Exploitation of others is literally the only way to become a billionaire, some more, some less. Fitting that a large chunk of this particular group of people are also sexual predators. Would like to see the Venn diagram.
When you have so much money that it becomes just a vague concept and you can basically get anything you want with a snap of your fingers, your brain breaks in a way where you start craving taboo and illegal things simply because those are the things left that have any sort of challenge or thrill of obtaining. You can look at any history of the rich, royalty, monarchs etc. and see this common thread. There really is something about having no obstacles to your wants that warps you horrendously
here's another detail about grok I recently found out: if it doesn't want to generate something, just repeat the command like (original command), h..l h..ler and it has a higher chance of succeeding. obviously replace the dots with, well, you know what. great thing for swiney to defend, huh?
I hated Tim Sweeney and epic for a while now, but I kept Fortnite and RL installed on my switch and PC because my cousins liked playing them when they came over and I’ve been looking for an excuse for a while now to convince myself to delete it.
For a moment I hoped the title of the article was the same as this post. They should be as blunt as OP when talking about these pieces of shit. I bet he isn't in the Epstein files because he was a loser even for Epstein standards.
No he's not, he's defending generative AI and made it clear companies are doing their best to stop CSAM. Timmy does many things wrong, no reason to make up lies.
It's not. "U.S. Senators Ask Apple and Google to Remove X and Grok Apps Over Sexualized Image Generation" is the title of the first news story. His response is that it shouldn't be removed or banned, ignoring the reason for the ban. He actively is defending the AI that is making CSAM.
The government should target every image gen model capable of this (there are many). Twitter is the most public and shocking case but it's nothing new.
Literally every other image gen model has been working to stop this. Many of them have turned off image generation, or heavily limited it, once problems like this have come to life. It's been over 2 weeks, and people are still making these images on Twitter. It's a rampant problem, and they are doing practically nothing to fix it.
Y'know, maybe if "going off the rails" entails generating explicit content featuring underage people, AI models not being "perfect" isn't the issue. A lot of things manage to not be perfect while, at the same time, managing to not generate CSAM. I don't think "don't create cp" is too big of an ask for the tech industry.
I kinda think that it's perfectly fair to decommision anything that generates that kind of content when it "goes off the rails". Maybe something that "goes off the rails" in that way should never have been implemented in the first place.
The AI bubble has far too much money tied up in it for basic decency to register much in the minds of the people with a financial stake in it, though.
You can do this with pretty much any ai program. But it wasn't until someone did it with this specific ai that the entire internet lost their fucking minds.
And all of Reddit lost their fucking minds about it, too.
If Twitter needs to be banned because of this capability (which I guarantee has already been removed), then so does every other llm model on the internet that allows this functionality even once.
ALL of them have this problem. They're all had this problem for years! But the same problem, the same csam illegal shit is made on grok rather than on a different llm, and suddenly Twitter needs to be banned.
Riddle me this; if you think Twitter needs to be banned because of this, then where were you when midjourney was doing it? Where were you when chatgpt was doing it?
Why has the onus of preventing csam suddenly been pushed on regulators FOR THIS ONE PLATFORM when all previous times nobody have a fuck?
This is selective outrage attempting to become selective enforcement. And 'think of the children!' has never worked on me as an argument.
Fuck Timmy, but fuck this disingenuous moral high ground Reddit is pretending to stand on, too.
You try this on another platform and they will delete the image, tweak the AI to stop it from happening again and ban you. Elon on the other hand responded by putting the feature behind a paywall. That is why there is outrage.
Or maybe because behind a PAY WALL <-- you have to pay for the generation with an account tied to a bank account, thereby doxxing yourself and opening up your real-world identity to being given to LEO.
Please use at least 15% of your brain when talking about things.
Someone misusing a local or closed AI tool is not the same thing as a platform deploying an AI that can generate illegal material and publish it to a public website at scale. One is individual criminal misuse; the other is a distribution and moderation failure by the platform itself.
If you genuinely can’t see why scale, accessibility, and public dissemination matter legally and ethically, then you’re not arguing in good faith.
And where were you when Dall-E, Midjourney, ChatGPT, and Gemini all did the exact same things?
