This is probably too pedantic, but to line up with the pattern the third founder would have to have died of a pregnancy complication due to abortion restrictions.
Erika isn't there to lead them. As a conservative woman, she is simply there to birth the next warrior. The prophesied son of Charlie who will lead the inbreds and temu nazis to become the saviour of America.
Unsuspiciously, she's now hanging out with some of her ex's (who suddenly work directly with her on her tour) and she's also hanging out with Vance a lot.
Candace Owens has gone cuckoo now - for anyone not in the loop, she thinks "the feds" were involved in the Charlie Kirk shooting and that his wife might be in on it
You forget that she's been totally insane for her entire life. That's the most plausible conspiracy theory that she's ever pushed. She's getting saner by the day
“I am pro life, which means I will maximize the potential for life which means I cannot let my walking incubator abort unless it means they will survive to make more babies with. What do you mean, it deserves a choice? It’s my wife.”
Wouldn't happen. If the third member wanted to, they could get an abortion in a state that allows it or in another country, and no one would bat an eye.
Yeah, the Tumblr posts could have been written better in that regard, maybe connecting the other founder's death to COVID with something more along the lines of what TPUSA had been pushing from the start about healthcare and laissez-faire or something like that.
On top of that even, later that month iirc he was scheduled to give the same speech at Virginia Tech. A school famous for one of the first school shooters.
Can't stand the people that defend that by saying "You assume he meant blacks by saying gang violence. Who's the real racists now?"
Like literally this is a common thing for Kirk and his ilk to do. They've been using "Gang Violence" as a euphemism since the 1960s with his predecessors. Also communication is more than just words. Tone, inflection and facial expressions also convey meaning and from how he says it, it's obvious as fuck he doesn't mean "Gangs" as Gangs. He also ignores the plethora of School Shootings the USA has that no other country has.
That, and “gang violence” isn’t even close to his most blatant racist dog whistle moments. “If I see a black pilot, I think ‘boy, I sure hope he’s qualified.’”
Bitch, you implying that there are different standards to pass a pilot’s exam based on the color of your skin? Fuck all the way off with that “always question a PoC doing a ‘white person’s’ job” nonsense. (Side note, I believe he’s also the one who claimed Supreme Court Justice Jackson-Brown “stole a white person’s job” to get her post)
He was trying to determine the asker's definition of "mass shooting." Why? Because depending on how you define it, the US had anywhere from only 6 to over 900 mass shootings last year.
Whether or not you count gang violence is a big factor in which number you're closer to.
Maybe he did it before, I haven't watched all of his stuff. But he clearly wasn't doing it when he got shot. Try actually watching the conversation he had. It was in no way related to race.
Watch the full exchange in context. It's clear it was not about race at all. He was just trying to determine how the person defined mass shooting, since some people count gang violence and others don't. And that makes a huge difference in the numbers.
I mean, the definition of "gang violence" is a bit of a problem in and of itself. To be honest, I wish the event hadn't happened so that we'd actually hear what Kirk had to say when actually pressed on the matter
i did. im just upfront about my intentions. might want to try it, being real. just say it brother. stop beating around the bush. because if healthcare = sochulizem; "with or without counting gang violence" = counting the blacks. even though, it's almost only whites shooting up schools.
it's like conservatoïds have no real line of thought. i call it "mashed potatoes" just put numbers and words together where it sounds good for theur cause.
The person asked him if he knew what percentage of mass shooters are trans.
In order to answer that question, you need to know how many mass shootings there have been. And in order to know that, you need to know how mass shooting is being defined.
Because whether or not you count gang violence as a "mass shooting" makes a massive difference in the numbers. (If you don't believe me, look at the FBI's numbers vs the gun violence archives numbers)
I'm not saying gang violence has never been used as a dog whistle, but it clearly wasn't in this case.
TPUSA was funded to fight climate change legislation. That's where the money came from, fossil fuel billionaires. It's telling that they find the most effective way to do that was talking about trans people, guns and abortion. Doesn't matter how you get them elected as long as Republicans get elected they'll get what they need
Ex-Shell corporate guy here. Not to diminish this research or it’s message but to share some context from the company:
Shell has an internal charitable donation program where if employees donate to an eligible group (thousands of charities, non-profits, and foundations are eligible) then the company will match your donations through their giving portal thing, and then both yours and the company contribution show up as being from Shell. And for a company with 10k+ employees in the US there tend to be contributions to every variety of charity from left to right and all in between.
