1) No, and there is no career insurance available 

2) what is catastrophic? You can easily do the math, but a 35-50% drop in US equities still results in a huge drop at 15% bonds. You can't go much higher though. Even 25% and the potential drop is still huge.

3 yes, you're over thinking it

Your post has been temporarily held for moderator approval and will not be approved unless it contains a proposed plan of action for members to provide feedback on.

r/HENRYfinance is focused on discussion, frameworks, and shared experiences — not individualized “what should I do?” financial advice.

Posts framed around tradeoffs, factors, or decision frameworks are more likely to be approved.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[removed]

You're in your mid 30s. Stocks always rebound. Why miss out on 20-30 years of compounding?

I don’t think you need to add bonds until you are within 5 years or so of early retirement. 

Yes, adding small value is a good idea especially working in tech IMO. I’d prioritize US small value over international personally (most of the difference between US and international equities is explained by 1) value factor and 2) FX). Yes, value has underperformed the last decade but there have been many decades it outperformed growth and it’s not possible to predict when value vs growth will go in and out of favor. 

The general idea is valid, but at the end of the day, if you still need to work, no portfolio tilt is going to make up for the loss of earning (and therefore saving) capacity.

That said, I do have serious concerns about the concentration of the US market into a handful of tech mega-caps even if I manage to stay employed in tech until I hit FI. So, I have tilted my portfolio away from US large-cap growth by adding weight in mid-cap, small-cap, developed, emerging and value.

I'd pick the minimal bond allocation that would help prevent you from panic selling during a 50% equity downturn. Whether its 0% or 20% isn't going to move the needle more than helping prevent behavior mistakes.

This is more of an investing question than a HENRY question. But I also work in tech and also worry about tech concentration in the stock indices since most of the growth of the S&P has come from a few tech companies.

I personally have no interest in owning bonds so I'm looking for investments that are good long term growth investments but which are not correlated or at least loosely correlated to tech companies and the US economy and USD. These are hard to find because 99% of the headlines and analysis are for those companies. I prefer to buy individual stocks rather than ETF's but I own a few of the top holdings of VXUS for example.

At the same time, the tech companies are dominating the economy and the indices because they are performing very well and consuming a lot of industries, a trend which isn't likely to change anytime soon. There are some tech stocks that I have no interest in owning such as TSLA or PLTR but others like GOOG and AMZN look like good long term holdings to me.

I personally have never seen the point of "bond ballast" in a portfolio. These days bonds will earn 3-4%, the same as cash, and holding these for a long period just means that your overall returns will be lower. Yes this will be nice to own in a downturn but it's far more likely that the markets will go up than down in a given year. I hold a little bit of cash so that I can opportunistically make investments when there is a downturn but not much besides that.

Your plan is fine.