Hello Tenno! As you are all probably well aware we have had a recent situation regarding NSFW content.

Historically, there has never been any rules or guidelines regarding NSFW artworks*... this is changing. We have heard the feedback and it is clear that some rules or guidelines are now necessary. This serves to inform posters what is acceptable to post and gives readers the right expectations about the type of content they can expect to see here on this subreddit. Of course, like with any changes, not everyone will be happy but we think this strikes a good middle ground.

This change can be revisited in the future should it not work out as we intended.

To be completely clear:

"NSFW artwork is allowed if there is no detailed outline or bare uncovered nipples, anuses, or genitals. Nudity is not allowed.

Allowances may be made if the nudity is intended to be artistic, where it's not the primary focal point of the artwork (e.g. Michelangelo's David). Any nudity found in game is allowed.

NSFW must be tagged and flaired appropriately on creation, failure will result in a warning, strikes following for repeat offences."

Moderator discretion applies. Should there be any doubts about whether your artwork is permissible, we advise you contact us through modmail for approval beforehand.

*We did previously have a disallowed post type; "Posts focused on sexualized character features ("hornyposting")", this was created to curb the number of low effort close up in-game screenshots of Wisps' ass. This rule was retired in the Subreddit Rules Update 2024 due to a lack of it needing to be enforced.

Examples of acceptable posts:

-https://www.reddit.com/r/Warframe/comments/1jvu4br/shouldve_used_safeguard/

-https://www.reddit.com/r/Warframe/comments/1jw0l56/cone_getting_male_pregnant/

-https://www.reddit.com/r/Warframe/comments/1ppy8rw/smug_marie_by_me_zeropengr/

-https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Flgp5o7zokj8g1.png

Additionally, some of you may know that the credit for artwork needs to be in the title of a post. This can be done by putting [Artist's name] or [OC] in the title. This has been a rule for a long time and is important for creators, however, this rule is often neglected. As a result we will be giving it a rule of its own so that it is more prominent. This should not change our enforcement of this rule.

This announcement signifies the enactment of these new rules. They may take approximately 1-48 hours to be added to the subreddit's rules page. Posts that violate these new rules but were approved before this change will remain untouched.

  • Any nudity found in game is allowed.

    wait, there's nudity in the game?

    This is more of a future proofing thing.

    I mean the case is still open on wether Warframe is their clothes or if they’re just constantly feeling the breeze

    I feel like we dont need to future proof rules when rules can be updated in real time as applicable. But better safe than sorry.

    A Warframe with no attachments is technically nude.

    Just a syndana and a bo staff (and a can-do attitude)

    So a nudist with a cape and a stick?

    And a can-do attitude!

    Blend of future proofing and what's already in the game, like mag heirloom straight up has her breasts out lol, same with ember heirloom's ass.

    It's a fair exception to the rule, given you could make the argument that they're nude in game. I doubt it would be taken as a serious argument, but it's foresight nonetheless

    Ember Heirloom and Valkyr Heirloom are pretty damn close. Ember Heirloom specifically is Winnie the Pooh-ing it, but with a Barbie crotch obviously. Which is pretty much the exact rules here in the sub

  • So basically, nothing's changing?

    Except banning nsfw art of guys only

    So nothing's changed?

  • Damn, the jokes about Reddit mods are actually true, huh?

  • Message is loud and clear. No balls allowed.

    Those poor Vauban mains

    Will somebody think of the Protea mains?!

    All 3 Lunaro players are crying in the conclave lobby

    The mods got confused when we were trying to say we didn't like Ballas. Honest mistake, really

  • Aren't the examples of acceptable posts the very same posts that triggered the negative response?

    yes, smug marie + jack-o oraxia + femboy uriel are literally the posts that started all of this

    they should all be prohibited

    And who would've guessed, of all of those, femboy Uriel is the only one getting banned by this rule.

    A lot of people were pointing to a double standard but I was of the opinion that it's all bad because it's goon stuff. Now the mods have basically proven the double standards are the case.

    I like that you think it wasn't always about double standards when it comes to reddit and the derelicts who moderate it

    I had hope because this community is typically really cool. The goon stuff was an issue for me because this is not a porn sub, but the mods are clearly biased one way, which is a shame.

