For your consideration...
This is a link to my list of sessions:
https://www.social-rv.com/users/CraigSignals?sortKey=self_score&sortDirection=desc&page=1
This is the site's creator explaining the statistical significance of their findings thus far:
https://www.social-rv.com/stats
This is a demonstration of how the site uses the blockchain to add an absurd level of validation regarding total target blindness:
https://www.social-rv.com/verify
It should be added that the functionality of the site's UI serves to verify blindness as well. You can't post your sessions until you upload your session descriptions and you don't get to see your target picture as feedback until your descriptions are submitted. Try it. You can only post blindly.
Finally here is a brief summary of my routine:
https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/s/AMD1Q2uyVS
I wrote a short remote viewing manual/workbook you can download for free here:
https://www.craigsignals.com/post/premembering
And finally this download is the declassified training document the CIA used during Project Star Gate, the government's decades-long study and weaponization of remote viewing as a tool for espionage:
https://share.google/6AikyoqCcYaLZDlZx
There will be downvote bots and commenters below discouraging you from considering remote viewing as a real phenomenon. You can listen to them if you like. Everyone should have the right to take an off-ramp if needed.
But my work stands on its own merit. I don't need to win the lottery or get the late amazing Randi to give me a million dollars or tell you what's on your nightstand (it's a picture of someone you've lied to recently).
No, all I have to do is keep practicing and sharing what comes out of this. The thing kind of speaks for itself. I'm going to keep sharing my hits until I die, because remote viewing is real and everyone can learn how to do it, which is something true that people should be allowed to know about themselves.
I work nights so I'm gonna sleep now but I'll be back in a few hours if you've got questions.
What are the numbers that you write that slowly devolve into scribbles?
The number is the target ID. I set my intention to view the picture associated with that target ID and I say it out loud and on the last digit I let my hand scribble wildly and thoughtlessly. That scribble is a subconscious expression and it serves as a kind of anchor to keep me in contact with my target so I can pull information from it.
I will try it for couple of monts next year. It all sounds wild, but why the heck not? Also the CIA document makes it even more interesting! Happy holidays!
P.S.:Thanks for the book too!
You repeatedly write the number that’s assigned to the image to try to tap into what the image is. Writing the numbers helps for some reason.
How are the numbers generated? Could I think of something and give it a number for example. I always wondered how they have Joe mcmoneagle the mars location for example
Joe was randomly tasked on the Mars target when he was studying at the Monroe Institute. I think it was a CIA tasking if I'm remembering correctly. But yea, you could think of something and give it a number and that could become a target for another viewer so long as they are totally blind to it.
The number is randomly generated and unique to the session. If multiple viewers get the same target, they will get different random numbers.
We (social-rv) also don’t know what the target will be before the user submits their session
now look inside the forbidden B vault of sree padmanabhaswamy temple
He would need to do it blindly, optimally, to prevent left brain from interfering
We’ll be adding a new pool of “esoteric” targets soon, which are targets of UFOs/conspiracy theories, etc
awesome!! sounds exciting and useful for the community
Well now, /that’s/ convenient.
meh, it's just how it works, if you know what you're targeting then you're gonna have preconceived ideas about the target get in the way of what you're really supposed to be seeing, the information that comes to you from observing the target with your consciousness, not actually having conscious thoughts about the topic of your target, that just gets in the way
it's like, looking at news headlines about the moon splitting in half, vs actually seeing that the moon split in half (or didn't, and you would be able to trust what you see rather than the news)
This is all accurate, thanks for explaining it. The analytical mind is loud and it wants to grasp and guess as to what the sensory impressions mean and it usually guesses incorrectly. If you know anything about your target then you'll only be describing your mental image of what you think you know instead of describing the real sensory data coming from the target which is much more subtle. Blindness goes a long way toward solving that problem.
If anyone wants to practice this themselves, there's a free app called RV Tournament.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ironzog.rvtournament
oh hey, thanks!
This app was a waste of time and effort.
this app is unfortunately not good especially for beginners or practice :(
RV Tournament has some issues with displacement since they show you the decoys. Would recommend the free practice pools on social-rv if anyone wants to practice (though I’m biased 😅)
I agree with this. ARV is not for beginners. Start off just looking at one target at a time.
The SpiritualYou app is also free and has more sophisticated RV experiences
I didn’t believe in this at all and then I tried it myself and was shocked. When I was actually trying/focusing/had a plan I had around a 65-70% hit rate. If had the tv on, etc my hit rate went way down, like even under chance. Totally believe there is more to our consciousness.
So does the site give you the typed prompt and then you have to try to guess what it is?
No, you just get a string of random numbers and that's it. I use the same website as OP but I'm much worse at it than OP, my stats go from 30-60% accuracy.
Damn I'm so lost. So the website generates a random string of numbers associated with a photo. Then it gives you just the numbers and you try to guess the photo?
The numbers are coordinates to a random location
You then draw what you see at the location
The Website then shows you a photograph of the location
you then compare that to your drawing
Okay this makes more sense, so they're not just random numbers, they're coordinates.
