And that's why in case of failure it's important to put your tongue and fingers to work. And even if that doesn't work, strap on can be worn by dick owners too.
Tbf, if your woman has to focus of cumming and not just enjoying herself so much that she doesn't have to, you aren't doing a good enough job
Nah bro....
Not trying to over embellish but I have no problem being able to please a woman. Even defy the odds of 70% of women not being able to orgasm from penis in vagina action. But legit they have to focus on some level to be able to catch their wave of an orgasm. It's not about other things being on her mind. Chicks are chicks, dudes are dudes
I’ve noticed that this kind of consideration usually isn’t limited to the bedroom from partners like this.
A man who is generous with insuring his partner has pleasure in the bedroom often works toward their shared happiness in other areas of life. It’s a very green flag.
Same, I can't believe there's so many guys out there who just don't care. Or guys who just think it's impossible, you're telling me you're so vanilla you won't even try eating her out? That's one of the hottest things to me imo and something I can't wait to try one day. When I finally meet the right women for me I'm gonna make sure she's satisfied. If she's the type who can climax multiple times I'm probably gonna be the type to get her off a few times before getting off myself.
Unless it's really hard to do. Some I'll get off 4+ times in one session. Others might not be able to at all. But ideally yeah.
I prefer it to be a little challenging but not impossible. Kinda boring when they climax from just a stiff breeze. And makes me a bit envious that they can just keep cumming.
As a base rule I get that, but what I learned above all is that this kinda pressure puts a layer onto intimacy that I don't want there. I don't want my partner to have his thoughts on "don't cum, don't cum, do this and this to make her cum". I'd rather have his thoughts actually in the moment and have him act out of care, not some kind of pressure to "deliver".
Things go as they go and that's fine. I had a better time just being playful, intimate and caring than just "trying to cum".
while i understand this, learning about your partner’s desires and what works for them is a form of love. don’t lower your standards and settle for someone who can’t handle that because they’re “nervous”. the “pressure to deliver” is literally them wanting you to have a good time and it means they’re a partner who cares about your wants. someone who genuinely wants you to enjoy your time together won’t see that as undue pressure, they’d see exploring with you as an enjoyable part of the experience as well.
i feel like as women we are often made to think that our pleasure is just secondary and sex ends when the guy finishes regardless of whether you feel gratified. but that’s entirely untrue and it doesn’t matter if he came or not, you’re done when both of you say you’re done. basically, find yourself someone who doesn’t feel like the idea of your pleasure is pressuring them to act differently.
My issue isn't about putting effort or putting thought into it. My issue is that its not a task or demand I put on my partner. I want him to act out of care, not because he feels forced to, and that's something that is heavily forced onto men especially. Their whole value as a partner seems to bank on their "sexual performance" as well as other aspects outside the topic. And that feels incredibly selfish to demand to me, when all I want is to spend the time with him in an intimate way. That's the unfair pressure I mean, he is not a machine with the purpose of making me cum. If that's what I want, then there are other options.
As for your second paragraph, that's just a difference in culture or because I'm just in my 20s, but I can not think of a single, modern instance where "my pleasure as a woman was secondary" but rather that it always seems to be sole most talked about aspect. It's what men brag about any chance given, it's what women talk about when they talk about their partners. Now weither it actually happens or is just empty talk is a different matter altogether, but the awareness is definitely there.
And I'm aware that in the past there was a certain "always give men what they want, or they will leave you"-attitude, we all heard it from older people or reports, I'm not discrediting that. But that attitude is nothing I have ever been personally involved with.
And every single of my previous partner's had concerns about performance, and talking openly about it with them and taking the pressure off them alone and rather putting it onto both of us together has always been an improvement.
Are there negative consequences to baptising a soulless child? Are they destined to use the holy gifts they are bestowed for evil? If welcomed into Jesus' blossom, do they become sleeper agents?
Take a moment and consider the wide variety of takes and opinions people have had about how a child should be conceived.
