I have the Google Drive download of all the footage/images, taken from when these were first posted in one of the subs here. It includes on-board pilot video recorded on the ground followed by additional footage once the object was airborne. To me, this remains one of the most credible examples of an anomaly ever filmed. Despite that, it was seen, discussed and people attempted to get answers yet nothing ever came of it...
For those who say aliens or UFOs are not real, this is a clear example of something anomalous that was filmed by pilots, yet quietly faded away without explanation. This suggests that even when reports are as credible as they can reasonably be the groups discussing them remain a minority and are easily ignored.
The truth feels suppressed rather than addressed. Imagine the millions, potentially billions of people who may have witnessed or experienced something genuinely anomalous in the context of UFOs or aliens, only to go to their graves without ever receiving the answers they deserved. This cycle will continue unless a genuinely major and undeniable leak occurs.
You cant use your eyes? All I did was reflect the orb so the lighting matched and simple auto color and it's near perfect match from that front section of the plane
Can you please provide a link to the Drive files? I've been dying to see the pilot footage and the full thing landing, then taking off again. Please please
I've seen the videos too. It shows footage from the cockpit where you can see that thing gliding across the tarmac then shoot up into the air. One of the craziest videos ive ever seen
Here in ufo land as Knapp would say, it'd be so easy to post from a handful of accounts "oh yeah I saw this legit video", then possibly even produce it... but if there's no traceable provenance how do we know this isn't being psyoped lol.
"We" (who now?) "posted it to Twitter" (good call /s) "You can also Google it" (okay, but you have the files, what makes you think your results will be the same as mine you sweet summer child?). Just post a link or GTHO
The music has nothing to do with anything because some random person added it. I was talking about the quality of the video. If I was to figure out how to make a dropbox account and share the file, the quality won't be too much better than that, except it would be minus the shitty music. I was just sharing a version of it.
Right. Apparently they didn't film the whole time. All the video does is establish that an object of some kind was there at the airport. The entirety of what the pilot claimed it did was not captured.
I was more concerned with the claim that no video from the pilot even exists, but all I said was that it's better than the average UFO case. That's obviously not saying much.
I personally think the object itself looks pretty strange if you look at the one photograph and I'd be curious to know exactly what it is. Some effort should be put into attempting to identify this one. That's about as far as I would take it.
A genuine video (even if it ends up being a balloon misidentified honestly) is supposed to appear "sketchy" as you can see. There are tons of different kinds of circumstances with a UFO case. A small number of them are expected to have "hits" for what appear to be sketchy coincidences, so a lot of these are expected characteristics of a genuine case.
ah so you have just a learning disability and fundamentally dont know how object lighting works on the most introductory level, or perhaps you're just not capable of understanding what arrows are. Given the level of intelligence you've demonstrated in your 'argument' im going with the later.
The real problem is there’s so much misinformation, outright lies, and other things at play that the truth is regarded with healthy suspicion. So when I say there are extremely advanced human factions living underground most of their lives - that are hoarding (very) advanced technology and are the root cause of (most) UFO and “alien” sightings; it’s taken as conjecture, coverup, denial, etc.
Why would we need pilot footage? There’s literally hundreds of passengers with smartphones to snap footage. For that alone, I call BS. Show me passenger footage or it’s a yawn from me.
Because they didn’t see them and the pilots with a full view window saw them. Multiple people. Who cares if it’s pilots or not - the fact is that you didn’t even bother to think about this more then 1 second before you turned off your brain.
I say that UFOs aren’t real and I’m really not sure what makes this anomalous.
We get 2 pictures of a circular object on the runway and a short video of an object floating in the sky. I’m not sure what’s clearly anomalous about this.
Strange that whatever it was was on the runway but what’s anomalous about it at all?
Can you explain the videos and credible eye witness testimony describing its behavior?
Yes, the eye witnesses are mistaken, this isn’t the size of a small car so clearly the witness is already under some false assumptions and the video only shows an object floating up in the sky a bit like a balloon.
That’s why it’s anomalous.
