I'd love to hear a cop explain, "You didn't get pulled over for traveling and you're not being arrested for traveling. You're operating a motor vehicle without a license on the street below our feet."
Exactly. Just insist that they arent being charged with traveling and when they keep repeating that they arent doing what they are charge with then tell them that thats what courts are for. If people would need to agree that they had done something wrong in order to get arrested for it then nobody would ever get arrested. You could arrest a bank robber, with ski mask over his head, the gun and money still on him and he could pull the Shaggy defense and go free.
That isnt how that works.
Also will police please start telling the idiots that the government and police is not a corporation and the laws arent optional ?
BTW, totally unrelated to the sovereign citizen nonsense, the US justice system is pretty terrible for people struggling with substance addiction. Harsh punishments for trivial drug offenses pile unbearable financial burdens on an already disadvantaged demographic in the form of fines and costs.
It attempts to solve addiction by just saying 'don't do it or we will punish you even harder' instead of offering viable rehab options, leading to steep jail sentences when people inevitably relapse. All that is not helping drug abusers rehab, but further marginalizing them and perpetuating drug usage.
The US should have admitted decades ago that its War on Drugs was a complete failure and that they need to completely reevaluate the approach to fighting drug issues. However, conservatism, inertia, and misplaced pride are preventing politicians from admitting the mistakes and starting to overhaul the system.
Their arguments are certainly becoming less and less reasonable. I understand that a someone initially thought they were being 'smart', by mixing "...the right to travel shall not be infringed..." with driving a car. But now "I have a right to drive" is just lazy.
They love to cry about 'rights' and 'The Constitution' but completely glaze over the Tenth Amendment.
I would also be curious to see the stats of just how many times cases have gone to court and this argument has been successful, I would guess it's over 1000 with a 0% win rate.
edit: when they are checking through the car, at about 9:30 in the video, you can see that his car is full of tools and toolboxes, does this mean that he is, in fact, using his vehicle to conduct commerce?
Riding dirty without a valid license as a repeat-offender in a small town is very much on-brand for these paste-eaters.
I'd love to hear a cop explain, "You didn't get pulled over for traveling and you're not being arrested for traveling. You're operating a motor vehicle without a license on the street below our feet."
Exactly. Just insist that they arent being charged with traveling and when they keep repeating that they arent doing what they are charge with then tell them that thats what courts are for. If people would need to agree that they had done something wrong in order to get arrested for it then nobody would ever get arrested. You could arrest a bank robber, with ski mask over his head, the gun and money still on him and he could pull the Shaggy defense and go free.
That isnt how that works.
Also will police please start telling the idiots that the government and police is not a corporation and the laws arent optional ?
You love to see these entitled idiots run up against the real world. Spoiler; the record is: entitled idiots-0, Reality-thousands.
Dont taze me.bro
Short answer is meth.
BTW, totally unrelated to the sovereign citizen nonsense, the US justice system is pretty terrible for people struggling with substance addiction. Harsh punishments for trivial drug offenses pile unbearable financial burdens on an already disadvantaged demographic in the form of fines and costs.
It attempts to solve addiction by just saying 'don't do it or we will punish you even harder' instead of offering viable rehab options, leading to steep jail sentences when people inevitably relapse. All that is not helping drug abusers rehab, but further marginalizing them and perpetuating drug usage.
The US should have admitted decades ago that its War on Drugs was a complete failure and that they need to completely reevaluate the approach to fighting drug issues. However, conservatism, inertia, and misplaced pride are preventing politicians from admitting the mistakes and starting to overhaul the system.
/End of rant
Not even once.
Their arguments are certainly becoming less and less reasonable. I understand that a someone initially thought they were being 'smart', by mixing "...the right to travel shall not be infringed..." with driving a car. But now "I have a right to drive" is just lazy.
They love to cry about 'rights' and 'The Constitution' but completely glaze over the Tenth Amendment.
I would also be curious to see the stats of just how many times cases have gone to court and this argument has been successful, I would guess it's over 1000 with a 0% win rate.
edit: when they are checking through the car, at about 9:30 in the video, you can see that his car is full of tools and toolboxes, does this mean that he is, in fact, using his vehicle to conduct commerce?
Dunno about you, but when I see a nut with a car full of tools, the assumption is not that they're his tools.
But I guess "I'm off to fence my stolen shit." counts as conducting commerce.
These videos are so entertaining. 🤩
This one was hilarious.