Oh nope she blew it, she used the word « automobile » instead of saying « ship » or conveyance », and didn’t type her name in all caps, she just created joinder with the government. Try again!
The CEO of Safelite and the presidents of the Towing and Recovery Association of America and Professional Bail Agents of the United States appreciate her pledged support.
This code section supplies a definition of motor vehicle applicable only to one small chapter of US federal law. It does not affect the rest of federal law or any state law.
No soliciting - 42 USC 1983
This code section just lets you sue the government if they violate your constitutional rights. Unsure how that applies to soliciting.
No trespassing - 28 CFR 29.1
This is just a federal regulation stating the purpose of a law establishing a voluntary anti-theft program whereby you can put a sticker on your car that allows law enforcement to stop the car to investigate whether it's been stolen if it seems suspicious. That's it.
Private property - 18 USC 654
This criminalizes federal officials embezzling or stealing. lol.
All rights asserted - 18 USC 242
This criminalizes federal officials knowingly violating constitutional rights. Again, lol.
28 CFR 29.1 has a provision where you can unregister from the program after you join it. SovCits take it out of context and say it means you can opt out of registering your vehicle.
Their car will be towed, they'll have to pay to get it released, and if (when) they take it on the road again the same thing will happen. Eventually, they can't pay the impound, or they'll be in jail so long that they'll lose their apartment/house, and they'll wind up on the streets complaining about the nasty government and the rigged legal system. Likely they will never stop being a SovCit.
Why not? The SovCidiot will whine and complain and continue not paying while racking up extreme storage fees. Good likelihood of the tow yard selling the vehicle for scrap if not picked up in 30 days.
These weirdos always think they're "sticking it to the man" but instead always end up sticking it to themselves.
When I was in college taking my first philosophy course, my teacher proposed an interesting analogy comparing "knowledge" to "opinions." To paraphrase, an opinion is like knowing a step-by-step driving route from Point A to Point B; you know how to get there, but it someone or something forces a detour, you might find yourself lost. Knowledge, on the other hand, is like knowing the general area around Point A and Point B; even if you get forced on a detour, you can figure out how to get where you're going.
Using that analogy, SovCits have frankensteined together a map of Paris, AK, Paris, NH, and Paris, TN, and claim to have an accurate representation of the capitol of France...
Do you have to be a Christian to be a Sovereign Citizen? I wouldn't be shocked if that were the case, I've just noticed the "Under God" shit in a lot of it. Is that a prerequisite for this idiocy?
Thank you! I just see so many races and religions and such an array of different people united in the fight against common sense and paying taxes, but many seem to relate it (loosely) on Christianity. Which kinda baffles me.
"I follow God's law!" "Natural law!" And "One woman created under God!" I guess I just think it's odd that they throw the God thing in with it. Like needing to add an extra layer of self-righteous crap. Jesus would probably register his car and have a drivers license. 🤷🏻♀️
Just the fact that she mentions UCC 1-308 is all the proof you need that she has no clue. If she actually read UCC 1-308 in context, she would realize how stupid she is. Unfortunately, she seems to even be too stupid to take that simple step and would rather push a false narrative to grift and flaunt the laws, which, when caught, she will try to claim All Rights Reserved under the very laws she says cannot be enforced upon her. Sovcidiots are nothing more than brain-dead cherry pickers.
If you think you've found a 'loop-hole' in the law wouldn't you run it past your lawyer first.
Similarly when I find a possible tax advantage I make enquiries about it before lodging my tax, because I don't want to be investigated by the authorities for claiming something I am not permitted to --- otherwise you can end up in legal & financial expense that is easily avoidable by just checking first.
So if I thought I found a loophole in registration & licensing requirements I would seek confirmation before blatantly flouncing the law..... OTHERWISE the ramifications could be fines, court, loss of vehicle etc - so I'd want to verify first....
I cannot understand why SOOOOOO many people just do what ever they believe.
What happens when these twats see a "Road Closed - Bridge Out" sign ??? Do they just drive on, because "I believe the bridge is actually OK, therefore I don't need to follow that rule or sign"
Or maybe bc the Google Maps or on the line says so? There are a lot of stories of people doing exactly that - driving off bridges and piers bc the map they have says so.
