Cit.:”He glorified the attack on the twin towers in New York. He even posted an image of one of the burning towers on the 22nd anniversary of the 2001 attack, including a picture of one of the towers on fire with the words "Oh God: a day like this… In this very year."’ Wouldn’t this alone require inprisonment, following UK’s new regulations for hate speech?
you’re allowed to openly threaten to slaughter a people if you are the right religion (political ideology) and have the right look.
this is not tolerance and acceptance of diversity. this is evil. some cultures and religions are evil and inferior. period.
the left wing leaders and civilian population of the UK have blood on their hands, and are virtually the same as nazis at this point. i use this word very sparingly unlike many who use it at the slightest inconvenience. this is truly the largest neo-nazi movement of our times. the arabs and muslims collaborated with hitler, and also he’s very popular in the arab and muslim worlds. this should come to no surprise if you know how WWII played out in the middle east. they call everyone nazis but fail to look at themselves, the actual ones. they are gaslighting us and inverting history, like they are doing with the EU research council-funded “european quran.” Completely re-engineering “knowledge” and “truth” - inverting reality as one of the if not the largest social engineering projects and psyops of our times.
IMO it is less a deliberate "the right religion" and more the results of a superficial virtue signaling from the governments side - that is, showing "oh how tolerant and progressive and blablabla we are" but at the same time turning a blind eye when certain problematic claims from these minority communities show up, to afterwards demonise anyone who just slightly comments on this, they being native or even non-native. Its a paradox of tolerance, so to say, and it only ends up creating more division between us.
"the arabs and muslims collaborated with hitler, and also he’s very popular in the arab and muslim worlds." Pardon me but that seems like a frankly hyperbolic example. The active pro-hitler Muslim figures at the time were fairly little compared to the amount of Muslims, so I don't think that counts as "the Muslims". And even hypothesising that this collab was considerably larger, how much relevance would that have for today's immigrant discussion? Just like (f.eks) the argument that "Immigration is deserved bc COLONISERS blablah" is blatantly flawed in its correlationto to todays europeans, likewise acts by arabs's ancestors during WWII doesn't seem actual as something against the muslims of today. (For instance i've lived through muslim immigrants since school days and i've personally never heard a pro-hitler uttering from any of them, hence i am not wholly convinced of its actuality here and now) And even should there be a part of muslims supporting hitler today (sadly not too unlikely given the thin gap between antizionism and antisemitism these days, just look at instagram etc.) there'd had to be considered culturul factors such as online radicalism and a fundamentalistic religious upraising in the family (think about the father and son terror attack in bondi against jews for instance). Varies a lot across the cirka 2 billion muslims on the globe. The problem is when these hateful thoughts are put out in the open and the responsibles then can plan a whole terror attack before anything is done. My initial comment was shocked at how UK are quick at catching certain type of groups for inciting violence and yet people like this get the pass. Neither natives nor non-terrorist immigrants gain anything from this unfairness. It's a lose-lose.
For similar reasons I'm curious about the "Hitler popular in Muslim world" statement. I def wouldnt be surprised was that in Palestine f.eks but "Muslim world" suggests a much larger scale than young ISIS-washed Muslim men.
But overall I think your take is understandable. Greets
We have a new Europe_Sub Discord which you can join: https://discord.gg/3p68xrfUWF
Harassment/Incitement to violence (especially towards the other people commenting) will not be tolerated!
An archived version can be found here and the complete rulebook of the sub can be found here.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
I'm surprised the headline doesn't vaguely refer to them as "far right".
They even show pictures and write their names, incredible.
Basically saying business as usual.
Cit.:”He glorified the attack on the twin towers in New York. He even posted an image of one of the burning towers on the 22nd anniversary of the 2001 attack, including a picture of one of the towers on fire with the words "Oh God: a day like this… In this very year."’ Wouldn’t this alone require inprisonment, following UK’s new regulations for hate speech?
Wrong skin colour for hurty words crimes
you’re allowed to openly threaten to slaughter a people if you are the right religion (political ideology) and have the right look.
this is not tolerance and acceptance of diversity. this is evil. some cultures and religions are evil and inferior. period.
the left wing leaders and civilian population of the UK have blood on their hands, and are virtually the same as nazis at this point. i use this word very sparingly unlike many who use it at the slightest inconvenience. this is truly the largest neo-nazi movement of our times. the arabs and muslims collaborated with hitler, and also he’s very popular in the arab and muslim worlds. this should come to no surprise if you know how WWII played out in the middle east. they call everyone nazis but fail to look at themselves, the actual ones. they are gaslighting us and inverting history, like they are doing with the EU research council-funded “european quran.” Completely re-engineering “knowledge” and “truth” - inverting reality as one of the if not the largest social engineering projects and psyops of our times.
Interesting comment of yours, heres what I think.
IMO it is less a deliberate "the right religion" and more the results of a superficial virtue signaling from the governments side - that is, showing "oh how tolerant and progressive and blablabla we are" but at the same time turning a blind eye when certain problematic claims from these minority communities show up, to afterwards demonise anyone who just slightly comments on this, they being native or even non-native. Its a paradox of tolerance, so to say, and it only ends up creating more division between us.
"the arabs and muslims collaborated with hitler, and also he’s very popular in the arab and muslim worlds." Pardon me but that seems like a frankly hyperbolic example. The active pro-hitler Muslim figures at the time were fairly little compared to the amount of Muslims, so I don't think that counts as "the Muslims". And even hypothesising that this collab was considerably larger, how much relevance would that have for today's immigrant discussion? Just like (f.eks) the argument that "Immigration is deserved bc COLONISERS blablah" is blatantly flawed in its correlationto to todays europeans, likewise acts by arabs's ancestors during WWII doesn't seem actual as something against the muslims of today. (For instance i've lived through muslim immigrants since school days and i've personally never heard a pro-hitler uttering from any of them, hence i am not wholly convinced of its actuality here and now) And even should there be a part of muslims supporting hitler today (sadly not too unlikely given the thin gap between antizionism and antisemitism these days, just look at instagram etc.) there'd had to be considered culturul factors such as online radicalism and a fundamentalistic religious upraising in the family (think about the father and son terror attack in bondi against jews for instance). Varies a lot across the cirka 2 billion muslims on the globe. The problem is when these hateful thoughts are put out in the open and the responsibles then can plan a whole terror attack before anything is done. My initial comment was shocked at how UK are quick at catching certain type of groups for inciting violence and yet people like this get the pass. Neither natives nor non-terrorist immigrants gain anything from this unfairness. It's a lose-lose.
For similar reasons I'm curious about the "Hitler popular in Muslim world" statement. I def wouldnt be surprised was that in Palestine f.eks but "Muslim world" suggests a much larger scale than young ISIS-washed Muslim men.
But overall I think your take is understandable. Greets