Why is everyone obsessed with labeling MY genitals? If I say, don’t call it that, then you do not get to call it that point blank. This is regardless if you think you can say it, or disagree with it.
I would highly appreciate it if you do not refer to my genitals as ;
It being or looking trans
Comparing it to a clit
Any female anatomical wording
—
It’s frustrating to see that in this space, which is supposed to be safe, I do not feel respected and lowkey not safe for setting boundaries when it comes to my genitals. I came to share, not to be judged.
I’m not making a statement about trans bodies in general. I’m talking about my own body and the language used for it. I’ve said that referring to my genitals as ‘trans’ causes me dysphoria as I’m trans, not my genitals and/or body. Being trans yourself doesn’t give permission to describe my body in ways I’ve asked you not to. I am trans, my genitals are not, and I’m asking that this boundary be respected.
Edit;
It appears people do not understand what I meant, or my words were put incorrectly. So I rephrased it.
Old; Guess that makes it worse haha, as you are trans yourself and thinking it’s cool to refer to someone’s genitals as trans.
Saying someone genitals are trans is inherently rude. Many people who get srs don’t want their genitalia to “be or look trans” most of us want it to pass.
So being a trans individual, knowing the pains and yet, still saying someone’s post op genitals are trans. It’s pouring salt on open wounds.
there's a difference between saying something looks trans and saying something is trans. saying something is trans doesn't mean it doesn't pass as cis. your internal transphobia is affecting how you view the word
I am trans, not my genitals. I’m cool with being a transexual man. But I do not need people to refer to my genitals as trans.
Trans is something that says something about a person, not someone’s body.
This isn’t in anyway internal transphobia. It appears that the meaning of my words got lost or misunderstood. I am not avoiding my transness.
How some people are cool with some wording, some aren’t. In the given case, my genitals were discussed, and I’m giving a heads up like hey please don’t refer to my genitals to “it being trans”. Yet because they are trans I should accept it? Letting people walk over the boundaries I set?
From a purely grammar perspective, that isn't how descriptive words work, especially in a context like this, ofc I will respect what you request, however I'm just a little confused as it seems you may not understand how the descriptive word "trans" would operate in this context. Obviously this isn't a grammar/English specific subreddit so the semantics of grammar don't really matter here, but its just kinda confusing to me, would you be willing to elaborate?
I understand how adjectives function grammatically. My point isn’t about whether the word can be used that way in English, but about how I understand and experience the term trans. I use it as an identity descriptor for people, not as a neutral label to be applied to body parts. In this context, grammar isn’t really the issue, consent and impact are. Referring to my genitals as ‘trans’ is dysphoria-inducing for me, and I’m asking that it not be used.
I never said your genitalia is trans I said it looks cis. I said that I realized it was a trans page. Anyways we are all trans I never mean to hurt your feeling's. Wtf
You literally said “I actually didn't know it was trans” was is past tense of is. After that, you referenced to the page. Maybe you did mean it differently, but the word choice was made it lose the meaning.
I guess it just hurt when I pointed it out, that I didn’t appreciate you calling it trans, and yet because you are trans, you could say it. As your response after was “I know I’m a trans too”.
I assume because surgically constructed genitals are bio genitals; they're made of biological tissue. And also because they said "genuinely a dick" suggesting that surgically constructed penises aren't actually penises. People often aim for natal-passing genitals, but that doesn't mean that our genitals aren't "real" or "biological"; it's transphobic to imply that surgically constructed genitals are "fake".
Personally, I would say that linking the words “genuinely a dick” to suggesting surgically created dicks and dick, is a bit far fetched. You took their words and added some more to it.
I guess it’s also just ironic as some other commented say “didn’t know it was trans” about my genitals. And got upvoted quite some. That comment is actually pretty shitty imo.
The difference sit in word usage.
“Genuinely a dick” and “genuine dick”.
The one you are referring to is genuine. Genuine is used to describe a word, in the given case dick. Would the commenter have said this, yeah that wouldn’t be it.
Now what the commenter said, “that’s genuinely a dick”. In this case there word genuinely is used to emphasize or insist upon something. It’s like saying “this dick is for real”. This way uses more emphaty and assertion of realness.
Thanks mate! It’s one of my fav things about them haha. I didn’t do anything to them. I bet because the took some skin from above my penis, the pubic area, when moving my sack below my penis, it added that extra hang.
Wow! So you don't have implants, and you already have that full sack hanging look. That's a pretty smart thing thing to do. The surgeon did a damn good job ball sack creation. The positioning is also perfect 👌.
I will ask my surgeon about that for my own sack (getting phallo next year so would be different, can't hurt to ask).
I’m planning on getting implants tho. Once I lay or sit, my sack looks deflated if that makes sense. But I’m def happy with it. I’ve seen sack where it’s filled with a lot of fat, like an erect penis sack. So I’m really happy.
here it is shown with some simple illustrations how they did it.
Is this extended meta? It looks great!
Nope, just the “regular” one, al though the surgeons did use a similar approach as Dr Özer’s extended, ( she worked at the given hospital prior )
Congratulations brother it looks great!
Thank you! Appreciate it.
Dude, you look amazing! Who was your surgeon?
Initial surgery was with Dr. M.B. Bouman and Drs. b. Ronkes. They are located at VUMC, Netherlands.
And what a handsome lil fella he is
Seriously, awesome results, glad to see more ftm posts recently
Why is everyone obsessed with labeling MY genitals? If I say, don’t call it that, then you do not get to call it that point blank. This is regardless if you think you can say it, or disagree with it.
I would highly appreciate it if you do not refer to my genitals as ;
—
It’s frustrating to see that in this space, which is supposed to be safe, I do not feel respected and lowkey not safe for setting boundaries when it comes to my genitals. I came to share, not to be judged.
