This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
I'm currently watching a group I'm in tear themselves apart over AI. I had a good laugh when an anti posted AI content unknowingly. It's such a weird grandpa stance to take, like when boomers were afraid computers would kill us during Y2K.
I really feel like it's not the same thing as Y2K. Ai is wrong because it plagiarizes, it doesn't create anything new. It just takes bits and pieces of other stuff. It would be like writing an essay with a paragraph or two from ten different books, yeah it might look like a new thing, but it's not.
Plagarism:presenting someone else's work, ideas, or words as your own without giving them proper credit.(I dont think any ai company has given a full list of their feed)
I mean technichaly no one really "creates" nothing new as the Creative procesa comes from a lot of referentes that come from referentes. It IS just that ai makes It corporate and a little to obvius.
Kinda.this IS What i think i understood from a video lesson from CGP gray . What It learns first IS to recognize a lot of images then he gets an image with "holes" and tries to fill them and if the result IS good enough he continúes. Then he learns how to make the image out of a full "hole" canvas. But all this proces comes from the original referentes which where made or photographed by humans.
In an effort to discourage brigading, we do not allow linking to other subreddits or users. We kindly ask that you screenshot the content that you wish to share, while being sure to censor private information, and then repost.
Private information includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames, other subreddits, and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
Not quite. The "enlightened" part is sarcastic. They're just someone that lacks nuance and tries to find a middle point between two positions rather than seriously considering the merits of either side.
"They're both wrong" is no different to "They're both right" in its simplicity and stupidity.
The "above them both" attitude by OP is shown in the writing of the title.
As for both sides screaming, that's just the goomba fallacy applied to both sides. They're not homogenous groups of identical people. The worst individuals from either side can be held up as an example with the uncharitable suggestion they represent that whole side. In reality there are reasonable people on both sides that aren't the screaming apes that get all the attention.
Anyone presenting both sides as screaming apes is literally just feeding people a fallacy with the aim of making themselves look "above it all", or indulging in self-aggrandizement.
I mean its pretty clear that this sub is just two intersecting echo chambers. I dont think anybody joining this sub is in a mental place where they would be willing to admit they are wrong.
Not going to lie I haven't been to this subreddit for a while and it has chilled out substantially. I suspect someday soon it's going to be two monkies.
I know rats are awesome, and cockroaches can survive a lot. But I honestly doubt that that is what you meant…. If you replaced “Antis” with humans, there would be a lot less discussion
This is an automated reminder from the Mod team. If your post contains images which reveal the personal information of private figures, be sure to censor that information and repost. Private info includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
this is just to be expected with any debate, online and offline.
just look at ww2 propaganda posters.
same shit, different glitter
Except for once I think ww2 did objectively have a *mostly good side and then a *mostly bad side (The nazis if it wasn’t clear)
i guess, yeah
This debate is the same except my side is good and the other side is the nazis
If you are American then yes, If you are German then no, if you are Russian then sort off ;)
Respectfully - every German I know says Germany was the bad guy in WW2. This is only an anecdote, don't take as evidence, but it suggests a trend.
I'm guessing they mean at the time. even still, I think from an objective pov the Axis was most definitely "the bad guy".
I agree.
That glitter line is gold.
Another one for OP's collection
https://preview.redd.it/wt42rog7f66g1.jpeg?width=592&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=24b150c7bf09f4f64b37a047f458b705736d7baa
I said both sides would be the ones who are the “lion” in the image. I pointed out both sides faults. Idk how I’m pointing at just one side lol
Excellent choice of colors
I'm currently watching a group I'm in tear themselves apart over AI. I had a good laugh when an anti posted AI content unknowingly. It's such a weird grandpa stance to take, like when boomers were afraid computers would kill us during Y2K.
I really feel like it's not the same thing as Y2K. Ai is wrong because it plagiarizes, it doesn't create anything new. It just takes bits and pieces of other stuff. It would be like writing an essay with a paragraph or two from ten different books, yeah it might look like a new thing, but it's not.
Define plagiarism.
Yes it does.
No it doesn't.
No.
Plagarism:presenting someone else's work, ideas, or words as your own without giving them proper credit.(I dont think any ai company has given a full list of their feed)
I mean technichaly no one really "creates" nothing new as the Creative procesa comes from a lot of referentes that come from referentes. It IS just that ai makes It corporate and a little to obvius.
Kinda.this IS What i think i understood from a video lesson from CGP gray . What It learns first IS to recognize a lot of images then he gets an image with "holes" and tries to fill them and if the result IS good enough he continúes. Then he learns how to make the image out of a full "hole" canvas. But all this proces comes from the original referentes which where made or photographed by humans.
