• [deleted]

    I asked Perplexity to explain your comment to me. This is what it said:

    She’s very attractive,
    but feels too much like a generic fitness-industry stereotype;
    however, she’s legit enough that she even trains Kim Kardashian.

    Is that what you meant?

    Thanks, I almost had an aneurysm reading his comment

    My brother in Christ I said plainly what I said, you didn’t need to put my comment in to an ai. Like wtf. But simply, she’s too robotic. Not a true natural athlete. Feels very elitist, almost uncanny. She’s hot, but it’s plastic hot. Putting on a show for us, but not alluding to it at all. She trains Kim k, adding to her almost unhuman nature. Again she’s hot, but I wouldn’t fawn or lust over her. It all is just kinda weird, ahain way too industry.

    Your original comment is illegible, illiterate nonsense.

    Or to make it easier for you to understand, as the goal of communicating is mutual understanding: you type words no good.

    As someone who's not a native English speaker, I understand why he did it. I had an idea of what you meant by "way to industry" and I was right, but I wasn't completely sure.

    🤣

    Much appreciated. I was partly playing around, but partly genuinely couldn't work out what you meant. I thought pretty much what the AI thought, but it didn't make sense (even after I finally got past that to instead of too), since at the end it sounded like you meant that Senada training Kim K made Senada less industry somehow.

    Anyway, I agree. She's fit as all hell. But her poses are weird, I hate her client (who incidentally doesn't strike me as actually fit), and some of her workouts are just asking for trouble.

    Yeah you lost me at “she’s been training Kim k tho”

    Born and raised in amurica and a millennial… has no idea what this meant. Maybe I’m just old 😂