Yet you haven’t mentioned a single anomalous attribute this thing has.
anomalous: deviating from what is standard, normal, or expected
Do you understand what anomalous means because it sure as heck isn’t what you typed. And it can be plausibly explained as a balloon though this isn’t irrefutable as we don’t have enough information to be 100% sure.
Balloons being on a runway aren’t expected so if you want to use that to say it’s anomalous then sure there you go but that’s not how anomalous is usually used in this context.
The word anomalous is usually used to describe something that doesn’t react to physics like we’d expect, nobody’s saying John Doe looks weird therefore he’s anomalous.
And it can plausible be explained as a balloon, you haven’t stated a single reason it can’t be a balloon.
And talking about misconstruing what people are saying why don’t we as u/JohnGalactusX what he meant.
Did he mean that this is a clear example of something weird happening or whether he meant this is a clear example of something alien happening.
If he meant a clear example of something weird then this is the biggest nothingburger comment ever and means so little about anything.
Balloons on a runway are normally expected no, but we fucking know what a balloon is. Yes, it's unexpected, shouldn't be there, but it isn't outside of normal parameters is it.
Balloons exist. We know what they are. It shouldn't be there.
There is ZERO proof this is a balloon other than speculation.
I'm not saying it IS aliens, I'm not. What I'm saying is we don't know what it is and there's nothing but speculation. That makes it an anomaly.
You're truly clutching at straws here.
This object is objectively anomalous because A. It shouldn't be there and B. We haven't got a clue what it is, zero data, zero reference nothing more than assumption and speculation.
It is plausibly a balloon, balloon have blown onto the Manchester airport runway before, last time it was a Pepa pig balloon this time it’s a spherical possibly metallic balloon. There’s no proof of it being a balloon but there is evidence, it’s roughly balloon sized and in the video it acts like a balloon.
Both the pepa pig and spherical balloon can be construed as anomalous because they aren’t expected.
Not knowing exactly what something is doesn’t make it anomalous.
You started this semantics argument instead of actually pointing out anything that makes it anomalous in the meaning it’s actually used.
It's not anomalous because it exhibits all of the characteristics that you'd expect of either a balloon, or any object that is able to float in the air or be picked up by wind.
At no point in any of the materials available does the object look, act, or experience anything that a balloon can't do, or anything that a regular old prosaic non-alien spaceship can't do, so by nature it's not anomalous.
It can be unexplained, because sure- we can say that we can't prove without a shadow of a doubt that it is a balloon... but it's not doing anything at all that should or would make us believe otherwise.
The burden of proof then goes to the one making the claim. If you say this is anomalous, I'd say "How?"... and I wouldn't really accept "I don't expect to see a balloon there" as compelling; we'd need to see it do something abnormal... something a balloon can't do.
Also interesting: recall that the X account of the pilot (captainbiggalow) and his YT/FB accounts & pages (Liberty Wing UK) were all deleted shortly after posting this content from the tarmac of Manchester airport (which IIRC wasn’t posted immediately day-of the sighting, but some time later)
I want to say there might be one more video out there of a ground crew truck approaching the blue sphere but I can’t recall honestly, might be my imagination
The NJ flap went viral almost the same day as this post. This post and the floating light from a Miami balcony are very intriguing and never spoken about.
Did you see the post where the guy is talking about them not being in our “mode” in 3D. Physics don’t apply to them because they exist in a higher “mode”. They don’t fly or move they “update location” which can look like movement to our eyes but there’s always something “off” about these and it’s starting to make sense
Man that time period was so hype. There was this, the on-going NJ drones, UFO sightings everywhere, government whistleblowers and it all ended in wet ass fart.
That Xmas to new year period was so peak, I was showing friends and family compilations of all the footage and it felt like we were going through something crazy.
Insane how some time can make people just brush the craziest of things off .
I've come to accept that there is already an "alien" presence here in our world so I didn't follow this story immediately because I still have other interests but dang, did this story get buried immediately. That reminds me that there was a post taken underwater of a supposed alien (being was semi-luminescent, looked similar to the Creature with the Black Macaroons) that was wiped a day later. One other user mentioned it and they're the only other person I'm aware of that remembers it. Forget which sub it was on...