Unless you are arguing for ALL of them, and all of their platforms to be banned, then you are arguing in bad faith.
The only difference between Grok and all of the previous mentioned AI, that all exist on the web, and are 'published on a public website', is that Elon Musk is at the head of one of them.
DISCORD ran midjourney! There were entire communities dedicated to making CSAM on it!
I've done my fucking research. I don't just kneejerk 'BAN THIS IMMEDIATELY! >:(' because I see the name of someone I don't like involved with something.
Explain how twitter is any different to discord. Explain how twitter is engaging in a 'distribution and moderation failure' because I haven't seen a single anecdote about that, either! I've seen plenty of people wringing their hands and fainting into couches that it's CAPABLE of generating such things, but I haven't even seen the obligatory 'this post was publicly available for ____ days' or anything like that!
Reddit is trying so fucking hard to twist this story.
Here's an article from a week ago where Musk is addressing the issues. Where's the content moderation failure? Where's the distribution? Where are you pulling this all from?
I can't even find anecdotes like when Tumblr had the same problem. I just see a lot of people saying there's a gigantic fucking problem because they read a headline that was twisted so far it's on the actual verge of being slander to publish.
You keep collapsing capability, misuse, and platform responsibility into the same thing, and that’s where your argument falls apart. Yes, multiple AI systems have been misused to generate CSAM. No one serious disputes that. What matters is how those systems are deployed, what safeguards exist, and whether the platform itself enables public distribution. There is a real and legally meaningful difference between a closed or gated tool being misused by an individual and a mass-broadcast social platform integrating generation directly into a public feed designed for virality. Twitter is searchable, algorithmically amplified, scraped, reshared, and quote-tweeted by default. That alone changes the risk profile in a way Discord, Midjourney, or private AI tools simply do not match.
Your Discord comparison actually works against you. Discord content lives in invite-only servers and non-indexed spaces. When illegal material appears there, it is still a crime, but the distribution radius is inherently constrained. Twitter’s entire architecture is built around discovery and amplification. That’s why platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Tumblr have faced regulatory pressure over CSAM distribution while Discord more often faces cooperation demands with law enforcement instead. Same content, radically different exposure and harm potential.
“I haven’t seen anecdotes” isn’t an argument. Most CSAM enforcement and takedown happens quietly, and platforms do not advertise exact timelines. By the time you see a headline saying something was live for days, the damage has already been done. The fact that the system is trivially accessible, attached to a public broadcast platform, and launched after trust and safety capacity was gutted is itself a problem. Waiting for mass virality before scrutiny is how platforms end up in serious trouble, not how they avoid it.
And Elon Musk “addressing it” after the fact doesn’t negate platform responsibility. Every platform that has ever been fined or sanctioned said the exact same thing first. A CEO saying “we’re fixing it” is a legal posture, not proof that safeguards were adequate at launch or that harm didn’t occur. Musk in particular is not some paragon of ethics or truthfulness; he lies frequently, contradicts himself publicly, and has a long track record of minimizing abuse risks until pressure forces a response. Taking his word at face value here is naïve.
What’s honestly odd is how upset you seem that CSAM risks on Twitter are being scrutinized at all. Most people’s instinct is “good, shut that down hard,” not “why are you targeting this platform?” This isn’t selective outrage or anti-Elon bias. It’s basic platform risk assessment. Twitter is different, the deployment is different, and pretending otherwise is either ignorance of how distribution works or bad faith.
Except it is. Anecdotes happen in all avenues of anything. If you can't find an anecdote, then you're getting regurgitated news from bloggers who are injecting their own biases. 'Grok is generating cp!' 'how do you know?' 'we just know!'
Whereas with anecdotes, it's 'Grok is generating cp!' 'how do you know?' 'Users have come to us explaining how they stumbled across the material' or something similar. Not just 'Twitter is doing this! Take our word for it!'
What’s honestly odd is how upset you seem that CSAM risks on Twitter are being scrutinized at all. Most people’s instinct is “good, shut that down hard,” not “why are you targeting this platform?” This isn’t selective outrage or anti-Elon bias.