Yep you're correct 👍
Appreciate it. So I've seen clips of Rainbolt playing GeoGuessr where it's sort of the opposite: he's given a photo and then he picks the coordinates on a map.
Do you think someone like Rainbolt would be good at remote viewing? Or is it two completely different skill sets (Geoguessr vs remote viewing)
when he said coordinates he doesn't mean physical coordinates on the earth (not latitude longitude) they are "virtual coordinates" if anything, that are attached to the target, whether a physical location , an image, object, etc. it's basically more of an identifier tag than coordinates but that's just the word commonly used in remote viewing
The number is completely random and unique to the session. Different people who view the same target will get a different number
There is 0 information in the number
Ok, some confusion is working its way into this thread. The ID numbers on the sessions posted above are completely arbitrary. They are random numbers with no connection to the nature of the target at all. All these random numbers do is give you something by which you can set your intention to describe your target. "It is my intention to see the information in the picture associated with target ID ####-####." That's all that ID is used for in the examples above. There are other types of remote viewing which focus on an actual GPS coordinates. In those cases the coordinates are typically in a sealed envelope so the viewer is still blind. But that's not what I was doing above.
Haha so you're not an inverse Rainbolt then?
Not that I'm aware of lolz
Depending on the site, you get a “target” and that’s usually a string of numbers. That’s what you are focusing on to get your remote viewing impressions (what OP describes as the shapes, colors, emotions, etc of the photo). You focus on the target numbers and do your best to do what OP did - draw, describe, color, ect. Then you eventually get to see the image associated with the target numbers and see how close you are. It can feel like a guess, but the more you do it the more you see there’s something more to it. Some even have a second false image, so not only do you have to visualize the image, you also have to pick the correct target. All sorts of things you can escalate to. Idk if I described it well!
You nailed it.
Yes
It's not guessing though
The website gives you a random number, but the number is really meaningless. You’re essentially trying to perceive the target you will be shown in the future. You’re given no hints or information to help you.
That's a pretty great hit rate. I hover around 60% myself, which is still above average. You should sign up for an account and try your hand at it again, I love seeing sessions from other viewers.
Can I get the numbers to next week's powerball? Please and thank you
For some reason this one simple ask messes up everyone that can see the future.
Because no one can actually see into the future.
It’s really hard to view numbers for some reason
I never realised there were so many insane people in the world.
TLDR: Remote viewing is good for pulling sensory data from a blind target. It's not good for analytical tasks like reading numbers and letters. Judging remote viewing harshly for its inability to read clearly is kind of like judging a race horse for it's inability to pass the New York Bar Exam. That's just not what it does best.
So, this question comes up every time anyone posts about remote viewing. In fact, remote viewers have had success in picking lottery numbers in easier formats like pick 3 and such but remote viewing is not a good tool for analytical info like numbers and letters in long form. Here is a link to a book on Associative Remote Viewing which is used in the pursuit of picking winning outcomes:
https://www.amazon.com/Associative-Remote-Viewing-Predicting-Outcomes/dp/1943951284
The most I've ever read in the RV environment is a short sentence and even then I only get sensory impressions related to what I'm reading and not the words itself. I am working on improving this ability. I have had sessions where I've read a short series of numbers correctly like this one linked below where I felt like I was reading something related to time that read "22". The target was the electric forest festival of 2022:
https://www.social-rv.com/sessions/b3aa9db2-a978-47aa-b86a-88cd1a813e4b
Letters and numbers are really just symbols of language whereas remote viewing seems to be on some universal information where shapes, locations, feelings exist. So that’s my theory why numbers are hard to predict, if you can’t see, feel, touch it then it’s not part of the universal language. And possibly easier to quantumly change between RV session and actual manifestation. Hard to explain but hopefully that kind of makes sense?
That's super convenient in a way that allows RVs to have a pass at anything specific or of value that can be tracked and verified.
See literally any part of my main post including the 9 examples given.
Yeah these show nothing. But have fun!
While you’ll have to take the OP at his word about his findings in the post, there have been masses of purported studies done by intelligence agencies, as well as, I believe, perhaps interesting, relevant data pulled from public studies where humans focusing on random number generators seem to have some kind of effect on the outcome. Anyway, not being able to pull specific numbers doesn’t at all mean that RVing in itself can’t be studied or measured, regardless of its validity, and I think you know that.
Yes, there are a couple studies that claim minor effects on random generators. These studies are not replicable. There is potential flaws in these experiments such as sensory leakage, lack of independent peer review, and conflicts of interest. These effects could be from bias or artifacts.
Lack of replicability and questions about the experimental methodologies raise significant doubt about the purported anomalies.
It can be studied and possibly measured. There is no validity, and I think you know that.
OP makes his living selling RV as authentic. Taking his word about his 'findings' is a choice one can make. As folly as that may be.
If RV is real, why is it not taken full advantage to manipulate events and outcomes and deal with real world issues? The US government shut down their program because it provided no actionable intelligence.
Interesting that they had said program for 20 years if it provided no results. I’m guessing you’ll hand wave away the many awards of Joe McMonegle for purported actionable intelligence using his remote viewing. Also the fact that they “ended” the program immediately after the name was leaked also seems like prime time for a name change as many people claim, but you’re right, I know that it works about as much as I know that it doesn’t.
