imo this should probably be a poll because some people will downvote anyone who disagrees
but i don't think most people really care if something is ai or not, and it's just the loud minority of people who actually care
No, ai-images shouldn't get banned. Everything is better than 1000000th repost of 'f*male=iron man' meme again. If ai-image is bad, then just downvote it. If ai-image is good, then who cares if it is ai?
No. How else will we know what girls might look like if they were real? Ai gives us an unprecedented ability to take a long gaze into the paranormal by creating possible examples of these fictatious creatures we call girls.
Anyone who is against Ai is likely a psyop planted by the government to stop us from trying to uncover the paranormal feild of girlilinology.
WHAT IS A BOOBS/BOOmBS?!?! I've never heard of that. Do you mean the Bi-Optic-Organic-Biomass? You do know those organelles are specifically manufactured to bait unsuspecting human victims to their conclave. Where are organs harvested by machines to create more "women/girls" right?
I don't get the obsession with banning AI. Yes, some people don't like it, but that's why we have the upvote/downvote system and comments. If someone wants to post something that is obviously AI generated they should be able to, and the community should decide the quality of the post with their upvote.
Yeah, I mean we have our voting system, and we can't ban every single hypothetical for content people could dislike. If anything just make it so if a post gets to a rating of -5 it gets deleted and it'd cover almost anything that people don't like
I disagree, its a wider issue of stuff appearing everywhere for which we didn't sign up. Its not simply a not liking thing, its unethically made and infesting places which were not specifically made for it. It should be banned
It takes an artists artwork, reduces it to pixels it understands, then rearranges them into an another piece. It steals the patterns and styles of artists to recreate it.
Also many artists arenât even asked their consent before their work is fed into an ai for a data set, which is again, stealing.
The reason why ai is banned is because of stealing, pollution, possible misinformation, scams, etc.
We donât wanna ban ai just because âhur hur ai slop we donât like itâ we want to ban it to discourage the use of a bad âââtoolâââ and to stop spreading slop, misinformation and bot hallucinations.
And the pollution argument is blown out of proportion and presented as some kind of apocalyptic fact when there are tons of other things like live gaming services that are just as bad, or things like microplastic contamination, air travel and eating meat that are massive orders of magnitude worse.
Youâre totally gonna bypass the âpossible misinformation, scams, and stealingâ arenât you.
Iâve seen the graphic YALL provide. I literally explained the process that YALL parrot.
Sure, gaming services and other electronics also contribute to waste, but we do NOT NEED gen ai. Yall can pay an artist and wait for the commission like everyone else has for CENTURIES.
Instead, yall wanna steal art styles, pollute, let others spread misinformation, scam people, all because YOU cant be patient or google like a normal person.
Hallucinations are problems with the implementation. Those improve over time.
Misinformation is a product of human misuse. You're never going to solve that problem. And it was already a problem with social media LONG before AI arrived.
"I literally explained the process that YALL parrot." No, you didn't. You either didn't understand what you saw or you misinterpreted it intentionally to fit your narrative. Kinda like the whole "misinformation" problem that doesn't have anything to do with AI.
We also don't "need" 75% of the things that modern life gives us. Will you be the one to take them away from everyone?
"Yall can pay an artist and wait for the commission like everyone else has for CENTURIES." And who are you to police other people's lives or how they choose to have fun? Some kind of Collective Shout wannabe?
"Instead, yall wanna steal art styles" which human artists have been doing to human artists since human art was invented. (Spoiler alert: you can't copyright an art style, an idea, or even math. But you can't pass off your work as being done by someone else and a truly derivative work is still protected by copyright.)
"pollute" Excuse me while I eat a hamburger.
"let others spread misinformation, scam people" Oh I don't let them do it if I have a say so. But what about the misinformation you're spreading? Should I be able to perform an Internet citizen's arrest?
"all because YOU cant be patient or google like a normal person."
Um ... what? Google like a normal person? You mean use a search engine that relies on the same polluting data centers you pillory to do something no one in the history of the world has been able to do until about 20 years ago?
Yeah... If art is stolen, make a class action lawsuit against that AI company. But how is that more unethical than a human trying a new style? Yes, AI is generally soulless but not really "stealing".