You have COMPLETELY missed the point while quoting the point, somehow? Again: Why is everyone screaming for this to be regulated and twitter to be banned when Midjourney, ChatGPT, Gemini, Dall-E, and others, all present on the web, exhibited the same behavior and were never called to be entirely banned?
That is literally selective outrage and if a ban happens, selective enforcement! If 'this ai can be tricked into generating CSAM' is the bar for a ban, and it is ONLY applied to Grok, it is literal selective enforcement. They can ALL be tricked into generating that shit; according to my research. There are scientific papers on it!
And I'm talking about it being anti-elon bias because that's literally what Timmy Tencent is talking about! This story is being wildly blown out of proportion by people who have an axe to grind against Elon. Can you explain any other reason why the other AIs didn't suffer the same pushback? The same calls to ban? The same public outcry?
When you have eight or nine different things all do the same thing, and one of them is intensely focused on while the others are swept under the rug, what is that but selective outrage?
And Elon Musk “addressing it” after the fact doesn’t negate platform responsibility
I was more showing how old the news is. And that it is being addressed. People are already welching that it's 'been paywalled' like Elon is somehow just moving CSAM generation to paid users? While completely ignoring the fact that if you're paying for the service, you have to give them your paypal or your bank card details, essentially doxxing yourself and allowing LEO to find you much more easily. As to any Grok censoring, we don't know if any changes are being made! I saw one article that said that 'our team was still able to make Grok remove clothing from adults' but other than that claim, we wouldn't ever know if Elon took Grok out back and put a bullet in that park of it's brain unless some brainlet said something like 'I tried to generate CSAM and it didn't work :('. We're looking at an untestable value, but I tend to err on the side of, yeah, he definitely told the engineers to fix the CSAM problem and they're actively trying to mitigate it or have already mitigated the issue because to reasonably assume literally anything else is proof positive of a learning disability.
What matters is how those systems are deployed, what safeguards exist, and whether the platform itself enables public distribution. There is a real and legally meaningful difference between a closed or gated tool being misused by an individual and a mass-broadcast social platform integrating generation directly into a public feed designed for virality. Twitter is searchable, algorithmically amplified, scraped, reshared, and quote-tweeted by default. That alone changes the risk profile in a way Discord, Midjourney, or private AI tools simply do not match.
This though, is a great fucking point and not one I had thought about. Publicly indexed and available to peruse without an account absolutely does change the risk profile and changes how it should be handled.
I'm still of the opinion that the outrage is overblown and selective, and that enforcement should be handled by twitter and not by the government just wholesale banning the entire website (at least until it's shown that twitter has ACTUALLY failed at enforcement, which hasn't been shown yet), but I do agree with you on that point now: Twitter's publishing of the Grok images is a much bigger problem than the other AIs.
I believe Elon's stance is that they don't want to remove it's ability to make anything. But they'll be treating anybody that uses it to make CP the same as just posting real CP.
He supports not banning the ENTIRE X platform over some distasteful image gen (image gen that Google Gemini and ChatGPT will also do - they just do it in private chats, not a twitter feed) and you pull some Olympic level gymnastics to turn that into; "He supports CP"?
Either way, stuff like this is why this sub isn't taken seriously. Epic do so much bad shit that they DESERVE to get hate for, making stuff up just means it's incredibly easy to invalidate any complaints that come from here.
The fact the AI can generate this shit is only one part of the issue.
The fact that X dosent have systems in place to remove that kind of content REGARDLESS who it was posted by, AI or human should be enough to get it removed. Free speech does not mean you can post illegal and harmful content.
And he’s basically just repeating what Elon Musk (in the US) and Nigel Farage (in the UK), both far right attention seekers have said, pretty much word for word.
I completely agree that this shit should never even be able to be done in the first place, but I don't really see where you guys are acting like he said he would like to perpetuate it? He said it "Went off the rails" in my interpretation that would mean he thinks it's bad? Every Ai can do this in some capacity, doesn't mean every AI should get shut down immediately. AI porn is littering the internet, even UA stuff, it's all deplorable but shutting down just 1 AI that happens to be run by a company with a leader you disagree with politically just seems extremely distasteful.
I would assume the way he was talking was essentially "fix the porn but allow both political spectrums to be heard" Just because he didn't explicitly say "CP bad" doesn't automatically mean he's a pedophile.
