NOTICE: ShitLiberalsSay does not allow threatening, inciting, advocating, defending, justifying, glorifying, or celebrating violence.
Any offending posts/comments will be removed and the associated users will be banned.
Please note that we do not allow the following types of "low-hanging fruit" posts:
Social media content with less than 20 upvotes, likes, etc. (No visible score counts as 0.)
Anything you are personally involved in.
Any kind of social media polls.
Miscellaneous low effort content that has been reposted often historically (CCP collapse, Vaush, r/neoliberal, political compass memes).
Your posts will be removed, and you will risk being banned if you break this rule repeatedly.
Please also be mindful of our general subreddit rules (which can be found on the sidebar), and Reddit's sitewide rules.
LOL yeah they've been coopting language from decolonial and indigenous liberation struggles for a while now *but* only after 'we're civilized people coming to colonize this land' became frowned upon as a message because way back when that's exactly how they described their state building project.
Also Einat Wilf is very openly an ethnosupremacist, like I've never seen a more obvious example of colonizer speak 😂😂 Plus presumably this means these people support a massive demographic shift in Canadian provinces like BC that are mostly unceded territory for example and allowing the Indigenous tribes there full sovereignty and their own country? Are they gonna give up their ski resorts and overpriced condos and move off the land or...
Also correct me if I'm wrong since I'm still learning but isn't the idea of unceeded territory not in indigenous understanding? Because indigenous people see the land very differently from the west? Apologies in advance if I am mistaken or misunderstood in anything here.
It’s essentially just western legalese for stolen land but under even worse circumstances than the rest of the country because in this case they never even bothered to sign treaties
Yeah the treaties were a complete sham from the start. Many of the treaties started with "willfully ceding of the land" and many times they would vaguely translate it or leave it's important implications out.
NOTICE: ShitLiberalsSay does not allow threatening, inciting, advocating, defending, justifying, glorifying, or celebrating violence. Any offending posts/comments will be removed and the associated users will be banned.
Please note that we do not allow the following types of "low-hanging fruit" posts:
Your posts will be removed, and you will risk being banned if you break this rule repeatedly. Please also be mindful of our general subreddit rules (which can be found on the sidebar), and Reddit's sitewide rules.
Please feel free to join our official Discord server!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
LOL yeah they've been coopting language from decolonial and indigenous liberation struggles for a while now *but* only after 'we're civilized people coming to colonize this land' became frowned upon as a message because way back when that's exactly how they described their state building project.
Also Einat Wilf is very openly an ethnosupremacist, like I've never seen a more obvious example of colonizer speak 😂😂 Plus presumably this means these people support a massive demographic shift in Canadian provinces like BC that are mostly unceded territory for example and allowing the Indigenous tribes there full sovereignty and their own country? Are they gonna give up their ski resorts and overpriced condos and move off the land or...
Also correct me if I'm wrong since I'm still learning but isn't the idea of unceeded territory not in indigenous understanding? Because indigenous people see the land very differently from the west? Apologies in advance if I am mistaken or misunderstood in anything here.
It’s essentially just western legalese for stolen land but under even worse circumstances than the rest of the country because in this case they never even bothered to sign treaties
Yeah the treaties were a complete sham from the start. Many of the treaties started with "willfully ceding of the land" and many times they would vaguely translate it or leave it's important implications out.
Have these people ever read Deuteronomy 20:10-18 or Joshua 6:20-21?
The funny thing is they are very selective about it. Choose what fits the Zionist narrative and leave these parts out.
Israel is the same age as Mountain Dew.