Hi everyone,
I’m a structural engineer (steel design, Eurocode 3) and I also do some software development.
I’m curious about the community’s experience:
- Are there tasks or checks in steel design that you find slow, repetitive, or frustrating?
- Are there things you wish were easier, faster, or more practical with the tools you use?
- If a simple, reliable tool existed to make these tasks easier, would that be useful for you?
I’m not selling anything just trying to understand what would really help engineers in practice.
Thanks for any insights!
Here’s what I want, no… here’s what we all need you to do;
Go into Eurocode, AASHTO, IBC, whatever, and simplify that shit. Use AI. Management loves AI. I’m a yank, so my poison is AASHTO, but someone ANYONE needs to do the math and zero out all the BS checks, reduction factors, and nonsensical masters theses commentary in the text and reduce it down. A lot. I’m talking like 1950’s ASD level simple Guide spec that fits in your back pocket. Yes, that was a real thing.
FACT - more analysis creates more mistakes and errors by omission.
FACT - 95% of bridges and steel framing is simple low buck overpasses and non high rise buildings.
FACT - it takes 10-15 times as long to design basic steel framing now than it did only a generation ago
FACT - it’s getting to the point that the cost to design a common steel frame overpass costs as much as the steel frame. We are already WAY PAST the point where economizing steel quantities with additional design is cost effective. Have been for years. You spend about a dollar on design for every ten cents you save in erected steel cost, and that’s not just the quantity, it’s the more complex fabrication, erection, detailing, and materials sourcing.
Amen everything is worse now. We are so worried about niche cases the code is unusable. Case in point ACI 318-19 in mat foundations. Thank God they regained their minds in the latest code. AASHTO is up to 3 books now and we are still doing LFD on the rating side. Just stop. Clean things up. Service load design is so clean and necessary can we just go back a bit?
I find in manufactured structures and equipment the people who actually do the analysis correctly lose the bid to idiots who ignore the rules.
💯. Steel is not alone in this. ACI makes you bounce around 4-5 chapters for a simple beam design
Eurocodes are terrible for this, with the second generation Eurocodes looking even worse
Is the second generation worse? I assumed they'd improved the workflow.
From the webinars I have attended, the second generation of Eurocode 3 is longer than the current one (i think by 20 pages but not 100% sure), with the new formulas for LTB atleast being much longer and more complex - also resulting in reduced capacities
Reduced LTB capacities? I'll just pretend I didn't hear that.