That’s not to conclusively say that the company doesn’t make donations to these orgs on their own, but I’ve seen multiple articles in the last decade claiming that “Shell supports x” and then I went and pulled the internal giving fund summary and found those donations there originating with employees.
Not from Shell, but another big tech co with a similar program. There is a big nonprofit clearinghouse company behind this. Forget the name. Nearly any registered 501c3 in the US is in it. I donated for years to our small town library foundation, and the company donated 2X up to $1000.
Shell isn't a living thing all of its actions are the consequence of its employees doing stuff. Companies aren't evil there are real humans making those decisions, its people that are the evil fuckers.
though it’s not just restricted to Shell tho- it’s quite often the fracking billionaires themselves who often make donations to these orgs in their own names, which is really rather more explicit
If shell matches funds and donated to an organization then they supported it. You can say they didn’t select it but they would have to approve the organization in the first place so that’s a false argument.
Yeah that makes it so much better! They're only endorsing the charities to take credit for their employee's charitable donations in an effort to whitewash their own participation in the climatic disaster that will affect humanity for many generations!
I hate Shell as much as the next guy but come the fuck on. "take credit" implies they didn't actually donate. Matching a donation and then telling people you gave money is a perfectly fine thing to do in principle.
both yours and the company contribution show up as being from Shell
That sounds like taking credit to me? If they're matching, only half of it is actually Shell's donation. So when it all shows up as from Shell that sounds manipulative as hell to me, in an effort to get good PR.
That is how all matching donations work. They're not hiding the fact that they're matching donations. If you're gonna hate them, do it for a good reason, instead of reflexively hating on anything they do just because it's them doing it.
Well then I kinda think that all matching donations are scummy. If you're matching my donation, then you're only donating half the total. The company shouldn't get the PR for my good deed.
The charity can get all the money and the company can get credit for their portion of the donation, I'm not sure I see what you're saying. It's not about me getting credit, and more about corporations being able to say they're charitable when half the money is not coming from them. If I claimed to have donated $100, but actually half of actual came from my friend, doesn't that make me a bit of a liar?
It seems like a false dichotomy to me to say that we can't all donate to charity and all get appropriate credit for the amounts we've donated. Why can't companies both credit their employees and make in kind donations? Why should they be able to claim my donation as their own?
What I'm getting here is that the hypothetical third founder would need to die from something caused by the fossil fuel industry (i.e. gas station explosion, suicide by monoxide poisoning from a car engine, fracking earthquake, being run over by a big ass SUV, etc.) to keep the theme.
The first major donor was Foster Friess, an equity manager who funded to Christian right causes. Oddly, he also funded organizations fighting gun violence, like Sandy Hook Promise and Rachel's Challenge.
yeah i feel like people are misunderstanding the third reblog
i would have been [blank] if you hadn't aborted me is used by anti abortion groups, it's like "your baby could have been someone really important if you'd kept them around" (..like an organization founder for example)
y'all I'll be honest you're right about my addition not really working because it accidentally implies that tpusa is pro choice but in my defense I really wanted to say "aborted baby voice"
nah i understand your addition just fine, the "aborted baby voice, i could have been someone" line is used in anti abortion contexts cuz it's supposed to imply the aborted baby could have been an influential figure and it was "wrong" to abort it for that reason (... which is pretty dumb and silly, like that baby could also have been a useless bum, we'll never know ! 🤷)
the achievement that unlocks when you go over to the corpse of the nazi aborted kardashian fetus and then rip a giant fart is one of the funniest things i've ever had happen in a game.
Hmm. How annoyingly inconsistent of markdown to behave that way, then. My version works on desktop, so I don't know why Apple wants to do it differently. Markdown is supposed to be a standardised formatting system.
It might not be Apple, to be fair. It could be the reddit app, which has plenty other problems already. I don't use the official app at all. Perhaps an Android user who does can say.
The shouting matches between the democratic socialists and TPUSA probably caused more hearing damage than the concerts I went to in college lmao, they were hilarious, but damned loud.