Final answer, corner cases included, this is far from the worst. Course if I had a few genie wishes i’m sure we could workshop a better ask, but given it’s all hypothetical anyways…
Except it's not about whether a child is conceived or not, it's whether the baby is born with a soul. So in this scenario, women are having unsatisfying or non-consensual sex and give birth to things that appear human but have no soul
Yeah? You’ve never met someone who’s lost theirs? Who just killed it cause they had to? Someone who never had a chance at making any other choice? There are some truly dire circumstances people are born into in this world we live in right now.
This would be little different, near as I can tell. Hell, do you know how many people back in the day wanted to be a Nobody from Kingdom Hearts? Thought it was dope as shit to be an empty husk guided by will alone?
I’ve known three people who’ve tried to actually sell their soul, one of whom claimed to have succeeded, and near as I can tell the only difference is they continued to wear a lot of black. Their taste in music remained garbage, so maybe the demons just didn’t want to be associated with them.
Ikr? The left are of teenagers, Elsa I think is the only one over 18 but could be wrong. The right shows them at least as adults and as actual people with desires other than “romance”
There is a thing of “looking young” that’s an impossible standard for some people. It’s gotten slightly better in recent years but so many guys see teens as the standard for beauty simply because they haven’t full developed (thinner bodies, no “fat” on their stomachs, no stretch marks or wrinkles. It’s bad enough that children as young as 8 are being pushed to start skincare routines on social media
She actually is 15, based on a lot of official media that disney released. They just recently decided to sweep that under the rug and pretend it never happened
Most Disney princesses motives boil down to romance, in shrek they’re more like actual people you could meet with relationships outside immediate family and love interests
Feminism often incorporates esoteric elements, but feministic cosmology is something new to me. I'm interested in the worldbuilding that's taking place here.
In Christian lore animals don’t have souls and therefore cannot be with you in heaven, that’s why I left the church (not really there were lots of reasons)
That would actually explain quite a lot. Most of the most heinous people on the planet seems to have fathers who couldn't make a sponge wet and mothers who've only experienced climaxes while watching a movie.
A lack of a soul and therefore basic humanity of the chronically unloved and unlovable could be a cool story to tell.
I’m sorry but I don’t believe that girls who “don’t mind” not getting oral or orgasms exist. They’re lying to you. Also you should feel embarrassed if you can’t give your girl an orgasm and she doesn’t have a medical condition. Also embarrassing if you aren’t willing to go down on your partner. All I’m getting from this post is the poster is bad at sex and blames their partner for it.
It sounds like a riff on the old mediaeval European belief (might have been wider and I'd guess it was because e.g. the Golden Age scholars in Baghdad etc. were working off the same basic sources) about conception. That both parties had to climax to end in pregnancy. Which made sense back then, because you could see one of them in real time so it stands to reason that the same is just going on internally.
It sounds good in theory, but then you have some scumbag saying "well obviously she wanted it or she wouldn't be knocked up" and you see where it starts to fall down. There are people who still believe that shit, so it's not that surprising to me that they'd take this logical leap as well.
Orgasms are great, but they aren't necessary to enjoy sex. But that aside, using strawman arguments because you're unable to satisfy anyone is really fucking sad.
so...if i wanted to create an army to commit war crimes the ideal are these soulless children. as a bonus i dont need to worry about their souls being sent to hell.
Wasn’t this the mindset of the Catholic Church for a while? I mean, of course they’re not going to avoid the baked in misogyny, but I thought I recall a Hollywood quotation that referenced how the Catholic Church or one of them espoused for a time period that the mom needed the Big O in order to ensure and thus ensoul the kid.
I'm not usually a Bible person, but one line sticks with me.
"As one dies, so dies the other. All have the same breath[c]; humans have no advantage over animals. Everything is meaningless. 20 All go to the same place; all come from dust, and to dust all return. 21 Who knows if the human spirit rises upward and if the spirit of the animal goes down into the earth?”