[removed]
I will take it as a compliment. But fyi it aint trans, I am, but my genitals ain’t. :)
I know I am trans too, but I thought it was a cis dick at first and then I realized.
I’m not making a statement about trans bodies in general. I’m talking about my own body and the language used for it. I’ve said that referring to my genitals as ‘trans’ causes me dysphoria as I’m trans, not my genitals and/or body. Being trans yourself doesn’t give permission to describe my body in ways I’ve asked you not to. I am trans, my genitals are not, and I’m asking that this boundary be respected.
Edit; It appears people do not understand what I meant, or my words were put incorrectly. So I rephrased it.
Old; Guess that makes it worse haha, as you are trans yourself and thinking it’s cool to refer to someone’s genitals as trans.
Can you explain that please?
I will try my best to.
Saying someone genitals are trans is inherently rude. Many people who get srs don’t want their genitalia to “be or look trans” most of us want it to pass.
So being a trans individual, knowing the pains and yet, still saying someone’s post op genitals are trans. It’s pouring salt on open wounds.
there's a difference between saying something looks trans and saying something is trans. saying something is trans doesn't mean it doesn't pass as cis. your internal transphobia is affecting how you view the word
I am trans, not my genitals. I’m cool with being a transexual man. But I do not need people to refer to my genitals as trans.
Trans is something that says something about a person, not someone’s body.
This isn’t in anyway internal transphobia. It appears that the meaning of my words got lost or misunderstood. I am not avoiding my transness. How some people are cool with some wording, some aren’t. In the given case, my genitals were discussed, and I’m giving a heads up like hey please don’t refer to my genitals to “it being trans”. Yet because they are trans I should accept it? Letting people walk over the boundaries I set?
From a purely grammar perspective, that isn't how descriptive words work, especially in a context like this, ofc I will respect what you request, however I'm just a little confused as it seems you may not understand how the descriptive word "trans" would operate in this context. Obviously this isn't a grammar/English specific subreddit so the semantics of grammar don't really matter here, but its just kinda confusing to me, would you be willing to elaborate?
I understand how adjectives function grammatically. My point isn’t about whether the word can be used that way in English, but about how I understand and experience the term trans. I use it as an identity descriptor for people, not as a neutral label to be applied to body parts. In this context, grammar isn’t really the issue, consent and impact are. Referring to my genitals as ‘trans’ is dysphoria-inducing for me, and I’m asking that it not be used.
Ok I see 👍🏼
I never said your genitalia is trans I said it looks cis. I said that I realized it was a trans page. Anyways we are all trans I never mean to hurt your feeling's. Wtf
You literally said “I actually didn't know it was trans” was is past tense of is. After that, you referenced to the page. Maybe you did mean it differently, but the word choice was made it lose the meaning.
I guess it just hurt when I pointed it out, that I didn’t appreciate you calling it trans, and yet because you are trans, you could say it. As your response after was “I know I’m a trans too”.
Yes you are right whatever have a nice day. 🙄
Very nice!🤤
Dude, that's genuinely a dick, looks like a bio/cis one FR ✨🙀
Not sure why people are downvoting you. This type of comments are actually really great. Having passing genitals is something i aim for
I assume because surgically constructed genitals are bio genitals; they're made of biological tissue. And also because they said "genuinely a dick" suggesting that surgically constructed penises aren't actually penises. People often aim for natal-passing genitals, but that doesn't mean that our genitals aren't "real" or "biological"; it's transphobic to imply that surgically constructed genitals are "fake".
Nice cock though anyway.
Personally, I would say that linking the words “genuinely a dick” to suggesting surgically created dicks and dick, is a bit far fetched. You took their words and added some more to it.
I guess it’s also just ironic as some other commented say “didn’t know it was trans” about my genitals. And got upvoted quite some. That comment is actually pretty shitty imo.
What's the opposite of "genuinely a dick"? "Not genuinely a dick". That's the literal meaning of adding "not" to what they said.
The difference sit in word usage. “Genuinely a dick” and “genuine dick”.
The one you are referring to is genuine. Genuine is used to describe a word, in the given case dick. Would the commenter have said this, yeah that wouldn’t be it.
Now what the commenter said, “that’s genuinely a dick”. In this case there word genuinely is used to emphasize or insist upon something. It’s like saying “this dick is for real”. This way uses more emphaty and assertion of realness.
I totally agree it really does, idk why ppl are being mean to you
Looks a lot like the one i was born with
Those balls have some nice hang. Did you do any ball sack stretching to get them to hang that well, or did they just naturally do so.
Very nice 👌
Thanks mate! It’s one of my fav things about them haha. I didn’t do anything to them. I bet because the took some skin from above my penis, the pubic area, when moving my sack below my penis, it added that extra hang.
Wow! So you don't have implants, and you already have that full sack hanging look. That's a pretty smart thing thing to do. The surgeon did a damn good job ball sack creation. The positioning is also perfect 👌.
I will ask my surgeon about that for my own sack (getting phallo next year so would be different, can't hurt to ask).
I’m planning on getting implants tho. Once I lay or sit, my sack looks deflated if that makes sense. But I’m def happy with it. I’ve seen sack where it’s filled with a lot of fat, like an erect penis sack. So I’m really happy.
here it is shown with some simple illustrations how they did it.
Thank you for the article. Saved it on my phone. Even though I don't know the language the illustrations are very helpful. Thank you man 👌
Goals!
Nice! Congrats. :>
Fair play, that's the most penis like penis and balls I've seen on a trans guy, ever.
Congratulations on hitting this milestone!
I'm going the opposite way but I can't wait to be ticking off the months and years post op when I have my turn. X
Congratulations ✨