    I am kind of happy with how the community reacted, it's great to see people calling out their hypocrisy. Move the NSFW stuff to the related sub.

    Notice how when they linked the last one it's just to the photo and not the entire thread? Yet the three before are. Because the last one was in fact one of the ones (along with the Marie) people voiced they didn't want to be seeing.

    Why have an entire other subreddit for this shit if it's not being filtered there. I hate how goonish the main sub has gotten. How about we keep it to the game and let any horny posts go where they belong?

    Also it's hilarious those are good examples when they are literally what the first rule states not to post, like what? Huge contradiction but okay, mods.

    It's wild to see post like that on the front page and what about posts with sensitive topics using the NSFW filter, now we have to wade through softcore porn, yay.

    Yup and the mods dont care, mods on reddit treat NSFW as only for porn

    Yeah the logic ain't exactly tracking here.

    We did previously have a disallowed post type; "Posts focused on sexualized character features ("hornyposting")", this was created to curb the number of low effort close up in-game screenshots of Wisps' ass. This rule was retired in the Subreddit Rules Update 2024 due to a lack of it needing to be enforced.

    But I guess a drawn picture of Wisp's ass with overly exaggerated proportions is fine? Yeah, I think this rule needs enforcing again asap.

    I think the final straw was Uriel with his whole gooch and balls out and that’s where they drew the line.

    Though I think posts 3 and 4 where the whole point is sexy shouldn’t be allowed. 1 is on the line and 2 is okay.

    It's seeming very sexist on the mods side for where they drew the line and with them saying that 3 and 4 are "acceptable" when they are essentially just female equivalents of the Uriel art.

    I swear, I’d count pussy mound as outlined genitalia, even has shading for the cleft

    Ditto, especially with clit showing through

    I meant the Marie one, but yeah, clit bump on orexia.

    Mods:"Vaginas and tits are okay, web holes and ass holes are fine but we draw the line at dick and balls"

    2 is definitely fine, but 1 has a clear boner. Considering it's a reference to a pretty tame meme, I see no reason for that.

  • Im microwaving my popcorn as i read this.

    Gimme some bro. That cone meme sent me

    I would be but im stuck in a mile long line for Christmas lights... mind if I borrow some popcorn?

    ive got extra lights, take those too

    I got the melted butter and snowcap candy. We're good to go. (I didnt even realize there was an issue going on till now)

  • The bottom two posts you linked are literally against st the rules you just outlined. The detailed outline is literally the focal point it’s not artistic

  • so every post that people didn’t like being in the main subreddit are acceptable except for the uriel one? lol

    Which is insane, because the Uriel post’s ENTIRE PURPOSE was demonstrating how people only ever start spamming the sub over male frame posts. The entire goal was saying “if puss bulge is okay, so is ball bulge.”

    And it proved what a lot of us knew, everyone in charge of the sub was fine letting us be a joke to newcomers as long as it didn't make them feel funny new things when they saw balls.

    Also, the Uriel one was funny. It wasn’t just a straight up goon post like examples 3 and 4 here

    hereTHICK is a caption for the ages fr

    I love that specifically the uriel one isn't there. I am a cishet man, I don't care for it, but it does show the hypocrisy lol

  • its hilarious that they linked the image instead of the thread for that one specifically because the entire thread is just people saying to send that shit to the NSFW sub

    “The rules haven’t changed, feel free to goonpost (no balls ass)”

    Yeah these mfs gooners

  • So the sub will eventually be made NSFW and UK people who don't want to give Reddit their ID will be unable to visit? Cool.

    I was thinking exactly the same! It better bloody not, this subreddit is my late night boredom scroll.

  • how are those last two acceptable? at all? there's several subs better suited for things that are so close to the line of NSFW that are specifically 18+ locked, what's with the huge need to also have them here, where anyone can visit?

  • The mods need to give their heads a shake, because the second two examples are literally the pictures that started people calling for mods to enforce the existing rules from last year.

    There's literally an NSFW sub specifically for WF already. If I wanted to see this, I could go there.

    The last image, they intentionally linked only the image, not the post, because it's one of the images that had people demanding moderation.

    Like, you can't claim it's "artistic". It was drawn to be extremely sexual as NSFW material, not to be artistic.

    I just think the double standard they're clearly taking is ridiculous.

  • Vote of no confidence for the mods.