This happened with other things. A very clear picture of a thin female red haired sasquatch with a baby on her back (in the same place I had an encounter with what I believe is the same female and her baby who were harassing me and my baby trying to get our attention a week before). was wiped from the Internet shortly after and stranger even disappeared from my screenshots as well.
I mean, who would willingly land in Manchester? jk, but I would think we mostly see them when they want to be seen, but I don't doubt tech that might be thousands of years ahead of us might fail now and then too.
We don’t tend to hide ourselves when observing ants, penguins, and other species. I honestly don’t think whoever they are goes out of their way to hide themselves. Especially if we’ve actually picked up some of their crashes. They probably don’t announce themselves anymore than I announce myself to the rabbits and squirrels in my backyard.
…okay… that’s a bad example. I always announce myself, but they’re mostly just scared of me apparently. Even though I only wanted to pet them.
Maybe it’s a good example after all? I’m sure they get that they might freak us out if they come up and try to pet us…
Nature photographers and biologists absolutely camouflage themselves when observing animals. Thats how they are able to observe them behaving naturally, instead of reacting to foreign influence.
Solid UFO footage seen by multiple witnesses at the time at the airport the sucker was the size of a small car ..moved when approached ..and took off upward at 7000 mph
The only one of its kind in the first photo? With nothing visible between the sphere and the ground? With no other photos of such a thing at that airport? At this time of day? In this part of the country? Localized entirely within your kitchen?
Rule 13 -Your content was removed due to the fact it was AI-generated. Please try to use your own skills to create art and/or put your own thoughts down for sharing.
In my personal experience, 90% of management possesses low emotional IQ and when you work hard and accomplish more you’re only rewarded with more work and higher expectations.
I have the Google Drive download of all the footage/images, taken from when these were first posted in one of the subs here. It includes on-board pilot video recorded on the ground followed by additional footage once the object was airborne. To me, this remains one of the most credible examples of an anomaly ever filmed. Despite that, it was seen, discussed and people attempted to get answers yet nothing ever came of it...
For those who say aliens or UFOs are not real, this is a clear example of something anomalous that was filmed by pilots, yet quietly faded away without explanation. This suggests that even when reports are as credible as they can reasonably be the groups discussing them remain a minority and are easily ignored.
The truth feels suppressed rather than addressed. Imagine the millions, potentially billions of people who may have witnessed or experienced something genuinely anomalous in the context of UFOs or aliens, only to go to their graves without ever receiving the answers they deserved. This cycle will continue unless a genuinely major and undeniable leak occurs.
Please share again! This case initially drove me into this and similar subs. And shortly after that all the NJ drones..
Why no one takes these incredibly phony looking images seriously
There’s video apparently? Also what are we looking at here?
I looked at that long enough to know I'm not going to speculate. Will wait for the answer
Are you asking if there’s video? Cause there absolutely is https://youtu.be/pG8xi-jf-p4?si=ywPvHB5WnJezQIaG
You cant use your eyes? All I did was reflect the orb so the lighting matched and simple auto color and it's near perfect match from that front section of the plane
Can you please provide a link to the Drive files? I've been dying to see the pilot footage and the full thing landing, then taking off again. Please please
This shit vanished so fast I thought it was fake...
Dude should probably make a backup and then post a drive link. I don't believe him.
It was overshadowed by the New Jersey/European drone flaps. Happened right around the same time.
I remember seeing all the videos he is talking about so I’m not sure why you don’t believe he downloaded them and has a copy?
Did you receive?
Would love to see the files.
So where are those videos you say you have?? I’ve only ever seen this one still image.
I've seen the videos too. It shows footage from the cockpit where you can see that thing gliding across the tarmac then shoot up into the air. One of the craziest videos ive ever seen
I’ve never seen or heard of this video before, do you have a link please?
[removed]
I've seen it too but to me it wasn't that amazing. It's like a 5 second video clip filmed from the cockpit. You don't see it shoot up into the air.
It's an animated gif made from the still photographs iirc. I've never seen a clear, smooth video of this.
There was video of it in the air, and then pictures of it on the ground.
