Technically yes, but seeing as though the feat isn't accomplished without the first royal flush occurring, 4.8b is a little misleading. If we select 2 hands from random, and they both contain a royal, your assessment is true.
Reminds me of a case I heard a while ago. A lady had 2 children. Both died from a fairly rare occurrence (1 in 7000). The prosecution argued 1 in 50 million isn't a coincidence, and she murdered the kids. A statistician came and showed how the odds are actually 1 in 7000, because the first occurrence has to happen for us to get to this point. Semantics, perhaps, but it illustrates how statistics can be used
Nice comment. But here, I think, you really should take into account the first occurrence happening.
I think there is some statistic about rolling two sixes in a row? Expected rolls not 36, but 42? And there is something else regarding rolling a 5, then a 6 vs rolling two sixes in a row or something, not sure
Straight 1/3 NLH. I 3bet pot on BtN vs an UTG maniac.( He was literally the father of the game's regular maniac,and less good, but just as splashy)
Flopped str8 flush on Qh Jh Th. Villain check raises flop. I flat call, thinking he CANT have AKh. Even i dont run that bad.
Turn Kh . Ok he doesnt have AKh. So we get it all in, he tables black AKo. I feel great....
River is Ah. House takes $20 and i have a smaller stack afterwards. I went from flopping 2nd nut str8 flush with 89h to playing the royal flush board for a loss.
Ok thats super rare. Reading “I might just withessed the rarest thing in poker” i was thinking its going to be another full house losing to quads 😆
Did you see the hand with quads losing to a FH?
Don't worry guys, online variance is fine.
You don't even get paid when you make royals
~ 1 in 4,800,000
Technically yes, but seeing as though the feat isn't accomplished without the first royal flush occurring, 4.8b is a little misleading. If we select 2 hands from random, and they both contain a royal, your assessment is true.
Reminds me of a case I heard a while ago. A lady had 2 children. Both died from a fairly rare occurrence (1 in 7000). The prosecution argued 1 in 50 million isn't a coincidence, and she murdered the kids. A statistician came and showed how the odds are actually 1 in 7000, because the first occurrence has to happen for us to get to this point. Semantics, perhaps, but it illustrates how statistics can be used
Nice comment. But here, I think, you really should take into account the first occurrence happening.
I think there is some statistic about rolling two sixes in a row? Expected rolls not 36, but 42? And there is something else regarding rolling a 5, then a 6 vs rolling two sixes in a row or something, not sure
Dang, I saw back to back quads by the same player the other day but I think this one easily takes the cake.
I lost money with a royal once. Thought that was pretty rare.
...hi/lo or double board game?
Straight 1/3 NLH. I 3bet pot on BtN vs an UTG maniac.( He was literally the father of the game's regular maniac,and less good, but just as splashy)
Flopped str8 flush on Qh Jh Th. Villain check raises flop. I flat call, thinking he CANT have AKh. Even i dont run that bad.
Turn Kh . Ok he doesnt have AKh. So we get it all in, he tables black AKo. I feel great....
River is Ah. House takes $20 and i have a smaller stack afterwards. I went from flopping 2nd nut str8 flush with 89h to playing the royal flush board for a loss.
I hate poker.
WPT?
Within the first hour of playing on their site I saw my first ever royal flush. Something is fucky on this website.
Yeah WPTglobal, meh probably just variance.
It's certainly the rarest back to back hands.
Well done on living up to your own hype lol.
On the second one, it would have been even better if AppleOfEden held the 9s, then the Board turned the 8s and rivered As.
Thats wild, the odds of this are like 100 to 1
The only thing crazier than that is when I had pocket kings and there was no ace on the flop. I still lost though. He had aces in the hole.
I believe 3 royal flushes in a row is rarer
Wow the odds are 50/50 twice. Impressive.
so that works out to 100/100, right?
红龙？