I pasted the URL and used the "suggest title", then added the comment about how people live in cities--"counterprotests" is in the <title> tag in the HTML (I just double-checked), so I suspect that was the original headline, and it's since been changed.
There was nothing intentional on my part to connote anything about the protests by calling them counterprotests.
Whataboutism over "people live in cities" is stupid crock of crap. If the people protesting are all in cities, the obvious conclusion to draw is that it affects people in cities more directly, or that the people who live in cities tend to have different values, etc etc. The USA is a unique country because cities are far less powerful than they are in many other places, and that is a unequivocal GOOD.
I frankly don't care when people in cities do things, because people from cities are rat people. I'll see if real humans care
Imagine being so mad about protests that you imagine whole backstories for the protestors like this lmao. Just legit can't handle the idea that people just actually support shit, huh?
"I don't go to these things. No one I know goes to these things. I think we are the only normal people. Therefore, normal people don't go to these things."
That wasn't my point. In terms of modern elections, yeah, it was a solid victory for Trump. The only election since 2000 with a larger margin of EV victory was 2008, which had a lot of other things going on (recession, unpopularity of Iraq, etc.)
Doing the "haha akshyually doing stuff makes you lose, come on bro keep doong stuff" manipulation is even MORE pathetic then the shit you tell yourself about protestors lol.
It wasn't nonsensical at all. You're just not smart enough to engage what people say. Kinda the whole reason you have to rely entirely on these memorized lines full of strawmen and delusion.
You all forget 2008-2016 and 2020-2024 so fast. Nooses from trees, burning down crosses, raiding the capitol, the trucker shitshow…. Let me know if you want pictures.
There isn't even a "far" left in the US. Your politics shifted so far to the right that things most of the world consider a centrist topic that both the left and right can agree on, is considered "communism" in the US.
Not allowing a shitty-diapered orange-glazed wannabe dictator dementia patient absolute control over the country, overriding all checks and balances, should be a bipartisan issue in the US. Yet, here we are...
Yall win one popular vote in the past 20 years and suddenly it’s all over. 1.4% margin btw. But yeah a “blowout.” Biden 4.4% over in 2020, Biden over 2016 by 2.2%, Obama by 7.2% and 3.9%.
2024 actually had the 6th lowest margin of popular vote in history. How exactly is that a blowout? Because he promised people in PA, WV and Ohio, the Carolina’s and Florida to bring back jobs and what did they get? Nothing of the sort and zero disaster relief.
So he lied about what he was going to do and even that was hardly enough to win an election. Cute
Thanks for not addressing how easily disprovable your claim was btw and moving the goal posts. Cute ragebait and diaper. Taking after your idol?
It takes a certain level of stupid to be a 28 year old diaper wearing fatass, criticizing protesters for exercising their right, and not see the obvious irony in that.
This has to be some weird satire account right? You put it in your bio that you wear diapers, go troll a left-leaning subreddit, call people babies, and then get mad when people bring up that you wear diapers? Am I missing something?
Haha, what a braindead take. I bet this guy would say the same thing about the civil rights protests in the 60's or the Indian protests in the 30's that lead to their freedom from British rule.
Reddit post title is confusing. “Counterprotest” is not used in the articles title or the body of the article, and has a specific meaning…
I pasted the URL and used the "suggest title", then added the comment about how people live in cities--"counterprotests" is in the <title> tag in the HTML (I just double-checked), so I suspect that was the original headline, and it's since been changed.
There was nothing intentional on my part to connote anything about the protests by calling them counterprotests.
Huh, thanks for clarifying that’s weird
Y'all don't get baited so hard by other commenters in here who are obvious bots or bad faith trolls. Save your energy for Saturday :)
That and why are some of the dots different sizes?
Whataboutism over "people live in cities" is stupid crock of crap. If the people protesting are all in cities, the obvious conclusion to draw is that it affects people in cities more directly, or that the people who live in cities tend to have different values, etc etc. The USA is a unique country because cities are far less powerful than they are in many other places, and that is a unequivocal GOOD.
I frankly don't care when people in cities do things, because people from cities are rat people. I'll see if real humans care
But like, shouldn't the majority rule?
In Trump's first election he lost popular vote.
[removed]
You sheep say this every time there's a protest lol. Cope and seethe about it
[removed]
Imagine being so mad about protests that you imagine whole backstories for the protestors like this lmao. Just legit can't handle the idea that people just actually support shit, huh?
[removed]
"I don't go to these things. No one I know goes to these things. I think we are the only normal people. Therefore, normal people don't go to these things."
[removed]
Damn, I didn't know my 'normal' credentials could be revoked if I vote the 'wrong' way. That's fucked up
Dudes calling people kitten and critiquing “comprehension skills on a fucking Internet forum. They’re obviously not a serious person.
[removed]
Person captured by propaganda is convinced that anyone redressing their grievances to their government is captured by propaganda.
What do you call the tea party protest movement?
You're an NPC, dude.
"Big majority"
Trump didn't even win a majority. Also, he beat Harris by less than 2% (49.8% to 48.3%)
[removed]
That wasn't my point. In terms of modern elections, yeah, it was a solid victory for Trump. The only election since 2000 with a larger margin of EV victory was 2008, which had a lot of other things going on (recession, unpopularity of Iraq, etc.)
PV wise, it was anything but a blowout.
