Christ all of you don't understand secluded points and examples? No wonder it's hell to argue on the internet when everyone evidently cannot comprehend giving an example to a secluded point, even when explicitly saying it, isn't flat out comparing the two situations
Almost like omitting context is a stupid thing to do? They're comparing the normalcy of genital jokes and pedophilia, and I'm pretty sure cat balls are in fact, genitalia(please correct me if I'm wrong 🙏)
Counter argument: genital jokes have been around for ages
New secluded point: x thing has been around for long time so it's not weird
Argument to new secluded argument: pedos have been around for a long time and they are weird
Do you see his secluded argument isn't referring to the original point, hence not fucking comparing pedos to caf balls? All of this to say I'm not supporting the arguments but God damn the reading comprehension shown in this comments section is awful
Bro I already played exodia, just accept defeat already
And that's not a "new secluded point", it's still about genitalia, that's taking a step back from "cat balls" to "balls" at best (and id argue still includes the former)
(And since you insist on giving a swag, a partial or indirect comparison is still a comparison)
It's not a partial comparison as he wasn't even referring to the original point, and that's not just inferring seeing as he explicitly SAYS he's not comparing them so this misconception wouldn't form yet everyone here is still saying he is. Genuinely impossible to have a coherent argument with people in the internet good lord
First of all, yes, cat balls, the original point, are a part of genital jokes, which are being compared to PDFs
And a comparison does not rely on being related to the original point, it relies on: being a comparison.
And just because they're saying 'it's not making a comparison' doesn't make it true.
This car is faster than that one
That's not a comparison, I SAYS it
(And if you want if you want to have an argument with people on the Internet, maybe go somewhere that isn't 'subreddit made for making fun of people for making an argument out of nothing')
You're right, a comparison doesn't rely on being related to the original point, but it does rely on being a comparison to the original point if it's a comparison TO THE ORIGINAL POINT. Simply because they are in close proximity to each one doesn't mean one if fucking being compared to the other. Saying "apples are tasty" and then saying "oranges aren't tasty" isn't comparing the two, however saying "apples are tastier than oranges" is comparing the two. Not hard to understand holy shit.
And that interlude at the end, no I'm not here to want an argument, I understand what the subs for, however when the comments are critiquing the original post unironically for "comparing the two" when that's explicitly not what happened then that's not based on a joke
Ornange and apple both fruit. They both grow on trees. They both appear in hit web series "annoing orange" but really it should be boioing orange because thats the sound my weenor makes when i watch it 😈😈😈🍎🥕🥕
Easy, because it is one of the few things that the entire west still agrees on is bad. So anytime you need something "universally wrong" you end up with pedophilia.
Nah. They are responding to the part in the other person's first response that states "it's just something funny." They just went from complaining about the usage of "y'all" back to complaining about the socks in question without any other hint of the topic switch lol
Coming from a southerner, I hate how terminally online types will just assume that people saying “y’all” is just a fad or something that’s meant to be funny. Not that it can’t be those things, but ffs have some social awareness, y’all is just easier to say.
Second time seeing this comment, people's reading comprehension really is cooked my god.
Secluding a point then giving an example to reinforce that secluded point is not comparing the original example with the new secluded point example, made evident when they explicitly say they aren't comparing those two points together.
It wasn't though lmfao, they were putting another example of why something that's been around for a long time doesn't make it not weird, it's always annoying as shit in arguments when people try to seclude a point and give an example on that point then people like you say "so you're comparing them???" Even when they explicitly say they're not
https://preview.redd.it/2mze5e3c1p6g1.png?width=753&format=png&auto=webp&s=7d84b082bd2af3a1b5258a987cb4f02edf4574fe
the swag giver be like
https://i.redd.it/xr6hvhpc2p6g1.gif
Swap pdfs with hitler then with jews then back to pdfs then to cat balls then to jews. Not so funny now huh?
Now swap AAALLLL of that with ai artists, who are obviously the most oppressed group of people
They would seethe when they find out cutesy Japanese animal characters are sometimes drawn with little x-shaped swagholes for the funny
Erm... so that's literally zoophilia. Hope this helps!
Erm... so that's literally swagphilia. Hope this swags!
i know you're joking but your comment makes me really want to punch you and im not a violent person at all I'm so sorry
swag holes 😭😭
PDF's are actually a pretty recent invention
why did bro bring up pedophiles for no reason
Idk probably a red herring argument or strawman or sum i have no idea what the difference is.