And yet here you are trying to convince people to give you money on reddit based on the strong evidence of 'trust me bro'.
If RV worked the government, and many other institutions would absolutely being using it for their own benefit. A leaked name wouldn't stop anyone from using such a valuable resource. That's laughable.
Wrong guy, chief. And apparently, the government has used it for their benefit according to people in the program. Good day though, I see you’re heavily against the idea.
honestly people shouldn't bother trying to convince people like rookraider1, he has his own beliefs and it really doesn't matter
The lack of any scientifically reproducible results, the lack of actionable intelligence, the lack of using this skill for anything meaningful should be all the evidence you need.
Why sell 'skill' on reddit if you could actually do this? The world would be your oyster. You would be one of the most in demand people in the world with an incredibly valuable and unique skill that could provide immense benefit to society....but, yeah sell your 'skill' on reddit🤷♂️
72% upvote rating over 166k views and over 430 shares. #2 post on High Strangeness today. Your opinion is in the minority, I'm afraid.
Lol he wanted the last one to be devils tower so badly
"This means something...This is important..." Lolz
I think the black/white was throwing me off because I kept thinking I was looking at something energetic and pulsing in the center of a crater on the moon. I do think it's interesting that Tesla's lab was in Colorado Springs, which matches the snowy/elevation/geologically interesting feelings I was getting.
Nice hits - RV is a great meditation practice, its solid for inner/shadow work and practical uses as well once you've put in the work for a bit.
This is great to see contemporary work
I used to make some threads on /x/ with a closed box asking for people to remote view what's inside. It was for fun but some comments were close.
You seem to make good use of intention
How does it affect your everyday life? Do you get synchronicities often?
Your method is very close to ritual work, have you ever tried in your own way to make a circle and banish outside influences like in any magical practice?
Have you tried using substances?
Thanks for sharing your work
These questions are great. Holding intention in the quiet mind is the key. I do notice many synchronicities now, and friends and family tell me about their own bizarrely improbable observations more often than ever before. I think maybe synchronicity is like a little wink from the universe once it realizes you're paying attention. I love it.
I haven't used magical circles, I haven't done spirit work, and I feel no need for protection. I have never felt threatened in the remote viewing environment after more than four years of practice. There are some methods that utilize a protective field of one's own light energy, like the resonant energy balloon in Gateway. I feel like that does serve to keep fear at bay but once you realize and know you're more than your physical body the concept of protection feels pretty unnecessary.
No substances in-session. It's important to have full control of your mind.
For those curious whether Remote Viewing is legitimate, there exists a large body of peer-reviewed scientific evidence which overwhelmingly validates our innate psi abilities such as RV.
It's important that we never lose our intellectual curiosity in life. ✌️
A link to a link to a guy who is not exactly the most legitimate isn't "overwhelmingly validated "
You were provided with +160 peer-reviewed academic papers.
You ignored all of them.
However that's the great thing about free will.
You are welcome to trust in your own feelings over the abundance of scientific evidence that is available to us.
No one will force you to learn anything new, to grow and evolve your consciousness.
You are free to stay exactly as you are now, for as long as you'd like.
✌️
EDIT: You blocked me instead of responding, really? This is just more evidence that you're not engaging in good faith. Silence those who disagree, lol. Good luck out there.
The very first example you posted has TWO PEOPLE in an MRI, and the guy who thinks he has telepathy showed more usage of the brain region associated with memory encoding and retrieval, which is exactly what one would expect from somebody who thinks they are telepathic.
Then you posted a mere four other links, then to some random website with 157 links. The very first one in there is about "distant healing", in which the authors claim that 13 out of 23 (small numbers) trials showed a "positive treatment effect", which turns out to be entirely subjective to the authors if you actually read the paper (e.g. "treatment group showed decrease in pain intensity" for 21 people who has some dentistry done on their third molar, with the "distant healing" performed THREE HOURS after surgery).
None of this seems worth reading further. You're going to have to show something statistically significant, not cherry picked and claimed to be so.
I did not ignore them. I have read most of those before whole researching this out of curiosity. Take a step back and consider other possibilities before immediately attacking because someone disagrees with you.
✌️
I appreciate you acknowledging that you have zero critiques of those papers.
It's important that we follow the evidence no matter what, even if it leads to initially uncomfortable conclusions.
As with psychology and psychiatry, this research is subject to the replicability crisis. You have to stretch the data analysis to a tenuous level to be able to argue statistical significance. It's a real problem. But one that is also found in other studies of the mind. It's one of the reasons that treatments for mental health are so hard to meet clinical endpoints in trials.
Let me know if you have any other questions I can answer for you.
Glad to help!
I'm glad you commented. Most people are woefully uninformed about this so I'm passionate about sharing the data.
Using the same standards that mainstream science requires for something to be accepted as true, the confirmation of psi abilities has far surpassed it.
Parapsychology is a legitimate science. The Parapsychological Association is an affiliated organization of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the world's largest scientific society, and publisher of the well-known scientific journal Science. The Parapsychological Association was voted overwhelmingly into the AAAS by AAAS members over 50 years ago.
