Yeah, while SDC is funny, its peak is ending up on reddit and people talking about how silly it is, dude is acting like we stole the Mona Lisa from his private studio lmao
Fun fact: you cannot copyright AI-generated material. Even if you made the AI and all of the content it's trained off of, you still don't own the output.
That's incorrect. You can't copyright something that is AI generated without any human input, but for a video, that will never be the case - the direction and editing is a lot of manual work.
The copyright office has issued copyrights for works made entirely by AI, as long as there is enough human input in the process.
"made entirely by AI" and "enough human input" contradict each other there. copyrights have been issused to works INVOLVING the use of AI that had a large amount of human alterations after generation. no work created entirely by an AI has been copyrighted.
That is untrue. Kent Keirsey's work A Slice of American Cheese was granted copyright in spite of being entirely AI generated. There were many alterations to the work (more than 35 edits) but all of the edits were also made by an AI, following Kent's direction.
it was not entirely AI generated. if you watch the video he submitted to the copyright office, there are many points where he draws directly on the image to add whole components. for example, the slice of cheese itself, the addition of third eye, and the bottom quarter of the image were initially drawn out by Kent. that is where i believe the copyright office got their "sufficient human input" from.
You mean "Whiny Grown Child gets AI machine to make crappy videos without any effort on their part and acts like a crybaby bully when people repost their garbage 'content' that the AI made for them?
To be fair, even those short videos are probably still tens of hours of effort to make and edit together - drastically less than the hundreds of hours it would take for traditional CG, but still a lot of work.
I could maybe imagine it took tens of hours to make the first SDC video, but only because the AI tools do have a learning curve. Once they figured out a decent workflow, subsequent videos probably took minutes to make, if not seconds.
That said, even if it took hundreds of hours to make the first video, it's still slop.
Honestly I'm kind of sick of these videos. Yes, they're facebook AI slop but at this point it's almost spam that's probably better off in its own subreddit. Which it has.
I just find it funny how an AI "artist" is putting all that shit about copyright and intellectual property in their profile, as if they had done any meaningful work.
Anyone can pay 20-30 bucks a month for an AI and create these shitty ass videos.
I mean, I cant even blame someone to have jumped on the money train (I'm sure theyre monetizing this somehow), but acting all high and mighty and blabbering about copyright and shit is just pathetic.
Dude, you put in a couple of prompts into an AI that you pay $20/month for, and then you put some fucked up version of "Diamonds" by Rihanna on top of it.
I'd lie if I said that I didnt find any of these videos slightly funny in the beginning, but come on...
I mean, I kinda get how this could go to someone's head, seeing all these views and people talking about it etc, but in the end he just put some prompts into an AI video generator. Just ride the wave and its all good, but the arrogance that radiates from his profile just leaves a sour taste in my mouth. Dude's acting like he wrote Bohemian Rhapsody.
tbh, he has literally 1 more month to bank on this concept, because the trend is dying quick, I'm already tired of these videos because they are always the same shit.
Well, I'm certain it was "original" at the time, as in "no one had made a video about a kitten, wearing a strawberry adorned diaper, wreaking havoc on the general populace" video before, but that doesnt mean that his AI generated prompts cant be recreated easily by pretty much anyone.
But yeah as much as SDC is fun to ironically look at and watch, it is just more kid-marketed ai content-farm slop.
It's just some dude not making stuff and then editing it together, all of it has the same basic plots and even reuses some of the exact same clips. It's a race to the bottom for how absurd, clickable and low-effort they can push out this... nothing.
I mean, its not like I didnt consume that content and found some of these little videos funny.
It was light, quick entertainment, and I'm sure its even more popular with the TikTok generation and even younger kids. Just found it hilarious how this dude (or group of people) is trying to protect their "Brand" now. "Can you really afford the consequences?" sounds like something about a low budget mafia movie.
Yeah, I saw that ages ago, but haven't seen any consequences here on Reddit yet. From what I've seen, he only seems to only target direct freebooting on places where there's the potential for monetisation. He also seems to leave the rip-offs alone.
Certainly a dick though, that section sux. I would totally boo it if there was a way.
Much like there are cases going through the courts of musicians being sued because they used the same chord sequence I do wonder in the future if there will be legal cases because 2 people put the same prompt into AI
Do you actually need permission to share content? Don’t you want the exposure of people sharing your content, as long as they’re not passing it off as their own?
They talk about copyrights, the need for prior written authorization, and denounce plagiarism, but did they get permission to depict the Iron Man suit in their video?
Come on AI bros you know what to do. Streisand Effect his ass. Flood the zone with superior SDC clones until he becomes drowned in the digital excrement of his own slop.
This makes for a nice reminder that AI slop is still slop, even if it might be a little funny or even endearing. There's no evidence to suggest SDC's creator is anything but a talentless hack, and from the looks of it, one with an ego.