Here in ufo land as Knapp would say, it'd be so easy to post from a handful of accounts "oh yeah I saw this legit video", then possibly even produce it... but if there's no traceable provenance how do we know this isn't being psyoped lol.
This subject is wild
Removed: Rule 1 - Be Respectful.
We posted it to twitter. You can also literally google it and pick up the original threads with everything.
"We" (who now?) "posted it to Twitter" (good call /s) "You can also Google it" (okay, but you have the files, what makes you think your results will be the same as mine you sweet summer child?). Just post a link or GTHO
[deleted]
I will be messaging you in 1 day on 2025-12-26 01:59:57 UTC to remind you of this link
CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.
That one is gone now. This got removed quickly then the airport put out a statement that it was fake but provided no evidence like video footage.
Video footage of what? Some dude at his PC making a ball in Blender?
I also saw
Plenty of people downloaded the video. I have a copy, but this upload isn’t bad:
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/RbsEy5a31CgEdit: since some people are unable to ignore the shitty music (I was being lazy), here is an upload of the original: https://np.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1h1x79l/video_from_the_manchester_orb_sighting_taken_from/
I have no opinion on what it is, but it’s better than the average ufo case.
Ty
Here is a better copy: https://np.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1h1x79l/video_from_the_manchester_orb_sighting_taken_from/
You can find threads on it by putting this into duckduckgo:
What a load of bs...
It's just still shots of the object with a bad narration and spooky music.
I thought there was video of what went down, not this.
The music has nothing to do with anything because some random person added it. I was talking about the quality of the video. If I was to figure out how to make a dropbox account and share the file, the quality won't be too much better than that, except it would be minus the shitty music. I was just sharing a version of it.
But you don't see anything. Just something in the sky and thats it.
No video of the object on the ground, no footage when it goes up.
I mean...meh
Right. Apparently they didn't film the whole time. All the video does is establish that an object of some kind was there at the airport. The entirety of what the pilot claimed it did was not captured.
I was more concerned with the claim that no video from the pilot even exists, but all I said was that it's better than the average UFO case. That's obviously not saying much.
I personally think the object itself looks pretty strange if you look at the one photograph and I'd be curious to know exactly what it is. Some effort should be put into attempting to identify this one. That's about as far as I would take it.
I read the whole thread, apparently the one who posted wasn't the pilot, also, the account was about 2 days old when this was posted.
So, from the get go, this looks rather sketchy
"New account" or new user to a forum was how the Flir1 video was debunked as CGI incorrectly. That is an expected coincidence.
A genuine video (even if it ends up being a balloon misidentified honestly) is supposed to appear "sketchy" as you can see. There are tons of different kinds of circumstances with a UFO case. A small number of them are expected to have "hits" for what appear to be sketchy coincidences, so a lot of these are expected characteristics of a genuine case.
Again, the video shows nothing.
Not sure how it is evidence of anything.
Vids?
Ok, so, where is it?
The video shows the ball stationary in the sky, no movement
the Still image has so many inconsistancys with the video
the runway looks compeltely different, even accounting for a different angle things dont line up properly
the plane color on the tail is different.
the video has rain visible on the windshield while the photo has none
the lighting in the photo has a different angle on the ball than the rest of the objects in the scene
the footage is probably genuine, but it doesnt show anything anomalous that couldnt be a balloon. the image is probably a sloppy edit
i went to line up the lighting side by side, and gee, it kinda looks really fucking obvious what the "orb" is
You guys won't believe anything that's put in front of you - what's your minimum for this to be real?
Patrick Jackson has basically undone the orb situation.
Where’s the video then?
No one here has a copy to share?
Then you've gotta ask, is it just people having a laugh or a coordinated effort to obscure whatever real information there is.
I have no clue which it is
That lighting comparison looks like it was done by an eleven year old with MSPaint. Lmao
It was done so that even an eleven year old would understand it, but if you don't even have that level of comprehension that says more about you
Oh, I understand it, alright.It's crap
Quite the vocabulary you have there
Really driving home that competency argument
There's no argument about your competency. Your "work" speaks for itself, genius. lmao.
ah so you have just a learning disability and fundamentally dont know how object lighting works on the most introductory level, or perhaps you're just not capable of understanding what arrows are. Given the level of intelligence you've demonstrated in your 'argument' im going with the later.