Here is one of a half dozen peer-reviewed meta-analyses of ganzfeld telepathy experiments that all reached similar conclusions:
Revisiting the Ganzfeld ESP Debate: A Basic Review and Assessment by Brian J Williams. Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 25 No. 4, 2011
There’s a lot in this analysis, let’s focus on the best part. Look at figure 7 which displays a "summary for the collection of 59 post-communiqué ganzfeld ESP studies reported from 1987 to 2008, in terms of cumulative hit rate over time and 95% confidence intervals".
In this context, the term "post-communiqué ganzfeld" means using the extremely rigorous protocol established by skeptic Ray Hyman. Hyman had spent many years skeptically examining telepathy experiments, and had various criticisms to reject the results. With years of analysis on the problem, Hyman came up with a protocol called “auto-ganzfeld” which he declared that if positive results were obtained under these conditions, it would prove telepathy, because by the most rigorous skeptical standards, there was no possibility of conventional sensory leakage. The “communiqué” was that henceforth, everybody doing this research should use Ray Hyman’s excellent telepathy protocol which closed all sensory leakage loopholes that were a concern of skeptics.
In the text of the paper talking about figure 7, they say:
Jessica Utts is a statistics professor who made excellent contributions to establishing the proper statistical methods needed for parapsychology experiments. It was work like this that helped her get elected as president of the professional organization for her field, the American Statistical Association.
Using these established and proper statistical methods and applying them to the experiments done under the rigorous protocol established by skeptic Ray Hyman, the odds by chance for these results are 11.6 Trillion-to-one based on replicated experiments performed independently all over the world.
By the standards of any other science, the psi researchers made their case for telepathy.
Take particle physics for example. Physicists use the far lower standard of 5 sigma (3.5 million-to-one) to establish new particles such as the Higgs boson.
The parapsychology researcher’s ganzfeld telepathy experiments exceed the significance level of 5 sigma by a factor of more than a million.
You bring a really important voice to these posts, btw. I feel like there's a reason dogmatic skeptics seek you out and challenge you so harshly when you pop up on these threads: You give them pause with real data they can research on their own. People shouldn't be so quick to assume they understand how everything works. That's like telling reality that you have nothing left to learn. Unwise.
I appreciate your efforts.
Have you applied this to Associative remote viewing methods to predict real life outcomes? How clairvoyant did you considered yourself to be prior to doing these?
Have you ever been to places like Area 51? They say there’s something there that stops you if you try to go in.
I have heard of this, as well as personnel in the RV environment who can see you and tell you to leave. I haven't experienced this myself and I would guess even if you can be detected and/or confused there is probably nothing that can force you to leave.
I had an experience with a moon target once where I felt like I was caught in a loop looking down at my own mind looking back up at myself. My abilities of perception were being reflected back on themselves, which felt very much like an old world magical ward or spell built around lunar concepts like reflection. Something like "Try to see me and you only see yourself". It was disorienting and it made me want to leave pretty fast. I've often wondered if that was some sort of psi camouflage or illusionary technique designed to keep me from looking around.
Security guards.
What app are you using or any other books, material, courses, websites you’d suggest for someone looking to get started.
I put together a free manual/workbook you can download here:
https://www.craigsignals.com/post/premembering
I use www.Social-RV.com to post my sessions. Read "Everyone's Guide To Natural ESP" by Ingo Swann. Read "Remote Viewing Secrets" and "Mind Trek" by Joe McMoneagle. Also "Mind Reach" by Russell Targ and Hal Puthoff.
If you haven't seen the documentary "Third Eye Spies" featuring Targ it's maybe the best introduction to the history of remote viewing research.
Practice practice practice. You might get good hits the first few times you try it and then fall into a long line of misses. It takes time to figure out how to quiet down your ego's urge to guess and learn how to dig into the subtle information that comes from the subconscious mind.
RVTheNews is full of ballers. You guys are pretty cool and fairly brave 😚
I need to get back to that project, it was so cool at times. People always say "Sure RV might be real but you can't do anything useful with it..." ...but seeing the picture on a specific news site at a specific date/time in the future seems pretty useful! Thanks for being here.
None of your examples show anything specific. They are interpreted later as being something relevant with an associated probability.
Do you get your mind in a relaxed state before rv? I listen to binaural beats.
I haven’t practiced every day, so maybe that’s the reason, but I am not progressing past basic impressions. Only in one of my first sessions I drew the Big Ben and it was.
At best, if I can keep my mind relaxed and waiting, a gentle impression will form and once it forms, it stays, it doesn’t go away (as opposed to when my imagination is active and keeps changing things). So for example, once I got ocean, ocean, ocean… I asked to see if there was something else too, but it wouldn’t budge . The target was a picture of 2 crabs at the bottom of the ocean.
You say you go in repeatedly but for me once the impressions fill my mind they won’t leave.
Also, how do you progress to get more complex stuff?
And if it’s not too much, I have this fear of failure or this drive to get it right all the time and it’s holding me back. I am better when I do this privately but when I do it with people I feel like I have to show results!
