Long Read: I want to start off by saying that I don't use Grok/X all that much and even if I did, my opinion would still be the same.

I am sure many of you have heard the rumblings about how the usual gang of nations are looking to ban Grok/X in unison, likely to shelter from the blowback that would occur. This of course includes the leader of the gang, the U.K, stating they are looking into it because they are very concerned about children. You may say to Grok, “Hey Grok, put her in a bikini” and that be dangerous, but only the government can say “Hey foreigner, rape that girl with your friends in a taxi” and not only get away with it, but weep for the perpetrators after backlash.

For those of you not in the know, this is the same U.K. government that has called victims of the "Asian" grooming gangs, of which British Indians have been up in arms about because it hides the fact that they were primarily middle eastern and African Muslim men doing it. And these same victims have been called "liars"(but believe all women), told parents their children were "choosing that lifestyle"(But children cannot consent, except to medication, gender ideology and surgeries) and even insulted by legislators in the current government, including their "safeguarding" minister calling demands for an inquiry as you guessed it, "Far right bandwagoning", oh, sorry, that was the SITTING PRIME MINISTER. Please look into this grooming gang mess, you will be horrified at what the U.K let happen to white girls because they didn't want to "instigate social unrest", "these were hard working important members of their communities", "they had a hard time growing up around white people". Remember, there is never any excuse for rape of all things, unless its for a "protected class". Other countries involved in this pursuit of shutting down X are the other usual suspects from the EU, Canada and Australia, New Zealand.

I mention all the above about grooming gangs because the bleating about protecting children is very much a lie. We all know it, but it's important to make it concrete that similar events are occuring in Canada, Australia and other Euro nations, but are buried and obfuscated just like they were/are in the U.K. So this has nothing to do with protecting children, especially white ones; as we have seen from the media these nations pump out, that even when a minority commits a crime, their "entertainment" version of the show will race swap characters, religions, etc to make the white child or person the criminal and the minority the victim. Combine this with entertainment being pumped out and given much more mind space to the average person than "ethical news", if that "ethical news" is even given the time of day, and they have manufactured reality to such an extent that most people passively believe IST and ISMS and the way society is, is one way, when it's really another.

This brings us finally to Grok/X. As many of you are aware, when Elon purchased the platform, a lot of people on the left lost their minds and began complaining about the usual billionaires owning things; when they had no qualms prior about billionaires owning things, because those billionaires agreed with them. Ever since then, X came under a lot of attacks from attempts to take it offline on an ongoing basis, to the most insidious and evil thing I noticed; Bad actors PURPOSEFULLY saying insane things, making threats of violence and so forth when Elon said hen was all for free speech, in order to trigger censors, EU psychopaths and "human rights organizations" into releasing reports, statements, threatening or issuing fines, etc and the "Ethical media" running with "X is a bad platform!".

Never did I think that people would go out of their way to create and publish content that while people DO create or post, is so infinitesimal because the people who often publish such things are truly unwell and an extreme minority. Only for people who are "fully" there, to create such content on the platform in order to try and bring it down, because they hated that people were able to say things that they didn't want them saying or pointing out. But then it dawned on me, that this was no different than "Jussie Smoletting" of things and the insane amount of fake hate crimes. Some people genuinely see this as a tactic to subvert and destroy things they dislike, by spamming extreme content, flagging it themselves to their "ethical" intuitionalist friends, media, etc. Who then pick it up and run with it, resulting in either more restrictions being placed on normal people because the bad stuff is so "prevalent", or destroying the platforms or peoples they hate. This failed for the most part though and X has continued growing and stabilized after the free speech abuse attempts failed for the most part.

Then came BlueSky. The lunatics complained that they couldn't censor people or band them without explanations(Because if you gave an explanation, you would then be locked into applying that equally to others) and tried many things such as Mastodon and so forth to utter failure. But BlueSky game them some hope. It aped Twitter/X almost 100% and the ideologies members could flee there and bleat about how they had a “safe” and “intellectual” platform where hate was not allowed and all those “stupid, uneducated, backwards, evil, inbred, nazi, ist and ism bastards that deserve to be punched in the face, killed, raped and forced to carry babies to see why abortion was a good thing”, were not allowed. But ironically enough, things got so bad that BlueSky began putting out statements about child pornography, sexual content, threats and violence towards others, because these lunatics would sit in a festering pit of pure hatred and malice with no one to challenge them. But this never made the news the way things on twitter did. No. Not even Instagram, facebook, tiktok made the news the way that Twitter/X did. Sure with facebook it made news about ads to young girls and tiktok for geopolitical reasons, but none of them were targeted as X for every little thing.

The targeting of X was very obvious and just like the targeting of “far right” people when twitter was under leftist billionaire control, it was very easy to see for those who cared to see. Instagram was riddled with hateful commentary, unsavory ads, nudity/sexual content, scams, fake accounts and more; but it never made the news because of that. You can think of any social media, and you will note that it never makes the news because of these things. X was targeted from day one to paint it as a “bad place” just like the ideology spent over a decade painting white people, western civilization and everything in it as “bad” as a means to beat people over the head until they got control. So came the EU fines and threats because “X was out of control and dangerous”, and why? Because people were free to insult politicians, say what was on their minds and challenge those in power(Although let’s be honest, Elon bowed to countries such as India and others from time to time).