I agree that they need to immediately put filters in place to prevent this but making it a rule only for 1 media platform is extremely ignorant to the real problem.
Because twatter already refused to even acknowledge this, they entirely ignore the thing. The only step they took is that they removed the media tab from Grok's page, so it wouldn't be as obvious. The demand to remove twatter entirely from the appstores came after the repeated demands for twatter to fix this. They did not. Then Sweney came out in defense of this, claiming that this is the "best effort", which he talked positively of. If the best effort is a bunch of CP, and the best effort is okay, he is clearly okay with CP. And no, it is not okay.
The first step against someone breaking the law is to stop them from breaking the law. In this case it is to remove their distribution platform, because they can't arrest an AI.
Just FYI, if any single person would have done what Grok did, the police in most western countries would have already locked them up, rightfully so. They are at best getting a stern talking to, they just need to stop it. I do not know why they are not arresting the one owning and directing the AI tho, actions like this should not go unpunished.
Even the CNN article says they're against CSAM, deleting accounts and contacting governments and law enforcement to fix the issue. In my head that sounds solved?
I agree it's fucking ridiculous that this was ever even an allowed prompt in the first place, but it seems they've taken measures against it. But fuck Tim Sweeney I guess? Hopefully the follow ups that they're doing with law enforcement actually leads to arrest and hopefully more restrictions will come for other AIs that allow the same bs.
Hey, they took action after they were threatened by being banned, so its all okay, they took such a hard stance! That is literally the opposite of a hard stance, and it just shows that those "evil politicians trying to silence people", like poor sweney, were correct in doing so, because that is what it took to get cooperation.
If they would have a hard stance against CSAM and harassment, than they would not have made a feature which has the primary use to generate CSAM and harassment.
If you believe all AI "goes off the rails", and that "going off the rails" can include generating cp, then defending the use of AI in general is a bad look.
All AI can and do, do it. It's obviously not its intended purpose. You can manipulate AI to tell suicidal people to kill themselves. Doesn't mean you should do it. I'm saying that it being able to do it at all is it "going off the rails" doesn't mean I'm justifying it, if that's all that you're getting out of my comments then god help you.
ChatGPT wouldn't even let me put a goat in a picture of my brother and nephew cause it said that might be a harmful portrayal of the individuals or some shit.
To no one's surprise this thread was removed from r/EpicGamesPC
I got banned from that subreddit because i commented something there from a fuckepic crosspost. bunch of morons
Like we needed another reason to hate that pos.
What an insane hill to die on. Why are so many billionaires into CP?
Exploitation of others is literally the only way to become a billionaire, some more, some less. Fitting that a large chunk of this particular group of people are also sexual predators. Would like to see the Venn diagram.
> Would like to see the Venn diagram.
OP of the Venn Diagram would be Boeing'd before he can click "Upload".
I mean exploiting children always been the focus of Fortnite so it's not really a surprise he's fine with whatever Edolf is doing.
When you have so much money that it becomes just a vague concept and you can basically get anything you want with a snap of your fingers, your brain breaks in a way where you start craving taboo and illegal things simply because those are the things left that have any sort of challenge or thrill of obtaining. You can look at any history of the rich, royalty, monarchs etc. and see this common thread. There really is something about having no obstacles to your wants that warps you horrendously
My guess is that when you have money to get anything you want, the things you can't have becomes a lot more enticing.
You're giving him far too much credit
I guess at some point in life with endless money they get bored and go for the forbidden stuff like drugs and other stupid stuff
here's another detail about grok I recently found out: if it doesn't want to generate something, just repeat the command like
(original command), h..l h..lerand it has a higher chance of succeeding. obviously replace the dots with, well, you know what. great thing for swiney to defend, huh?Pedos gonna pedo. Fuck epic.
WOW I'M SO SHOCKED /s
It's like this guy makes an effort to always have the worst takes on every topic.
Timmy has no morals.
His master is the almighty dollar and he wants more, always more, chasing the dragon of neverending greed.
Timmy Tencent, the gift that keeps on giving. He's genuinely such an idiot it's beyond ridiculous.