Hello! It's always good to meet another viewer.
I have a bit of a ritual I do before my sessions. I describe it here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/s/mWOAJlhDMs
I do listen to binaural beats sometimes, specifically I use the Focus 15 beats on the Expand app. But I've had good deep meditation with others. For me, the ritual aspect acts like a kind of wave to the subconscious to let it know I'm ready to quiet down and have a talk.
I think we get stuck expecting too much from ourselves. But our job is just to capture what the subconscious gives us. Our thinking mind believes it's the most important thing in the universe, but behind all that ego the quiet mind is waiting for us to shut up and listen. The more mental noise we have the harder it is listen. And the harder we try, the noisier it gets.
Come up with a cooldown routine you do every time you sit down for a session. Make it spooky. I did Trataka meditation for a while, candle gazing, and it was so spooky and cool. It created a feeling I didn't get anywhere else besides when I was ready to approach the subconscious.
Also come up with a feedback ritual. That way during your session you can look ahead to the acts you take right before checking your feedback. I stare in the mirror and say "OK, this is the target picture I was looking for. Ready?" And then I look.
But whatever you do it has to belong to you. Build a secret handshake with your soul and then hang out with it often and let it show you how your future self will feel when it sees the picture. Start with feeling to make the connection, then ask direct questions and record the responses. Over time your responses will be more and more on-target and you'll learn how the subconscious wants to communicate with you. It's a very personal thing.
Thank you. There is also the remote viewing track among the gateway tapes. I will try it next time.
I think having a ritual is important. Mine was just writing my name and date on the page. But I get what you meant and I would like to deepen it.
I never thought of having a ritual for just before seeing the target, I will think of it.
What I have done is to say thank you you and feel gratitude for whatever it was I got.
Btw, have you tried looking at your self in the mirror with an unfocused (whole-taking) glaze, not blinking (as much as possible)? There is lots to find out when trying to experience the world outside the grasping/isolating/dividing mind.
So how do we know people aren’t looking at community results and then performing with that knowledge?
There’s no blinding?
Very impressive - try and take part in some research if you can.
Thank you! I am currently working on a research project and hopefully have more opportunities lined up in the near future.
But that would destroy everything he has worked so hard for…
Hell of a session Craig! You’re one of the social-rv GOATS
Thank you! I appreciate the effort you've put into your project as well.
What's the significance of the squiggles after the last number?
I think he's just letting himself trail off and warm up for thinking without logic if that makes sense (but I don't know for sure, I just know that I've done that same thing before too both in normal writing situations and a couple times when trying to write a remote viewing report... And I'm definitely as far as it gets from expert just to be clear 😅)
This is pretty much right. https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/comments/1pwy8nv/comment/nw9eezq/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
They're called "ideograms" sort of like a quick scan to get the "genre" of the target before getting more specific info.
Very cool. Thanks for the manual and links. Can you also get locations?
You can get some impressions on locations but RV is good for when you know where something is but you don't know what it is. If you know what something is but not where, then map dowsing with a pendulum works better than rv in my opinion. There's a guy named Paul H Smith who wrote "Foundations of Controlled Remote Viewing" who wrote a book on map dowsing that was a good read. I haven't committed time to this yet, but I will.
I try to do this myself! This is making me want to be more routine/take it more "serious"
Good! Having a regular routine is super important. You learn through reflecting on your sessions even when they produce a miss, which is going to happen a lot when you're starting out. I'll give you a good example: I had a session once where I was seeing drooping power cables. I wrote "drooping lines" but then stopped because it didn't feel correct. Instead I asked what was *the information* behind the image of the power lines and I wrote something like "individual parts, all identical to each other, working together to move something in a circuit or circulation". The drooping lines ended up being good because the target image was an operating table with tubes drooping all over, but there was a team of surgeons around the table all dressed in scrubs that appeared to be doing heart surgery. Individual parts, all identical to each other, working together to move something (blood) in a circuit or circulation. Do you see? If you're in contact with your target your mind might generate an incorrect mental image that is driven by correct data from your target. The data underneath that mental image is what you want.
Don't forget to put plenty of time into your cooldown method. You have to be in the quiet mind or else the analytical mind is too noisy and you'll never see/feel the RV data underneath. Imagination is loud and clear and nameable whereas RV data feels kind of murky and surprising. Imagination is like "I know this" whereas RV data feels like "Where did that come from?'.
Awesome, man! My hit rate is not super high, but its crazy how when you're "in the zone" and get one so right that even if you can't do it all the time, you know it's flippin' real.
How long have you been at it? Do you do it daily? Getting better with time? lol I'm looking for motivation to practice more diligently :P
Remote viewing is very real. I have no clue how it works, but there are so many like Pat Price and Ingo Swann that demonstrated this ability with remarkable accuracy.
I used to do it daily but now it's just a few per week. It takes me about 45 mins to do a session so the time isn't always available. But a daily routine teaches you to become familiar with how the subconscious wants to package sensory information for you. Look for patterns in your misses and try to relive what you were seeing and feeling during your session once you see your feedback. Sometimes you get insights that can improve your whole practice.