I don't understand why if they don't need license plates why don't they just run with nothing there instead of trying to pretend they have one and pray no one looks too closely?
While I would love to “get in contact” with them on this group and help them address their copious legal misconceptions……I feel the polite thing to do is blur their name like other posts connected to this group
Now why exactly this is any different from posting the company a DOT number is linked to…..I don’t know.
Can't wait to see them on Youtube either with a broken car window or a Judge Raking them....
Both please
Dog bite? Tasering?
Bark Bark Nom Nom?
Fire the fur missile!
I want the video trifecta. Broken window, Taser Taser Taser, and then the judge handing down an appropriate sentence.
Don't forget STOP RESISTING STOP RESISTING
Or her arguing with a tow lot after her car was towed even though it had that super official do not tow sign!
The law will catch up with Brittney eventually.
As time passes, I'm more convinced that the fumes from burning leaded gasoline screwed with more people with more effect than we realized.
There’s a distinct change in behavior in societies that happens about 30 years after leaded fuel is banned, so you’re not wrong.
Definitely had "born under power lines" vibes
“Mom took Tylenol when she was pregnant”😂
Mom took Tylenol and washed it down with her 3rd vodka and tonic of the day while pregnant, you mean, because the Tylenol isn't the problem.
While chain smoking.
Chain smoking.... METH!
Hence the 😂
Oh nope she blew it, she used the word « automobile » instead of saying « ship » or conveyance », and didn’t type her name in all caps, she just created joinder with the government. Try again!
Jurisdiction was not established. Checkmate
also no gold fringes around the "corrugated boat" and she forgot to put a left thumb print in blood on the corner
It will be interesting when it starts raining!!
The CEO of Safelite and the presidents of the Towing and Recovery Association of America and Professional Bail Agents of the United States appreciate her pledged support.
In case anyone is wondering:
This code section supplies a definition of motor vehicle applicable only to one small chapter of US federal law. It does not affect the rest of federal law or any state law.
This code section just lets you sue the government if they violate your constitutional rights. Unsure how that applies to soliciting.
This is just a federal regulation stating the purpose of a law establishing a voluntary anti-theft program whereby you can put a sticker on your car that allows law enforcement to stop the car to investigate whether it's been stolen if it seems suspicious. That's it.
This criminalizes federal officials embezzling or stealing. lol.
This criminalizes federal officials knowingly violating constitutional rights. Again, lol.
You already know what it is.
28 CFR 29.1 has a provision where you can unregister from the program after you join it. SovCits take it out of context and say it means you can opt out of registering your vehicle.
They really treat the law like Humpty Dumpty treats words, don’t they?
Does anyone give police handouts with info like this?
Just banking on the law of probabilities, I assure you that someone has tried at least once
It would be amusing to see a police sergeant run down a debunked list like this in a bodycam video.
For absolute certain
That nail painting emoji like she really did something
Well she did use her own name as a hashtag.
Third search result under her name: AmEx debt collection, surprising no one.
😂
She "squashed" the contracts, did she?
Is that like quashing a decision?
More like grapes. I like the pop they make when you get them just right.
Whoever rides in her area I want to ride along. I want to call the tow in so badly.
The whole sovcit notion is a mastery class in the Dunning-Kruger effect.
Their car will be towed, they'll have to pay to get it released, and if (when) they take it on the road again the same thing will happen. Eventually, they can't pay the impound, or they'll be in jail so long that they'll lose their apartment/house, and they'll wind up on the streets complaining about the nasty government and the rigged legal system. Likely they will never stop being a SovCit.
Depending on where you are, the tow yard might not release it unless it's registered and insured.
Ah yes, because tow drivers will totally treat that like their kryptonite garlic to not yoink that shit
I mean I can see a tow company just not wanting to deal with the hassle of towing a crazy person's car
Why not? The SovCidiot will whine and complain and continue not paying while racking up extreme storage fees. Good likelihood of the tow yard selling the vehicle for scrap if not picked up in 30 days.
These weirdos always think they're "sticking it to the man" but instead always end up sticking it to themselves.
This is why I maintain that sovcits are just masochists with a very specific kink.