As always when this is posted, TPUSA was started to make college kids into Republicans and then get them into office. It had nothing to do with guns or anti-vaxx. It was also founded in 2012, so no possible way it had anything to do with COVID.
This poster lied, and then people are liking it instead of really basic fact checking.
I don’t know what it says about me that my brain automatically interpreted “aborted baby voice” as the voice of Pennywise the clown, but it’s probably nothing good.
"Two conservatives start an organization to push COVID Conspiracies..."
It's pedantic but it wasn't started to push COVID Conspiracies because it was started before COVID. It just seemed a bit misleading and I wanted to clarify.
Why is this being downvoted? The post is misleading and makes it sound like TPUSA began as a reaction to Covid. They started the organization to indoctrinate college kids to right wing ideology
Unfortunately, Kirk did not really warrant much for people to symphatize with. Like sucks he died, but I straight up forgot about him week after it happened. If all you present about yourself is hate, you will have nothing to be remembered for when you pass. I literally forgot about him a week after the news.
I mean, I really don't understand this mindset. I find in horrific to see a man get publicly executed. And I'm not sure how people have the cognitive dissonce to say an average Christian bro talking about average Christian bro stuff is somehow worse than murdering someone.
Like, there are lots of people I disagree with, and they say stuff that makes me angry. But...murder is always like a million times worse than words.
Charlie believed that sacrifices needed to be made to preserve our right to bear arms, so we’re just honoring him as he honored victims of gun violence
This is probably too pedantic, but to line up with the pattern the third founder would have to have died of a pregnancy complication due to abortion restrictions.
That would require them to be female (or a trans man) which could never happen in the world of Turning Point.
Nah, that's silly. They love bringing out their token minority and women supporters. Just look at Candace Owens
Yeah, but to have her be the leader and founder? That’s not very likely! Women are too emotional to lead! /s
Erika isn't there to lead them. As a conservative woman, she is simply there to birth the next warrior. The prophesied son of Charlie who will lead the inbreds and temu nazis to become the saviour of America.
Unfortunately Charlie looked like this so she didn't fuck him very much.
Unsuspiciously, she's now hanging out with some of her ex's (who suddenly work directly with her on her tour) and she's also hanging out with Vance a lot.
So a miraculous birth is afoot.
And everyone knows emotions suck! /s
Candace Owens has gone cuckoo now - for anyone not in the loop, she thinks "the feds" were involved in the Charlie Kirk shooting and that his wife might be in on it
You forget that she's been totally insane for her entire life. That's the most plausible conspiracy theory that she's ever pushed. She's getting saner by the day
Lol
Erika Kirk is supposedly pregnant, so there's still time.
So, if she were to die due to ectopic pregnancy complications, the prophecy would still hold?
True. But if she needs an abortion, she'll get one. When they talk about banning abortion, they don't mean for them
“I am pro life, which means I will maximize the potential for life which means I cannot let my walking incubator abort unless it means they will survive to make more babies with. What do you mean, it deserves a choice? It’s my wife.”
manifesting
Let’s hope nobody tries to debate her about trans shooters during labor.
Isn't erika kirk the CEO now?
And apparently her ex from the daily wire works there now too
If homophobic politicians can be gay or bisexual, then why cant a trans man be a founder of Turning Point?
He could want to, but do you see any of those people following a trans man as the leader/founder of their organization?
Do you think he would be openly trans?
No, no. They’d definitely stay in the closet, and have an arranged marriage to throw off any scent. Maybe even have a kid or two for cover…
Or the Pope?
Wut?
The movie "Conclave"
Interesting.
He can’t stop his widow from taking over now that she killed him.
Erika Kirk is in charge now... This may be her dark foretelling.
"he died from domestic gun violence caused by post-partum depression" is a way around that
Erika Kirk is leading it and in some kind of public will they won’t they with JD Vance. Maybe we get that for the 28 presidential election.
You can just say female. Female =/= woman. Female is a sex, woman is a gender. Not that complicated.
It doesn’t hurt to add the extra words, and tbh the extra clarity avoiding issues is worth the extra effort to me.
Or they would have been the second pregnancy if their parent survived the first?
Spouse of someone who died of pregnancy related complications that an abortion would have solved?
there is another.
Foreshadowing for the JD/Erika season of this shitshow perhaps?
