Hello, chess learners!
It's been two years since our last user flairs update, and we thought it would be nice to give things a bit more personality here. We've expanded our user flairs to differentiate between Chess.com and Lichess ratings, as well as expanded our rating range flairs to have an upper limit of 2800.
Flairs that were previously assigned have likely been turned into a Chess.com flair, please double-check to see if your flair is where you want it to be!
Wondering how to set your flair? See below!
If you are on a computer or laptop:
- Load the homepage of r/chessbeginners
- Look to the right hand side, under the count of members
- Click on the pencil beside "User Flair Preview"
- Select your desired flair, you can change it as many times as you'd like
- Click "Apply"
If you are on mobile, or if the above does not work:
- Load a comment you've left on r/chessbeginners (Or write one on this post!)
- Tap on your user profile photo/avatar on the comment you wrote
- Tap on "Edit User Flair"
- Select your desired flair, you can change it as many times as you'd like
- Tap "Apply"
- This works on computers too! Just hover over your username for number 2 instead
A quick FAQ:
Which rating should I use? We don't have any set policy, we want our users to be able to assign a flair that they think represents their abilities as a chess player. Generally, good practice is to use a rating associated with playing other users in standard chess (try not to use puzzles or variants or chess960 rating, for example). If you are truely lost, try setting your flair to your rapid (10+0, 15+10, etc) rating, as that is one of the most commonly played time controls without significant time pressure.
Why are the ratings going up to 2800? This is chessbeginners, isn't it? Some of our higher rated players have consistently proven themselves to be phenomenal helpers in the community, and we wanted to give them a chance to show off their chess skills with newer flairs. Alongside this, the addition of Lichess ratings mean that there will be a larger number of people reporting ELOs above 2000, it felt fair to give them some more breathing room. There is a very small number of players who will be above 2400 ELO regardless, so the overall look of the subreddit should not change much. That said, this is an experimental change, and we are happy to revert back to a cap of 2000 rating (or something) dependent on feedback.
I have an over-the-board (OTB) rating that I would like to use instead of an online rating, can I do this? We spent some time debating this, and decided against allowing users to show off their OTB ratings. Firstly, OTB ratings are relatively rare in the online chess community, and almost anyone with an OTB rating likely has an online rating that proportionally shows off their chess abilities. Also, OTB ratings are very difficult to compare to one another, as different countries use different metrics and some tournaments are only rated within a country's organization, others are only FIDE, etc. Therefore, we ask users to stick to online ratings only, as those are the most easily translatable to other users.
I have a formal chess title (GM, WFM, FM, etc), can I show this off on the subreddit? Yes! Titled players have access to an exclusive golden flair. You can send us a ModMail message for further instructions.
What's coming next for the subreddit? The biggest thing we're looking to tackle next is a thorough update to the wiki. It is a solid learning resource, but it feels slightly outdated and we are interested in giving it a makeover. If you have any suggestions, let us know! (No promises on when the update happens, for all we know it'll be another 2 years lol)
May I please have a cookie? You may have three! This is a 6000x4000 incredibly high quality image of cookies.
Thank you all for keeping this community every ounce as vibrant and friendly as you do. This has got to be one of the easiest subreddits to take care of, everyone here regularly keeps things chill, and we really appreciate it.
Enjoy!
~The r/chessbeginners Mod Team.
I’m too old to get good, but I’d like to try!
Positive change. I'm a fan of the more detailed flairs. I guess I should probably start playing online to earn one.
How detailed are we looking to go with the wiki overhaul? Just cleaning it up a bit, or are we going to really load it up with information and suggested content?
I'm not necessarily an expert, but I've seen a lot of the same questions here and I have lots of ideas (some of which I do myself and apply at my club) to serve as a "crash course" of exercises and training routine for beginners.
Saying this because I would enjoy being involved, if it becomes a community driven thing. I would assume that you do too because (
youre definitely not writing a book) you're also very active, so if you would need/want my help, just let me know :)Thanks for the new flairs. I changed my flair from 800-1000 on chess.com to 1200-1400 on Lichess, as I find myself to be much more active on the latter.