Thats what I find so baffling. Its not like he (or they) animated all of that themselves. They put in prompts into an AI that they pay a couple bucks a month for. Big woop.
And its not like the stories are intellectually stimulating or somehow creative.
Lmao, dude even used AI to type his threat for him. What a pussy.
I also like that apparently he has a "dedicated team" to find people who repost his shitty AI slop creations.
I'd lie if I said that I didnt find SDC funny at all, but its not real art and never will be.
I'd love to see his "team" go head to head with reddit and people who repost his videos here. Dude should be grateful for all the exposure.
Yeah, while SDC is funny, its peak is ending up on reddit and people talking about how silly it is, dude is acting like we stole the Mona Lisa from his private studio lmao
Peak cinema confirmed
Bro thinks he's tuff 🥀🥀🥀
Well, have you seen how ripped SDC's dad is? Wouldn't wanna mess with him haha.
Ripped and genius IQ. The Buff One does lots of advanced science stuff
Fun fact: you cannot copyright AI-generated material. Even if you made the AI and all of the content it's trained off of, you still don't own the output.
That's incorrect. You can't copyright something that is AI generated without any human input, but for a video, that will never be the case - the direction and editing is a lot of manual work.
The copyright office has issued copyrights for works made entirely by AI, as long as there is enough human input in the process.
"made entirely by AI" and "enough human input" contradict each other there. copyrights have been issused to works INVOLVING the use of AI that had a large amount of human alterations after generation. no work created entirely by an AI has been copyrighted.
That is untrue. Kent Keirsey's work A Slice of American Cheese was granted copyright in spite of being entirely AI generated. There were many alterations to the work (more than 35 edits) but all of the edits were also made by an AI, following Kent's direction.
it was not entirely AI generated. if you watch the video he submitted to the copyright office, there are many points where he draws directly on the image to add whole components. for example, the slice of cheese itself, the addition of third eye, and the bottom quarter of the image were initially drawn out by Kent. that is where i believe the copyright office got their "sufficient human input" from.
Dude creates AI videos without much effort and hes acting like an internet tough guy. A dedicated team monitoring online content, lmao. Come on dude.
That's so funny.
But that's how it is dude, making money on the internet is competitive as fuck. Thats all they want to do with these videos, make money.
You mean "Whiny Grown Child gets AI machine to make crappy videos without any effort on their part and acts like a crybaby bully when people repost their garbage 'content' that the AI made for them?
To be fair, even those short videos are probably still tens of hours of effort to make and edit together - drastically less than the hundreds of hours it would take for traditional CG, but still a lot of work.
Is this a joke?
Sorry, but do you actually believe any SDC video takes tens of hours to put together?
either you dont know how far AI has come, or youre trolling.
Slop like that can be put together super quickly.
I figure his 'dedicated team monitoring content online' is also AI.
I also believe that its all bullshit. What are they gonna do? try to get people to take down their AI slop? Good luck with that,
I could maybe imagine it took tens of hours to make the first SDC video, but only because the AI tools do have a learning curve. Once they figured out a decent workflow, subsequent videos probably took minutes to make, if not seconds.
That said, even if it took hundreds of hours to make the first video, it's still slop.
2 hours tops
Sure, and pickpocketing also takes time and effort. That doesn't make someone the rightful owner of the results.
*30 seconds
Honestly I'm kind of sick of these videos. Yes, they're facebook AI slop but at this point it's almost spam that's probably better off in its own subreddit. Which it has.
I just find it funny how an AI "artist" is putting all that shit about copyright and intellectual property in their profile, as if they had done any meaningful work.
Anyone can pay 20-30 bucks a month for an AI and create these shitty ass videos.
Yeah, they're also getting extremely repetitive. It was a bit fun for the first maybe 5 videos, but now it's just kind of boring.
There is a SDC subreddit dedicated to the video, but I assume it doesn't get you as much karma.
I don’t think he can copyright those even.
they can't lol
Bro thinks he is the artist of the slop just because he typed some text into the textbox💀
Well, he did give the prompt, but to act all high and mighty and as if they were some real kind of artist is pathetic.
It doesnt take any effort or talent to create these videos.
The amazing irony of claiming "original creations" and "safeguard the creative ecosystem"
I mean, I cant even blame someone to have jumped on the money train (I'm sure theyre monetizing this somehow), but acting all high and mighty and blabbering about copyright and shit is just pathetic.
Dude, you put in a couple of prompts into an AI that you pay $20/month for, and then you put some fucked up version of "Diamonds" by Rihanna on top of it.
I'd lie if I said that I didnt find any of these videos slightly funny in the beginning, but come on...
the song diamonds is a bongo cat cover, they didn’t even make that shit
[removed]
I mean, I kinda get how this could go to someone's head, seeing all these views and people talking about it etc, but in the end he just put some prompts into an AI video generator. Just ride the wave and its all good, but the arrogance that radiates from his profile just leaves a sour taste in my mouth. Dude's acting like he wrote Bohemian Rhapsody.
