This video ends with 20 sec of slow-mo of a sturgeon being caught. This is…definitely not an unknown creature.
OP, ya gotta acknowledge: if you’re posting a video meant to make people wonder “wowww what if it really DOES exist? Look at the compelling evidence!” but the evidence that had compelled you included easily refuted evidence, it makes everyone think “ohh, so OP just has really bad discernment skills. We can’t safely trust any other ‘EvIdEnCe’ they put forth, because how do we know they don’t fall for something equally refutable?”
You have cheapened your message, or worse, driven people away from it by adding one more piece of evidence that supports the popular paranormal-denying claim “nahhh, magic isn’t real. I know a lot of ppl swear it is real, but when you look at their ‘EvIdEnCe’, it’s just really bad hoaxes that are easy to spot for most other people.”
Obviously, you did not read the title, and 6 more lacking reading comprehension skills. The sturgeon is to show what people may be mistaking for Nessie.
Why do you think this? Do you think the title includes the phrase “none of these clips are sturgeons” or “I think all of these vids are compelling evidence that the monster exists”? Cuz the title didn’t say that. Go back and reread and you’ll see.
”…and 6 more lacking reading comprehension skills”
What? I’ll use my reading comprehension plus context clues to assume that when you wrote this attempt at an insult, there must have been 7 upvotes on my comment, making you think that myself plus 6 other people agreed. And since we agreed, but not with you, you think that means…we don’t have reading comprehension?
Why not? Did you write something warning us that there’s a sturgeon video mixed in your post, so we should have not been surprised to see it? Kindly point out where you wrote that, please. Thanks.
”The sturgeon is to show what people may be mistaking for Nessi”
Ahh ok. So, now that you’ve SAID THAT for the 1st time, we all have our first chance to understand that this is what you meant. Before you said that, there was no indication in the vid or by your comments or title that this last clip was being treated any differently than the rest of the clips.
Actually, now i’m wondering if ALL the clips are what you consider to be evidence against the existence of Nessi. How could one know what your secrets are, now that we know you have that poor of a judge of how the things you write (or forget to write) come across to others.
There was no critical commentary or analysis. Your post was simply NOT WELL DESIGNED and you deserve the critical feedback. If you allow yourself to learn from this, you may be able to make your own messages clearer for people in the future. As you can see, I’m not the only one who had noise that secretly in your head you were treating ANY of the vid clips as evidence against Nessi.
Since you didn’t WRITE THAT ANYWHERE before, you really shouldn’t be accusing everyone who didn’t psychically divine your secret message of BEING BAD AT READING COMPREHENSION.
Of course I read that title. But saying “is it misidentified?” and then NOT analyzing the clip is irresponsible. There’s no way to know if you thought that were pointing out it was clearly not Nessi or if you thought the sturgeon was Nessi (as you observed that “many” people do). It wouldn’t be far fetched to assume you’re another one of those people. If you had said ANYTHING about that last clip, we would have read it and understood.
Your immature responses are further worsening your case. When you turn 12 someday, you’re gonna have one of those self cringe moments about this. It’s all good, I’m just gonna duck out tho cuz I thought I was dealing with someone strong enough to take feedback without being a little weirdo about it and going into elementary school clap back mode. ✌️later kid
i trust these eyewitnesses far more than the average eyewitness of today.
People love to discount the tales of our ancestors as fables of mere fantasy, meanwhile these hardy folk and the Natives especially in America would have a keen eye and an honest compass that would put the average person to shame today.
I love it, and i love the stories from the folks who lived 100+ years ago especially. When you start to consider their lives and the actual daily struggle of survival they endured as simply a part of life, any sort of "fantastical" tale takes on a different tone.
"I didn't believe in it then, until i saw it. Now I KNOW it's true."
That sort of attitude remains true today. I had a visual sighting of a sasquatch in 2021, and I no longer need to "believe", i've seen it and I know it to be true. It's always a fairytale until it happens to YOU personally!
The leprechaun witnesses were accustomed to a saturated media environment, knew they were being pumped for a story and treated the question with the disrespect it deserved.
I don't think older eyewitnesses are somehow ironclad. But they would not be so flippantly dishonest.
So you had a "sighting" that , unless there was a 3rd party to believe you, is basically impossible to verify to someone like me that it was 100% Sasquatch. Why should anyone take your sighting seriously? For all I know I could have seen an "alien" in the sky, but grew up where skies were so dark I knew that it wasn't
yeah pretty much. all i got is my word and that's all that 99.9% of humans who have ever lived have had. It's pretty strange when you think about it, we've only really started taking eyewitness accounts seriously since the mid 1800s, and even later than that, stretching into the mid 1900s.
I did a few rounds around Loch Ness and spend a few nights there . What I can tell you from that experience is that its full of tourists (like me) and most likely among the most photographed places on the planet.
Some good interviews in the beginning, ruined by stupid X-files music and videos of trash stuck on a rock undulating in a frozen stream. Those videos were debunked (found to actually BE bunk) on THE PROOF IS OUT THERE TV show years ago.
I truly believe that at least one famous sighting was of an elephant from a travelling circus, bathing in the Loch
"It was about 15 feet long and looked like an overturned rowboat" is great lol
This video ends with 20 sec of slow-mo of a sturgeon being caught. This is…definitely not an unknown creature.
OP, ya gotta acknowledge: if you’re posting a video meant to make people wonder “wowww what if it really DOES exist? Look at the compelling evidence!” but the evidence that had compelled you included easily refuted evidence, it makes everyone think “ohh, so OP just has really bad discernment skills. We can’t safely trust any other ‘EvIdEnCe’ they put forth, because how do we know they don’t fall for something equally refutable?”
