We’ve reviewed the draft paper from Breakthrough Listen (Jacobson-Bell et al., 2025) regarding the radio scans of Interstellar Object 3I/Atlas.

The mainstream headlines are already running with it: "No Technosignatures Found." They are using this "Null Result" to claim the object is just a rock.

However, when you look at the actual search parameters used in the paper, a massive strategic flaw emerges. The "official" conclusion relies on two assumptions that contradict the physical behavior of the object:

  1. The Physics Contradiction: They admit the object is accelerating, yet they found no radio noise. Natural comets that accelerate due to outgassing are messy and "loud" in the radio spectrum. 3I/Atlas is accelerating like a rocket but is as silent as a stone.
  2. The "Cell Phone" Fallacy: The paper explicitly states they searched for "isotropic continuous-wave transmitters" signals broadcasting in all directions simultaneously.

This begs the question: If you were a probe entering a potentially hostile system ("The Dark Forest"), would you be broadcasting omnidirectionally like a cell tower? Or would you use tight-beam, directional comms that look like silence to an outside observer?

We argue that this lack of signal doesn't prove it's a rock. It confirms Anomaly XVII: The Dark Mode Protocol.

We’ve published the full strategic dispatch, including the breakdown of the "471,198 hits" found in the raw data and the "Blind Spot" analysis.

Read the full Sentinel Report here.

  • Use of Upvotes and Downvotes is heavily encouraged. Ridicule is not allowed. Help keep this subreddit awesome by hitting the report button on any violations you see and a moderator will address it. Thank you and welcome to UFOB.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

  • Why isn't Avi Loeb saying this, if true? I thought natural radio emissions corresponding to OH absorption were detected, e.g. "The First Radio Signal From Comet 3I/Atlas Ends the Debate About Its Nature | WIRED https://share.google/dJDYholCD24xJTKiD"

  • Please, enough with these low effort ChatGPT written posts.

  • Nice take but i get ptss from your ai written post. Especially the titles of statements in bold hurt. Only thing missing is the phrase “this makes everything different “.

    I totally get that you want to polish your writing, but please, im a human and i want to talk to other humans, and i dont want to need to think “hmmm is this an actual argument or is this bogus that just sounds good”.

    Just put in the effort of your own thinking…

    Or, this is very common..

    Thats why i get fed up with it.

  • Is this the same object people were talking about a year ago, and breakthrough was mentioned alot. Or is this a different ting altogether. I recall the claim back then was it was likely technology rather than rock..