“Going with the later”? Lmao. Moron
Aw is the child upset he cant understand simple things and has to lash out with Insults?
Care to share? I've never seen this case
Can you share the videos?
Can you share again or DM me?
The real problem is there’s so much misinformation, outright lies, and other things at play that the truth is regarded with healthy suspicion. So when I say there are extremely advanced human factions living underground most of their lives - that are hoarding (very) advanced technology and are the root cause of (most) UFO and “alien” sightings; it’s taken as conjecture, coverup, denial, etc.
Exact same view of it mate, there’s so much evidence and cases like this .
preaching to the choir mate
People simply don't care. Unless it stops people from going to work, consuming entertaining media, or creates global change, no one will bat an eye.
If you ask "do I still have to go to work tomorrow?" And the answer is "yes". No one will care.
Why would we need pilot footage? There’s literally hundreds of passengers with smartphones to snap footage. For that alone, I call BS. Show me passenger footage or it’s a yawn from me.
Because they didn’t see them and the pilots with a full view window saw them. Multiple people. Who cares if it’s pilots or not - the fact is that you didn’t even bother to think about this more then 1 second before you turned off your brain.
I say that UFOs aren’t real and I’m really not sure what makes this anomalous.
We get 2 pictures of a circular object on the runway and a short video of an object floating in the sky. I’m not sure what’s clearly anomalous about this.
Strange that whatever it was was on the runway but what’s anomalous about it at all?
Can you identify the object?
Can you explain the videos and credible eye witness testimony describing its behavior?
You can’t.
That’s why it’s anomalous.
Credible eye witness?
I believe a video if you show me.
It looks like a Yoga ball rolling.
Not confidently, maybe a balloon.
Yes, the eye witnesses are mistaken, this isn’t the size of a small car so clearly the witness is already under some false assumptions and the video only shows an object floating up in the sky a bit like a balloon.
Yet you haven’t mentioned a single anomalous attribute this thing has.
The LITERAL fact that it cannot be plausibly and irrefutably be explained LITERALLY makes it anomalous.
Do you not understand what the word anomalous means?
Do you understand what anomalous means because it sure as heck isn’t what you typed. And it can be plausibly explained as a balloon though this isn’t irrefutable as we don’t have enough information to be 100% sure.
Your own description literally dictates that this object on the runway is fucking anomalous as it deviates the normality.
Strange metallic spheroids floating on a runway are NOT normality. This object is LITERALLY anomalous.
No it cannot be plausibly explained as a balloon at all.
It can be assumed. Assumption and playability aren't the same thing.
You're seriously trying to misconstrue what people are saying here to fit your own personal bias.
Good work, kid.
Balloons being on a runway aren’t expected so if you want to use that to say it’s anomalous then sure there you go but that’s not how anomalous is usually used in this context.
The word anomalous is usually used to describe something that doesn’t react to physics like we’d expect, nobody’s saying John Doe looks weird therefore he’s anomalous.
And it can plausible be explained as a balloon, you haven’t stated a single reason it can’t be a balloon.
And talking about misconstruing what people are saying why don’t we as u/JohnGalactusX what he meant.
Did he mean that this is a clear example of something weird happening or whether he meant this is a clear example of something alien happening.
If he meant a clear example of something weird then this is the biggest nothingburger comment ever and means so little about anything.
Balloons on a runway are normally expected no, but we fucking know what a balloon is. Yes, it's unexpected, shouldn't be there, but it isn't outside of normal parameters is it.
Balloons exist. We know what they are. It shouldn't be there.
There is ZERO proof this is a balloon other than speculation.
I'm not saying it IS aliens, I'm not. What I'm saying is we don't know what it is and there's nothing but speculation. That makes it an anomaly.
You're truly clutching at straws here.
This object is objectively anomalous because A. It shouldn't be there and B. We haven't got a clue what it is, zero data, zero reference nothing more than assumption and speculation.