    All of the r/NSFWarframe mods that also mod here are clearly putting their cum covered thumbs on the scale, it's so blatantly transparent that it's unreal. Same.

    Honestly one of the things I hate the most about Reddit being displayed here: a few select people that totally create a monopoly of the community spaces for a game. These people run r/Warframe, r/memeframe and r/NSFWarframe. This shit should not be possible. I wish DE would take over and have actual moderators instead of power-tripping Redditors take care of the place.

    replace literally every single one

    I feel bad for Rebb and DE. Imagine trying to get new players in to your game and they come here and see the mods have turned this place in to a porn / fetish page. Makes the community seem weird as hell and the people will probably just drop the game.

  • The discourse over these changes is gonna be nuts

    Lmao, it would appear that's the only thing being censored by the changes. Bit ironic

    no no nuts are illegal, everything else is fine lmao

  • Post 3 and 4 are definitely not artistic....

  • Those acceptable posts are wild WTH.

    I had thought people here were just being dramatic but the 3rd and 4th examples are shit you'd see in a goddamn porn sub.

    "No outlined genitals."

    Marie going full ass-cheek spread with bulging camel toe:

    After seeing Marie, I was expecting to see Uriel's ballsack

    Nope, that's the only one being banned by this rule, what a coincidence.

    Same for the first with nezha's boner bulge :_3

    Like I was on board with this change until I saw the examples lmfao

    I'm glad I'm not the only one supremely confused by the "acceptable" examples

  • Yea so this is an insane take

  • Hold, hold, hold it. I was going to write a whole comment on how I'm pretty in-between on the matter and blah blah, sex negative bad, nsfw drowns out non-nsfw art blah blah...

    "Allowances may be made if the nudity is intended to be artistic, where it's not the primary focal point of the artwork"

    Your last example is BLATANTLY not adhering to this what are you SMOKING. That ain't Michelangelo's David, dawg. Shit makes Quentin Tarantino's favorite subject matter look subtle the hell ya' on?

    Your last example is BLATANTLY not adhering to this what are you SMOKING. That ain't Michelangelo's David, dawg.

    That's why they linked the image directly and not the post, or everyone would see the amount of complaining about it when it was first posted. Deliberate obfuscation from the mods. Not a great look tbh

  • hahahahaha what.

    like, i dont care about NSFW. im a big fan of adult material.

    examples 3 and 4 are NSFW in the most literal sense. you could not reasonably be seen with those on a screen at any workplace that isnt a sex-shop.

    this is the Comic-book equivalent of "SFW". "yeah everything is on display, but its coloured purple because its actually skintight lycra"

    as far as mainstream comics those last two would not make the cut honestly lol

  • This is hilariously not a middle-ground position at all. These mods are seriously weird af

    I had no faith when the primary ones piping up to try and quell the discussion were also the top 3 mods (out of 4) of r/NSFWarframe and I'm "glad" I was right in not having any.

    [removed]

    That's really how it comes off.

    If it's NSFW and nothing comparable is in game, it shouldn't be appropriate for the sub. There's an entire NSFW Warframe sub for that.

    This sub is fucking embarrassing for how other people and new players must see us. It's just become so normalized to us, because the mods have refused to enforce their own rules they put in last year.

    3/4 of the mods on nsfwarframe also mod here, I have no idea why all porn can't be put in the porn sub.

  • You literally proved the point the Uriel post was making - visible genitalia is fine as long as it’s a woman. Crazy decision.

    Weirdly sexist of them

    of course it is. youre only allowed to objectify women/female presenting biomechanical dolls here. god forbid we objectify them all smh

  • I'm all for allowing NSFW but judging by the rules, as stated, shouldn't the Marie and Oraxia examples be rule violations? That's pretty outlined and detailed to me at least.

    no no, its fine because those are female frames. see? biiiig difference. /s

    there should be no difference. oraxia showing clit below the gem, marie spreading wide open and uriel showing balls are all the same way of being bad. just one is female and the other one is male.

    So the way I saw it (I could be wrong) is that these "acceptable" art 3 and 4 are okay but draw a line on Uriel art? (A lot of people keep bringing that art up which I haven't seen it) Sound like they just wanna see female genitalia but not male like come on if I want see male NSFW? I'm a woman and seeing this post (not yours, the mod) piss me as some (SOME) people see us as nothing more then a gooner material. I might be bit too woke for that but that's how I saw it

  • So what you're saying is that so long as it's a female frame. It's fine, but man when it comes to a male frame it's suddenly too disgusting.