If that shit happens I’m getting on a boat and sailing to find a wall because I’m living in the Truman show.
Wouldn't happen. If the third member wanted to, they could get an abortion in a state that allows it or in another country, and no one would bat an eye.
Yeah I was thinking this too, like the way its written it implies tpusa is pro choice? Which i doubt lol
Third participant didn't really understand the joke.
there’s still time for the kirk-vance affair baby to do some damage.
Yeah, that immediately jumped out at me. The third was in direct contradiction to the pattern set up by the other two
…
Not at all pedantic, the OOP missed the entire point and you indeed got it
I mean, it could still hypothetically happen to Erika Kirk now that she is taking over
Not that I want that to happen to anyone
The current CEO is a woman....
The lore is already flawed anyway bc TPUSA predated Covid by nearly a decade.
I’ve been disgusted by Mr Small Face for a very long time
Yeah, the Tumblr posts could have been written better in that regard, maybe connecting the other founder's death to COVID with something more along the lines of what TPUSA had been pushing from the start about healthcare and laissez-faire or something like that.
Yeah, they weren't pro covid conspiracies, pro gun and pro-abortion.
JD and Erikkka have the opportunity to do the funniest thing
There is no such thing as too pedantic on the internet.
Guess we’re playing Tragedy Bingo with founders now huh
Lol, you prophesying Erika Kirk's fall?
Erika Kirk predictions???
The current CEO is a woman apparently, so there’s still a possibility.
It's Shakespearean honestly
I'm just laughing at *aborted baby voice*
You laugh until you hear it
In the comments:
For anyone who is pregnant with a kid like this: first, get an abortion. Then, get an exorcism.
An exortion.
Sounds like something that would be in Macbeth
it's true. the guy downplaying american gun violence and then immediately getting shot in the neck is like something from a lazily written satire
Downplaying it with a racist dogwhistle, even
And it was at a school, too. Continuing the trend of most of the famous 21st century shootings happening at schools.
On top of that even, later that month iirc he was scheduled to give the same speech at Virginia Tech. A school famous for one of the first school shooters.
Can't stand the people that defend that by saying "You assume he meant blacks by saying gang violence. Who's the real racists now?"
Like literally this is a common thing for Kirk and his ilk to do. They've been using "Gang Violence" as a euphemism since the 1960s with his predecessors. Also communication is more than just words. Tone, inflection and facial expressions also convey meaning and from how he says it, it's obvious as fuck he doesn't mean "Gangs" as Gangs. He also ignores the plethora of School Shootings the USA has that no other country has.
That, and “gang violence” isn’t even close to his most blatant racist dog whistle moments. “If I see a black pilot, I think ‘boy, I sure hope he’s qualified.’”
Bitch, you implying that there are different standards to pass a pilot’s exam based on the color of your skin? Fuck all the way off with that “always question a PoC doing a ‘white person’s’ job” nonsense. (Side note, I believe he’s also the one who claimed Supreme Court Justice Jackson-Brown “stole a white person’s job” to get her post)
They're doing it with the rehashing of it's ok to be white things that jd Vance brought up
That wasn't a racist dog whistle.
He was trying to determine the asker's definition of "mass shooting." Why? Because depending on how you define it, the US had anywhere from only 6 to over 900 mass shootings last year.
Whether or not you count gang violence is a big factor in which number you're closer to.
Yes it was. Get out from under your rock and listen to the way language is used around you.
Explain how it was a dog whistle in the way he used it then.
Because race wasn't even a part of the conversation he was having.
If I say, "we must preserve a future for our children", I'm dog-whistling to Nazis.
If I try to make a conversation about mass shootings into a conversation about gang violence, I'm dog whistling to racists.
Get out more
That's not what he was doing though.
He was trying to see what the other person's definition of mass shooting was so that he could give accurate numbers.
Like I said above, whether or not you count gang violence as aass shooting makes a huge difference in the numbers.
He has done it before countless times in his campus events. He was doing it again when he got shot.
Maybe he did it before, I haven't watched all of his stuff. But he clearly wasn't doing it when he got shot. Try actually watching the conversation he had. It was in no way related to race.
Dude, he was trying to make it about race. That's what he does!
"he wasnt trying to fuck my wife, he was asking how her pussy felt, what the vaginal canal length was, and if she used teeth while sucking dick"
yuri tarded bud... but it's okay. good luck god bless.