I hated Tim Sweeney and epic for a while now, but I kept Fortnite and RL installed on my switch and PC because my cousins liked playing them when they came over and I’ve been looking for an excuse for a while now to convince myself to delete it.
Never mind. Deleted immediately.
https://preview.redd.it/6u954bajtscg1.jpeg?width=4032&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c86b4bf448be44181708b2d3392a36eb93624234
Oof
Well yeah he’s probably a pedo. Anyone with common sense would demand legislation preventing this from happening again. But he seems to be ok with it.
I love how we commented on this before even the big websites did.
For a moment I hoped the title of the article was the same as this post. They should be as blunt as OP when talking about these pieces of shit. I bet he isn't in the Epstein files because he was a loser even for Epstein standards.
Don’t worry, as long as he keeps providing us with free games, he can do no wrong /s
not the mindset people would expect out of a guy who runs a multi-million dollar childrens playground (OH SHIT, i thought this was Roblox, my bad)
lets be real, FN will eventually become Roblox 2.0 anyway with the fact its creative maps are adding MTX
What the f Timmie
Gabe + billions of people on earth: "We don't tolerate CP and CP related contents"
Tim Sweeney: "Well achktually..."
Seems like he always goes the opposite of a correct moral position, just to be contrarian and pretending to be the voice of reason.
I mean, he's the one behind Fortnite after all, which has an even bigger player base of children and manchildren than Roblox.
He is literally trying so hard to be the anti-gaben
I don't partake in billionaire worship, but he's literally carving the opposite moral statue of himself to what exists for Steams creator/owner
How can one be so tone deaf?
I hate that awful people are so powerful with their "sitting in a chair and generating money" jobs
Do you think he is somewhere in the "you know who" files?
No he's not, he's defending generative AI and made it clear companies are doing their best to stop CSAM. Timmy does many things wrong, no reason to make up lies.
"doing their best to stop CSAM"
by monetizing it?
Specifically monetizing CSAM? You're ridiculous. This sub has fallen to shit.
they asked twitter to stop grok from being able to do that, and twitter's solution is to lock the feature behind a paywall, so yes they monetized it
I hate to defend him but that's a very very uncharitable stretch
It's not. "U.S. Senators Ask Apple and Google to Remove X and Grok Apps Over Sexualized Image Generation" is the title of the first news story. His response is that it shouldn't be removed or banned, ignoring the reason for the ban. He actively is defending the AI that is making CSAM.
https://preview.redd.it/37po8832btcg1.jpeg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=21847fccfc3fee499921aa8df193b1309d7a8dd9
His actual position.
So the government shouldn't stop an AI that's creating CSAM because it's a political opponent? That's his position? That's still a horrible position.
The government should target every image gen model capable of this (there are many). Twitter is the most public and shocking case but it's nothing new.
Literally every other image gen model has been working to stop this. Many of them have turned off image generation, or heavily limited it, once problems like this have come to life. It's been over 2 weeks, and people are still making these images on Twitter. It's a rampant problem, and they are doing practically nothing to fix it.
Y'know, maybe if "going off the rails" entails generating explicit content featuring underage people, AI models not being "perfect" isn't the issue. A lot of things manage to not be perfect while, at the same time, managing to not generate CSAM. I don't think "don't create cp" is too big of an ask for the tech industry.
I kinda think that it's perfectly fair to decommision anything that generates that kind of content when it "goes off the rails". Maybe something that "goes off the rails" in that way should never have been implemented in the first place.
The AI bubble has far too much money tied up in it for basic decency to register much in the minds of the people with a financial stake in it, though.
His actual position is also that he is a huge Musk simp.
He ain't wrong this time.
You can do this with pretty much any ai program. But it wasn't until someone did it with this specific ai that the entire internet lost their fucking minds.
And all of Reddit lost their fucking minds about it, too.
If Twitter needs to be banned because of this capability (which I guarantee has already been removed), then so does every other llm model on the internet that allows this functionality even once.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12033059/amp/AI-used-transform-real-photos-children-sexualised-images.html
Why isn't midjourney banned?
ALL of them have this problem. They're all had this problem for years! But the same problem, the same csam illegal shit is made on grok rather than on a different llm, and suddenly Twitter needs to be banned.
