Honestly I think we’re going to treat random screenshots with circles like we treat rumors now. If it doesn’t come HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP nothing without context.
Yea and to just piggyback off of what you said: HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELPHELP HELP HELPHELPHELP it sucks, but the default is going to shift fromHELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
Journalism has a huge chance at a comeback due to AI. If people can trust what certain publishers produce is fact based reporting that explains why each side believes what they do people would start paying for it again. I know I would. Instead of spending hours trying to see what each side has to say I could read XYZ, help yeah.
If people can trust what certain publishers produce is fact based reporting
Turns out it's more profitable to just feed people lies and AI slop through a tube, and journalistic integrity alone isn't enough to fund a reputable news agency.
Not caring about the world around us and just focusing on what’s on our plate might also be a massive help to a very large chunk of the populations mental wellbeing. I just don’t think we were meant to take in this much information, and then on top of that now have it be a constant witch hunt for reality
Honestly never thought of that. Unsure how successful it would be tho, seems so many people have already fled to their own echo chamber news sources tho and everything else is "fake news"
Would be hard to find a news source everyone would trust i guess is what i mean
You are NEVER going to get the right wing to come back to reality. They're too far gone. They live in a world where the more evidence and expertise you have just means you're a bigger part of the conspiracy. The random person on YouTube or Twitter that has no evidence but helps them feel like they know more than others is all they want. Perfect example - Joe Rogan being steadfast that COVID vaccines have killed more people than COVID. There's absolutely zero evidence for his belief and overwhelming evidence that shows his belief to be wrong but he's not going to change. No amount of great journalism and scientific evidence will change his mind either.
If you think this is limited to fox, you're not seeing the other side of it correctly. Fox at least people have to pay for, the MSM nightly news at minimum should be fact based reporting
One of my favorite horror stories has always been the king in yellow. Unlike other cosmic mythos, the crux point isn’t the titular king showing up and going boo. The king itself doesn’t even show in most stories.
No, what makes the king in yellow fun is the concept that all of reality is a production, a dream, a fantasy. I in particular love the delta green impossible landscapes take on it, where the deeper and deeper into it the investigators get, the more gooey this reality becomes.
At the deepest layers, once they’ve fully crossed into carcosa, they begin to understand. The deep ones they once did battle with are rubber suits in a costume department’s box somewhere.
But before that boundary switch into Carcosa, there is this strange, painful half out state. Where reality is real but a subset of reality is noticeably not. I’ve always, always struggled describing this to players. I excel at absurdity, the complete loss of everything. Psychotic episodes in my past means I’ve experience with the subject. But how do you describe the concept of most of reality is real but pieces of it have been replaced with what is not?
This. Oh, what a delight it is this! This is the fog of Carcosa, the first step past the point of no return! We are maddened, and the king’s arrival is nigh!
Sometimes, I've entertained the idea that maybe, a good number of people on Reddit are all just programmed by curation. So what you end up with, looks indistinguishable from AI, when it really isn't. Sort of a "get enough monkeys on typewriters" kind of situation.
My question is will this new standard be based off of APA or MLA citations? It's good to see the art of research being reborn from the ashes of stupidity and ineptude.
This basically confirms my theory that bots are especially active in anti-ai conversations. I assume it’s to build rapport while subtly influencing sentiment
I haven’t heard that sentiment expressed that way. It gives me hope, I hope we are able to move in the direction of discerning what is a credible source.
Honestly I think we’re going to treat random screenshots with circles like we treat rumors now. If it doesn’t come HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP nothing without context.
Yea and to just piggyback off of what you said: HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELP HELPHELP HELP HELPHELPHELP it sucks, but the default is going to shift fromHELP HELP HELP HELP HELP
Journalism has a huge chance at a comeback due to AI. If people can trust what certain publishers produce is fact based reporting that explains why each side believes what they do people would start paying for it again. I know I would. Instead of spending hours trying to see what each side has to say I could read XYZ, help yeah.
Turns out it's more profitable to just feed people lies and AI slop through a tube, and journalistic integrity alone isn't enough to fund a reputable news agency.
I'd say vote with your purse, but it's getting hard for the average person to see through the BS now. I know I'm starting to struggle more.