ALL DOGS (and cats, lizards, monkeys, bears, dolphins) go to Heaven.
It's more me that insists on giving oral sex and orgasms to women, then women insisting on it from me. I love eating pussy and I think I would feel a bit emasculated if I ever would fail to give at least one orgasm.
Ok, I feel like the point this (probably a) guy tried to make was that girls who want pleasure from sex (that presumably he isn't very good at giving) are uglier than those that just give pleasure (which he probably like to just take).
Sorry but not only do I think that girls who actually like having fun during sex are hotter and cooler, I also think the Shrek Pincesses are hotter and cooler.
I am not surprised that someone who thinks girls shouldn't enjoy sex is also into the most milk toast concept of a woman imaginable. Just buy a Real Doll or something if you want to have sex with a lifeless piece of plastic, dude.
I read an old wives tale that said if a woman becomes pregnant but did not orgasm, the child will be ugly.
My poor mother
There are a lot of funny fuckers in the comments, I’m cracking up!
Hi, cracking up, I'm dad
Same🤣
My dad must’ve laid it down. Lowkey proud.
r/suicidebywords
Oh. Well I certainly know why Im ugly then.
Damn my mum only had it good once (I have a brother)
At least my bio-dad was good for one thing.
Makes sense😔
So that's why I'm ugly as fuck. I understand it now
And suddenly, it all makes sense. That would explain why my dad was never part of the picture.
Dad?
My friend has two boys and she says there's an old wives tale that women have boys when they orgasm at conception. Her husband is very proud lmao.
I always felt if you climax, she should climax
This is the way
At its core it's basic civility
I almost wanted to call this sex etiquette typing it out lol but I didn't want it to sound like rules
Sexiquette
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡° )
Nice guys finish last
Fr tho the goal should be get her to finish first in most cases. Like I can wait.
Nah, it's a competition, I went 7-0 one time before my streak was ruined. No one in this relationship nuts without my permission.
https://old.reddit.com/r/meme/comments/1pi9hv3/_/nt61vwg/
Also...
Men have to concentrate on not climaxing while women have to concentrate on trying to.
And that's why in case of failure it's important to put your tongue and fingers to work. And even if that doesn't work, strap on can be worn by dick owners too.
Tbf, if your woman has to focus of cumming and not just enjoying herself so much that she doesn't have to, you aren't doing a good enough job.
I always try to give my wife the time of her life so she doesn't have to try to focus on it, it's the only thing on her mind.
Not every woman is the same. Sometimes theyre less sensitive down there, sometimes they just cant from penetration.
Thats why other ways exist and some guys refuse to do that stuff sooo….
Sometimes I just like the intimacy from sex even when I know I'm not going to climax. My husband's the same way.
We get each other off 95% of the time but the way we treat each other that 5% of the time makes everything feel solid.
Nah bro....
Not trying to over embellish but I have no problem being able to please a woman. Even defy the odds of 70% of women not being able to orgasm from penis in vagina action. But legit they have to focus on some level to be able to catch their wave of an orgasm. It's not about other things being on her mind. Chicks are chicks, dudes are dudes
I can be right there... and if something happens I can lose it and have to start all over.
Man, I’m a cis woman, and I have to concentrate sometimes when I’m doing it myself. Sometimes that’s just how it is
I married a man who believes the same. Forever grateful.
I’ve noticed that this kind of consideration usually isn’t limited to the bedroom from partners like this.
A man who is generous with insuring his partner has pleasure in the bedroom often works toward their shared happiness in other areas of life. It’s a very green flag.
The main character traits I would use to describe him are generous and considerate, so this tracks.
Same, I can't believe there's so many guys out there who just don't care. Or guys who just think it's impossible, you're telling me you're so vanilla you won't even try eating her out? That's one of the hottest things to me imo and something I can't wait to try one day. When I finally meet the right women for me I'm gonna make sure she's satisfied. If she's the type who can climax multiple times I'm probably gonna be the type to get her off a few times before getting off myself.
