https://youtu.be/Qbe_7Fa_giY?si=qCRSwA4deZg0QNz8
https://youtu.be/1wJQEMmxhjw?si=9BAzFCuzSaqffpAb
Note: yes the original scan has a detail in one character that was misinterpreted as an erection
while the original 1989 theatrical negative of the feature film has not been technically lost because Disney has the original source confidentiality secured, it was never used again post-1991 home media releases and was never probably shown ever since. Until this past Sunday.
Plus, According to Michael Putluck,”It's worth noting that this is 1.85:1 aspect ratio as theatrical movies generally are in that radio or the wider, skinnier 2.39:1 ratio. These are known as flat or scope respectfully, with scope using an anamorphic lens to fit a wider picture within a film cell that is the same width (22mm, with the remaining 13mm consisting of sprocket holes to propel the film through the projector and optical soundtracks which are read by lasers).”
(Main topic)
For the first time since the 1990 VHS and laserdisc, Disney’s iconic original variant of their production sleeping beauty logo ident is been rediscovered in its original, native 1:85:11 widescreen aspect ratio from a French dub 35mm 1990 film scan. The Little Mermaid was originally released on November 1989 in the US before additional releases nationwide afterwards. After making $84 million, Disney decided to finally release newly produced animated films on home video forgoing the tradition of rereleasing classic films to make revenue and it also become a major success on VHS and laserdisc. It was at one point one of the highest selling home media releases at that point , surpassing Pinocchio, before being surpassed by Aladdin and to this day The Lion King. The Little Mermaid is commonly referred as the return of form to Disney by starting a Renaissance and marked one of the best animations since Snow White.
The Little mermaid was re-released in theaters and home media with newly mixed audio presentations, remastered visuals including updated color correction, digitize noise reduction and all others. The original variant of Disney’s logo has been replaced by later iterations in 1997, 1999, 2006, 2011, and 2019. The original variant was exclusive in the 1990 4:3 pan and scan VHS and laserdisc, as it by the way the only legal way to watch the film in its original print from start to finish and laserdisc but the widescreen format for the original theatrical scan has never been seen the light of day in any version of the film from start to end until now.
For the movie 35mm scan as a whole, it was a French fellow But for whatever reason the unnamed scanner added ai upscaling, which is troubling.
Despite the odd ai upscaling seen in some areas, it’s not terrible. French dub mov and mp4, two versions of the English one. https://gofile.io/d/RZiv1R
Comment "!FOUND!" if your media is found in the comments, in doing so this will lock the post and flair it as being found.
Please include the following in your post;
An explanation of the media, and the name.
How it is lost.
What research has already been done.
A conclusion as to the current situation as of posting.
We are not here to help you find something (r/helpmefind), to name something (r/tipofmytongue), or help you pirate something.
-
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Cool, not sure what I'm looking at but cool. Love a good home done scan
Yes I am not sure what has been discovered either.
It’s the original release and it has a detail that was mistaken as an erection
https://preview.redd.it/gw2wbawxv59g1.jpeg?width=1665&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cfb0ba23cf67b4de6bb3f195adddd2247e165221
https://gofile.io/d/RZiv1R
There is also a feature in one of the characters that was misinterpreted as an erection
https://preview.redd.it/tbz8tm70w59g1.jpeg?width=1665&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8c37a0da00ca420402da198cafa531291ba5f599
https://gofile.io/d/RZiv1R
It's worth noting that this is 1.85:1 aspect ratio as theatrical movies generally are in that radio or the wider, skinnier 2.39:1 ratio. These are known as flat or scope respectfully, with scope using an anamorphic lens to fit a wider picture within a film cell that is the same width (22mm, with the remaining 13mm consisting of sprocket holes to propel the film through the projector and optical soundtracks which are read by lasers).
Thank you for pointing it out
Thank you so much! I've been looking all over for these ever since I learned of them. AI upscale or not, I'm glad I found them!
And this
https://preview.redd.it/b33sga10269g1.jpeg?width=1665&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1974e8d7d2f8fb2df2917ec660e632173be7b920
I would not consider "I did a google search of "X" film on 35mm and I can't find it, therefore lost media" lost media, I would consider a film lost media when not a single film archive or private individual has a copy of a film. I can assure you that any film that did moderately well at the box office still has dozends of prints around. There's many FB groups of people selling super 8, 16mm and 35mm full feature films in any language you can imagine.
What's your point, though? Until someone actually tracks one down and confirms its existence, it's lost
It might not be extremely difficult to do, but judging by OP's writeup, it seems like it took a while to pull this off and someone has to go out there and do the work in the first place for us to have it
I'm still not going to consider something lost if it's not avaliable by a google search. The film community is whole different bubble outside of the lost media community. Also OP's writeup boils down to "this thing that was avaliable on 4:3 is now in 16:9!!" how is that even lost media? the media already exists.
I mean, if finding additional filmed content we didn't have access to doesn't count, then you can absolutely discard stuff like lostwave from the lost media umbrella because we already have the media in question
At the end of the day, this stuff has so much overlap and is so subjective with regards to who wants/likes it that it's pointless to police it so much
That's actually my view on that as well. If a piece of media is available but the name or author is unknown then its not lost media, its lost information. Is like that recent video of blameitonjeorge were he label lost people as lost media.
https://preview.redd.it/4ga9y6j5w59g1.jpeg?width=1665&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d0aa281ed6f6f2674356f17f61073226368f222f
There is also a feature in one of the characters that was misinterpreted as an erection
https://preview.redd.it/3zwrbjy2w59g1.jpeg?width=1665&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=e051e1bffa38f5a1eb7708cad54a6fa7ad8813cc
https://preview.redd.it/qkucq1b1w59g1.jpeg?width=1665&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a4fda5eab6ca9b5d4bed3e05417988cb31179392
[deleted]
Read the room, nobody cares.
Sooo you can now see the extra bits of absolutely nothing that were previously cut off the sides to make it fit in 4:3? This has gotta be some sort of record for longest thing I’ve read hyping up something completely stupid.
I think this subreddit has a minimum character count to post
Why do actual lost media finds get the rudest comments here? It might not be super earthshattering, but it's worth noting when something like this is found - we didn't have the original print of a very famous movie until now
Idk they don’t care about any lost media
https://gofile.io/d/RZiv1R
https://preview.redd.it/k4dkvfx6w59g1.jpeg?width=1665&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3d063fef439b9571252fa2acf20238832f350cfc
…is it different because the castle doesn’t look symmetrical?
https://gofile.io/d/RZiv1R
https://preview.redd.it/stej8xpm269g1.jpeg?width=1665&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=ea3bea19ac033d7b27008baf7f38d4ecc4e80e73