I've had some success, several sessions with impressive hits, but after that it started to go downhill and my guesses were getting further and further from the target. I gave up after I thought the target was a metallic object when it fact it was a bunch of fluffy kittens😕
the CIA docs mention there is learning curve to this. Initally, you are prety ccurate but then you start to fail and the hardest part is then learning to get yourself to some baseline
The general belief is when it's new and novel your ego isn't able to step in because it's not really sure what's going on. As such you get the good results.
Then after your ego sees how it works it's like "no prob fam I got this," and you start getting terrible results.
Therefore getting back to good is about controlling your ego, as much as it is learning what signals are noise and which are the good ones.
This is the why the "never take a target you cant get feedback on" part is so important. It helps you learn what's real and what's noise.
Okay so as someone who is fairly interested in this area I’d love to know kinda just how everyone got started with this? I know he posted a ton of links and stuff but it’s still kinda overwhelming.
I’ve started meditating regularly and admittedly I’ve felt myself drift but never into anything my own mind wasn’t for sure generating. I’m betting just more practice but I’m super curious. The closest I’ve been able to do anything id consider as like a “whoa” moment was I got a lucid dream going for a brief amount of time.
Do you worry that on the days you can’t see the future that it may be because you won’t live that long?
Nah. Why do some sessions result in misses is a really good question though. I personally think it's because sometimes my timeline changes between my session and checking feedback. So sometimes I'm viewing a timeline that is going to occur and sometimes I'm viewing a timeline that will change by the time I see my feedback. But that's just a guess, this whole area needs a lot more study.
I would love to give this a go but I have aphantasia. I don't see anything but black and varying shades of black.
I "see" through thought or memory, so I don't know how that would work in an automatic RV type scenario.
Remote viewing is more feeling than seeing. I do get intuitive flashes of vision sometimes, but most of the time it's just a feeling. I wouldn't be surprised if aphantasia turned out to be an advantage instead of a handicap in the RV environment.
But can he predict the lottery number?
Numbers are very difficulty to view.
It’s like trying to read your phone screen in a dream
That’s the only exception.
I won the lotto on my first try. I actually predicted 7 random numbers in a row that day, but just happened to assign three in the middle to the lotto. RV works.
Sure it does.
It’s so much real.
Already asked/answered:
https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/comments/1pwy8nv/comment/nw9r8dw/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
Single universe misconception.
We live in an infinite multiverse. Stable structures occupy broader multiverse landscapes. The mind transcends these universes. Seeing the titanic at the bottom of the ocean is easier than picking the one tiny branch that hits those lotto numbers.
You can’t. You’ll be met by physic security.
I love RV. I don’t have a picture on my nightstand though.. although most people do.. and most people lie.. so that’s probably for the majority
Good shit.
Thanks for sharing. I've had some success with remote viewing. I've had more success with automatic writing.
People will start to get it soon enough.
I do wonder how many of my descriptions come from something close to automatic writing. Seeing other examples it feels very similar and often my words work better with the actual target image than they do with whatever it was I was picturing. It's as if the subconscious knows what mental image will generate the best description when broken down into basic language.
RV is a super practical thing. I was more curious about opening a general conduit to the "akashic record" (non-entropic conscious state that exists external to spacetime). I think that's the link between the psi stuff. "The Universe is Mind" as the Hermetists say.
Once I got to "the void", I get general practical downloads soon after (logical connections and 'gnosis') . But to get to the void, I need to clear my mind. Those stray thoughts keep popping up.
RV has a target. Clearing space for the void is more like tuning down radio channels and interference. Sometimes there's coherent language in the chatter.
I studied Rosicrucianism for a short while and I think a lot of Hermetic ideas ring true in my experience with RV. Just anecdotally I do believe our reality exists in the mind of some celestial dream, and our minds then offer a connection to the dreamer. As far as precognition is concerned, the Rosicrucians had a practice where every night before sleep they would relive the events of the day in reverse. This created a different relationship between the flow of time and memory because in that practice one is able to remember the next event, having already experienced it, but the event is still ahead in the chronological order of the mental exercise. For me, this created a feeling of unity between my past/present/future consciousness which is something I also experience when I get a good RV hit. Lots and lots of overlap there.
You seem cool, I like you.
That explains a lot
Same to you, fellow traveler.
What is your process for automatic writing like? I always wondered if left handed people have a different experience due to right-brain connection.
I'm right handed.
I started by just meditating with specific ritual conditions and quickly jotting down "invasive" thoughts that would get in the way.
I then go full focus on staring into the void, getting rid of the invasive thoughts starts to be automatic where I'm not thinking about what is being written. My hand just goes. Many of the thoughts aren't "local".
Isn't automatic writing channeling feedback from spirits? I honestly dont know the difference which is why I'm asking. I'm not criticizing at all!
I don't know about "spirits", but something comes through. Some predictive, some retrospective. Could be "spirits" (define that), or could be a mental connection to another consciousness in another time or location.
This is a fascinating topic. I'll have to look into it more!
[removed]
Be civil.
So you're given the typed prompts as clues?
All you get to identify your target is the Target ID, which is a series of random numbers. You are completely blind.