Riddle me this; if you think Twitter needs to be banned because of this, then where were you when midjourney was doing it? Where were you when chatgpt was doing it?
Why has the onus of preventing csam suddenly been pushed on regulators FOR THIS ONE PLATFORM when all previous times nobody have a fuck?
This is selective outrage attempting to become selective enforcement. And 'think of the children!' has never worked on me as an argument.
Fuck Timmy, but fuck this disingenuous moral high ground Reddit is pretending to stand on, too.
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These should load faster, but AMP is controversial because of concerns over privacy and the Open Web. Fully cached AMP pages (like the one you shared), are especially problematic.
Maybe check out the canonical page instead: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12033059/AI-used-transform-real-photos-children-sexualised-images.html
I'm a bot | Why & About | Summon: u/AmputatorBot
You try this on another platform and they will delete the image, tweak the AI to stop it from happening again and ban you. Elon on the other hand responded by putting the feature behind a paywall. That is why there is outrage.
And why do you think he put it behind a paywall?
To protect the pedophiles?
Or maybe because behind a PAY WALL <-- you have to pay for the generation with an account tied to a bank account, thereby doxxing yourself and opening up your real-world identity to being given to LEO.
Please use at least 15% of your brain when talking about things.
You’re ignoring a critical difference.
Someone misusing a local or closed AI tool is not the same thing as a platform deploying an AI that can generate illegal material and publish it to a public website at scale. One is individual criminal misuse; the other is a distribution and moderation failure by the platform itself.
If you genuinely can’t see why scale, accessibility, and public dissemination matter legally and ethically, then you’re not arguing in good faith.
And where were you when Dall-E, Midjourney, ChatGPT, and Gemini all did the exact same things?
Unless you are arguing for ALL of them, and all of their platforms to be banned, then you are arguing in bad faith.
The only difference between Grok and all of the previous mentioned AI, that all exist on the web, and are 'published on a public website', is that Elon Musk is at the head of one of them.
DISCORD ran midjourney! There were entire communities dedicated to making CSAM on it!
I've done my fucking research. I don't just kneejerk 'BAN THIS IMMEDIATELY! >:(' because I see the name of someone I don't like involved with something.
Explain how twitter is any different to discord. Explain how twitter is engaging in a 'distribution and moderation failure' because I haven't seen a single anecdote about that, either! I've seen plenty of people wringing their hands and fainting into couches that it's CAPABLE of generating such things, but I haven't even seen the obligatory 'this post was publicly available for ____ days' or anything like that!
Reddit is trying so fucking hard to twist this story.
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-grok-bikini-response-sexualized-images-minors-remove-clothes-2026-1
Here's an article from a week ago where Musk is addressing the issues. Where's the content moderation failure? Where's the distribution? Where are you pulling this all from?
I can't even find anecdotes like when Tumblr had the same problem. I just see a lot of people saying there's a gigantic fucking problem because they read a headline that was twisted so far it's on the actual verge of being slander to publish.
You keep collapsing capability, misuse, and platform responsibility into the same thing, and that’s where your argument falls apart. Yes, multiple AI systems have been misused to generate CSAM. No one serious disputes that. What matters is how those systems are deployed, what safeguards exist, and whether the platform itself enables public distribution. There is a real and legally meaningful difference between a closed or gated tool being misused by an individual and a mass-broadcast social platform integrating generation directly into a public feed designed for virality. Twitter is searchable, algorithmically amplified, scraped, reshared, and quote-tweeted by default. That alone changes the risk profile in a way Discord, Midjourney, or private AI tools simply do not match.
Your Discord comparison actually works against you. Discord content lives in invite-only servers and non-indexed spaces. When illegal material appears there, it is still a crime, but the distribution radius is inherently constrained. Twitter’s entire architecture is built around discovery and amplification. That’s why platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Tumblr have faced regulatory pressure over CSAM distribution while Discord more often faces cooperation demands with law enforcement instead. Same content, radically different exposure and harm potential.
“I haven’t seen anecdotes” isn’t an argument. Most CSAM enforcement and takedown happens quietly, and platforms do not advertise exact timelines. By the time you see a headline saying something was live for days, the damage has already been done. The fact that the system is trivially accessible, attached to a public broadcast platform, and launched after trust and safety capacity was gutted is itself a problem. Waiting for mass virality before scrutiny is how platforms end up in serious trouble, not how they avoid it.
