img

  • Is it silly? I would say so, but I don’t think it’s consoom.

    parent

    Not consoom just ugly and stupid

    parent root

    Exactly.

    OP is a dork guaranteed.

    parent root

  • Honestly if they’re a fan of Lego and Star Wars this is fine. The question is how many Lego Star Wars models are currently in their living space. I’m sure there’s a Lego model to square footage of living space ratio that sets the bar between a hobby and overconsumption.

    parent

    It is not fine.

    parent root

    Correct...not even remotely. lmao

    parent root

  • Unless the person is buying stuff for the sake of buying it, I don't see the issue with the tattoo?

    Sure, it is technically a commercial product, but I'm guessing they grew up with Lego Star Wars (games) and are just a huge fan. Or it's just a fun tattoo?

    I spent countless hours playing with legos with my friends, so I actually quite like what they did:)) Especially since this was clearly done in the style of the old(er) sets

    Regardless, I would say this is harmless compared to the other posts on this sub with the wall to wall collections of Funk pops etc.

    parent

    I don't know. I think making brands so much a part of your identity that you permanently put them on your body is kind of sad. 

    parent root

    [deleted]

    parent root

    I think getting a cartoon character tattoo is kind of sad, too. It's their skin, but that just seems like a weird thing to feel that strongly about. 

    parent root

  • I like it its cool

    parent

  • I mean like star wars was literally meant for kids and to sell toys 

    So I think this is better than a billionth rebellion logo tattoo 

    parent