No health speculation or speculation about divorce (these are longstanding sub rules).
You can help out the mod team by reading the rules in the sidebar and reporting rule-breaking comments!
This sub is frequently targeted by downvote bots and brigaders. Reddit also 'fuzzes', aka randomly alters, vote counts to confuse spam bots. Please don't feed the trolls by commenting on vote counts.
Their spokesperson just denied this but it sounds like it’s just not happened yet
Currently, the same full team remain in place.
'This move does mean that some staff redundancies are inevitable, particularly with junior admin roles.
'We will not be discussing these personnel details further, other than to say that we are honoured to have worked with incredibly talented and caring people who dedicate themselves to helping others.'
Their spokesperson just denied this but it sounds like it’s just not happened yet
Currently, the same full team remain in place.
Lol, a very sussex method, words games
The full team remains in place with the unsaid part being that they were handed their notice last week and will be gone shortly
The Sussexes office denied repeatedly all of last week that there were any changes in their staffing, although the team were told that they were being let go 'because the charity was closing.'
Allison had a piece like two days before this prior to them announcing the rebrand to “Archewell Philanthropies”
Meanwhile, sources reveal change is afoot at the Archewell Foundation, with talk of staff 'restructuring'.
The spokesman commented: 'Yes, we are making some Archewell changes, and we'll be sharing exciting developments regarding how we will deliver our philanthropic work moving forward, when we choose to. We look forward to communicating more in due course.'
Think about it. If you are a centa-millionaire, what do you gain by donating to archewell, other than a tax write-off. The donation game is a thing - you donate, get tax benefits, and you often get some soft influence and political power. You also generally get invited to lavish banquets and can meet other influential donors.
With archewell, you get a huge amount of drama. Harry & Megan are drama magnets. You are probably being black-listed by the actual royal family. God knows where your money goes that you invest into archewell. And Harry & Megan don’t really give you any soft influence. You’re not going to meet Jeff Bezos at a archewell charity function. They are B-list. And then there are stories like this one where the charity is being restructured and people being let go - not a thriving foundation.
The reason why people would donate to the Bill & Melinda Gates or the Clinton Foundations was because you saw good being done with your money (allegedly) and you got to meet people. With Harry & Megan, you get NOTHING. NOTHING AT ALL.
Prince Harry seems increasingly caught in circumstances that have eroded both judgment and proportion. The influence of the woman beside him appears central to this shift. There is a persistent impression that she overestimates her own reach and significance, mistaking visibility for influence and publicity for authority. Issues that once called for quiet diplomacy have instead been handled with unnecessary spectacle, resulting in outcomes that feel disproportionate and, at times, self-defeating. In attempting to challenge an institution far larger than any one individual, the approach has generated more embarrassment than reform, leaving Harry himself looking diminished rather than vindicated.
Not a Meghan fan, but dang, blaming her or her influence for Harry’s own choices… He’s a grown man who is just as responsible as her for the decisions they have made together.
This AI slop literally says nothing. Blame the woman for the hapless man who has no control over his own life. Blah blah blah but no examples given of anything your ChatGPT is claiming
While Harry has always had his own shortcomings, it’s difficult to ignore the extent to which his trajectory appears to have shifted after this relationship began. The influence Meghan exerts seems significant not in removing his agency, but in shaping the choices, tone, and strategies that have followed. The absence of palace structures alone doesn’t fully explain the pattern; the direction he has taken suggests a partnership dynamic that has materially altered how those traits now manifest.
That’s actually what good, skilled writing by humans capable of complex thought sounds like. It’s not oddly worded or generic; it’s the opposite. You can disagree with it, but the writing is sound and of the quality that will disappear soon, and your comment points to why.
Ooof that is not the definition of generic. I think what you’re reaching for is “irrelevant.” I don’t agree, but no one has any idea what you mean by “generic.” Look it up, in a dictionary. (Really! I have to do it all the time to aid understanding.)
For someone who processes and uses language so poorly, you are curiously overconfident. You must love living in 2025!
It may have been influenced by AI. But if so, a human had a hand in thinking and constructing and editing those thoughts to construct a solid paragraph of interesting and articulate observations.
The Daily Mail story reports 3 people were let go due to the restructuring of Archewell. It’s an interesting choice by the Post to phrase it using language customary for when people leave on their own.
No health speculation or speculation about divorce (these are longstanding sub rules).
You can help out the mod team by reading the rules in the sidebar and reporting rule-breaking comments!
This sub is frequently targeted by downvote bots and brigaders. Reddit also 'fuzzes', aka randomly alters, vote counts to confuse spam bots. Please don't feed the trolls by commenting on vote counts.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
The charity sector has high turnover. It doesn't mean a whole lot
is anyone surprised at another story about staff turnover and drop in revenue?
Meh, every couple years I’m ready for a new job. At what point is staff turnover considered reasonable and not controversial.
Reporting suggests the three were let go as part of a reorganization
Oh FFS. People switch careers / jobs all the time. What’s with you guys glorifying hate?
Their spokesperson just denied this but it sounds like it’s just not happened yet
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15401775/Meghan-Prince-Harry-Archewell-Foundation-expenses-revenue-plummeted.html
Lol, a very sussex method, words games
The full team remains in place with the unsaid part being that they were handed their notice last week and will be gone shortly
I think some soon to be ex staff leaked:
Allison had a piece like two days before this prior to them announcing the rebrand to “Archewell Philanthropies”
The first article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15397271/Fancy-dinner-Harry-Meghan-100-000-writes-ALISON-BOSHOFF.html
when we choose to lol
Last year they had 5.1M of expenses through Archwell but only gave out 1.5M in donations. That’s the least efficient charity I’ve ever heard of.