Then came Grok. First they laughed and said it could never compete. But it did and eventually became integrated with X. And again the ideological lunatics came back to Twitter despite claiming they were leaving and never coming back. Many of them right from the jump began trying to break it, to get it to again, say all manner of horrible things. They managed to do so because no system is perfect and eventually the “MechaHitler” incident occurred. X took action and their engineers did their best to resolve it. But strangely enough, even this was made fun of and people claimed that it must simply be due to X being a “hate platform” and “echoing the thoughts of Elon Musk” for some strange reason, despite it was THEM purposefully and maliciously implanting these things into Grok and trying mightily time and again until they bypassed the safeguards. “Ethical news” thus picked this up, “ethical youtubers” did as well of course and there was plenty of coverage about X being a hateful and “far right” platform where things like this are easy to do and just a constant. But eventually this died down as well, though people continue to cite this as yet another reason it’s so “dangerous” and the EU as always, banged on their drums about it.

Many more events occurred between and after this, leading to the current debacle of “X/Grok hate women and girls especially, it’s for pedophiles!”. And what happened here? Well, X created a new function where Grok could edit images on twitter at users requests. The intent? Allow users to create media right in the app, no need to go to Grok and unify things ever more for their customers. The result? It actually was rather normal at first, but then came the lunatic bad actors. This was a failure on X’s part for sure, as they should have seen this coming from all the bad actors they’ve had to contend with before, but regardless, the bad actors began prompting Grok to edit images of people, and yes, including children into bikinis and so forth. This naturally spread like wildfire and before anyone pulled the plug, it became well known. Twitter/Grok pulled the plug and went into emergency maintenance to solve the problem. Elon as well put out a statement saying that future image gen would only be on Grok for now and the reason being that at least they could have a users contact information, and thus refer them to their local police for generating illegal content such as sexualization of children. The problem was met and dealt with, but this wasn’t enough. The ideology had managed to create another firestorm on purpose and “amplified” it as the ideology always like to put the things they do, to “ethical” news, media and legislators. “Twitter/X supports pedophilia and encourages it” became the insane new line.

And thus we come to the current situation of where some wholly captured nations seek to ban X not just Grok, but X AND Grok. Which raises a rather interesting question of “Why?”. Once could argue that banning Grok could be seen as reactionary and insane, but understandable. Whereas reasonable people would say, “But the problem was dealt with and the CEO even put out a statement that it was not the intended use for sexualization of children. Things like this happen all the time across all platforms, why are others allowed to fix their problems and weaknesses and move on, but you’re looking to ban an entire platform?” And the answer is as follows: It was obviously never about protecting children. It was always about banning X. Banning Grok alone would still leave X running, and they don’t really care about Grok at all, because there are COUNTLESS literal, sexual LLM’s out there for both text and images. You have likely never heard a peep about them in news and media. No, the reason why X specifically needs to be banned, is because these select governments have been after X due to POLITICAL reasons from day one. One thing I have noticed about the ideology early on, is that not only does it create problems and then enflame them as a means to an end, but they will look for any little thing that is imperfect about you, and try to use that as leverage to control you or destroy you.

BlueSky exists not because it is “better” or “safer” than X. If you go there, you will be horrified by the casual talks of violence and hatred towards “evil, bad people” on one hand, while cheering on and weeping for straight up criminals on the other. It is the ideologies breeding ground and when Australia for example wanted to ban social media for children under 16, they banned all the big ones for the most part, except BlueSky. Now why would that be? Well, if you look at the Australian government and media class, they are all extremely adherent to the ideology. All the violent threats, speech, “hate speech” on BlueSky does not even register for them, because all of it is what they agree with. There is a local weather channel where I live and for the longest time, it was simply a place to get news. But after a decade of slow but methodical indoctrination from our ruling government, the channel has warped into talking about climate change(fair enough), human rights? Racism? Gender ideology and how it affects the environment??? And the ticker on the channel used to have Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and TikTok. But after Elon purchased Twitter and before even any of the drama, they dropped twitter and now it has replaced Twitter with BlueSky.

There will be no “ethical” news or media or creators talking about the awful things on BlueSky, including even straight up child pornography that even BlueSky themselves admitted was an issue. And it is not because it does not occur, or that members of the ideology are not constantly being exposed for being pedophiles or other monstrosities. No, it is because like all the normal news and media we consume, ever since 2020, so many organizations and institutions jumped on the “We do not need to be impartial” bandwagon and have utterly changed their core internal logic of fairness and reason to, “Anything for the ideology”. I recall during 2020, some news association talking to journalists about how impartiality was actually bad and that they do not need to be impartial about the climate or ISTS and ISMS. This is the working mentality being taught to children all the way up and through higher education, with further indoctrination once in the working world if you wish to get ahead.

Everything we consume is poisoned with the ideology and their greatest power and realization is that they do NOT need to be 50% of the population to say that 50% of the population says this and “the country is divided” or even better, “The country mostly agrees on this or that”. So long as they control the majority of the institutions, awards, “NGO’s”, etc. They can literally manufacture reality as they see it and bury some things in cahoots with their governments or amplify others. I mean, you really think some awful tv show called “Adolescence” just blew up and was talked about by so many “ethical” media platforms and the U.K government even having a session about it in parliament to pass legislation to “educate boys more” naturally?

I don’t know whether X will end up banned or not, but it already has been in Australia an I would not be surprised if it is banned in others aligned with Australia. Heck, there are even AMERICANS encouraging and wanting to see it banned. It’s funny, I remember the absolute glut of bad Tesla drivers media after the election was won. So many of the videos were not only years old, but even of the newer ones, they were just bad drivers. But everyone was going on about Tesla drivers consistently.

We are living in very dangerous times and not for the reasons that “ethical” media says. A lot of you were celebrating after the U.S. election, but from another country, I saw it for what it truly was. Not simply a switching of the guard politically(The wars will continue), but also that the world isn’t the U.S. despite it’s power, and the rot is way, way deeper than most can imagine. “Woke is dead/dying” is the funniest thing.