Did you actually watch the video?
There was no dog whistle in what he said.
(You know dogwhistles are called that because the statements only flag as unreasonable to those who know about it, right?)
Watch the full exchange in context. It's clear it was not about race at all. He was just trying to determine how the person defined mass shooting, since some people count gang violence and others don't. And that makes a huge difference in the numbers.
I mean, the definition of "gang violence" is a bit of a problem in and of itself. To be honest, I wish the event hadn't happened so that we'd actually hear what Kirk had to say when actually pressed on the matter
i did. im just upfront about my intentions. might want to try it, being real. just say it brother. stop beating around the bush. because if healthcare = sochulizem; "with or without counting gang violence" = counting the blacks. even though, it's almost only whites shooting up schools.
it's like conservatoïds have no real line of thought. i call it "mashed potatoes" just put numbers and words together where it sounds good for theur cause.
You clearly didn't watch the video.
The person asked him if he knew what percentage of mass shooters are trans.
In order to answer that question, you need to know how many mass shootings there have been. And in order to know that, you need to know how mass shooting is being defined.
Because whether or not you count gang violence as a "mass shooting" makes a massive difference in the numbers. (If you don't believe me, look at the FBI's numbers vs the gun violence archives numbers)
I'm not saying gang violence has never been used as a dog whistle, but it clearly wasn't in this case.
i saw 5 angles, i saw the video, case dismissed.
it's charlie kirk brother, his existence is a dog whistle.
He said he was ok with a few gun deaths a year if it meant everyone could have a gun.
That depends, when you’re talking gun violence do you include gang violence?
Bang
If I was a southpark writer I'd pack it up and spend the rest of my days working fire lookout.
Or well written satire... this could be some O. Henry shit.
I think God got frustrated at them Not Getting It and sent his most clear message yet.
Somehow, still not enough.
TPUSA was funded to fight climate change legislation. That's where the money came from, fossil fuel billionaires. It's telling that they find the most effective way to do that was talking about trans people, guns and abortion. Doesn't matter how you get them elected as long as Republicans get elected they'll get what they need
Yep. 80% of anti-trans groups receive funding in whole or part from the fossil fuel industry.
No matter how much you hate the fossil fuel industry, you don’t hate it enough
Ex-Shell corporate guy here. Not to diminish this research or it’s message but to share some context from the company:
Shell has an internal charitable donation program where if employees donate to an eligible group (thousands of charities, non-profits, and foundations are eligible) then the company will match your donations through their giving portal thing, and then both yours and the company contribution show up as being from Shell. And for a company with 10k+ employees in the US there tend to be contributions to every variety of charity from left to right and all in between.
That’s not to conclusively say that the company doesn’t make donations to these orgs on their own, but I’ve seen multiple articles in the last decade claiming that “Shell supports x” and then I went and pulled the internal giving fund summary and found those donations there originating with employees.
I guess then there's questions about which charities are eligible, but that's a very different thing to "shell supports this cause explicitly"
Not from Shell, but another big tech co with a similar program. There is a big nonprofit clearinghouse company behind this. Forget the name. Nearly any registered 501c3 in the US is in it. I donated for years to our small town library foundation, and the company donated 2X up to $1000.
I guess my problem is with how Shell defines an eligible group then.
Shell isn't a living thing all of its actions are the consequence of its employees doing stuff. Companies aren't evil there are real humans making those decisions, its people that are the evil fuckers.
huh. never knew that.
though it’s not just restricted to Shell tho- it’s quite often the fracking billionaires themselves who often make donations to these orgs in their own names, which is really rather more explicit
Honestly a really solid point, credit where it's due.
If shell matches funds and donated to an organization then they supported it. You can say they didn’t select it but they would have to approve the organization in the first place so that’s a false argument.
I'm not talking about shell, I'm talking about the Koch brothers directly
Yeah that makes it so much better! They're only endorsing the charities to take credit for their employee's charitable donations in an effort to whitewash their own participation in the climatic disaster that will affect humanity for many generations!
I hate Shell as much as the next guy but come the fuck on. "take credit" implies they didn't actually donate. Matching a donation and then telling people you gave money is a perfectly fine thing to do in principle.
