When antis are the ones drawing tons of porn for money? I'm tired of them calling us gooners. You can make art of attractive people if you want to or whatever goon material, but antis need to stop active like conservative Christians about it.
Not to mention profiting from the copyright of characters that aren't theirs, for which they didn't ask permission, and furthermore, making money by drawing them in an NSFW style and soliciting donations on platforms like Patreon, or simply by allowing commissions with COPYRIGHTED CHARACTERS.
But they don't say anything about that because it's done by a human and not a machine, right? (más bien, por que ganan dinero, y eso es lo que buscan todo, DINERO)
You know you're absolutely right! Never really thought about it before. Poor Meg, Marge Simpson and many others out there getting exposed by these pencilers 😞
Setting aside the anti nature for a moment, the idea that calling us gooners is an insult is also ridiculous.
Oh no, people enjoy sexual stuff, the horror. However will we survive such a cutting commentary? It's not like this is a habit we have had since we were goddamn apes. I'm less insulted by being called a gooner and more that being one is a negative trait.
And before the anti's go into their normal spiel about every evil thing that AI can create for NSFW purposes, might I remind you, oh dear artists, that you have Shadman. Want to make us responsible for the sins of every AI user? Your list of sins is a lot bigger, and with many more verifiable names. You aren't winning that fight in the slightest.
Why is it such a taboo for a person to express their sexuality? It's perfectly fine for people to make art of attractive people and sexual things, it's completely natural, and them calling us gooners as an insult just seems prudish and not progressive at all.
Still thinking "puritan" is a better descriptor than "conservative Christian" - as it's more specifically "hellfire and brimstone Conservative Christian" as opposed to "Jesus Loves everyone, we're all sinners" Conservative Christians.
In the past, people have top pay top dollar to have their furry kink animated this way
Not to mention profiting from the copyright of characters that aren't theirs, for which they didn't ask permission, and furthermore, making money by drawing them in an NSFW style and soliciting donations on platforms like Patreon, or simply by allowing commissions with COPYRIGHTED CHARACTERS.
But they don't say anything about that because it's done by a human and not a machine, right? (más bien, por que ganan dinero, y eso es lo que buscan todo, DINERO)
this guys is saying how i felt for a while bout the anti ai ppl calling us gooners and stuff
You know you're absolutely right! Never really thought about it before. Poor Meg, Marge Simpson and many others out there getting exposed by these pencilers 😞
so is copyright enforcement a good thing again now
Everybody's a gooner lol
Facts
When antis accuse you of being a gooner
https://i.redd.it/bavxbeav5o6g1.gif
I don't vibe with this universe
But they are "ethical" gooners, whatever that means
I think they think that they're saving the planet while they're gooning
There are around 22,000 to 23,000 private jets worldwide.
Setting aside the anti nature for a moment, the idea that calling us gooners is an insult is also ridiculous.
Oh no, people enjoy sexual stuff, the horror. However will we survive such a cutting commentary? It's not like this is a habit we have had since we were goddamn apes. I'm less insulted by being called a gooner and more that being one is a negative trait.
And before the anti's go into their normal spiel about every evil thing that AI can create for NSFW purposes, might I remind you, oh dear artists, that you have Shadman. Want to make us responsible for the sins of every AI user? Your list of sins is a lot bigger, and with many more verifiable names. You aren't winning that fight in the slightest.
EXACTLY! PREACH!!!!
Why is it such a taboo for a person to express their sexuality? It's perfectly fine for people to make art of attractive people and sexual things, it's completely natural, and them calling us gooners as an insult just seems prudish and not progressive at all.
Cultural Christianity.
A lot of the revenue of traditional artists is likely from porn anyways
Neither side are gooners, but I wouldn't say this is the best spokesperson to combat that claim.
I am against gooners of any kind, AI or not, they are nothing more than addicts.
Still thinking "puritan" is a better descriptor than "conservative Christian" - as it's more specifically "hellfire and brimstone Conservative Christian" as opposed to "Jesus Loves everyone, we're all sinners" Conservative Christians.
(otherwise of course I agree with you one hundred percent, take another upvote.)
I am.
There are goon people on both sides