    Fuck this place I'm out.

    I find it fascinating how they managed to choose the most idiotic response possible, managing to piss off both the supporters and denouncers of these posts. It's a complete failure in every way, contradicting itself countless times and communicating nothing beyond bizarre and blatant sexism. Fucking incredible.

    As a woman, yeah me too, no thank you, I don't wanna be seen as a gooner material to these incel

    Yeah, I’m muting this sub. This is peak idiocy even by reddit standards.

  • time to add the "Please put an NSFW tag on this. I was on the train and when I saw this I had to start.." copypasta to the automod

    Please put an NSFW tag on this. I was on the solar rail and when I saw this I had to start furiously masturbating. Everyone else gave me strange looks and were saying things like “what the fuck” and “call the tenno”. I dropped my kimpad and everyone around me saw this image. Now there is a whole solar rail of men masturbating together at this one image. This is all your fault, you could have prevented this if you had just tagged this post NSFW

    Are you really sure you wanna call the Tenno?

    i think they wanted a tenno to come and bisect me vertically

    choked on a pizza slice thanks to this

  • “…where it's not the primary focal point of the artwork”

    Those last two “acceptable” examples are the epitome of “detailed outlines of […] genitals” and are clearly meant to be the focal point of the image. You can see Marie’s labia and Oraxia’s clitoris. I never thought I’d be typing these things. Seems like one hell of an oversight.

    Yeah this "new ruling" is hardly much ruling mods just want less male soft core corn and are fine with female soft core in here

    The "acceptable posts" are

    • Comic depicting sex (as comedy).

    • Comic depicting sex (as comedy).

    • Pornographic art depicting visible genitals (under skin-tight fabric).

    • Pornographic art depicting visible genitals (under skin-tight fabric).

    Important distinction! Pornographic art is only acceptable if it's female pornographic art

    yeah, male art makes the weirdos act up and raise a fuss because their peen is too offended to stand down

    DE should just take over the sub and lay some ground rules, mods take is absurd.

    Couldn't agree more; but I doubt they want anything to do with the sub honestly.

    they really did make the two problematic posts okay despite them breaking the outline rule & basically said sexualizing female frames is okay but sexualizing male frames isn’t.

    I'd have been on board with this "change" if they didn't then include all that shit as being "acceptable". Absolute insanity.

    It's by design, not an oversight. Earlier it was linked that the mods looked for dissent to cherrypick that it was accounts that allegedly primarily just posted complaints about the more lewd NSFW pieces.

    Agreed. If they still stand behind this, I can only assume the difference between acceptable and non-acceptable is adding a "slit."

    Sigh... Having the same thoughts about having to type things out. I feel like these rules barely change anything if those 2 don't represent detail or primary focal point.

    Agreed. If they still stand behind this, I can only assume the difference between acceptable and non-acceptable is adding a "slit."

    Which is funny because the concept/WIP art for F4derati0n (last example) had a fully drawn out slit, this is just the version with a really skimpy/thin "suit" lol

    Gooner porn-addict mods are the bane of many a gaming subreddit.

    Yep, those are the types of posts that should be in violation.

  • detailed outline

    Smug Marie doesn't count as a detailed outline? Mods, are you all literally blind?

  • so who's gonna make the new sub for normal people?

    Time to move actual discussion to NSFWarframe sub

    half of the mods here are also mods there though

    yeah, but it would be a really funny way to stoke the fire

    yo that would be so funny

  • My question is: ok, so if "artwork" is fine, what about all the low effort screenshots? You say a rule used to exist but has been removed due to it not needing enforcement. So it's not a rule anymore and we have to be inundated with new "huhuhuh check it out" posts every time there's a new female heirloom skin?

    If someone dresses up a screenshot, some filters in captura, does that count as artwork?

  • Congratulations on NSFW for winning the War on NSFW

  • Can we just not have this stuff on the main sub at this point? I mean, is it right to sexualize us women's, but when we sexualize males and we get a view of Uriel family jewels, then it's not allowed? 🤨 why is it allowed to sexualize women's in this sub gets me damn confused lol

    Not sure those pictures as examples of what is allowed are right.