Yeah, I used to go by 1000-1200 because I was ~1050-1100 on chess.com, but I’m much more active on lichess where I’m around 1300, but I never wanted to use 1200-1400 because most people on here use chess.com, I’m super glad I can finally make the distinction
I know, right?
New flairs just dropped
https://preview.redd.it/oms82ryxdfre1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cc33756dcc3abe00287a4e017fe3e502355f26ce
I came here for cookies, not "cookies"
Finally ! Using ELO to mean Chess.c*m Glicko 1 was even more annoying when the correct score was a value not covered for lichess
The new flairs are nice to report the actual values instead of having to choose between the correct estimation and what people are more likely to understand
Making a comment to test flair.
It works.
I think it would be ideal if the Lichess and chess.com colors corresponded by strength rather than just number value. If you don't want to get too fancy, adjusting by one or two steps (e.g. 1200 lichess matching 1000 chess.com) would be a simplification but still an improvement.
We considered doing this, but decided to keep the colour codes identical because there are a number of players who won't understand the difference between how rating scales between different websites. Additionally, higher level players on chesscom and Lichess see their ratings slightly converge as they go up in the rankings, which would make the colour scheme much more convoluted.
The colours aren't intended to be a prestige thing or anything (though I sorta see why people would consider that to be the case), just a quick way to distinguish your rating range from others. Thanks so much for the suggestion!
Flair
.
It would feel silly having a Lichess 1600-1800 https://lichess.org/@/Lr3rd so I’ll go with my chess 1200-1400 https://www.chess.com/stats/overview/lr3rd
thanks
Sweet!
Flair
Thanks
Comment test
Glad to see lichess included
Broadly positive, but I would like to open a discussion on this point:
First the obvious argument in favour of using online ratings; they're going to be more familiar to most beginners who will have chess.com or lichess ratings but not fide/national ratings. It's easier for them to understand where they and their interlocutor fit into the ecosystem if everyone is using the same rating system.
But there are some significant problems with this. The assumption that OTB players have an online rating that adequately reflects their understanding and ability is demonstrably false.
Online rapid is a relatively fast time control that aggressively rewards a comparatively narrow skillset. I'm not saying that this form of the game is in any way inferior to other formats, merely that it doesn't adequately describe understanding and ability to the extent one might assume it does.
There is a world of difference between someone who plays 10 0 as their main format and has no experience of (OTB) classical and a classical focused player who also plays 10 0 online sometimes.
The 10 0 specialist is able to maintain the same performance in 10 0 as our classical player, but the classical player will almost certainly have a far deeper and better rounded understanding than the 10 0 player.
True, there are plenty of what do I tactics here questions where both players will be adequately armed to give advice - and the 10 0 player will probably get to the correct answer first - but in terms of strategy, positional play, endgame technique, etc, you'd rather have the opinion of a 1700 fide rated player than a 2000 rated chess.com player. In both cases, it's beneficial to know what player that answer is coming from.
There is also the issue of the rating of record. Most people who have OTB ratings treat online play as skittles and don't necessarily apply themselves there, anyone whose only rating is their online rating will protect that number more jealously.
All of this to say, while online ratings are a very useful way of measuring everyone who play primarily online, it doesn't adequately describe those who tend towards OTB/classical. Without casting aspersions on anyone who doesn't play longer formats, it's those classical players that you probably want answering the questions where the number next to your name starts to matter.
If the purpose of using flairs is to assign a confidence level to the advice being offered by the bearer, this point deserves further consideration.
Regardless of this, I reserve the right to award an online rating flair to one particular player who does have a very substantial OTB rating with the self-evidently deep understanding that comes with that, even though they don't play online. You know who you are, and probably so does everyone else.
You don't miss a beat, do you?
USCF 1889 after my most recent tournament. At my peak and hopefully rising. What do you figure? 2000-2200 CCom flair? I don't want to step on anybody's toes.