Ah ok thanks, just trying to understand. The numbers are randomly generated? So if there's no specific connection between the numbers and the image how are the numbers useful? Like if I write 62 how are you going to know I drew a picture of some flowers?
How the target ID signals the subconscious mind to find the target associated with that ID is one of the mysteries that needs to be studied in depth. The clairvoyance model of RV suggests that the target ID creates a link between your subconscious mind and some higher frequency dimension of information that contains every possible event in every possible timeline and you can pull whatever information you want from it. In quantum mechanics this idea is called the Quantum Hologram and Russel Targ explores that possible explanation in his book "Limitless Mind". Another possible explanation is the precognition-on-demand model, which suggests that your future mind that reacts to your target image is able to package those sensory impressions and make them available in the past during your session while you're still blind to the target. That model goes further in explaining some quirks around RV, like "displacement" where your session describes something else your react to strongly around the same time you're checking your target feedback.
Fascinating, thanks for the insight. Which model resonates more with your experience?
I fought against displacement while I was predicting future news pictures on r/RVTheNews so I know displacement is a real phenomenon which gives some weight to the precognition-on-demand model.
But I've also done ARV (Associative Remote Viewing), where your target is one of two possible targets associated with two possible outcomes and your job is to describe the picture associated with the outcome that will actually happen. I've had instances where I describe both of the possible target images without ever having access to the incorrect one. So I was pulling data from a picture that I would never see, which speaks to the clairvoyance model. But the possibility exists that even knowing that I did pull good data from the incorrect option meant that I was getting partial feedback on it so it doesn't eliminate the precognition model either.
We just need a lot more study on it.
some people think of the numbers as a “handle” for your intention to grab onto.
But they have no information in them, and we really only keep them around because RVers are used to getting numbers
the seal eating a sunfish was on reddit last week
Have you tried to remote view Mars?
I have not.
I’d be curious to see what you got, jf you gave it a try. Have you ever heard of Ingo Swann?
I have. I studied his work early on. "Everyone's Guide to Natural ESP" is my favorite. I liked "Penetration" a lot too, but that one leaves me a little out of sorts. Dr Ed May, who was a leading researcher in Project Star Gate, has said before that he's not sure any good data came from McMoneagle's Mars sessions or Ingo Swann's moon sessions. One of the issues with RV is if you don't have good feedback your subconscious will still paint a picture of what it thinks the target will mostly likely be like. So if my target is "Is there a base on the moon?" then the subconscious might paint a convincing picture of a base on the moon and maybe it will be all fiction or half-fiction or completely accurate but you have no way of verifying any of that. I like concrete knowable targets so I get to know if my session was a hit or a miss without wandering into that mental limbo that accompanies paranormal targets. But don't get me wrong, paranormal targets can be a lot of fun.
Got it, and interesting. Also funny you mention Penetration as I was poking around in another thread from several years ago, just now and the book Penetration is mentioned.
I find all of this fascinating and have mixed views and opinions based on some of the people involved. Such as Uri Geller, among others. I also meant to ask about McMoneagle instead, but I was mixing him up with McCandlish, until you mentioned the former.
Yeah Geller is such a mixed bag. He has produced amazing remote viewing sessions under laboratory conditions and he has also been caught cheating at bending spoons. He did great work with Project Star Gate while he was also working for the Israeli govt. Part of me thinks his main job was to muddy the waters because he accomplished that goal so well.
What are your thoughts on the Monroe institute? And psi hits and psi misses, and the sheep-goat effect?
I would love to study at Monroe Institute. I've never been out-of-body, at least not that I know of, but I loved "Journeys Outside Of The Body". As far as hits and misses are concerned the only thing I know is no one gets above 70% hit rate. That seems odd to me. What is it that prevents a 100% hit rate? Part of me thinks the timeline changes between the time of the session and the time I check feedback sometimes. Like 60% of the time I'm able to look ahead in my timeline but then 40% of the time my timeline has changed and so has my target. I just don't know.
Interesting. I’m curious what you know, or think, about no one getting above a 70% hit rate and why you think it has something to do with timelines changing?
Have you gotten into the Gateway tapes at all?
You're very talented, I've tried remote viewing but have had no success so far. Makes me want to pick it up again, thanks for sharing!
Utts still recognises the replicability problem. That's why she has to use large numbers of non-replicable studies to act as proxy parallels.
What are the Power Ball numbers for Monday December, 29th at 9PM?? DM me the numbers and I’ll split it with you 25%/me and 75%/you! (And Ill give 20% of my 25% to charity)
What do you see in Antarctica?
Can you look under the pyramids of egypt?
First off, that's awesome and great progress!
With that said, where were you with that 1.6 billion dollar power ball drawing?!?!
We should get a bunch off remote viewers together to identify the next drawing numbers.
why don’t you post these online so it’s actually verifiable that it happened ‘the day before’
Gonna need some powerball numbers soon my friend!
So if the CIA asked you to RV coordinates using longitude and latitude, could you?
Yes. It's better if I don't know the coordinates at all.