It is plausibly a balloon, balloon have blown onto the Manchester airport runway before, last time it was a Pepa pig balloon this time it’s a spherical possibly metallic balloon. There’s no proof of it being a balloon but there is evidence, it’s roughly balloon sized and in the video it acts like a balloon.
Both the pepa pig and spherical balloon can be construed as anomalous because they aren’t expected.
Not knowing exactly what something is doesn’t make it anomalous.
You started this semantics argument instead of actually pointing out anything that makes it anomalous in the meaning it’s actually used.
Let's say you could see a shopping cart in one of the pictures. That would be odd, since it's not a grocery store.
Would that be "anomalous"?
All the pics and video is here - Orb UAP photographed by pilot on tarmac and flying during the day in Manchester | Metabunk
The question is "Why isn't this a balloon?"
It's not anomalous because it exhibits all of the characteristics that you'd expect of either a balloon, or any object that is able to float in the air or be picked up by wind.
At no point in any of the materials available does the object look, act, or experience anything that a balloon can't do, or anything that a regular old prosaic non-alien spaceship can't do, so by nature it's not anomalous.
It can be unexplained, because sure- we can say that we can't prove without a shadow of a doubt that it is a balloon... but it's not doing anything at all that should or would make us believe otherwise.
The burden of proof then goes to the one making the claim. If you say this is anomalous, I'd say "How?"... and I wouldn't really accept "I don't expect to see a balloon there" as compelling; we'd need to see it do something abnormal... something a balloon can't do.
Also interesting: recall that the X account of the pilot (captainbiggalow) and his YT/FB accounts & pages (Liberty Wing UK) were all deleted shortly after posting this content from the tarmac of Manchester airport (which IIRC wasn’t posted immediately day-of the sighting, but some time later)
https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/s/7yIeRs5GRO
https://preview.redd.it/khimu4tab79g1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c96aa4103aaa1f92e5f6fa14f6ba475980261e2f
This shit was scrubbed so fast. I wrote it off as a fake. Some dude here is trying to say he has the goods but didn't post a link which is sus.
Of all places you can actually find the original pics and videos at Metabunk:
https://www.metabunk.org/threads/orb-uap-photographed-by-pilot-on-tarmac-and-flying-during-the-day-in-manchester.13786/
I want to say there might be one more video out there of a ground crew truck approaching the blue sphere but I can’t recall honestly, might be my imagination
Unimpressed.
Also, all the replies make it even less impressive.
And LW YouTube channel went down for a matter of days at the time but didn't get scrubbed https://youtube.com/@libertywing-uk?si=dEToK1zpPUnhkCFB
Shocking how it faded
Agreed - like the majority of the orb reports. Were they all ET or was it one big psyop?????
Patrick Jackson has a book and method for summoning the orbs. The book is free on Kindle mobile.
They're real.
It’s a massive psyop
The NJ flap went viral almost the same day as this post. This post and the floating light from a Miami balcony are very intriguing and never spoken about.
Did you see the post where the guy is talking about them not being in our “mode” in 3D. Physics don’t apply to them because they exist in a higher “mode”. They don’t fly or move they “update location” which can look like movement to our eyes but there’s always something “off” about these and it’s starting to make sense
https://preview.redd.it/g23q5u4ao69g1.jpeg?width=1000&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d2d0e2fa98745900fc8992e339edc4943d12f959
Parker is on a mission
I loved that show
Peak 90s television
Great show. I can't find it anywhere to stream or buy :(
It’s only available on DVD
😝👍🏻
I saw exactly the same in zürich airport
When?
Ca. 2 years ago
Man that time period was so hype. There was this, the on-going NJ drones, UFO sightings everywhere, government whistleblowers and it all ended in wet ass fart.
That Xmas to new year period was so peak, I was showing friends and family compilations of all the footage and it felt like we were going through something crazy.
Insane how some time can make people just brush the craziest of things off .
2021 was even better
I've come to accept that there is already an "alien" presence here in our world so I didn't follow this story immediately because I still have other interests but dang, did this story get buried immediately. That reminds me that there was a post taken underwater of a supposed alien (being was semi-luminescent, looked similar to the Creature with the Black Macaroons) that was wiped a day later. One other user mentioned it and they're the only other person I'm aware of that remembers it. Forget which sub it was on...
