What does everyone think about it this? It appeared online just these past few months..

  • This isn’t the vagina video I was hoping for

    😂😂😂 That certainly would be a disappointment if that’s what you came looking for.

  • Poor creature - it died. Alone.

    Just like all of us will

  • Well funny enough it actually precise match the reports of the people who claimed to see the creatures on that day, just search for Brasil Varginha incident there is alot of documentation about it, its literally the exact creature described ....

  • James Fox said its likely a fake. I'll take his word for it

  • The video is kinda old and probably real.

    Logic and data provided checks out ✅

  • Is that Josh from Polarity that I hear? He's one of my favorites.

  • Can I have the clip without this voice over? Why don’t you add the original in? Credit the creator and not just let with a voiceover

    I can’t step in that. I actually just used a clip from Polarity. But I think this footage is about to be released officially soon..

  • This seems legit because of the static encountered by the camera recording which is an indication of high radiation in the area

  • Vhs filter in overdrive

  • I wish James Fox would take this footage and confirm it with the girls.

  • Better fake than that damn blue light video people are losing their mind over

    Hahahaha, this is better? It looks like someone modeled E.T. And used tomatoes for its eyes. C'mon.

    The video you are referring to is the guy that drilled a hole in nuclear molten salt reactor by the looks of it, if you look at the object in the video and the latest post on this sub it’s interesting. Hard to tell if the video is real or fake though.

    Even the smallest reactor in that category, which is being built by Brigham Young University, is still large enough to take up a flatbed trailer. Not sure what you mean.

    They meant enrichment rod. Not reactor.

    Okay, that tracks. I was genuinely scratching my head, asking myself if they knew something I didn’t. Lol

    That being said, it does look essentially identical to the photo of the enrichment rod from Oak Ridge National Laboratory(which is actually in my neck of the woods, here in East Tennessee!), if you imagine the engravings on the end.

    THAT being said, if that’s what it really was, that guy might legitimately be in rough shape, considering the use of radioactive materials and the theory that the blue light is actually from Cherenkov radiation.

    Yeah. If he found that thing and just started engraving it (which is a theory), he could have exposed himself to something harmful before the drilling video even started.

  • Has been debunked

    I haven’t seen any legit debunk. Show the source please when extending the conversation on these old videos.

    Don't mean to cut you off, but before you dump posts on the sub you can first check if someone already did that in the past. And in 99% of cases it has already been discussed extensively on the sub already. I do not mean to discourage constructive discussion, but I am very close to leaving the sub because of 60% israeli "3 eyed carcass" disinformation spam and 40% clueless boomers posting the same over-discussed video over and over and over again.. It's like hearing someone celebrate discovering the wheel daily, but it's actually a square. It's tiring.

    Ya I could, or you could have also linked your source on the debunk. Given you are most familiar, why don't you take a few minutes to do that and get back to me? So I can review EXACTLY what you are referring to, and we can have an actual discussion on it.

    The burden of proof isn’t on debunkers.

    The burden of proof is on anyone claiming anything. The video has been posted for discussion, if you have something to add it would be appreciated if you could share the information.

    Wrong, the burden of proof lies on those making extraordinary claims but I'm sure you are already familiar.

    That goalpost moving was smooth as f*ck, dude.

    Champion of defending hoaxes

    I’m not defending anything, neither am I saying it is real. You claim that it has been debunked, you have been asked to share the resource that you can clearly remember as a good one and you are unwilling to share.

    Edit: you are it the previous person, yet I stand by my point.

    1. Say “it has been debunked”
    2. Condescend and ridicule when asked for source
    3. Repeat

    It always amuses me how many people take time out of their day to shit talk things they are convinced are fake. By comparison, I expend zero time and energy in the flat earth reddit telling those people they’ve lost the plot.

    I wonder what makes their time less valuable than mine?

    I mean, you are the one taking time to be smug about other people that come here to laugh at these larpers. Your time is probably less valuable than mine

    So you only came here to laugh at people, and not partake in any form of meaningful conversation? And you expect people to believe your time has any value? How ironic.

    Ironic is talking about "meaningful conversations" on a sub about a metal ball with sharpie marks with people that really believes it is an alien artifact. Even if I'm just posting gifs, it is more valuable than everything else in this sub lmao

    So what is the point in having the conversation at all, then? There is no way to truly validate this footage, and if debunkers don’t need to provide any evidence when claiming something has been debunked by someone, what are you even doing interacting?

    The burden of proof is on anyone who makes a claim. I have not made any claim, aside from not viewing anything which has debunked this video.

    If you have, then you make the claim as such, the burden of proof is on you to support that claim. Simple. So provide your source on the debunk.

    This guy wasn't the one faking teleporting on live TV???

  • Stop posting bullshit!