It's good to have goals.
Oh yeah for sure, goals and optimism are the only things that keep me going most of the time.
Mine does this and hes amazing. He’ll take care of me several times before he does himself.
Dude I used to be in your spot a while back. Engaged now.
Def be that way. Honestly its pleasure to give pleasure. If my partner gets off it turns me on 10x more and its great. too.
God, if all men were like you, I don't think we'd have a loneliness epidemic.
Shit, how are you not already married by a lucky woman who knew what she got?
I made her arrive 3 times my first time and felt like a pornstar 😂
I saw a guy wearing a shirt that said “women cum first” on my 21st birthday, you know damn well I got me a picture. 😂
It's just sexiqitte
Not in that order
Unless it's really hard to do. Some I'll get off 4+ times in one session. Others might not be able to at all. But ideally yeah.
I prefer it to be a little challenging but not impossible. Kinda boring when they climax from just a stiff breeze. And makes me a bit envious that they can just keep cumming.
As a base rule I get that, but what I learned above all is that this kinda pressure puts a layer onto intimacy that I don't want there. I don't want my partner to have his thoughts on "don't cum, don't cum, do this and this to make her cum". I'd rather have his thoughts actually in the moment and have him act out of care, not some kind of pressure to "deliver". Things go as they go and that's fine. I had a better time just being playful, intimate and caring than just "trying to cum".
while i understand this, learning about your partner’s desires and what works for them is a form of love. don’t lower your standards and settle for someone who can’t handle that because they’re “nervous”. the “pressure to deliver” is literally them wanting you to have a good time and it means they’re a partner who cares about your wants. someone who genuinely wants you to enjoy your time together won’t see that as undue pressure, they’d see exploring with you as an enjoyable part of the experience as well.
i feel like as women we are often made to think that our pleasure is just secondary and sex ends when the guy finishes regardless of whether you feel gratified. but that’s entirely untrue and it doesn’t matter if he came or not, you’re done when both of you say you’re done. basically, find yourself someone who doesn’t feel like the idea of your pleasure is pressuring them to act differently.
My issue isn't about putting effort or putting thought into it. My issue is that its not a task or demand I put on my partner. I want him to act out of care, not because he feels forced to, and that's something that is heavily forced onto men especially. Their whole value as a partner seems to bank on their "sexual performance" as well as other aspects outside the topic. And that feels incredibly selfish to demand to me, when all I want is to spend the time with him in an intimate way. That's the unfair pressure I mean, he is not a machine with the purpose of making me cum. If that's what I want, then there are other options.
As for your second paragraph, that's just a difference in culture or because I'm just in my 20s, but I can not think of a single, modern instance where "my pleasure as a woman was secondary" but rather that it always seems to be sole most talked about aspect. It's what men brag about any chance given, it's what women talk about when they talk about their partners. Now weither it actually happens or is just empty talk is a different matter altogether, but the awareness is definitely there. And I'm aware that in the past there was a certain "always give men what they want, or they will leave you"-attitude, we all heard it from older people or reports, I'm not discrediting that. But that attitude is nothing I have ever been personally involved with. And every single of my previous partner's had concerns about performance, and talking openly about it with them and taking the pressure off them alone and rather putting it onto both of us together has always been an improvement.
Well my IVF child is in for a weird afterlife I guess
Gotta break out the vibrator in the other room while they prepare the eggs.
lol the church in my country straight up declared that IVF children have no soul and advised pastors not to baptise them
Are there negative consequences to baptising a soulless child? Are they destined to use the holy gifts they are bestowed for evil? If welcomed into Jesus' blossom, do they become sleeper agents?
no it was just 'dont bother baptising them, they have no souls anyway so it wont change anything'
Quick! Theres still time to get the rose toy!
New ruleset, but honestly not the worst i’ve heard proposed.
Now I have to call and ask my mom. Wouldn't want to be unsouled
"Mom, Mom this is important, did you cum when Dad got you pregnant with me?"