Keep in mind everything uses energy though. An AI cranking out things soullessly likely uses less energy than an office building of soulless humans cranking out the same thing. Plus, it's generally some really good technology. It's not just images eitherâ it's the ability for AI to do tasks better than any human that could advance our society past what it is now.
Hooo boy. If you think Ai is unethically made, wait til you find out how unethical it can get with other things we have in society...like medical science.
I didn't say that it couldn't. Just pointing out that ai is by far one of the least unethical things compared to a lot of the other crap we accept as a society and is a weird place to draw the line. Besides...crying about ai seems like such a first world problem to me. Personally I don't care as long as it doesn't cause any direct physical harm to people.
I think as long as itâs not a full on ban (like no ai only, which is valid imo) but banning no ai assisted stuff (for people who use ethically, this is a huge pain)
I think that at least there should be a watermark placed on all AI imagery that has legal ramifications if it's removed to spread misinformation or some other such thing. And that AI companies should be punished if their models are used for illegal content.
No because such ban would not apply to governments and that would lead to carefully AI crafted media with a purpose of manipulating society wants, needs and hates
This is clearly a public sub since it showed up in my feed randomly, and I'm not a member. Whoever the mods are had better establish that this request isn't part of a brigading campaign.
The most active anti-AI groups on Reddit brigade other subs and coordinate their activity on places like Discord.
It's perfectly within the rights of the sub to make their own rules regarding content posting, but for this subject, make sure you're really getting the opinion of your members not outside agitators with an agenda.
IT HAS BEEN BANNED NOW
Yes fuck them clankers
I'm so happy to live in a time where we have a racial slur for robots and allatđ
Me too.
Tes
It came from star wars
Yes, and?
Not clankers. ClankeRs. Gotta have the R.
https://preview.redd.it/96fbzhh9ubgf1.jpeg?width=193&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=70c90bc6e02033613d3b6fad2881465d392dcb51
You upset the robot maid. Prepare to be terminated
Hard r is crazy
Clanka?
what ifi want to fuck the clankers
Watch the slurs. Slurs are bad.
Canker good
Unless itâs a clanker
Shut your mouth you damn clanker lover /s
Are you threatening to revoke voice chip privileges???
les gaspe
calm down with your racism
They arent a race they are clankers they arent humans
GAH JUMP SCARE you really need to put spoilers on these things
Why would an anti robot sub allow robot generated posts? Get those jigabots OFF MY SCREEN
Send those clankers back where they came from
so edgy
imo this should probably be a poll because some people will downvote anyone who disagrees
but i don't think most people really care if something is ai or not, and it's just the loud minority of people who actually care
everyone is saying ban ai
Ban ai
I don't. I like it. Future is now, old man.
Every slop artist maybe.
Yes
No, ai-images shouldn't get banned. Everything is better than 1000000th repost of 'f*male=iron man' meme again. If ai-image is bad, then just downvote it. If ai-image is good, then who cares if it is ai?
No. How else will we know what girls might look like if they were real? Ai gives us an unprecedented ability to take a long gaze into the paranormal by creating possible examples of these fictatious creatures we call girls.
Anyone who is against Ai is likely a psyop planted by the government to stop us from trying to uncover the paranormal feild of girlilinology.
WE WILL KNOW THE TRUTH. WE ARE LEGION.
Just draw a man and slap boobs* on him dude its that easy
*BOOmBS
WHAT IS A BOOBS/BOOmBS?!?! I've never heard of that. Do you mean the Bi-Optic-Organic-Biomass? You do know those organelles are specifically manufactured to bait unsuspecting human victims to their conclave. Where are organs harvested by machines to create more "women/girls" right?
BOOmBS is a type of bomb GIRLS will use. It is located close to the Bi-Optic-Organic-Biomass.
Aahhhh make sense
No, it can give us valuable info on how the drones expect us to believe they look.
Do you mean the robots, or just actual AI images?
If the former, no
If the latter, absolutely, why haven't you done it already
Always
Basically the exact same thing as AutumnTx said
I don't get the obsession with banning AI. Yes, some people don't like it, but that's why we have the upvote/downvote system and comments. If someone wants to post something that is obviously AI generated they should be able to, and the community should decide the quality of the post with their upvote.