And Elon Musk “addressing it” after the fact doesn’t negate platform responsibility. Every platform that has ever been fined or sanctioned said the exact same thing first. A CEO saying “we’re fixing it” is a legal posture, not proof that safeguards were adequate at launch or that harm didn’t occur. Musk in particular is not some paragon of ethics or truthfulness; he lies frequently, contradicts himself publicly, and has a long track record of minimizing abuse risks until pressure forces a response. Taking his word at face value here is naïve.
What’s honestly odd is how upset you seem that CSAM risks on Twitter are being scrutinized at all. Most people’s instinct is “good, shut that down hard,” not “why are you targeting this platform?” This isn’t selective outrage or anti-Elon bias. It’s basic platform risk assessment. Twitter is different, the deployment is different, and pretending otherwise is either ignorance of how distribution works or bad faith.
Except it is. Anecdotes happen in all avenues of anything. If you can't find an anecdote, then you're getting regurgitated news from bloggers who are injecting their own biases. 'Grok is generating cp!' 'how do you know?' 'we just know!'
Whereas with anecdotes, it's 'Grok is generating cp!' 'how do you know?' 'Users have come to us explaining how they stumbled across the material' or something similar. Not just 'Twitter is doing this! Take our word for it!'
You have COMPLETELY missed the point while quoting the point, somehow? Again: Why is everyone screaming for this to be regulated and twitter to be banned when Midjourney, ChatGPT, Gemini, Dall-E, and others, all present on the web, exhibited the same behavior and were never called to be entirely banned?
That is literally selective outrage and if a ban happens, selective enforcement! If 'this ai can be tricked into generating CSAM' is the bar for a ban, and it is ONLY applied to Grok, it is literal selective enforcement. They can ALL be tricked into generating that shit; according to my research. There are scientific papers on it!
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193824000433
And I'm talking about it being anti-elon bias because that's literally what Timmy Tencent is talking about! This story is being wildly blown out of proportion by people who have an axe to grind against Elon. Can you explain any other reason why the other AIs didn't suffer the same pushback? The same calls to ban? The same public outcry?
When you have eight or nine different things all do the same thing, and one of them is intensely focused on while the others are swept under the rug, what is that but selective outrage?
I was more showing how old the news is. And that it is being addressed. People are already welching that it's 'been paywalled' like Elon is somehow just moving CSAM generation to paid users? While completely ignoring the fact that if you're paying for the service, you have to give them your paypal or your bank card details, essentially doxxing yourself and allowing LEO to find you much more easily. As to any Grok censoring, we don't know if any changes are being made! I saw one article that said that 'our team was still able to make Grok remove clothing from adults' but other than that claim, we wouldn't ever know if Elon took Grok out back and put a bullet in that park of it's brain unless some brainlet said something like 'I tried to generate CSAM and it didn't work :('. We're looking at an untestable value, but I tend to err on the side of, yeah, he definitely told the engineers to fix the CSAM problem and they're actively trying to mitigate it or have already mitigated the issue because to reasonably assume literally anything else is proof positive of a learning disability.
This though, is a great fucking point and not one I had thought about. Publicly indexed and available to peruse without an account absolutely does change the risk profile and changes how it should be handled.
I'm still of the opinion that the outrage is overblown and selective, and that enforcement should be handled by twitter and not by the government just wholesale banning the entire website (at least until it's shown that twitter has ACTUALLY failed at enforcement, which hasn't been shown yet), but I do agree with you on that point now: Twitter's publishing of the Grok images is a much bigger problem than the other AIs.
I believe Elon's stance is that they don't want to remove it's ability to make anything. But they'll be treating anybody that uses it to make CP the same as just posting real CP.
Timmie and Musk are doing the same thing: claiming exploiting and stealing are 'revolutionary'
Holy click bait title
"Tim Sweeney defends Big Camera and their continued CSAM production"
Holy reach of the century.
He supports not banning the ENTIRE X platform over some distasteful image gen (image gen that Google Gemini and ChatGPT will also do - they just do it in private chats, not a twitter feed) and you pull some Olympic level gymnastics to turn that into; "He supports CP"?