The guys comment verbatim says
That sounds like taking credit to me? If they're matching, only half of it is actually Shell's donation. So when it all shows up as from Shell that sounds manipulative as hell to me, in an effort to get good PR.
That is how all matching donations work. They're not hiding the fact that they're matching donations. If you're gonna hate them, do it for a good reason, instead of reflexively hating on anything they do just because it's them doing it.
Well then I kinda think that all matching donations are scummy. If you're matching my donation, then you're only donating half the total. The company shouldn't get the PR for my good deed.
Would you rather the charity get more money or that you get all the credit?
The charity can get all the money and the company can get credit for their portion of the donation, I'm not sure I see what you're saying. It's not about me getting credit, and more about corporations being able to say they're charitable when half the money is not coming from them. If I claimed to have donated $100, but actually half of actual came from my friend, doesn't that make me a bit of a liar?
It seems like a false dichotomy to me to say that we can't all donate to charity and all get appropriate credit for the amounts we've donated. Why can't companies both credit their employees and make in kind donations? Why should they be able to claim my donation as their own?
What I'm getting here is that the hypothetical third founder would need to die from something caused by the fossil fuel industry (i.e. gas station explosion, suicide by monoxide poisoning from a car engine, fracking earthquake, being run over by a big ass SUV, etc.) to keep the theme.
Freak gasoline fight accident. Coulda happened to anyone.
Yeah, and the anti-abortion movement was started by christian "colleges" upset that Brown v Board of Education now requires them to pay income taxes.
Every single Republican policy comes down to making money. Everything else is a facade.
Yeah. It was certainly not founded to push COVID conspiracies, given that it was founded in 2012.
The first major donor was Foster Friess, an equity manager who funded to Christian right causes. Oddly, he also funded organizations fighting gun violence, like Sandy Hook Promise and Rachel's Challenge.
That third one doesn’t work unless TPUSA is PRO abortion.
“I would have been x if you hadn’t aborted me” is a trope they have peddled in.
yeah i feel like people are misunderstanding the third reblog
i would have been [blank] if you hadn't aborted me is used by anti abortion groups, it's like "your baby could have been someone really important if you'd kept them around" (..like an organization founder for example)
y'all I'll be honest you're right about my addition not really working because it accidentally implies that tpusa is pro choice but in my defense I really wanted to say "aborted baby voice"
I fully understand this view.
PLEASE 🪦
OMG it's the user from the screenshot! <squeals gleefully>
It’s like seeing a celebrity
...I thought ur name said autism n. I was like yo that's sick. autism n. but alas. austin
nah i understand your addition just fine, the "aborted baby voice, i could have been someone" line is used in anti abortion contexts cuz it's supposed to imply the aborted baby could have been an influential figure and it was "wrong" to abort it for that reason (... which is pretty dumb and silly, like that baby could also have been a useless bum, we'll never know ! 🤷)
Death cultists
aborted baby voice???
Ever play South Park: The Stick of Truth?
Thankfully, no
You're actually missing out. It's a really good RPG that happens to be set in the South Park universe. The same is true for The Fractured But Hole.
The Fractured but Whole*
God, I need to replay that game today. Thanks for the stoner activity suggestion!
the achievement that unlocks when you go over to the corpse of the nazi aborted kardashian fetus and then rip a giant fart is one of the funniest things i've ever had happen in a game.
PSA spoiler tags have to touch the text you want to hide
like thislike this
Marking spoilers like this doesn't work, st least not on all platforms
on iOS your example is opposite, I can see the first two clearly but have to touch the last to see, just fyi
Hmm. How annoyingly inconsistent of markdown to behave that way, then. My version works on desktop, so I don't know why Apple wants to do it differently. Markdown is supposed to be a standardised formatting system.
It might not be Apple, to be fair. It could be the reddit app, which has plenty other problems already. I don't use the official app at all. Perhaps an Android user who does can say.
i can see the first two but not the 2nd. android
it looks perfect on my android, weird. good to know
afaik reference not to south park but only to the conservative memes where they post in the "perspective" of an aborted baby, like:
"I'd be bringing home my first boyfriend...... if you hadn't aborted me..."
Ben Shapiro's voice
I think it's a reference to the aborted girlfriend meme.
[sickos voice] Yes... ha ha... yes!