    I just don't want to see any of this content on this sub. I want to share builds, discuss lore, theorize on future frames, etc.

    The last thing I want is a subreddit that I feel ashamed to look at while I'm on the bus or doing anything else in public.

    Absolutely! This sub is supposed to be about builds, lore etc.. but now it's full of losers drawing women's private parts. I expect the blurry images to be spoilers and not porn, there's already a sub for that. If I wanted to see that crap, which I would never call art, I'd go there instead. Or I actually just turn around and look at my man, honestly, I don't need any weird drawings for that stuff..

    Mods and these so called "artists" need to get out there and touch some grass

    I opened one of those damn images while I was visiting my mother. I know how you feel.😰

    why is it allowed to sexualize women's in this sub gets me damn confused lol

    Because reddit mods will never beat the allegations. Reddit is pretty overwhelmingly straight men

    Heck even us straight men are staring at this post and going "Wtf? More than 50% of those arts are just ass and (implied) puss, and apparently that's not a focal point enough?"

    It's ridiculous, I'm here to read warframe news and stuff, not get a boner .

    (Also the dichotomy in examples is laughable lol. Here in example 1 and 2 of acceptable stuff, we have jokes related to sex/internet meme about it drawn in an almost non-horny way (because it isn't emphasising genitalia or asking you to bone the picture, just making fun with the motion. The meme being reference also literally shows that the joke was there being no penetration involved and yet someone got pregnant-> turning into the "tragic backstory" of some dude at a bar) And in example 3 and 4 we have just straight up r34/porn)

  • Is this a joke? Do (some of at least) the examples of “acceptable” posts not literally go against what is explained before them?

    I had someone try and rationalize it to me as "it's not pornographic because I don't see it that way."  They're just moving goalposts so they can allow as much goonerbait as possible, it's like they're afraid of the self-shame of visiting the NSFW sub. The first two examples are fine, there's literally no justifying the other two. 

    Which is funny, instead of being ashamed that they went on the NSFW sub, they'd rather turn the entire main sub into a porn sub.

    No one fucking cares if you look at anime titties, we just didn't want the main game sub to be an open porn sub.

    I've legit had people side-eye me for recommending or talking about warframe because the perception is so closely connected to gooner gaming, and it gets harder to dispel that with each of these controversies.

    Yeah, I mean people can point the finger at Reb for pushing the envelope more than what you'd normally see in dev communications, but this sub pushed things way the fuck too far, and a million miles past any jokes or innuendo from her.

    And if the mods don't want people to think they're homophobic, they're definitely going the wrong way about clearing that up, since they've made it clear in print that only male sexual images are against the rules, everything else is "art" that isn't made just for the sake of being sexual.

    Yeah.

  • I still feel like the last 2 are unacceptable, and I'm a straight male...

  • Way to give credibility to everyone calling the sub out for homophobia and sexism. I still wouldn't call the community homophobic, but the mods of this sub??? Hmmmmm.

    Is there any other explanation why the mods would create rules that specifically allow that Oraxia post and not the Uriel one?

  • so basically, porn artwork is fine as long as it doesn't show Male genitalia.

    you coulda just said that.

    THIS, I don't get how mods get pissy over male genitalia but not female genitalia? Once again, us woman are seen nothing more than a gooner material 😔 (might be too woke for this)

    Yeah this decision is offensive to basically everyone. Misogyny AND homophobia all wrapped into one double standard mess (but for some reason the rhino/nezha art is okay??). And god forbid you have nuts I guess. Cause I guess thats gross...

    What's the nsfwarframe sub for at this point? I joined this one to avoid 8000 wisp ass posts every time I open reddit. At least the Uriel one was something new 

    Because male sexualization is only acceptable when it's for comedy, look at Venom and now Deadpool in Marvel Rivals. The only reason they're allowed to have asses as detailed as all the other female characters is because they're meant to be funny, they're there for ridicule not to actually be arousing.

  • [deleted]

    This post hurts me as a woman because they want to see more females NSFW then a male one like is a male art not good enough for you?

    The decision is definitely being pushed forward by straight men, there's no other reason for their decision to ban NSFW of men while allowing NSFW of women to remain.