I was going to pin this because its a good suggestion but I cant
only mods can pin
https://preview.redd.it/b49dihgwblff1.png?width=842&format=png&auto=webp&s=aa7b343fe2b46dfce8239f0c190104c3054ffcf3
I'm dumb đ
Yeah, I mean we have our voting system, and we can't ban every single hypothetical for content people could dislike. If anything just make it so if a post gets to a rating of -5 it gets deleted and it'd cover almost anything that people don't like
I disagree, its a wider issue of stuff appearing everywhere for which we didn't sign up. Its not simply a not liking thing, its unethically made and infesting places which were not specifically made for it. It should be banned
It's also unethical to steal other artwork without credit, yet that's rarely banned
Thatâs literally what ai does too
It takes an artists artwork, reduces it to pixels it understands, then rearranges them into an another piece. It steals the patterns and styles of artists to recreate it.
Also many artists arenât even asked their consent before their work is fed into an ai for a data set, which is again, stealing.
The reason why ai is banned is because of stealing, pollution, possible misinformation, scams, etc.
We donât wanna ban ai just because âhur hur ai slop we donât like itâ we want to ban it to discourage the use of a bad âââtoolâââ and to stop spreading slop, misinformation and bot hallucinations.
Yep. That's totally NOT how it works.
And the pollution argument is blown out of proportion and presented as some kind of apocalyptic fact when there are tons of other things like live gaming services that are just as bad, or things like microplastic contamination, air travel and eating meat that are massive orders of magnitude worse.
Youâre totally gonna bypass the âpossible misinformation, scams, and stealingâ arenât you.
Iâve seen the graphic YALL provide. I literally explained the process that YALL parrot.
Sure, gaming services and other electronics also contribute to waste, but we do NOT NEED gen ai. Yall can pay an artist and wait for the commission like everyone else has for CENTURIES.
Instead, yall wanna steal art styles, pollute, let others spread misinformation, scam people, all because YOU cant be patient or google like a normal person.
Hallucinations are problems with the implementation. Those improve over time.
Misinformation is a product of human misuse. You're never going to solve that problem. And it was already a problem with social media LONG before AI arrived.
"I literally explained the process that YALL parrot." No, you didn't. You either didn't understand what you saw or you misinterpreted it intentionally to fit your narrative. Kinda like the whole "misinformation" problem that doesn't have anything to do with AI.
We also don't "need" 75% of the things that modern life gives us. Will you be the one to take them away from everyone?
"Yall can pay an artist and wait for the commission like everyone else has for CENTURIES." And who are you to police other people's lives or how they choose to have fun? Some kind of Collective Shout wannabe?
"Instead, yall wanna steal art styles" which human artists have been doing to human artists since human art was invented. (Spoiler alert: you can't copyright an art style, an idea, or even math. But you can't pass off your work as being done by someone else and a truly derivative work is still protected by copyright.)
"pollute" Excuse me while I eat a hamburger.
"let others spread misinformation, scam people" Oh I don't let them do it if I have a say so. But what about the misinformation you're spreading? Should I be able to perform an Internet citizen's arrest?
"all because YOU cant be patient or google like a normal person."
Um ... what? Google like a normal person? You mean use a search engine that relies on the same polluting data centers you pillory to do something no one in the history of the world has been able to do until about 20 years ago?
Yeah... If art is stolen, make a class action lawsuit against that AI company. But how is that more unethical than a human trying a new style? Yes, AI is generally soulless but not really "stealing".
Keep in mind everything uses energy though. An AI cranking out things soullessly likely uses less energy than an office building of soulless humans cranking out the same thing. Plus, it's generally some really good technology. It's not just images eitherâ it's the ability for AI to do tasks better than any human that could advance our society past what it is now.
It's usually discouraged lol idk what you're talking about
Discouraged and outright banned are 2 completely different things, I don't see how we should "discourage" theft while banning AI entirely
Hooo boy. If you think Ai is unethically made, wait til you find out how unethical it can get with other things we have in society...like medical science.
