse the contract if they didn't like the content?
The article linked in the above article doesn't really explain it further:
iHeartMedia still has human djs? I thought they replaced them all with AI.
Even if someone with a gun said, ”Your money or your life,” it’s still a choice. Not liking a choice doesn’t mean there is no choice. Fwiw.
Don't you think that's a "bridge too far?"
There's a bunch of shady tricks to get glowing testimonials and that isn't one of them. Telling people to lie their ass off is not "a grey area technique." It's just purely deceptive.
Lol, that’s a joke. Texas’ Republican leadership supports Trump working towards a Nazi surveillance state.
This is more about making certain companies play ball than for privacy protections.
[deleted]
It‘s homes, like a homing device. You home in on something.
Hones is more like sharpening Or refining.
it’s still an awkward headline
One of only four states with a data broker registry, surprisingly.
Yeah. Ok. They are just screaming that they want their cut from the tech bros. Once that happens, the vortex will widen to suction up even more of your PII and take away your rights that much faster.
Man the comments on this are mega salty
Redditors gonna Reddit 🤷♂️