    Yeah seems really weird, they had a lot people calling them out on Oraxia's posts so they didn't link the post itself but linked the artwork. So funny to me how they said they were going for a middle ground (Which would be moving NSFW posts to the NSFW sub, half the team are also mods there) but no they went with sexism.

  • Your examples of acceptable artwork are the literal examples that started this. If "cheeks spread bent over but in a suit" is acceptable.. yeah, nah, that aint gonna go well.

    Theyre also extremely low quality memes, which should be against other subreddit rules? Are low quality memes allowed if theyre extremely suggestive in nature now?

    This does uh.. not seem to be what the community was after. Or maybe it was, idk. Still gonna be plenty of bitching.

    Edit: after reviewing this post a bit more, I dont think Ive seen subreddit mods make such a strange post since maybe the r/art fiasco. I dont think Ive ever seen the mods say that the artwork that started this whole debacle is an example of fine art, because obviously it aint. Is this smoke & mirrors?

    The Helldivers sub had a pretty good one about a very similar issue, particularly when the mods declared that "gooner" was a slur and would no longer be tolerated..

    The whole new "rules" just come off homophobic. Many of us have been saying for ages while this escalated that the mods only care and follow last year's rules if it's a male character, and when you look at what they actually did over it, and their acceptable "artistic value" examples, I'm just saying, they sure aren't changing anyone's opinion.

  • Why do half your examples of acceptable posts immediately break the rules stated prior to the examples?

  • when I’m in an “out of touch with my community” competition and my opponent is the Warframe mods:

  • Examples of acceptable posts
    Look inside
    All examples are either sexual intercourse or clearly displayed genitals

    Alright guys it's okay just put a traffic cone where the cock and balls or vagina or nipples would be and it'll be fine, even if it's the most obviously provocative thing imaginable

    No no, you dont understand, what they meant was that porn is fine as long as there arent visual dicks.

  • Lmao. What a sad look for the community. I'll never recommend this sub for any new players. It's literally double standards

  • In other words, porn is only allowed if it's women. What a weird stance. Those last two examples of acceptable posts are a joke.

  • This has to be one of the dumbest things I've ever read. Why is porn of the women frames fine but the male ones aren't??? Either both are ok, or none are ok. Insane

  • I hope this sub gets new mods, we deserve better.

  • Why is the Marie post allowed still when there is outline of her genitals?

  • I’m sorry, but the “acceptable” examples are ridiculous. That’s hardly enforcing anything if those are acceptable lol It’s not a crazy ask to just remove the gooner art from the subreddit.

  • This is literally nothing. You made no change. All the complained about posts are still around. The only ones that did not make it to acceptable are the gay ones. Funny. Insane to link the last two "acceptable" posts with a straight face. Have any of you spoken to a person in real life?

  • those examples are acceptable? they're all pretty much gooners (hornyposts). wow...i would think those would be examples of unacceptable artwork.

    Inb4 Uriel without his ballsack gets posted.

    Somehow I knew they'd end up making a hypocritical rule designed to only ban porn of 1 sex but not of the other, Idk how these are the mods of one of the most inclusive games' subreddits with the non-inclusive outlook they have on moderation.

    Now I have to give Uriel bottom surgery since if he has a fat muff it'll suddenly be allowed.

    Surely it's not against the rules to exaggerate codpieces on warframes like the exaggerations done in the allowed art. Just needs to not have a detailed outline!

    Define detailed, since that seems to mean a different thing for male depictions than it does for female depictions.

    And can I make the codpiece flaccid and veiny and give it foreskin? Because people take a LOT of artistic liberty to exaggerate and redesign female frames to be as exposed and sexually explicit as possible in their allowed art, multiplying their cup size, giving them physics, adding vaginal lip and clitoris bulges on separate occasions.

    Uriel with a clit like the Oraxia one when? 

    Oh maybe give him some nice big devil titties while you're at it. 

    Let Voruna have the cock and balls too.

    Now we're cookin

    Honestly. The Marie one is particularly insane to me. What's the point in banning nudity if skin tight ass shots are still acceptable?

    Edit: Jesus, the Oraxia pinup is also allowed? Is this a prank?

    i was agreeing with everything till the "acceptable" artwork which is a joke, those kind of post are main problem that most ppl have in here

  • LOL. First two are fine but those last two. Like come on. Legit just say no male drawings.

