This helps us take our minds off of the ones actually accused by Epstein's trafficking victims of rape, so I'm sure Epstein would thank you from the grave!
This helps us muddy the waters with other suspects that were actually accused by Epstein's trafficked victims. With your help, it will be harder to distinguish between the guilty and the big names Epstein chased for clout. Great job, you are very useful.
He said, âBILLIONAIRES control the worldâ Jeffrey Epstein isnât a billionaire as his net worth was around 600 million dollars. Therefore, it isnât hypocritical and because he wasnât hanging out with a billionaire.
Agreed đ They love to make conclusory statements and pass off their idle musings and opinions on topics outside their areas of expertise as incontrovertible facts. Rightoid pundits arenât much better, if any, but a lot of them at least donât seem quite as condescending
Maybe you donât understand the word âgenocideâ, because the Palestinian population (both inside and outside Gaza) has grown tremendously since 48. Maybe you are trying too hard to cover up and apologize for Islamic colonialism?
Again, you are simply covering up and apologizing for hamas, Iran, hezbollah, Houthis etc. Israel is actively defending itself against terrorists on all sides. The only evidence of genocide are the Islamistsâ endless calls for conquest extermination of Israel, which remain largely unchanged since they began in the 7 Th century. You say nothing about the Islamistsâ ethnic cleaning of Jewish people from the Middle East and Northern Africa? This is the context for what is happening in Gaza, itâs simply the continuation of the Islamic conquests. To invert that and accuse Israel of genocide is a perversion of logic, itâs a big lie, itâs right from Goebbelsâ playbook.
You said âyes if you deny Genocide in Gaza then you can't recognize Srebrenica either.â
But logic requires us to evaluate each situation individually. Using your logic, one would have to accept every claim of genocide ever made in history to avoid being called a denier of one. It ignores the nuance that a person can be a "recognizer" of genocide in one instance and a "skeptic" in another based on evidence, without being logically inconsistent.
Whatever happened with the crusades or in srebenica, doesnât require anyone to defend hamas.
All these white western saviours in keffiyehs screaming âgenocideâ, but outside of Hamas propaganda, the Palestinian people themselves know thereâs no genocide.
In the West Bank, they werenât hiding in attics from Israeli soldiers who were sent to wipe out the Palestinians - earlier this year they were opening a luxury shopping mall with grand celebrations. They go to restaurants and play sports and live their lives as normal, completely and rightly free of the fear of genocide.
I mean, the thing about Bosnia is that pretty much all 3 nations living there suffer a lot, because country is still unstable clusterfuck and Serbs are threating secession once per month. Out of those 3 nations, I'd say currently Croatians at least politically suffer the most since they don't have their own entity and because of the loophole Muslims are pretty much choosing their representative in Presidency of BIH.
Both Serbian and Croatian nations openly want independence. Because the Muslim nation many times applies their rules to the others.
Bosnia (Herzegovina) is an example of how multi culturisam doesn't work. Three religious and ethnicities (Catholic, Orthodox, Muslim, Serbs, Croats and Bosnian) even they all share the same language (At least the base Serbo Croatian).
Maybe you should "ask socialists" what they think about this? đ¤
Never happened and it was a good thing. Also why did the Jews make him do that?
Hard to smay, maybe they were taking the pics đ¤ˇđťââď¸
Well he is Jewish so itâd be easy to scapegoat him as such.
They will defend him. As usual.
They'll pretend like we have to have evidence for our claims, only to realize our claims are vibes. We can't lose this way.
Evidence exists, but it's censored, hidden and covered up.
This is the angle we can use forever! To suggest whatever we want! Just like the JFK assasination! It's an effective ruse, with a proven track record.
[deleted]
You hit your head or something? Libertarian socialist is an oxymoron.
[deleted]
Leftist anarchist
Is that basicly: "Everyone just chill so it will all work itself out, man"
Thatâs AnCapistan.
Nope
Cool, but you still need economic liberty to be a libertarian. Socialism isnât that. âBut they do it voluntarily.â Yeah, thatâs not socialism.
He know too much... đŹ
Left wing libertarianism existed before the American an cap lite version
Q: How do you get Noam Chomsky to shut up?
A: Ask him a question about linguistics.
Stalin would be proud. He loved bad humor.
