The OP has provided the following Submission Statement for their post:
An investigator into farming practices and animal rights explores the hidden toll that slaughterhouse work takes on the employees. Through investigation and interviews, the documentary highlights the working conditions and how the system is designed to keep everyone quiet.
If you believe this Submission Statement is appropriate for the post, please upvote this comment; otherwise, downvote it.
The problem with agitprop today is that there so much of it the sheer volume means sympathizers will tune it out and the persuadable will turn it off.
That probably doesn't matter in a political theory—and climate—where a position can achieve dominance without it really mattering what anybody thinks about it anyway. But for the integrity of an art form and a particular tradition of public discourse it just can’t be good.
The OP has provided the following Submission Statement for their post:
If you believe this Submission Statement is appropriate for the post, please upvote this comment; otherwise, downvote it.
The problem with agitprop today is that there so much of it the sheer volume means sympathizers will tune it out and the persuadable will turn it off.
That probably doesn't matter in a political theory—and climate—where a position can achieve dominance without it really mattering what anybody thinks about it anyway. But for the integrity of an art form and a particular tradition of public discourse it just can’t be good.
I didn't understand a single word of this. Am I an idiot?
Just a bot posting nonsense