Some of these photos don’t look anywhere near legitimate (This isn’t a knock against you, I realize you can only work with what you’re seeing/sensing) that one with the fish/seal specifically… Not surprising, just take a look at photos of any big story in the far distant past, and you’ll start noticing a whole lot of goofy things (one that really sticks out to me, search for the powerline worker giving coworker mouth to mouth while up on the pole - it’s just so ridiculous on every level!) Sorry I get sidetracked easily 😬👍
I like the blockchain tech. Ever attempted remote viewing specific intended targets? Looked for anything supernatural?
Prior to your foray into remote viewing were you heavily into meditation? Had you experienced any other psychic instances or premonitions?
I've had meditation routines on and off since I was a teenager. And yes, I did have premonitions prior to starting RV. I think premonitions are probably way more common than we let on because western culture deems it socially unserious to talk about psychic phenomenon. But western culture is unique in that ignorance. The term "Second sight" was coined by the Scottish and created a cultural vocabulary for premonition that is still relevant today. The ancient Chinese developed I-Ching thousands of years ago and it serves as a model for predicting and understanding changes in nature/life/spirituality. Patanjali wrote in the Yoga Sutras about seeing unseen people and locations in the quiet mind. The west is just catching up to the rest of antiquity, really.
What app/website are you using?
... He literally wrote it in his post 😭
www.social-rv.com
I don’t see much relation in the scribbles/RV vs the target. The mind can connect dots even when not really there. This is similar to a Rorschach test imo, once drawings are completed and compared.
Ok.
What are, if any...the limitations of your talent? Can you go to outer space?
This is my session on the ISS:
https://www.social-rv.com/sessions/0472c6f8-5cb3-4147-8e87-83131166ce5c
Is your connection to other human minds or intangible? What is the primal derivative of the connection that allows this foresight?
This is why this topic needs to be studied more. I don't know. I can tell you what it feels like though. It feels like I am using my physical body to communicate via dedicated intention with a version of myself that exists in a non-physical reality outside of time. It feels like my non-physical self is able to respond to my intention and package sensory impressions from my future self in physical reality when I look at my target photo and make those impressions available to my physical body in the past before I look at the picture. I think that's how I can feel what the target image looks like before looking at it.
But the most responsible answer is I don't know.
Thanks for answering. Keep those spidey senses up tiger! 🤠🫡
This is very cool. I’ve been practicing as well. Thanks for sharing.
That’s amazing! You have a knack and seem to be a natural. I use “RV Tournament”. More people should practice this as we all have the ability, we just have to exercise it like any other muscle. Keep killing it. Cheers.
You should come visit us on the High Strangeness discord. There's a few RVers among us with some pretty great skill and belong to even larger RV communities if you're looking to meet more people.
Can you give me tips on the stock market?
Love to give it a go what to do
Here is a brief summary of my routine:
https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/s/AMD1Q2uyVS
I wrote a short remote viewing manual/workbook you can download for free here:
https://www.craigsignals.com/post/premembering
For a second there I thought the post title would end in AMA
I’m not sure I understand the system used to give you a location to go to, and how they’d give you enough info for you to “find” it without giving away what it is? Apologies in advance if I missed something obvious in the photos
All you get is the random target ID number. Then you do your session and submit your descriptions which you cannot change after submission. Then, only after you've submitted your descriptions, do you get to see what your target was. You are totally blind during your session. Try it!
This ability you claim to have cannot be real if any variable in the design influences your result. Your skill cannot be dependent on the design of the test.
If it truly works then for example the number of images shouldn’t matter right? Your chance of being right has to be above random luck caused by restricting the AI’s available choices to only ten images. I mean if real whatever you saw, you saw, and whatever will be shown will be shown right? And you’re having a AI do the work it’s not like it costs you more labor to increase the sample size. So if your results are not dependent on sample size, then keeping the same ratio of source group to select group should not affect your results. I think the video said you start with 300.
I bet if you increased the source group to 3,000 or better 30,000, and gave the AI 100 or better yet 1000 photos to rank, that your predictability would drop closer to zero with each increase. Now you have 1/100 or 1/1000 chance of a match. Currently you have a 10% chance of a match and the AI only ranks 10 images. This is very restrictive. Moreover it doesn’t seem like the system allows a no match or negative finding where it says you match no images. It always picks a match when in reality a no match is a valid result. If your results change for the worse with sample size there is a flaw or bias in the system that is influencing your results to appear to work.
If you have this ability then every variable has to be shown to be independent and not influence the results. You might argue that you know it works and you don’t have to prove it, that’s fine, but it only means you believe it’s real. It doesn’t mean it’s real.
I was here to call this BS but you proved me wrong. I love this feeling of being prowen wrong thank you!
Congrats on your open mind and quality of character! It's rare to meet someone who can change their initial reaction. Things like this give me hope.
But... how does this show anything? You saw something, draw it and then just search a slightly correlating thing in real life?
Actually Randy is dead but his organization still stands by the offer, and I believe it’s more than a million now.
Many people have tried to claim the prize but they’ve changed the rules or moved the goalpost at the last minute every time
Not true. The rules are clearly written and every year an article is written about each claim ability, the established testing rules, what happened during the test, and how they failed, with statistics.