Indeed, while I failed to source this particular image, assuming OP's attribution is right, the person in question does describe himself as an AI prompter. They're also present on Reddit while we're at it: u/Gilkardex — and their profile does indeed showcase a number of AI-generated ungulate ladies some of which, just like this one, would've easily fooled me.
Le sigh. Reflaired, and held as another example on why, if anything, I hold to conditionally allowing AI posting: not because it can be good (whether it can or not has no bearing), but because it can be indistinguishable without doing time-intensive research on every submitted piece; so the best I can do is incentivise open, clearly marked, posting of it as opposed to bad faith stealth-posting, refrain from destructive witch hunts and suspicion-mongering, and establish a non-destructive procedure to handling late discoveries like this one (compare reflairing and spoilering to being obliged to purge the post with fire, esp. in cases where there's a possibility of a later counter-claim).
Established as AI-generated, see conversation below for detail.
Prompter's profile: u/Gilkardex
Beautiful!
This whole subreddit has been one stunner after another. Glad I found it :)
The algorithm knows me too well.
She is utterly beautiful!
Reverse Image Search:
Google Images || SauceNAO || Bing || TinEye || Yandex || IQDB || Google Lens
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
Untagged for AI art. Artist's Twitter is nothing but AI generated works and he doesn't call himself an artist.
Hi! Thanks for heads up!
Indeed, while I failed to source this particular image, assuming OP's attribution is right, the person in question does describe himself as an AI prompter. They're also present on Reddit while we're at it: u/Gilkardex — and their profile does indeed showcase a number of AI-generated ungulate ladies some of which, just like this one, would've easily fooled me.
Le sigh. Reflaired, and held as another example on why, if anything, I hold to conditionally allowing AI posting: not because it can be good (whether it can or not has no bearing), but because it can be indistinguishable without doing time-intensive research on every submitted piece; so the best I can do is incentivise open, clearly marked, posting of it as opposed to bad faith stealth-posting, refrain from destructive witch hunts and suspicion-mongering, and establish a non-destructive procedure to handling late discoveries like this one (compare reflairing and spoilering to being obliged to purge the post with fire, esp. in cases where there's a possibility of a later counter-claim).
u/JuneFawks, please make a statement on whether you knew this is an AI-generated piece.
Booo, AI. :(