This happened with other things. A very clear picture of a thin female red haired sasquatch with a baby on her back (in the same place I had an encounter with what I believe is the same female and her baby who were harassing me and my baby trying to get our attention a week before). was wiped from the Internet shortly after and stranger even disappeared from my screenshots as well.
Hey look! There's an unauthorized craft on the runway! What should we do? A) ignore it B) deny it C) all the above.
Remember remember, the 24th of November
There is a theory that these spheres are alien probes observing us.
Shouldn’t they be a little more subtle?
Why?
So as not to affect their subjects. Discreet observations seems to be the most sensible thing to do here
Perhaps they could be observing how we would react to them/something like this?
Assuming it's scientific surveillance. Could be penetration testing, reaction testing, defense testing, etc.
You are applying our way of thinking to an entirely different species.
Is it just me thinking these are the malfunctioning ones?
That’s a good point, I hadn’t considered that.
I mean, who would willingly land in Manchester? jk, but I would think we mostly see them when they want to be seen, but I don't doubt tech that might be thousands of years ahead of us might fail now and then too.
We don’t tend to hide ourselves when observing ants, penguins, and other species. I honestly don’t think whoever they are goes out of their way to hide themselves. Especially if we’ve actually picked up some of their crashes. They probably don’t announce themselves anymore than I announce myself to the rabbits and squirrels in my backyard.
…okay… that’s a bad example. I always announce myself, but they’re mostly just scared of me apparently. Even though I only wanted to pet them.
Maybe it’s a good example after all? I’m sure they get that they might freak us out if they come up and try to pet us…
Nature photographers and biologists absolutely camouflage themselves when observing animals. Thats how they are able to observe them behaving naturally, instead of reacting to foreign influence.
I flew out of that airport the day after these were posted. I stared out the window ready with my phone every second til we were up in the clouds!
these things pop out of the bigger orb ships or what ever they are.
This started the Orb fiasco.
Never forget
Yeah they stopped all flights
So what's the status on this one. Seems to be posted everywhere and then silence. Any reports come out from anywhere to corroborate?
Yup, definitely forgot. Thanks for the reminder
Solid UFO footage seen by multiple witnesses at the time at the airport the sucker was the size of a small car ..moved when approached ..and took off upward at 7000 mph
First time I heard those details. Got a source for me?
https://youtube.com/shorts/RbsEy5a31Cg?si=YSP_5o-r-4sHruJ3
Shit it’s a fireball! Where’s my ferro?!
[removed]
Ha this. You're better at getting attention than I was about this. Happened just before the NJ "drones".
Looks imposed on the image. Nothing showing in the second slide. Feels like reaching
Would you share that? This is for me the best example other world contact ever shown
That's a 10 pack of Butterball turkeys that somehow got loose on the runway
Poor things, having to go to Manchester
The lighting on the ball doesnt match the correct angle the rest of the photograph has
There are videos
so maybe post even one of them?
Will you then admit that the lighting absolutely does match and your above comment is worthless?
Still waiting for a video
it seems your intelligence is the only thing who's worth needs to be questioned
Lmao what is this schizo 4 Chan type analysis?
And you’re still denying that these are stills from a video?
Holy shit, your type is absolutely unhinged
You posted this comment when you could have posted the video.
[deleted]
There is a video
Where?
Manchester airport orb video
NeverForget
That was at the tail end of a truly wild few months last year where unconventional aerial activity was having a moment.
[removed]
The only one of its kind in the first photo? With nothing visible between the sphere and the ground? With no other photos of such a thing at that airport? At this time of day? In this part of the country? Localized entirely within your kitchen?
You lost all credibility when you said, "When I use AI".
Rule 13 -Your content was removed due to the fact it was AI-generated. Please try to use your own skills to create art and/or put your own thoughts down for sharing.
In my personal experience, 90% of management possesses low emotional IQ and when you work hard and accomplish more you’re only rewarded with more work and higher expectations.