[removed]
In an effort to discourage brigading, we do not allow linking to other subreddits or users. We kindly ask that you screenshot the content that you wish to share, while being sure to censor private information, and then repost.
Private information includes names, recognizable profile pictures, social media usernames, other subreddits, and URLs. Failure to do this will result in your post being removed by the Mod team and possible further action.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
No matter how many times you repeat it, that's still not how they work.
No I am the lion
https://preview.redd.it/noxyjh6we66g1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=cb5377b7a8dd920251f0ff369cbc0b8fb1a9833c
Except replace the monkey in the thought bubble with the lion and then you have me.
Yeah that checks out
https://preview.redd.it/q2htn0rdz76g1.png?width=2000&format=png&auto=webp&s=257e3c052fbe2d8d0fd7d95d04f0879586409f9f
Fixed
It's like those never-ending images, just a loop with the bubble
I also have this one, imo it's funnier
https://preview.redd.it/3q9q7fhpi66g1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=60fddbd25f4c70b1ca7700ba0599f9359eb0520f
It's indeed funnier with the expression
The lion is the based on. People who wanna be the contemplative monkey are dorks
Im in anti side but
This is TRUE.
Very true
Saw this on defendingaiart
Had a laugh
Upvoted
Scrolled past
More laughable than either side is the "enlightened centrist" that believes themselves above both sides.
Enlightened centrist and its just someone with nuance and is able to look at things from an outsiders perspective
Not quite. The "enlightened" part is sarcastic. They're just someone that lacks nuance and tries to find a middle point between two positions rather than seriously considering the merits of either side.
"They're both wrong" is no different to "They're both right" in its simplicity and stupidity.
Its less they're both wrong or right and more that they both act like screaming apes
The "above them both" attitude by OP is shown in the writing of the title.
As for both sides screaming, that's just the goomba fallacy applied to both sides. They're not homogenous groups of identical people. The worst individuals from either side can be held up as an example with the uncharitable suggestion they represent that whole side. In reality there are reasonable people on both sides that aren't the screaming apes that get all the attention.
Anyone presenting both sides as screaming apes is literally just feeding people a fallacy with the aim of making themselves look "above it all", or indulging in self-aggrandizement.
I'd say it varies from person to person, but it does generally tend to be like this.
I mean its pretty clear that this sub is just two intersecting echo chambers. I dont think anybody joining this sub is in a mental place where they would be willing to admit they are wrong.
Starting early today, huh? Yesterday we had 4 of these on less than 24 hours.
Enlightened centrist and its just someone with nuance and is able to look at things from an outsiders perspective
The one that's worse is the one I don't agree with, obviously. /s
And many people complain that AI is "uncreative". How many times is this lion-who-thinks-she's-a-monkey meme going to be posted here?
" You are both sheeple, I am so above you both! I am a free thinker! A dangerous maverick!"
I’m literally making fun of my own side how am I putting myself above others 😭
That’s actually a pretty good way to view it
Both sides have absolute dumbasses.
Not going to lie I haven't been to this subreddit for a while and it has chilled out substantially. I suspect someday soon it's going to be two monkies.
To be honest, I think this applies to Reddit in general
https://preview.redd.it/f9j3d7aep96g1.jpeg?width=606&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=df2b8a3e834dbf8672cac3d45bf3ba0aa1fa7725
The whole subreddit is basically toxic yuri/yaoi
Perhaps I should draw Yuri of the 2 subs
Do it
We need more toxic Yuri/yaoi of the sub 🥹✌️
The dark truth...
https://preview.redd.it/yyv75q0ro66g1.jpeg?width=1336&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8323f157a8bdbf0f0cc158b6844dcf5dbe8a13bd
I'm so tired of all of this pro/anti ai shit, ai sucks
Source? Because I say so, I don't care about anything else, I'm just sick of it
Most pathetic creatures Tier List from least to most pathetic
>Rats
>Cockroaches
>Bacterial slime
>Antis
>"muh both sides" enlightened centrists (actually Antis)
>Monkey Lion meme posters
I know rats are awesome, and cockroaches can survive a lot. But I honestly doubt that that is what you meant…. If you replaced “Antis” with humans, there would be a lot less discussion
man this is really degenerating into political levels of bitterness.
“Well it’s the antis fault for-!!!” yeah yeah save your breath
What did the antis do to you?
Sent me death threats and such. The usual.
And what about actual neutrals, thoses who see both good and bad in this?
why arent transphobes on that tier list as well?