You have cheapened your message, or worse, driven people away from it by adding one more piece of evidence that supports the popular paranormal-denying claim “nahhh, magic isn’t real. I know a lot of ppl swear it is real, but when you look at their ‘EvIdEnCe’, it’s just really bad hoaxes that are easy to spot for most other people.”
Perhaps the sturgeon video is meant to show that misidentification can occur, if so it should be labelled as such
Thank you, you get an A+!
Obviously, you did not read the title, and 6 more lacking reading comprehension skills. The sturgeon is to show what people may be mistaking for Nessie.
Woah there.
”Obviously you did not read that title”
Why do you think this? Do you think the title includes the phrase “none of these clips are sturgeons” or “I think all of these vids are compelling evidence that the monster exists”? Cuz the title didn’t say that. Go back and reread and you’ll see.
”…and 6 more lacking reading comprehension skills”
What? I’ll use my reading comprehension plus context clues to assume that when you wrote this attempt at an insult, there must have been 7 upvotes on my comment, making you think that myself plus 6 other people agreed. And since we agreed, but not with you, you think that means…we don’t have reading comprehension?
Why not? Did you write something warning us that there’s a sturgeon video mixed in your post, so we should have not been surprised to see it? Kindly point out where you wrote that, please. Thanks.
”The sturgeon is to show what people may be mistaking for Nessi”
Ahh ok. So, now that you’ve SAID THAT for the 1st time, we all have our first chance to understand that this is what you meant. Before you said that, there was no indication in the vid or by your comments or title that this last clip was being treated any differently than the rest of the clips.
Actually, now i’m wondering if ALL the clips are what you consider to be evidence against the existence of Nessi. How could one know what your secrets are, now that we know you have that poor of a judge of how the things you write (or forget to write) come across to others.
There was no critical commentary or analysis. Your post was simply NOT WELL DESIGNED and you deserve the critical feedback. If you allow yourself to learn from this, you may be able to make your own messages clearer for people in the future. As you can see, I’m not the only one who had noise that secretly in your head you were treating ANY of the vid clips as evidence against Nessi.
Since you didn’t WRITE THAT ANYWHERE before, you really shouldn’t be accusing everyone who didn’t psychically divine your secret message of BEING BAD AT READING COMPREHENSION.
Is the Loch Ness Monster real or simply misidentified?
I guess you missed the title. 😂🤣😂🤣 DM me and I will be happy to break it down for you in a way that you can comprehend. You are welcome!!!
Of course I read that title. But saying “is it misidentified?” and then NOT analyzing the clip is irresponsible. There’s no way to know if you thought that were pointing out it was clearly not Nessi or if you thought the sturgeon was Nessi (as you observed that “many” people do). It wouldn’t be far fetched to assume you’re another one of those people. If you had said ANYTHING about that last clip, we would have read it and understood.
Your immature responses are further worsening your case. When you turn 12 someday, you’re gonna have one of those self cringe moments about this. It’s all good, I’m just gonna duck out tho cuz I thought I was dealing with someone strong enough to take feedback without being a little weirdo about it and going into elementary school clap back mode. ✌️later kid
i trust these eyewitnesses far more than the average eyewitness of today.
People love to discount the tales of our ancestors as fables of mere fantasy, meanwhile these hardy folk and the Natives especially in America would have a keen eye and an honest compass that would put the average person to shame today.
I love it, and i love the stories from the folks who lived 100+ years ago especially. When you start to consider their lives and the actual daily struggle of survival they endured as simply a part of life, any sort of "fantastical" tale takes on a different tone.
That sort of attitude remains true today. I had a visual sighting of a sasquatch in 2021, and I no longer need to "believe", i've seen it and I know it to be true. It's always a fairytale until it happens to YOU personally!
Leprechaun in the hood news report has lead me to believe that eye witnesses don’t mean a thing
The leprechaun witnesses were accustomed to a saturated media environment, knew they were being pumped for a story and treated the question with the disrespect it deserved.
I don't think older eyewitnesses are somehow ironclad. But they would not be so flippantly dishonest.
So you had a "sighting" that , unless there was a 3rd party to believe you, is basically impossible to verify to someone like me that it was 100% Sasquatch. Why should anyone take your sighting seriously? For all I know I could have seen an "alien" in the sky, but grew up where skies were so dark I knew that it wasn't
yeah pretty much. all i got is my word and that's all that 99.9% of humans who have ever lived have had. It's pretty strange when you think about it, we've only really started taking eyewitness accounts seriously since the mid 1800s, and even later than that, stretching into the mid 1900s.
So you didn't see sasquatch, thank you for answering
Three dudes on the boat at the end are in Canada
Wait a second.. Could it have been a sturgeon with a swan in its mouth?
I did a few rounds around Loch Ness and spend a few nights there . What I can tell you from that experience is that its full of tourists (like me) and most likely among the most photographed places on the planet.
Thats all.
Some good interviews in the beginning, ruined by stupid X-files music and videos of trash stuck on a rock undulating in a frozen stream. Those videos were debunked (found to actually BE bunk) on THE PROOF IS OUT THERE TV show years ago.
AC tore a hole in our dimension
It's 100% fake.
Paid actors... the 2nd one is Robin Williams from Mrs. Doubtfire.
“Nessie, Our Underwater Ally” 😂
Vintage paid actors.