But that all the more motivates me to find a few publications that I trust and stay loyal too as the rest falls to AI slop.
Not caring about the world around us and just focusing on what’s on our plate might also be a massive help to a very large chunk of the populations mental wellbeing. I just don’t think we were meant to take in this much information, and then on top of that now have it be a constant witch hunt for reality
Try ground news!
Was about to say this - its the only source I use !
Honestly never thought of that. Unsure how successful it would be tho, seems so many people have already fled to their own echo chamber news sources tho and everything else is "fake news"
Would be hard to find a news source everyone would trust i guess is what i mean
You are NEVER going to get the right wing to come back to reality. They're too far gone. They live in a world where the more evidence and expertise you have just means you're a bigger part of the conspiracy. The random person on YouTube or Twitter that has no evidence but helps them feel like they know more than others is all they want. Perfect example - Joe Rogan being steadfast that COVID vaccines have killed more people than COVID. There's absolutely zero evidence for his belief and overwhelming evidence that shows his belief to be wrong but he's not going to change. No amount of great journalism and scientific evidence will change his mind either.
This is called the "fairness doctrine" and it was repealed around the same time fox news went off the deep end.
It used to require any news outlet to cover both sides of any public issue.
Demand your representatives bring it back and combat Ai slop.
If you think this is limited to fox, you're not seeing the other side of it correctly. Fox at least people have to pay for, the MSM nightly news at minimum should be fact based reporting
If only. Reality: the article starts with "Of course! Here is a news article about emerging technology written in a professional style:"
And the paper still charges a $10 / month subscription fee.
[deleted]
Bad bot
Try checking on your motherboard, mr bot
Bloody hell.
Like that video when the newscasters spit the same speech word for word bar for bar
Sinclair Media!!!!
This could be very dangerous for our democracy.
I mean that is literally the intended purpose of these bots….
What the ad in the middle should say:
Teasing a new tool: ask multiple AI models at once (and see where they agree)
One of my favorite horror stories has always been the king in yellow. Unlike other cosmic mythos, the crux point isn’t the titular king showing up and going boo. The king itself doesn’t even show in most stories.
No, what makes the king in yellow fun is the concept that all of reality is a production, a dream, a fantasy. I in particular love the delta green impossible landscapes take on it, where the deeper and deeper into it the investigators get, the more gooey this reality becomes.
At the deepest layers, once they’ve fully crossed into carcosa, they begin to understand. The deep ones they once did battle with are rubber suits in a costume department’s box somewhere.
But before that boundary switch into Carcosa, there is this strange, painful half out state. Where reality is real but a subset of reality is noticeably not. I’ve always, always struggled describing this to players. I excel at absurdity, the complete loss of everything. Psychotic episodes in my past means I’ve experience with the subject. But how do you describe the concept of most of reality is real but pieces of it have been replaced with what is not?
This. Oh, what a delight it is this! This is the fog of Carcosa, the first step past the point of no return! We are maddened, and the king’s arrival is nigh!
ironic that theres an ad for ai right in the middle
Sometimes, I've entertained the idea that maybe, a good number of people on Reddit are all just programmed by curation. So what you end up with, looks indistinguishable from AI, when it really isn't. Sort of a "get enough monkeys on typewriters" kind of situation.
Idk why people think two people just happened upon the exact same sentence structure. Idk
Seems like you're not online much
Or did you?!?!?!
This gives “I see this post more than I see my parents” energy
That is something people should've been doing for the last decade? If it finally starts actually happening, then good.
Usernames like
Random_word_8391938
we lal jsut hve to mke relly bsd splling mstikes now
My question is will this new standard be based off of APA or MLA citations? It's good to see the art of research being reborn from the ashes of stupidity and ineptude.
Welllp that's stessfull
This basically confirms my theory that bots are especially active in anti-ai conversations. I assume it’s to build rapport while subtly influencing sentiment
Two humans who agree with each other. Not AI
I haven’t heard that sentiment expressed that way. It gives me hope, I hope we are able to move in the direction of discerning what is a credible source.
spectacularly missing the point
What makes you so certain one or both are AI and not two people coming to the same reasonable conclusion?
Just check their accounts lmao it’s so obvious
impossible! i’ve never met anyone that has come to the same conclusion as anyone else