Many people are concerned about the Great Reset, a push for centralized control, less ownership, and restricted movement. Instead of becoming miserable, the strategy is to develop a robust Plan B by geographically and politically diversifying your life.
The key is to acquire toeholds in places showing positive momentum and a culture of resistance to the heavy-handed oversight increasingly seen in the West. This isn't about finding one perfect country, but building a legal portfolio of options to prevent any single government from holding all the leverage.
Global Areas for Strategic Diversification
- The Continent of Africa
Focus on Southern and Eastern states as potential future hubs.
Promising Countries: Rwanda, Namibia, Botswana, Kenya, Mauritius, and the Seychelles.
The Appeal: These nations are increasingly asserting their sovereignty, pushing back against Western influence, and partnering with non-Western global powers (like China) on development. Many offer residency or citizenship programs (e.g., Namibia residency, Mauritius investment, Egypt citizenship-by-property).
The Mindset: They prioritize their own national interests ("Rwanda First") and have a low tolerance for being lectured.
- The South Pacific
Primarily useful for extreme asset protection and tax reduction.
Vanuatu: Offers a near-zero tax environment and a highly laissez-faire administrative approach.
The Caveat: The country is often disorganized, and its passport has lost significant visa-free access (Schengen, UK). This is less about travel and more about establishing a remote, tax-free base.
- Eastern Europe (The Balkans & Caucasus)
A region defined by its opposition to centralized power.
Key Countries: Serbia, Montenegro, Albania, and Georgia.
The Appeal: Their historical experience with oppression has created a powerful "don't tell me what to do" culture. These nations and their leaders actively push back against pressure from the European Union, offering a tangible sense of freedom.
The Strategy: Acquiring residency or a second citizenship here hedges against the growing regulatory uniformity and political correctness of the EU bloc.
- Countries That Have Known Oppression
Prioritize nations where the population vividly remembers losing their freedom.
The Principle: Populations that have experienced abusive regimes are innately more vigilant and less likely to accept the erosion of rights. They recognize the warning signs early.
Actionable Step: Adopt an "Abusive Relationship" philosophy toward your country: stay as long as it works, but be ready to leave the moment your rights are substantially violated. Your diversification portfolio ensures you have a place waiting.
- Countries Cooperating with Non-Western Powers
Look for nations challenging the unipolar global order.
The Principle: In the shift to a multipolar world, countries that choose diplomatic and economic relations with China, Russia, or other non-Western blocs are strategically bucking the trend.
The Benefit: This diplomatic rebellion against a single-superpower system often correlates with a desire for internal sovereignty, which translates into less external pressure on their citizens and residents.
The Great Reset is a far-right conspiracy. Post invalid.
Palantir has entered the chat
Sorry, what is "the great reset"?
wish fulfillment from the far right.
I mean, a Multipolar world is sort of happening either way just as a principle of more of the world developing, North America can't realistically dominate Continental Asia just due to Demographics
and while it's probably gonna be "freer" in some sense, it's not gonna be entirely nice for "freedom", China already has a sovereign digital and memetic space, they have entirely different websites, fads and celebrities you've never heard off, the mascots in those Chinese characters are entirely different, and you will very hardly see a Chinese online, and just the base cultural differences, if you want to live in China or really anywhere that's not western, this, figuring out terms like "Filial" or "Guanxi" or "Xiao" will actually be way more difficult than having no Elections, and it's been an increasingly difficult to go to or invest place, a decade ago there was a whole expat culture there and lots of foreign investments, now not so much, Western investors and expats basically ran away and the CCP basically stole their money, and why this happened just because they are culturally different, and they don't like the West, never did, and they want to be their own world
and I could see very similar to India or the Islamic World as those places industrialize, they will have their own Internet and Celebrities and even Nursery Rhymes, and be increasingly more difficult to go to or economically or really anything participate in and be increasingly culturally alien**, the Multipolar World will be a world where the Civilizations of the World contain their own and each other's citizens and block each other's citizens which is basically the Opposite of the Libertarian Globalist dream of the borderless citizen**, in a way, the advantage of Western Unipolarity that sort of really dosen't exist anymore even now but did in the 2000s is that it's just a lot easier to travel and invest around, so the individual is way more powerful in that regard, same as it's much easier to travel across the Mediterranean unified by the Roman Empire, and in a way, much more like the Middle Ages or the Silk Road World where the differences between the Civilizations of the world is almost tantamount to Alien Civilizations, down to stuff like practices like Infanticide or the very different Clothing or family types of the pre-modern Old World, People look at Multipolarity often only in Geopolitical Lens but the Cultural Lens will be even more drastic
the sort of fundamental truth is that Industrialization and rapid transportation just fundamentally favor centralized governments for pretty obvious reasons, and Industrialized Countries just produce way more, way more advanced stuff, and win wars and feed and supply their people better, even a lot of the smaller "sovereign" countries might as well be economic or political satellites or subsidiaries by whoever is dominant in their bloc, down to what kinds of goods their using or websites they use, there's a fundamental bias towards continent-sized powers or blocs emerging especially in the Richer parts of the World outside Sub-Saharan Africa
and keep in mind unlike America most of these societies are already more autocratic and also centralist, fear for over-centralization is pretty unique to America, in say a lot of the Old World, that's actually a good thing due to association with the stable imperial court ruling a healthy empire, the merchants, the family, movements must be regulated by Imperial law or scripture for the good of society and the culture and the empire, almost mercantilism-esque, the Ottoman or Islamic Gunpowder Empires or the Neo-Confucian East Asian regimes are sort of the peak example of this kind of logic, so these Eastern Blocks could be way more centralist, way more controlling of the individual (the family type is already more controlling even now, aka, Tiger Parents or Clans) than America within their own borders, America and the West is sort of moving into this kind of direction if you listen to what both the left and even the right is saying, but there are hard cultural barriers to this, say I just don't see a Western Government doing state-assigned brides as a solution to the Demographic crisis, I could see that in East Asia where similar practices existed historically, and they already did the one child policy and the social credit system
basically, going forward, just choosing between different types of centralized regimes, I pick the American/Western
Thanks, ChatGPT. I always thought moving to Rwanda was a smart move! 2026 goals, here I come!
Worried about losing the right to ownership, and free movement, so you advocate moving to countries that work with China and Russia? That's like moving from California to Florida hoping to escape the heat and humidity