Get the fuck out of here, internet tough guy.
"i legally hold the complete copyright" Id bet a significant amount of money that this "copyright" is just him saying "its mine 😡 no repost 🤬"
That wall of text just reads like more AI slop to me!
Well fine, he can fade back into obscurity, this sub probably brought in more traffic he could generate on his own
Later, gator
tbh, he has literally 1 more month to bank on this concept, because the trend is dying quick, I'm already tired of these videos because they are always the same shit.
it’s crazy cause these plots are just recycled from other AI slop, these guys take themselves way too seriously
B*tch, please. You use AI. All your content is stolen.
Yeah! Don’t you DARE try to plagiarize my plagiarized content!
"original" "creations"
Well, I'm certain it was "original" at the time, as in "no one had made a video about a kitten, wearing a strawberry adorned diaper, wreaking havoc on the general populace" video before, but that doesnt mean that his AI generated prompts cant be recreated easily by pretty much anyone.
kitten feeds blue fent to endangered species parent, clubs their kid and/or feeds fent to armed services
Kitten eats/skins/raises endangered animal - comandeers weapons of war
blows shit up, upsets sexy dad cat, someone goes to jail
Profit?
Don't forget snitch cat in there somewhere! Its an integral part of the "brand" along with the massive line of police cruisers!
💀💀💀💀💀💀
I’m kind of looking forward to this going back to r/facebookAIslop instead of r/instagramAIappreciation
arent these the guys that are anti copywrite lol?
The hypocrisy here is rich. Jesus christ.
You can’t copyright AI…
Separating the work from the unsavory "artist"
Tale as old as time 😔
But yeah as much as SDC is fun to ironically look at and watch, it is just more kid-marketed ai content-farm slop.
It's just some dude not making stuff and then editing it together, all of it has the same basic plots and even reuses some of the exact same clips. It's a race to the bottom for how absurd, clickable and low-effort they can push out this... nothing.
I mean, its not like I didnt consume that content and found some of these little videos funny.
It was light, quick entertainment, and I'm sure its even more popular with the TikTok generation and even younger kids. Just found it hilarious how this dude (or group of people) is trying to protect their "Brand" now. "Can you really afford the consequences?" sounds like something about a low budget mafia movie.
I love sdc ashamedly. That doesn't mean I don't see it for what it is ;-; 🤝
What is SDC
Is anyone really surprised
hate this for us
watch out for what you eat when you repost SDC videos. it might have the blue substance of death.
Yeah, I saw that ages ago, but haven't seen any consequences here on Reddit yet. From what I've seen, he only seems to only target direct freebooting on places where there's the potential for monetisation. He also seems to leave the rip-offs alone.
Certainly a dick though, that section sux. I would totally boo it if there was a way.
Much like there are cases going through the courts of musicians being sued because they used the same chord sequence I do wonder in the future if there will be legal cases because 2 people put the same prompt into AI
What a nightmare
Do you actually need permission to share content? Don’t you want the exposure of people sharing your content, as long as they’re not passing it off as their own?
They talk about copyrights, the need for prior written authorization, and denounce plagiarism, but did they get permission to depict the Iron Man suit in their video?
Come on AI bros you know what to do. Streisand Effect his ass. Flood the zone with superior SDC clones until he becomes drowned in the digital excrement of his own slop.
Think of all the poor artists that went into making SDC!
Bro really thinks he made anything objectively good. Like yeah it’s funny, but it’s funny cause it’s objectively bad.
Bro you own no copyright lmao.
'Original creations' then they are stealing the AI's videos and posting them
You can't claim copyright to AI generated content, it isn't your creation. What an idiot!!
Funny thing is that they don't own nothing if ai made it
I do not believe that you actually own it. The company that made the ai that you use to make the video owns it
Oh the irony <3
lol copyrighting content that’s made from stolen assets
Gasps, dials 911
What is he going to do ai make me pregnant?
This makes for a nice reminder that AI slop is still slop, even if it might be a little funny or even endearing. There's no evidence to suggest SDC's creator is anything but a talentless hack, and from the looks of it, one with an ego.
Feel like this sub forgot that SDC man is still a person using AI to create stolen content.
can....can you even copyright ai?
We definitely need a new law that bans AI content from being copyright...
It made me laugh so hard when I saw this shit
I almost want to make a SDC channel just to piss them off. What they are gonna do??
I think the whole "can you really afford the consequences?" made me laugh the most. Fucking internet tough guy, that one.
Lol, lmao, even. It's AI. He didn't do shit.
Thats what I find so baffling. Its not like he (or they) animated all of that themselves. They put in prompts into an AI that they pay a couple bucks a month for. Big woop.
And its not like the stories are intellectually stimulating or somehow creative.
I'm pretty sure you cannot OWN ai content.
Guys the sdc creator banned tons of AI cat video accounts
the "creative ecosystem" of... ai generated cat videos..?
sdc would not aproove