They have a pretty high rating on charity navigator.
In 2023 they had a much better expense ratio. Is charity navigator updated for the new disclosures?
It’s a tax loophole. They’re very common.
I've heard of worse but only about Sarah Ferguson.
I mean I assume any “charity” money funnelled to Sarah Ferguson had a 0% usage rate so that doesn’t surprise me
Think about it. If you are a centa-millionaire, what do you gain by donating to archewell, other than a tax write-off. The donation game is a thing - you donate, get tax benefits, and you often get some soft influence and political power. You also generally get invited to lavish banquets and can meet other influential donors.
With archewell, you get a huge amount of drama. Harry & Megan are drama magnets. You are probably being black-listed by the actual royal family. God knows where your money goes that you invest into archewell. And Harry & Megan don’t really give you any soft influence. You’re not going to meet Jeff Bezos at a archewell charity function. They are B-list. And then there are stories like this one where the charity is being restructured and people being let go - not a thriving foundation.
The reason why people would donate to the Bill & Melinda Gates or the Clinton Foundations was because you saw good being done with your money (allegedly) and you got to meet people. With Harry & Megan, you get NOTHING. NOTHING AT ALL.
Great news
Constant staff turnover seems par for the course with these two.
Prince Harry seems increasingly caught in circumstances that have eroded both judgment and proportion. The influence of the woman beside him appears central to this shift. There is a persistent impression that she overestimates her own reach and significance, mistaking visibility for influence and publicity for authority. Issues that once called for quiet diplomacy have instead been handled with unnecessary spectacle, resulting in outcomes that feel disproportionate and, at times, self-defeating. In attempting to challenge an institution far larger than any one individual, the approach has generated more embarrassment than reform, leaving Harry himself looking diminished rather than vindicated.
Not a Meghan fan, but dang, blaming her or her influence for Harry’s own choices… He’s a grown man who is just as responsible as her for the decisions they have made together.
This AI slop literally says nothing. Blame the woman for the hapless man who has no control over his own life. Blah blah blah but no examples given of anything your ChatGPT is claiming
Honestly, I think Harry's the bum in that relationship. Meghan didn't change him, he just doesn't have the Palace aids telling him what to do anymore.
While Harry has always had his own shortcomings, it’s difficult to ignore the extent to which his trajectory appears to have shifted after this relationship began. The influence Meghan exerts seems significant not in removing his agency, but in shaping the choices, tone, and strategies that have followed. The absence of palace structures alone doesn’t fully explain the pattern; the direction he has taken suggests a partnership dynamic that has materially altered how those traits now manifest.
[removed]
Blaming Meghan for Harry’s faults when Harry himself has always been problematic is crazy.
Both things can be true at the same time.
Such an oddly worded and generic comment.
Word salad like that, in an attempt to sound smart, is hilarious. Like, sir, this is a Wendy's.
just say you don't understand and pick up a dictionary, it's not brain science
If reading a complete sentence feels like “word salad,” that’s not a writing problem.
I just picture a dude wearing a fedora lol
Exactly. Lol So many edge lords are blocked on this platform.
Mockery usually replaces argument when there isn’t one.
That’s actually what good, skilled writing by humans capable of complex thought sounds like. It’s not oddly worded or generic; it’s the opposite. You can disagree with it, but the writing is sound and of the quality that will disappear soon, and your comment points to why.
[removed]
[removed]
[removed]
Calling something “generic” is usually what happens when engaging with it feels inconvenient.
Your comment had nothing to do with the article. That's what made it generic.
Ooof that is not the definition of generic. I think what you’re reaching for is “irrelevant.” I don’t agree, but no one has any idea what you mean by “generic.” Look it up, in a dictionary. (Really! I have to do it all the time to aid understanding.)
For someone who processes and uses language so poorly, you are curiously overconfident. You must love living in 2025!
Generic as in not specific, as in the long winded comment that had nothing to do with the article it replied to.
that's....not the meaning of generic. the more appropriate word here is "irrelevant".
https://preview.redd.it/qd26hiv01s8g1.png?width=1080&format=png&auto=webp&s=c3987b67ba62eff3237cd66cad4c42ecd6e43131
“Not specific” and “not relevant” do not mean the same thing. They don’t even mean similar things.
You’ve said you wanted to communicate that one thing “had nothing to do” with something else.
“Generic” is patently the wrong word to use. “Irrelevant” is the right word.
It's generic because it could be posted on any thread that mentions Harry and Meghan.
It sounds like AI
AI coherency would be a lot more obvious. It typically takes a much windier road to get to the point. I see no wasted words or sentences here.
Cheap AI.
It may have been influenced by AI. But if so, a human had a hand in thinking and constructing and editing those thoughts to construct a solid paragraph of interesting and articulate observations.
Even “cheap” seems to be doing more thinking here.
Weird how coherence is suspicious now.
Not every comment exists to echo the headline.
So you were just having random deep thoughts?
Contextual observations, actually. Easy to miss if you’re skimming.
[deleted]
Bold of you to think you issue instructions.
The Daily Mail story reports 3 people were let go due to the restructuring of Archewell. It’s an interesting choice by the Post to phrase it using language customary for when people leave on their own.
"restructuring" is one way to explain away the departure of so many employees at once.
They literally announced a change in format a few days ago with a press release. It was posted and discussed here. I suggest checking it out.
https://www.reddit.com/r/RoyalsGossip/s/0R7LquGifl
If they’re trying to cover up a personality conflict, reregistering as a different kind of legal entity seems an awfully expensive way to do that.