• They shine the biggest spotlight on incidents that meet the *narrative* they want to talk about, and push forward as a group. They never mention children killed or permanently injured from school shootings. They are data dredging for narrative, and once they find an exemplary example, they preach it from the largest megaphone, and across their network. The story was *chosen* for their narrative, they will never, for example, spotlight minority racism, civil rights, hate speech, police incidents, because those are against the narrative they want to drive, they treat those issues as if they don't exist and don't matter.
  • Matt Walsh is known for his "Am I racist series" and has been instrumental to the GOP for his normalization of racial ideologies, a systematic Socratic method approach using extremely misleading questions, making the viewer feel like they came up with the conclusions he designed the questions to align to, a more effective propaganda system than fox news-style sound bite repetition
  • Now the series pivots. They are already racist. He wants to normalize violence, especially retaliatory eye for an eye violence. The problem is the target is anyone the administration wants to punish, and the propaganda machine can create any narrative it wants to justify it. We should be fearful about stage normalize-violence, it's starting to pervade their networks whether we like it or not.
  • The Ukrainian victim cannot be mentioned by name in your social media posts or you will get a flurry of foreign bots "adjusting" the narrative when you check the traffic statistics, even in reddit.
  • The incident was a horrific act of violence against someone who did nothing to deserve being attacked, by a repeat mentally ill offender. They are using this single event to justify extreme sentences to minority or mentally ill repeat offenders to fight back against their self made race wars.
  • The algorithm on X is full of videos of minorities acting in an unbecoming way. Sometimes violent, sometimes trashy, sometimes AI generated welfare reaction videos. All of it is to drive this idea of "ending white guilt" and avoiding "white society" from becoming more "third world", since saying "white power" now is outright taboo.
  • Conservatives spending even a few minutes a day on X have likely been slowly radicalized in sentiment over time, polarizing towards these ideas
  • It may be that this propaganda has been maliciously architected for the billionaire's culture wars agenda; a bully narrative, extremely effective at radicalizing the uneducated in low-diversity rural areas that can dominate in gerrymandered maps. By creating movements of hate and fear, it always ends with the most extreme amongst the groups gaining leadership positions, so whether it was designed or not, the leaders of tomorrow always end up LARPing in a manufactured narrative, that never existed in the first place, which they truly believe exists. A conspiracy against them, their proud people and culture.

  • Agree. Anti-Blk narratives have always existed, but something's changed because even objective and liberal publications are falling victim to this false narrative.

    Oklahoma, for example, had 2 similar stabbing incidents in August 2025: one on public transit and one near a mountain hiking trail. The races of the perpetrators and victims were opposite that of the NC incident. The races of the OK victims aren't mentioned in any media that I could find, only by family in the comments. Hint: they weren't White.

    I say objective and liberal publications are also falling victim to this false narrative because most news articles about the recent Chicago public transit incident where the victim was set ablaze also related what happened in Illinois to the NC thing instead of the OK incidents despite all of them occurring in August 2025.

    ETA add threads to the list of social platforms promoting this narrative

    parent

  • Good thing I'm an atheist, so don't care about the biblical stuff. Not kidding.

    parent
  • parent