> (aborted baby voice) I would've been the third TPUSA founding member if you hadn't aborted me
Thank God I destroyed that save file before it went anywhere
What does an aborted baby sound like
A sort of gurgling
Funky town :x
Dunno, but if you want to hear or read an unwanted one you can always turn on the news or twitter
Erika is gonna be lost to a preventable pregnancy complication when JD Vance opts to protect the baby over the mother
The shouting matches between the democratic socialists and TPUSA probably caused more hearing damage than the concerts I went to in college lmao, they were hilarious, but damned loud.
You could have just turned your YouTube volume down.
It wasn't on the nose.
It was in the neck.
r/HermanCainAward.
Erika Kirk is going to transition next.
don’t deadname Eric Kirk like that /s
If I'm not supposed to make fun of Charlie Kirk's death, why is every new detail I learn about it so hilarious?
'aborted baby voice's 😂
They should have listened to Tony Montana.
But it is poetic that the things they tried to pretend did not exist killed them.
I’m not a believer in God. But if this doesn’t have God’s fingerprints all over it like “oh no the fuck you don’t.”
This might be the sign I’ve been waiting for all my life.
Twisatz Pusarach
As always when this is posted, TPUSA was started to make college kids into Republicans and then get them into office. It had nothing to do with guns or anti-vaxx. It was also founded in 2012, so no possible way it had anything to do with COVID.
This poster lied, and then people are liking it instead of really basic fact checking.
...wow. That's just...ironic isn't a strong enough word...
Like RAIIIIII
If god were real id admonish him for lazy writing
I don’t know what it says about me that my brain automatically interpreted “aborted baby voice” as the voice of Pennywise the clown, but it’s probably nothing good.
They looked at Scientology. Said Hold My Beer.
It's like poetry, it rhymes
I’ve been saying that for a while. If you tried to pass this shit off as fiction, people would tell you it isn’t believable. It’s way too on the nose.
Aborted baby voice? You mean.. like... Lil' Markie?!!
Lil' Markie - Diary Of An Unborn Child
Like Protect the Right to Life by Rev. John D. Occhipinti.
And now it's an educated working woman telling other women to submit to their husbands
It's like how an anti-seatbelt activist died in an easily-surviveable car wreck
Wasn’t it started before Covid?
Uma..umaa maa
Zygote got
This gives me a chuckle.
wa wha ha...
I know it's not the point but TPUSA started in 2012. Long before the COVID pandemic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turning_Point_USA?wprov=sfla1
It was also founded long before Kirk’s assassination, what’s your point?
"Two conservatives start an organization to push COVID Conspiracies..."
It's pedantic but it wasn't started to push COVID Conspiracies because it was started before COVID. It just seemed a bit misleading and I wanted to clarify.
their point is it wasnt founded to push covid conspiracies, like the post says
“Among other things” doing some heavy lifting
When isnt it
Why is this being downvoted? The post is misleading and makes it sound like TPUSA began as a reaction to Covid. They started the organization to indoctrinate college kids to right wing ideology
Grrr how dare you point out misinformation grr
I love being misinformed grrr
Correcting people is evil grrr
God punishes.
Is that why you guys call him Daddy
Not that sort of punishment. You need to talk to a Catholic for that, LOL
Laughing at the death of others, especially by murder, is ghoulish. It's nasty and off-putting.
And it's frustrating, because if you want people on your side, this shit does the opposite
Unfortunately, Kirk did not really warrant much for people to symphatize with. Like sucks he died, but I straight up forgot about him week after it happened. If all you present about yourself is hate, you will have nothing to be remembered for when you pass. I literally forgot about him a week after the news.
I mean, I really don't understand this mindset. I find in horrific to see a man get publicly executed. And I'm not sure how people have the cognitive dissonce to say an average Christian bro talking about average Christian bro stuff is somehow worse than murdering someone.
Like, there are lots of people I disagree with, and they say stuff that makes me angry. But...murder is always like a million times worse than words.
What's wrong with you people
What disgusting little people
lol
Haha woo (shakes my ding dong leftistly)
Charlie believed that sacrifices needed to be made to preserve our right to bear arms, so we’re just honoring him as he honored victims of gun violence
I notice you're Jewish. Charlie Kirk had things to say about you.