redman
straw herring
Herring man
Red straw
i'd prefer a green one, thank you
They did that, and then added "no I'm not comparing them" to make sure no point was made
Christ all of you don't understand secluded points and examples? No wonder it's hell to argue on the internet when everyone evidently cannot comprehend giving an example to a secluded point, even when explicitly saying it, isn't flat out comparing the two situations
Almost like omitting context is a stupid thing to do? They're comparing the normalcy of genital jokes and pedophilia, and I'm pretty sure cat balls are in fact, genitalia(please correct me if I'm wrong 🙏)
Original point: cat balls are weird not funny
Counter argument: genital jokes have been around for ages
New secluded point: x thing has been around for long time so it's not weird
Argument to new secluded argument: pedos have been around for a long time and they are weird
Do you see his secluded argument isn't referring to the original point, hence not fucking comparing pedos to caf balls? All of this to say I'm not supporting the arguments but God damn the reading comprehension shown in this comments section is awful
Bro I already played exodia, just accept defeat already
And that's not a "new secluded point", it's still about genitalia, that's taking a step back from "cat balls" to "balls" at best (and id argue still includes the former)
(And since you insist on giving a swag, a partial or indirect comparison is still a comparison)
It's not a partial comparison as he wasn't even referring to the original point, and that's not just inferring seeing as he explicitly SAYS he's not comparing them so this misconception wouldn't form yet everyone here is still saying he is. Genuinely impossible to have a coherent argument with people in the internet good lord
First of all, yes, cat balls, the original point, are a part of genital jokes, which are being compared to PDFs
And a comparison does not rely on being related to the original point, it relies on: being a comparison.
And just because they're saying 'it's not making a comparison' doesn't make it true.
This car is faster than that one
That's not a comparison, I SAYS it
(And if you want if you want to have an argument with people on the Internet, maybe go somewhere that isn't 'subreddit made for making fun of people for making an argument out of nothing')
You're right, a comparison doesn't rely on being related to the original point, but it does rely on being a comparison to the original point if it's a comparison TO THE ORIGINAL POINT. Simply because they are in close proximity to each one doesn't mean one if fucking being compared to the other. Saying "apples are tasty" and then saying "oranges aren't tasty" isn't comparing the two, however saying "apples are tastier than oranges" is comparing the two. Not hard to understand holy shit.
And that interlude at the end, no I'm not here to want an argument, I understand what the subs for, however when the comments are critiquing the original post unironically for "comparing the two" when that's explicitly not what happened then that's not based on a joke
https://preview.redd.it/vksf4b757q6g1.jpeg?width=535&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bff4d8b9cbf7ee79526a8f511b8a50b684fac0dc
but they said they’re not comparing them!! so obviously that means they’re not, right????
Ornange and apple both fruit. They both grow on trees. They both appear in hit web series "annoing orange" but really it should be boioing orange because thats the sound my weenor makes when i watch it 😈😈😈🍎🥕🥕
There, just coompared them. Gonna cry, liberol?
Easy, because it is one of the few things that the entire west still agrees on is bad. So anytime you need something "universally wrong" you end up with pedophilia.
Yeah that and Nazis, there's a whole logical fallacy related to it lmao
Nazis aren't considered universally anymore tho
Western Minecraft YouTubers and billionaires have entered the chat
https://i.redd.it/kuoildvics6g1.gif
It feels like they wanted to argue that it's zoophilia but there's no way to shorten/censor it like you can PDF file, so they argued pdf file instead.
Godwins law alternative.
Godwin’s law opening, gambit declined variation. -0.2 white, positional disadvantage. Book move.
Hey Zorak!
Uh.. a hungry man thinks of bread
Does that person think "y'all" means the same thing as "lol"???????????????
Nah. They are responding to the part in the other person's first response that states "it's just something funny." They just went from complaining about the usage of "y'all" back to complaining about the socks in question without any other hint of the topic switch lol
Weard
Genuinely stupid since it is one of the best option for a second person plural pronoun imo
Yeah right up there with yous
Agreed!!! It's a frequent flyer in my daily lexicon lol
Are there even other options that aren't just nouns? (so no guys, folk, fellas etc)
you can count “you two”, “you lot”, or even “all of you”, but I can’t think of anything outside of nouns yeah
hell are you on about
It seems like that's the meaning behind the comment that starts with "'Y'all' use this word too much"
The middle finger is literally a representation of a shlong so... No. Genitalia were always are always and will always be on our mind.
trouble puffs are funny
Coming from a southerner, I hate how terminally online types will just assume that people saying “y’all” is just a fad or something that’s meant to be funny. Not that it can’t be those things, but ffs have some social awareness, y’all is just easier to say.
I do the pennsyltucky "you lot"/ "y'all"/ "youse". Such great words were invented for daily convenience
i think animal balls/asshole chibi stuff is weird but good lord its in no way comparable to pedophilla 💔💔
https://preview.redd.it/b2quv6e1pr6g1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ad3e5d79e9f3f3c475cc65795b4e9a1aff0ed1eb
moth balls 🤤
To me they're funny af. I don't know why. Not obsessed that'd be so weird but in a "funny because humans have them too" way I suppose
They're saying they're not comparing them while comparing them
Second time seeing this comment, people's reading comprehension really is cooked my god.
Secluding a point then giving an example to reinforce that secluded point is not comparing the original example with the new secluded point example, made evident when they explicitly say they aren't comparing those two points together.
I wasn't being that serious, the example they used is stupid
They comparing them fr
"No, im not comparing pedophiles to cat balls"
...except you are. That's quite literally what you're doing.
It wasn't though lmfao, they were putting another example of why something that's been around for a long time doesn't make it not weird, it's always annoying as shit in arguments when people try to seclude a point and give an example on that point then people like you say "so you're comparing them???" Even when they explicitly say they're not
if you're secluding a point to make in an argument, that doesn't directly correlate to the argument, why bring it up at all
Tf is a swag ball?
Where's that Norm McDonald clip when you need it most