Bad news... You're fine, but her husband has never given her an O.
Oh, wait, I'm projecting my own family drama
😂😂😂😂
Unsouled is a good book.
Absolutely
r/unexpectedcradle
I...I meant the one from Niel Shusterman's Unwind books, but Cradle is also a good series.
I know exactly what you mean. Uh, could we get a movie about this series already? It is relevant
Are you a ginger? If not probably safe!
You wan't to live in this world for 70-120 years and then keep existing? I hope I don't have an immortal soul unless I get to try a different planet.
Whatever gets tradcaths to be better to their wives is something I can support
If one side is making up theology, a response of fake theology is reasonable.
Except when you actually think about it for a minute
Guess I should have asked the fertility doctor for a happy ending after the embryo transfer
Take a moment and consider the wide variety of takes and opinions people have had about how a child should be conceived.
Final answer, corner cases included, this is far from the worst. Course if I had a few genie wishes i’m sure we could workshop a better ask, but given it’s all hypothetical anyways…
Except it's not about whether a child is conceived or not, it's whether the baby is born with a soul. So in this scenario, women are having unsatisfying or non-consensual sex and give birth to things that appear human but have no soul
Yeah? You’ve never met someone who’s lost theirs? Who just killed it cause they had to? Someone who never had a chance at making any other choice? There are some truly dire circumstances people are born into in this world we live in right now.
This would be little different, near as I can tell. Hell, do you know how many people back in the day wanted to be a Nobody from Kingdom Hearts? Thought it was dope as shit to be an empty husk guided by will alone?
I’ve known three people who’ve tried to actually sell their soul, one of whom claimed to have succeeded, and near as I can tell the only difference is they continued to wear a lot of black. Their taste in music remained garbage, so maybe the demons just didn’t want to be associated with them.
Which means they can sin and do bad stuff without fear of retribution. Sounds like a good deal.
He’s out of line, but he’s not wrong
But he will also be confined to nonexistent after this life. Toss up if you ask me
The ultimate yolo, just because your mom didn't climax back then.
(That sentence reads weird on so many levels)
Turn on hardcore mode by turning her off.
idk man.. true nothingness seems pretty peaceful to me.
Right??
You had me at can sin without retribution you don't have to sweeten the deal
And now we know why there’s no overpopulation in Heaven and Hell; historically, most people were never ensouled.
By the looks of the pics, i definitely want the women who insist upon it
Ikr? The left are of teenagers, Elsa I think is the only one over 18 but could be wrong. The right shows them at least as adults and as actual people with desires other than “romance”
Anna is 18 in the first movie, Elsa is 21
I dont believe they ever clarify Pocahontas' age (though ofc shes based off an irl child so,,,)
Belle's age is not clarified but people assume shes a young adult (19+)
Cinderella is believed to be 19
Rapunzel turns 18 in her movie
Tiana is officially 19
Surprisingly Jasmine ISNT actually 15, in the movie they say "before your NEXT birthday" not 16th, so her age is unknown.
Mulan is somewhere between 16-19
However Ariel, Merida, Aurora, and Snow White are all canonically underage.
Either way all of them are SUPER young lol. It was fun to look and see what their official ages are
There is a thing of “looking young” that’s an impossible standard for some people. It’s gotten slightly better in recent years but so many guys see teens as the standard for beauty simply because they haven’t full developed (thinner bodies, no “fat” on their stomachs, no stretch marks or wrinkles. It’s bad enough that children as young as 8 are being pushed to start skincare routines on social media
IIRC, Ariel was in her mid twenties with a kid in the second movie. You know, the one with URSULA'S CRAZY SISTER!
She actually is 15, based on a lot of official media that disney released. They just recently decided to sweep that under the rug and pretend it never happened
Why are the left ones not actual people
Most Disney princesses motives boil down to romance, in shrek they’re more like actual people you could meet with relationships outside immediate family and love interests
shorter answer would be
bazonkers 👀👀
N-... No?
