Court cases where AI copyright claims were dismissed (reference)

PLEASE READ FIRST - Subreddit Rules

Are we fr right now

Larian Studios going hard on the antis for whining about AI references

How dare Larian give their artists efficient tools?

Where’s the out of touch?

The mask is off. Anti AI accidentally reveals they don't care if artists are replaced with AI.

Just sad and pathetic

I’m confused.

So everyone must support artist but programmers should go fuck themselves?

I mean if it's specifically ONLY AI images. Then it makes sense for a photographer get disqualified from this contest (easy logic tbf) 🤷

And so it begins.

Here come the antis

Based Take on AI Art

I found this in another sub. AI use was disclosed up front, but anti still joined and tried to impose.

This is the first thing I saw when I opened Reddit. The people in this sub have already been flooding the comments on posts with the typical anti bullshit whether the post was AI or not and some of the posts they call "AI slop" are pretty obviously not AI. Now they're demanding a no AI rule.

He loved this image...

I keep seeing posts of young antis who fight learning AI in school.. why?

Behold, the greatest case of "lack of self-awareness" you'll ever see

AI art is NOT an insult to art

Antis are so stupid. They really cant find anything Ai has done good. So much for their vast imagination and creativity

What’s an antis favorite pass-time? Review bombing indie games of course!

i'm getting harassed because of my post about spantz lmao

Pro AI person made post on X (Twitter) and Anties are not happy. (REPOST)

Sometimes looking at Anti posts provides some military grade hopium.