Not what majority means, which is the word you used. Hope this helps.
A majority would be >50%. Trump received a plurality of the votes at 49.8%, which is neither a majority or a “big majority”
[removed]
His approval rating on his actions shows the opposite, so no, not even close
“Big majority” he won by the popular vote by like 1% little bro
Doing the "haha akshyually doing stuff makes you lose, come on bro keep doong stuff" manipulation is even MORE pathetic then the shit you tell yourself about protestors lol.
[removed]
I love the way ya'll just pretend not to understand when you get a response you can't handle
He’s not pretending. Maga are really that obtuse. Wild, right?!
[removed]
It wasn't nonsensical at all. You're just not smart enough to engage what people say. Kinda the whole reason you have to rely entirely on these memorized lines full of strawmen and delusion.
Normal people piss and shit in toilets
[removed]
Prove it
[removed]
Yeah man
Yeah man prove you shit and piss and aren't a bot
Surely it’s only the far left 🙄
link.
You all forget 2008-2016 and 2020-2024 so fast. Nooses from trees, burning down crosses, raiding the capitol, the trucker shitshow…. Let me know if you want pictures.
The lefts rhetoric is “violent” by the way.
There isn't even a "far" left in the US. Your politics shifted so far to the right that things most of the world consider a centrist topic that both the left and right can agree on, is considered "communism" in the US.
Not allowing a shitty-diapered orange-glazed wannabe dictator dementia patient absolute control over the country, overriding all checks and balances, should be a bipartisan issue in the US. Yet, here we are...
[removed]
Yall win one popular vote in the past 20 years and suddenly it’s all over. 1.4% margin btw. But yeah a “blowout.” Biden 4.4% over in 2020, Biden over 2016 by 2.2%, Obama by 7.2% and 3.9%.
2024 actually had the 6th lowest margin of popular vote in history. How exactly is that a blowout? Because he promised people in PA, WV and Ohio, the Carolina’s and Florida to bring back jobs and what did they get? Nothing of the sort and zero disaster relief.
So he lied about what he was going to do and even that was hardly enough to win an election. Cute
Thanks for not addressing how easily disprovable your claim was btw and moving the goal posts. Cute ragebait and diaper. Taking after your idol?
Go to one and see who’s there. It’s your neighbours, your coworkers. People just like any other.
[removed]
“normal people don’t exercise their rights”
Normal people don’t go to protests, they sit in their chairs whinging on reddit about people who go to protests
Child
Yes. Like the wise Martin Luther King Jr said “stay home, protests don’t solve anything.”
Perma online in-person protestors seems like a bit of an oxymoron
Well, the guy is a moron, so him coming up with fictional, oxymoronic protesters is on brand, it seems.
ok buddy
You lying to yourself if you think Congress aint going Democrat in 2026, it's just the way our two party democracy works
Perma online leftists who are actually going out and protesting by the millions? I feel bad for your brain.
It takes a certain level of stupid to be a 28 year old diaper wearing fatass, criticizing protesters for exercising their right, and not see the obvious irony in that.
Well at least us protesters piss and shit in toilets
That guy is 100% trolling or he gets off on being called a baby
Took me a minute to realize what you were talking about and now I'm laughing so hard I'm literally crying.
What are they talking about?
lol I completely misread this, apologies
[removed]
It's objectively hilarious that a person in diapers is describing other people as babies.
[removed]
It is not ethical to involve other people in your humiliation fetish.
[removed]
It is very clearly a humiliation fetish, not a poopoo peepee fetish. That's why you go around talking about how you poo and pee in your diaper.
oh my god that hilarious
[removed]
keep telling yourself that babe
I do, therefore you're wrong, "kitten"
This has to be some weird satire account right? You put it in your bio that you wear diapers, go troll a left-leaning subreddit, call people babies, and then get mad when people bring up that you wear diapers? Am I missing something?
[removed]
Yeah, they do
dude they have building blocks printed on them, and the absorbent pad is very visible lmaoooo
if they don’t look like diapers, what do they look like‽
My guy actually calling protestors baby while having this shit on his profile?
Bro. The fuck? Yeah. Those scary Mexicans ain't your biggest problem rofl.
Account not even 2 weeks old. This is a troll or a bot. Not a serious interlocutor just another idiot.
[removed]
11 days is less than 2 weeks bud.
[removed]
Counting and math is hard for someone who shits themselves like an infant. 11<14
Yeah… less than two weeks. At least you know your weaknesses…
[removed]
Does it hurt?
Its s saturday you dumbass
[removed]
No never, thats illegal
It's on a weekend… they have jobs
Were the january 6th "protestors" giant jobledd babies with fake outrage?
[removed]
Thats not an answer but ok buddy. Keep crying.
[removed]
Omg im arguing with a grown adult with the body of a toddler who posts photos of themself online in diapers.....
Welcome to Reddit
I don't usually peep at profiles. I dont know if its something I need to do more or never again after seeing that.
Nasty ain't it.
Says the person simping for a corrupt old billionaire who hung with Epstein a shit ton😂
[removed]
You mean like the 'tourists' that stormed the Capitol on January 6?
Haha, what a braindead take. I bet this guy would say the same thing about the civil rights protests in the 60's or the Indian protests in the 30's that lead to their freedom from British rule.
It's literally on Saturday, idiot