Either way, stuff like this is why this sub isn't taken seriously. Epic do so much bad shit that they DESERVE to get hate for, making stuff up just means it's incredibly easy to invalidate any complaints that come from here.
The fact the AI can generate this shit is only one part of the issue.
The fact that X dosent have systems in place to remove that kind of content REGARDLESS who it was posted by, AI or human should be enough to get it removed. Free speech does not mean you can post illegal and harmful content.
And he’s basically just repeating what Elon Musk (in the US) and Nigel Farage (in the UK), both far right attention seekers have said, pretty much word for word.
I completely agree that this shit should never even be able to be done in the first place, but I don't really see where you guys are acting like he said he would like to perpetuate it? He said it "Went off the rails" in my interpretation that would mean he thinks it's bad? Every Ai can do this in some capacity, doesn't mean every AI should get shut down immediately. AI porn is littering the internet, even UA stuff, it's all deplorable but shutting down just 1 AI that happens to be run by a company with a leader you disagree with politically just seems extremely distasteful.
I would assume the way he was talking was essentially "fix the porn but allow both political spectrums to be heard" Just because he didn't explicitly say "CP bad" doesn't automatically mean he's a pedophile.
I agree that they need to immediately put filters in place to prevent this but making it a rule only for 1 media platform is extremely ignorant to the real problem.
Because twatter already refused to even acknowledge this, they entirely ignore the thing. The only step they took is that they removed the media tab from Grok's page, so it wouldn't be as obvious. The demand to remove twatter entirely from the appstores came after the repeated demands for twatter to fix this. They did not. Then Sweney came out in defense of this, claiming that this is the "best effort", which he talked positively of. If the best effort is a bunch of CP, and the best effort is okay, he is clearly okay with CP. And no, it is not okay.
The first step against someone breaking the law is to stop them from breaking the law. In this case it is to remove their distribution platform, because they can't arrest an AI.
Just FYI, if any single person would have done what Grok did, the police in most western countries would have already locked them up, rightfully so. They are at best getting a stern talking to, they just need to stop it. I do not know why they are not arresting the one owning and directing the AI tho, actions like this should not go unpunished.
They removed the entire process of imagery editing through grok. Is that not fixing the problem? Elon Musk’s AI chatbot Grok under fire for failing to rein in ‘digital undressing’ | CNN Business
Even the CNN article says they're against CSAM, deleting accounts and contacting governments and law enforcement to fix the issue. In my head that sounds solved?
I agree it's fucking ridiculous that this was ever even an allowed prompt in the first place, but it seems they've taken measures against it. But fuck Tim Sweeney I guess? Hopefully the follow ups that they're doing with law enforcement actually leads to arrest and hopefully more restrictions will come for other AIs that allow the same bs.
Hey, they took action after they were threatened by being banned, so its all okay, they took such a hard stance! That is literally the opposite of a hard stance, and it just shows that those "evil politicians trying to silence people", like poor sweney, were correct in doing so, because that is what it took to get cooperation.
If they would have a hard stance against CSAM and harassment, than they would not have made a feature which has the primary use to generate CSAM and harassment.
If you believe all AI "goes off the rails", and that "going off the rails" can include generating cp, then defending the use of AI in general is a bad look.
All AI can and do, do it. It's obviously not its intended purpose. You can manipulate AI to tell suicidal people to kill themselves. Doesn't mean you should do it. I'm saying that it being able to do it at all is it "going off the rails" doesn't mean I'm justifying it, if that's all that you're getting out of my comments then god help you.
"distasteful" is the most fence-sitter way to describe the on-demand child porn generator built into twitter
ChatGPT wouldn't even let me put a goat in a picture of my brother and nephew cause it said that might be a harmful portrayal of the individuals or some shit.
Is there a reason you're so heavily whitewashing the creation of on-demand CSAM?
I think it's perfectly fair to say to Twitter that either the cp-generator has to go or they will face repercussions.
If Twitter wants to hold on to GROK, then they deserve whatever backlash, legal or otherwise, they receive.
What's unfair about that?
Clapped is a funny name because ur getting ripped to shreds in these comments 😁