I was gonna steal that car, but the cardboard says I can't. Dang
There’s no wet signature, so you’re good to go.
This is why most car thieves carry a Uno reverse card on their person at all times. (Source: Trust me bro)
When I was in college taking my first philosophy course, my teacher proposed an interesting analogy comparing "knowledge" to "opinions." To paraphrase, an opinion is like knowing a step-by-step driving route from Point A to Point B; you know how to get there, but it someone or something forces a detour, you might find yourself lost. Knowledge, on the other hand, is like knowing the general area around Point A and Point B; even if you get forced on a detour, you can figure out how to get where you're going.
Using that analogy, SovCits have frankensteined together a map of Paris, AK, Paris, NH, and Paris, TN, and claim to have an accurate representation of the capitol of France...
Paris, TX is feeling left out. May it join the fun?
The plaster is over their eyes.
Do you have to be a Christian to be a Sovereign Citizen? I wouldn't be shocked if that were the case, I've just noticed the "Under God" shit in a lot of it. Is that a prerequisite for this idiocy?
Not at all. Look up Sovereign King Bey and Moorish Sovereign Citizen movement.
Thank you! I just see so many races and religions and such an array of different people united in the fight against common sense and paying taxes, but many seem to relate it (loosely) on Christianity. Which kinda baffles me.
"I follow God's law!" "Natural law!" And "One woman created under God!" I guess I just think it's odd that they throw the God thing in with it. Like needing to add an extra layer of self-righteous crap. Jesus would probably register his car and have a drivers license. 🤷🏻♀️
Matthew 22:21 would confirm this suspicion.
Just the fact that she mentions UCC 1-308 is all the proof you need that she has no clue. If she actually read UCC 1-308 in context, she would realize how stupid she is. Unfortunately, she seems to even be too stupid to take that simple step and would rather push a false narrative to grift and flaunt the laws, which, when caught, she will try to claim All Rights Reserved under the very laws she says cannot be enforced upon her. Sovcidiots are nothing more than brain-dead cherry pickers.
I love the statute referenced under "no soliciting" is 42USC1983, which is the federal law for deprivation of civil rights.
I'm impressed that her rights are both assured and reserved. That's a good package deal.
So smarty.
People say homemade food is better than store-bought. Not sure about homemade license plates though
Ketchup uber alles.
"Here's a list of codes to take out of context."
If you think you've found a 'loop-hole' in the law wouldn't you run it past your lawyer first.
Similarly when I find a possible tax advantage I make enquiries about it before lodging my tax, because I don't want to be investigated by the authorities for claiming something I am not permitted to --- otherwise you can end up in legal & financial expense that is easily avoidable by just checking first.
So if I thought I found a loophole in registration & licensing requirements I would seek confirmation before blatantly flouncing the law..... OTHERWISE the ramifications could be fines, court, loss of vehicle etc - so I'd want to verify first....
I cannot understand why SOOOOOO many people just do what ever they believe.
What happens when these twats see a "Road Closed - Bridge Out" sign ??? Do they just drive on, because "I believe the bridge is actually OK, therefore I don't need to follow that rule or sign"
Or maybe bc the Google Maps or on the line says so? There are a lot of stories of people doing exactly that - driving off bridges and piers bc the map they have says so.
Why are you bringing common sense and logic into this? Are you in the right sub?
She might as well have put on Christmas lights spelling out "pull me over"
I don't understand why if they don't need license plates why don't they just run with nothing there instead of trying to pretend they have one and pray no one looks too closely?
While I would love to “get in contact” with them on this group and help them address their copious legal misconceptions……I feel the polite thing to do is blur their name like other posts connected to this group
Now why exactly this is any different from posting the company a DOT number is linked to…..I don’t know.
It’s okay, just use all lower case and they won’t know.
e.e. cummings loves this one simple trick.
Ever notice no one in this movement ever steps in to assist anyone else with their “legal” arguments…
same old bullshit. It never works.
I can hardly wait to see the state trooper break her window out and drag her ignorant ass out through the shattered glass.
Soon to be towed........
These people are a bunch of fruit loops… oh right… “with prejudice”
Bullshit
The only part i agree with is read contracts the rest is straight looney toon
We know where she falls on the hot/crazy scale