Manufacturing consent.... from 14 year olds.
This helps us take our minds off of the ones actually accused by Epstein's trafficking victims of rape, so I'm sure Epstein would thank you from the grave!
Noam Chomo-sky
Hah, perfect
This helps us muddy the waters with other suspects that were actually accused by Epstein's trafficked victims. With your help, it will be harder to distinguish between the guilty and the big names Epstein chased for clout. Great job, you are very useful.
See, thatâs where youâre wrong.
He said, âBILLIONAIRES control the worldâ Jeffrey Epstein isnât a billionaire as his net worth was around 600 million dollars. Therefore, it isnât hypocritical and because he wasnât hanging out with a billionaire.
600 million publicly known wealth, well over a billion including hidden wealth.
If there's one thing I've learned in the past 10 years is 99% of leftist celebrity "intellectuals" are hypocrites and full of shit.
Agreed đ They love to make conclusory statements and pass off their idle musings and opinions on topics outside their areas of expertise as incontrovertible facts. Rightoid pundits arenât much better, if any, but a lot of them at least donât seem quite as condescending
100%, they call themselves âintellectualsâ to shield themselves from those who point out their obvious fallacies.
Commies love the elite. They hate people.
Just assume anyone famous and over the age of 50 had ties to Epstein. It seems youâll be right more often than wrong.
This honestly seems to be the case. It's really sad and might be why it was so hard to get real data.
How do you think he confirmed it?
But he wrote on Palestine tho But he wrote on Palestine tho But he wrote on Palestine tho
Don't forget his stance on Cambodia is "but have you considered the US is bad"
There are others too of course.
[deleted]
Maybe you donât understand the word âgenocideâ, because the Palestinian population (both inside and outside Gaza) has grown tremendously since 48. Maybe you are trying too hard to cover up and apologize for Islamic colonialism?
[deleted]
Again, you are simply covering up and apologizing for hamas, Iran, hezbollah, Houthis etc. Israel is actively defending itself against terrorists on all sides. The only evidence of genocide are the Islamistsâ endless calls for conquest extermination of Israel, which remain largely unchanged since they began in the 7 Th century. You say nothing about the Islamistsâ ethnic cleaning of Jewish people from the Middle East and Northern Africa? This is the context for what is happening in Gaza, itâs simply the continuation of the Islamic conquests. To invert that and accuse Israel of genocide is a perversion of logic, itâs a big lie, itâs right from Goebbelsâ playbook.
[deleted]
You said âyes if you deny Genocide in Gaza then you can't recognize Srebrenica either.â
But logic requires us to evaluate each situation individually. Using your logic, one would have to accept every claim of genocide ever made in history to avoid being called a denier of one. It ignores the nuance that a person can be a "recognizer" of genocide in one instance and a "skeptic" in another based on evidence, without being logically inconsistent.
Whatever happened with the crusades or in srebenica, doesnât require anyone to defend hamas.
All these white western saviours in keffiyehs screaming âgenocideâ, but outside of Hamas propaganda, the Palestinian people themselves know thereâs no genocide.
In the West Bank, they werenât hiding in attics from Israeli soldiers who were sent to wipe out the Palestinians - earlier this year they were opening a luxury shopping mall with grand celebrations. They go to restaurants and play sports and live their lives as normal, completely and rightly free of the fear of genocide.
True. Otherwise Gaza would be a desert, not a concrete desert with hyper urbanization.
And genocide in Srebrenica and Gaza are connected how exactly?
[deleted]
I mean, if you want to reduce it like that sure, but I'd say its rather simplistic view. Situation in Balkan is/was A LOT more complicated
[deleted]
I mean, the thing about Bosnia is that pretty much all 3 nations living there suffer a lot, because country is still unstable clusterfuck and Serbs are threating secession once per month. Out of those 3 nations, I'd say currently Croatians at least politically suffer the most since they don't have their own entity and because of the loophole Muslims are pretty much choosing their representative in Presidency of BIH.
Both Serbian and Croatian nations openly want independence. Because the Muslim nation many times applies their rules to the others.
Bosnia (Herzegovina) is an example of how multi culturisam doesn't work. Three religious and ethnicities (Catholic, Orthodox, Muslim, Serbs, Croats and Bosnian) even they all share the same language (At least the base Serbo Croatian).