Is that the sole barrier between you and pedophilia? Tf
i'm a minor tho
If that's the case, would that not make Fiona the pedophile??
I owe you an apology. I was not familiar with your game.
The OG post is such a horrible take
So a tiny tiny minority of us actually have souls. That…
…that makes so much sense
Feminism often incorporates esoteric elements, but feministic cosmology is something new to me. I'm interested in the worldbuilding that's taking place here.
"like that of animals" bitch u take that back my pets are waiting for me up there
And all the chicken you ever ate...
I didn't say I'd be joining them, just that they are waiting for me.
Why more people are not outraged by this is beyond me. If my pups ain’t up there I ain’t going.
In Christian lore animals don’t have souls and therefore cannot be with you in heaven, that’s why I left the church (not really there were lots of reasons)
New DnD rulesets getting complicated man
little girls on the left, women on the right. it's honestly just creepy
Energy can not be created or destroyed- only transformed
Right or wrong, good or bad, sustainable or unsustainable. It's all just a matter of preference
Babe new meta just dropped
Myths are society's way of encouraging behavior they want to see
*citation needed*
Pity that's not in the Christian's Bible.
Girls who don't know any better vs. The most Badass women you've ever met.
Genuinely weirdest take of all time
I… why are we using Dreamworks and Disney princesses to compare these two?
Girls that have sex vs bitches that fuuuuhck
Is that what's wrong with me?
I want a religion to form with this principle in mind
I'll take the ones on the right any day.
That would actually explain quite a lot. Most of the most heinous people on the planet seems to have fathers who couldn't make a sponge wet and mothers who've only experienced climaxes while watching a movie.
A lack of a soul and therefore basic humanity of the chronically unloved and unlovable could be a cool story to tell.
Wtf....
What if tha animals was both cumin tho
This makes so much sense. No wonder bastards are such bastards.
I’m sorry but I don’t believe that girls who “don’t mind” not getting oral or orgasms exist. They’re lying to you. Also you should feel embarrassed if you can’t give your girl an orgasm and she doesn’t have a medical condition. Also embarrassing if you aren’t willing to go down on your partner. All I’m getting from this post is the poster is bad at sex and blames their partner for it.
Imagine if we could get them to believe this 👀
I just logged on, and... yep. That's enough internet for me today.
Back in my day we used to start our day with a good morning
A strategic, but necessary lie for convincing pro-lifers to pleasure their women.
Well that's half the planet 🤣🤣
What the fuck
Children who were conceived without the man having an orgasm are born with tails and horns.
Sick!!!!
So what does this say about Mary and her child? There was no orgasm there.
I don’t know who this Mary is, but if she didn’t climax then I’m sure her child was not noteworthy.
People believe the most insane things.
It sounds like a riff on the old mediaeval European belief (might have been wider and I'd guess it was because e.g. the Golden Age scholars in Baghdad etc. were working off the same basic sources) about conception. That both parties had to climax to end in pregnancy. Which made sense back then, because you could see one of them in real time so it stands to reason that the same is just going on internally.
It sounds good in theory, but then you have some scumbag saying "well obviously she wanted it or she wouldn't be knocked up" and you see where it starts to fall down. There are people who still believe that shit, so it's not that surprising to me that they'd take this logical leap as well.
😦
What
Tha
FUCK
It’s horrifying to think people like this exist
Orgasms are great, but they aren't necessary to enjoy sex. But that aside, using strawman arguments because you're unable to satisfy anyone is really fucking sad.
so...if i wanted to create an army to commit war crimes the ideal are these soulless children. as a bonus i dont need to worry about their souls being sent to hell.
If only more war criminals with child soldiers would consider their spiritual well-being
we're here to commit crimes against humanity not fill the legions of hell.
That’s so fucked up
So almost every child??🙄😂
I am so fucked
This just in: the Neshamah is bestowed by climax
I don’t believe any of this!! That’s crazy talk!