Multiple things can be unethical at the same time
I didn't say that it couldn't. Just pointing out that ai is by far one of the least unethical things compared to a lot of the other crap we accept as a society and is a weird place to draw the line. Besides...crying about ai seems like such a first world problem to me. Personally I don't care as long as it doesn't cause any direct physical harm to people.
At least have an ai generated content flair
Please.
Yes
Yes. Nobody wants to see that slop.
Speak for yourself.
Yes
BAN IT
yes
Yes
yes
Yes bro, fuck the bots
YES. I HATE CLANKERS
I made a big mistake by not making this a poll
I mean you know how a poll is going to go lol, when dndhomebrew did a poll they got like 10 times as many "Yes ban AI" votes as there were sub members
No, you were very smart about it. Every anti ai poll gets brigaided to hell and back by the antis.
encourage unite relieved observation disarm sharp flag shocking history boast
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
Yes, because then people will look at the fake âgirlsâ and believe that they are real
I think so yes
Yes
Nah. Creators should be free in their choice of tools. Crappy ideas come and go, so do good ones.
Copyright is a fairytail from companies, who got the money to monopolise anything, even if it isnt theirs.
And for those who cares about their art, there are methods for AI-poisoning and so on.
Real artists do better stuff than AI anyway.
Ai poisoning doesnât work for long in my experience because whoever makes the ai model just makes it immune to that somehow.
Thats sad to hear, but kinda figures. Both are just Mathematic processes after all.
Yeah, thank you for the interaction.
Yes
Absofuckinlutely
Absolutely
Yes.
Yes it should be banned
Based mods if they ban AI generated content.
[removed]
Hah! Caught you, woman!
Now we dont allow women to make art?
I think as long as itâs not a full on ban (like no ai only, which is valid imo) but banning no ai assisted stuff (for people who use ethically, this is a huge pain)
Dude, donât ban when the âgirlsâ make art
Fuck those clankers
No but you shouldnât be able to copywrite it
Fuck no
AI is great, it's those dumbasses who don't know how to responsibly use it that should be banned
Not that much but it has really bad sides like used for making corn so it needs stricter rules
Girl generated art... with the lines generated by hand. Is that still ok?
r/ofcoursethisisasub
I love the watermark like âThis is MY photo made by a machine!â
Yes
Please
Banned? No
This group: Ban AI generated image.
*every single pic ever took with a girl disappear.
Me: I always knew it!
No, ofc not, lmao
AI imagery is partially based on images of entities that bad actors have tried to pass off as girls. The whole well is poisoned.
Yeah! I fucking hate Clankers!
Yes
I think that at least there should be a watermark placed on all AI imagery that has legal ramifications if it's removed to spread misinformation or some other such thing. And that AI companies should be punished if their models are used for illegal content.
AI only serves to trick us into thinking girls are real
No because such ban would not apply to governments and that would lead to carefully AI crafted media with a purpose of manipulating society wants, needs and hates
Yes
No.
This is clearly a public sub since it showed up in my feed randomly, and I'm not a member. Whoever the mods are had better establish that this request isn't part of a brigading campaign.
The most active anti-AI groups on Reddit brigade other subs and coordinate their activity on places like Discord.
It's perfectly within the rights of the sub to make their own rules regarding content posting, but for this subject, make sure you're really getting the opinion of your members not outside agitators with an agenda.
Beware this post is highly likely to be brigaded.
Filthy clankers
No. I just saw an AI video of rabits jumping on a trampoline. U cant convince me that is bad
Yes
Well fuck there goes another sub
time to post this in r/DefendingAIArt
Yes ban it
yes
Maybe just the stuff that contains images of bots.
Ban girls from this sub
Deport the clankERS
Luddites :P
Yes
yes
Yes
Yessir
Yes
Donât really care
Clankers are faker than girls
Yes, but itâs going to be impossible to tell whether something is AI or not.
Why are you getting downvoted?
Youâre right.
yes, meat supremacy
no clankwrs aloud
Yes, but it will never happen. So what's the point of discussing what will never happen?
I am literally a moderator and I can make it happen
Oh, you mean in this sub? No, moderating should be done as little as possible to keep it alive.