  • ""NSFW artwork is allowed if there is no detailed outline or bare uncovered nipples, anuses, or genitals. Nudity is not allowed"

    And then following this by declaring the Oraxia and Wisp art as "acceptable" is absolutely wild. 🤣 I guess it's fair game to draw labia and big asses on r/warframe now, but don't you dare create an outline of balls or a bulge.

    What gets me, though, is:

    Allowances may be made if the nudity is intended to be artistic, where it's not the primary focal point of the artwork (e.g. Michelangelo's David). Any nudity found in game is allowed

    Ah yes, those posts definitely are akin to Michelangelo's David. My immediate thought of seeing the artist depicting Marie in a suggestive pose, with her cheeks and boobs exaggerated with a suggestive face, was "damn, Michelangelo would be so proud of these artists".

  • I'm a lesbian and I can 10000% say that if we are allowing coochie like in 3 and 4, the straights and gays should get their balls and cock outlines allowed. I'm all for women being hot and sexy poses, but can't leave my fellow tenno hanging out to dry without the spice.

    That said the image section should show image 1 and 2 as allowed, 3 and 4 not allowed.

    I thought the r/Gunpla mods saying that a model kit isn't a model kit if it is a blind box and a model kit was the dumbest reddit mod take of the year. At least it wasn't sexist.

  • Why allow nsfw at all? Theres a whole sub for that.

    Literally asking myself the same thing, theres no reason we should have any nudity, porn or sexualization, even if its from in game scenes or images directly. if ppl wanna see shit like that there's a place for it, shouldn't be here.

  • thats not it chief. you cant say "for males it isnt allowed, but female warframes are fine because "its not detailed enough"" just say its fine or its not fine. the marie and oraxia post are not fine, if the uriel post is not fine. please be better. maybe DE needs to step up and put your heads in a right place?

  • This is actually ridiculous.

    Full vulva outline = not too sexual

    Outline of testicles = too sexual

    Joke about impregnating a character that is frequently fetishized and called transphobic slurs by the playerbase = not too sexual

    Make it make sense? Can you all just admit you're all afraid of males being sexualised but still want to allow goonposts since it's uncontroversial? This is supremely disappointing

    that's why the porn addict mod didn't link that post

  • THOSE are acceptable??? swear to god the rules havent even changed in that case

    ...except the cone one, that one is fantastic, that's very acceptable

  • This is incredibly stupid. 3 and 4 are NSFW as well and don't belong just like the Uriel post.

    Its the exact same thing??

    Sounds like the mod team needs to take a second look at this, the comments seem to all agree this is wrong.

  • pretty fucking clear not one woman moderates this sub.

  • So we have a subreddit for gooner fuel and a subreddit for porn, how about just one regular one?

    WarframeMemes and WarframeLore seems quite enticing

  • Comparing this shit to Michelangelo is sincerely the funniest fucking thing I've ever read. This can't be real, you guys are trolling 🤣

  • How are the last two examples still acceptable? They are both clearly suggestive and inappropriate. L mods.

  • So dumb question, does the Deluxe Styanax skin get an exception for the bare nipples thin considering he’s in the game and has his out or…?

    I know it’s not super important but I was wondering how he would fit into that lol

  • This sub is an embarrassment lmao

  • The last two are the farthest thing I've seen from tasteful. Just rename the sub to r/NSFWarframe at this point honestly.

    This rule change is somehow even worse than I and i'd bet money 90% of people expected.

  • This is stupid, get rid of all of them. The Oraxia, Marie AND the Uriel shit. Why are you making exceptions when it's the SAME thing?

    God, gaming reddits are literally in hell rn when it comes to making proper decisions.

  • I don't think I've ever seen a game that has two porn subs but no regular one before.

  • DE should just leave Reddit and officially dissociate with this platform if this is how things are going to go.

  • As a fem this is bullshit fem art has had everything out but one man's blue ball sack is too much lol

    I'm not against nsfw art at all btw against double standards.

  • Showed the permitted examples to my girlfriend who writes fanfic but doesn't know anything about Warframe and she also agrees that the examples of things that are "allowed" are super weird because while they don't break the rules as written, they're still super suggestive and inappropriate.