I have think that’s how you kill Macbeth.
L = Weirdo
Anna = Schizo
Wasn’t this the mindset of the Catholic Church for a while? I mean, of course they’re not going to avoid the baked in misogyny, but I thought I recall a Hollywood quotation that referenced how the Catholic Church or one of them espoused for a time period that the mom needed the Big O in order to ensure and thus ensoul the kid.
the only response I can be bothered to have for a moron like this is "all dogs go to heaven" and "how dare you"
All those IVF babies…
I'm only here to defend the animals.
I'm not usually a Bible person, but one line sticks with me.
"As one dies, so dies the other. All have the same breath[c]; humans have no advantage over animals. Everything is meaningless. 20 All go to the same place; all come from dust, and to dust all return. 21 Who knows if the human spirit rises upward and if the spirit of the animal goes down into the earth?”
ALL DOGS (and cats, lizards, monkeys, bears, dolphins) go to Heaven.
You can tell the original poster had never pleasured a woman before
It's more me that insists on giving oral sex and orgasms to women, then women insisting on it from me. I love eating pussy and I think I would feel a bit emasculated if I ever would fail to give at least one orgasm.
Sex is like Chinese food, it isn't over until you both get your cookie.
That bitch just say animals don't go to heaven? What on earth would make anyone willingly believe that?
If this is true, there are a LOT of soulless people running around!!!
Ok, I feel like the point this (probably a) guy tried to make was that girls who want pleasure from sex (that presumably he isn't very good at giving) are uglier than those that just give pleasure (which he probably like to just take). Sorry but not only do I think that girls who actually like having fun during sex are hotter and cooler, I also think the Shrek Pincesses are hotter and cooler.
I am not surprised that someone who thinks girls shouldn't enjoy sex is also into the most milk toast concept of a woman imaginable. Just buy a Real Doll or something if you want to have sex with a lifeless piece of plastic, dude.
So… because you’re thin and have your hair done means you don’t want to get yours?
I know this wasn’t the point of the post, but all the ladies from Shrek look like they’re cutting a fart.
Thats all I have to add.
I just realized Rapunzel from Shrek reminds me of Thorgie Thor
I just realized
Rapunzel from Shrek reminds
Me of Thorgie Thor
- Marley9391
I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully. Learn more about me.
Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete"
"Like that of animals" haven't heard this shit in a very long time, I forgot there are morons who believe that lol
Wait, does OOOP think the pretty ones are the ones that will settle for guys who can't get them off?
wtf
Uhm that’d probably mean only 10% of people have souls
So that's how techbros are born
Heaven and hell must be very empty then
So they don't have a soul but when they die their soul gets destroyed?
Logic much?
So there is an easy way we can fool the devil ?
The ones on the left kinda look like teenagers....
Well i guess both heaven and hell must be pretty lonely places
Every part of this image is strange
I saw this once but it said girls who poop vs girls who shit and it was the funniest meme i had ever seen.
That fucking sucks for all of the fertility treatment kids.
News flash for OP. The first subset of women doesn’t exist. They know orgasm won’t happen, and would prefer to be getting pleasured or keeping busy.
what could a sperm do to go to hell guys?
"It"?...
Wtf?
Wait so is this how gingers are made? Is this how I was made? My poor mother. 🤦🏻♀️
One of the craziest concepts I've ever heard someone spout... Kind of strange since humans are animals
That’s pretty aggressive
Sperm is viable up to 48 hours so that leaves a two day window for her to orgasm
Some people actually believe these delusions.
The fuck does "ensouled" means ? Having a soul ? How the fuck do you determine that in the first place ?
BTW I'm taking the piss here, I'm just curious if someone that believes in souls see this.
I guess my coming child will have about 20 souls. What then?
the real cause of austism
One crazy statement followed by a somehow even crazier one.
That is one of those memes that says a whole more about the person who posted it than what the meme itself says.
🤔 more unsatisfied wives = more gingers.