I like to give credit where it's due and scorn everywhere it isn't.
Nicely done. I'm going to have to get myself back into playing tournaments before you overtake me...or completely dumpster myself and expedite the process.
Step on as many toes as you like.
Either way, my cc is in that bracket and I'd welcome the company.
I am not remotely salty that my lichess is like 17pts short of a much deeper shade of red by the way. Just in case anyone was wondering...Whatever, I still outrate that patzer Aagaard.
Thank you. My goal this year is to be over 1900 by July, when my state's open championship is.
You must have good cones. The colors look identical to me.
Who? I don't recognize the name/username.
I'm secretly a mantis shrimp.
Jacob Aagaard. Great writer, though his books are not exactly intended for we mere mortals. It tickles me that I outrate him there, and am reasonably confident he did this intentionally as a joke.
I haven't bought a new chess book since Silman died. I like the look of Aagaard's titles. Is there any one in particular you recommend?
I liked Calculation, but I also know I need to read it at least 4 more times before I can pretend I've properly read it. Unfortunately my reading pile is now measured in metres so I might not circle back for a while. Yusupov got in the way, and then I discovered that a small publisher in Estonia had republished Keres 1948 and a beautiful book on Rubinstein that...I have too many chess books.
If you play the Sicilian, Experts on the Anti-Sicilian pretty much lives on my desk now. Co-authored with John Shaw, though they brought in a number of other masters to write chapters. Very comprehensive.
This is a fantastic response, lots to think about here. I will hopefully have time to reply properly on Sunday, send me a comment in case I forget.
yay
Nice, but I think that 1800-2000 chess.com is missing
Nice! But isn't Lichess's floor 600? That would mean that the first two Lichess flairs, 200-400 and 400-600, are useless.
It’s 400. Used to be 600 years ago.
Thanks! Then only the first one is still useless, though.
Test
Flair
J
yay
Flair
1
Comment
hello
What’s the difference between the ratings on lichess and chess.com?
They have different starting points and are measured differently. Lichess numbers are higher for the same playing strength, up until a certain point. They even out somewhere around 2200 or so, I believe.
Gonna give it a go
Nice
test
yo
Great !
The journey begins
Excited to change it as I get better
I’m so new it hurts
Hi buddy I am still not able to get the flair free please do something 🥺
Seems like it's working now! Let me know if you're still running into issues.
Great change mod team 😁
Nice
cool
I reached 1202 this week, i keep winning and losing 50-50, right now i go between 1194-1201 consistently for the past 2 days. Help me. Also do i put my flair 1000-1200 or 1200-1400 chess.com?
Could you send some game links so that we can see which areas you can improve in?
I think it'd be good to keep your flair as 1000-1200, as you go between 1194-1201 consistently which you claimed.
I don’t know the last time i commented here if at all soooo obligatory comment for flair
New flairs
give us the customizable flair (or the chess.com pieces)
A
Ok
check
Mhm
Test
Testing flair lol
Flairs
Nice!
flair
New flair time!
Nice flairs
.
Meow
Halo
Test
.
.
Flair comment
Lurker posting for flair :3
Adding flair!
Nice
Making a comment to add flair
Flair
Cool! 😎
hi
Flair setting
Nice
When I click the pfp I go to mu profile
Nice!
but there are only two sites to choose from? what if another site is my favorite website?
Comment
Comment
Cool flairs
Ooo
Just checking out my updated rating flair :)
Let's try this.
New to chess
:)
for the flair
Let's try
H
Cool!
Sorting ma flair
Flair
Ok im gonna try it
Test comment
Hi
Im curious to learn more!!!
I make a flair right now
Aight sure
I just started playing within the past few weeks
Flair!
flairs
Bruh
yo
ho
Happy Cake Day!
Flair
Hi
Testing
Flair
Test!
test
Yo
Nothing to say, I'm just new and want a flair
I need to update this flair !! 😂
.
I don't see the option to add a flair in the reddit android app :(
Add your reply
flairs
Flair
Ok