• Deadass, how do people find subreddits like these? Do you actively browse for pedo subs, or does your Reddit algorithm suggest pedo stuff?

    No friend, someone linked it under a post and I clicked on it And... Yeah Ive been reporting it since.

  • petite I get, but never in a million years will I ever understand why people would be attracted to kids

    Yeah it should be unimaginable. It’s a really unfortunate mental problem, and I hope that everyone who seeks help gets it, and everyone who actively tries to get with minors rot in a cell.

    PREACH SISTER

    I’m non-binary. Thank you though

    lesbian threw me off hardcore lmao, my bad friend

    When I was 14 I remember thinking “obviously pedophilia sexualizing children is bad. But is it really pedophilia to sexualize young teenagers? It’s weird when adults do it, but we all have these thoughts and share them. There should be media like that for us!” And now that I’m in my 20s such a thought makes me want to gag. I do not understand, AT ALL, how anyone could be attracted to someone younger than 19-20. Really that’s stretching it though. Even if they were an early bloomer for puberty, the mental maturity and life experience just isn’t there. A friend of mine briefly was trying to hit on a college freshman a few months ago and I basically had to tell him “dude. She might be 18 but she’s barely out of high school. You can legally drink. What are you doing, she’s our little siblings’ age!”

  • Here they come on every post like this. The lolicons and proshippers coming to defend their child rape porn to death and downvoting every sane person's comment

    They are downvoting you lol. Truly pathetic beings

    yeah i had like -5 lmfao

    They're so annoying. Isn't this against sitewide rules to raid posts?

    The amount of downvoting all at once feels abnormal, they're all probably huddled in a discord server somewhere. Would explain also how that one r/proshipclub post had to get locked because suddenly a shit ton of heavily upvoted lolicons/proshippers raided it defending child x adult ships by using flowery language such as "it's just fantasy" and "it's a healthy way for young people to explore (the sub allowed minors btw)", groomer shit

    Lolicons literally use the same dogwhistles as pedophiles "cute and funny", "small and cute". Plenty of posters on r/smallandcuteyoutube were in lolicon subs despite posting links to little girls channels who were innocently dancing to tiktok trends but these creeps sexualized them. Lolicon subreddits frequently have to beg users to stop trying to post irl stuff. That is not normal.

    They. Are. Pedophiles.

    Huddling in a discord server to argue why jacking off to depictions of children is somehow okay sounds on brand for them

    hell yeah i love virtue signalling by putting all my detractors under an umbrella term labelling what they ingest as the most heinous possible thing to exist and calling people who hate the extreme hyperbole “sane”. truly, a beacon of open and honest discussion

    i don’t, i’m not interested in shit like that. i’m just not sick in the head enough to argue that drawn art is just as bad as the Actual Fucking Thing.

    people who view stuff like that need therapy, not demonisation. and actual fucking victims don’t need virtue signallers like you downplaying their experiences, intentional or not, by putting their abusers on the same level as people who masturbate to art.

    go fuck yourself. you and every reactionary who agrees with you and doesn’t look at the other side.

    Good lord you need therapy for your anger problems holy shit.

    Yeah this sub is definitely getting raided the inconsistency in upvotes/downvotes is insane

    Noticed that. You really get the weird people coming out the woodwork.

    Yeah no, fully agree. It is victimless (arguably, there are cases of fictional stuff lowering your repulsion to real stuff, but rare, so doesn't matter) and hurts no one really other than maybe overworked artists lol.

    So in that way I agree.

    At least in the country I live though (UK), the internet watch foundation says any depictions of child like sexual material (even sketches drawing etc) is CSAM, or at least a part of the same bracket.

    Which In my eyes is wasting their time when they could be looking at irl cases, but I guess it is a step in a good direction? Maybe?

    Idk, my view is that the only thing stopping it from being worse is artstyle. Anime and cutesy? Legally grey, not really consistently bannable. But make it more realistic? Suddenly that's genuinely enforcable.. Which is funny in my eyes

    The UK is full of crimes ,hell only like 5 countries, and said countries have more problems than Japan, and to be fair,him being angry is sorta fair? Idk though

    I fully disagree. It normalizes problematic ideologies and behavior and there are also cases of lolicons acting out irl.

    Also calling out pedophilic tendencies and people being sick for being attracted to depictions, fictional or not, of children in no way somehow detracts away from real cases and thats such a bs argument and whataboutism for jerking it to drawings of kids.

    Thats the type of asinine reasoning Ive gotten used to seeing from them though. Anything to try and gas light the world into thinking its somehow normal and okay. I dont care thats the line and nobody irl would ever admit being attracted to lolis as they shouldnt and it should never. Never be normalized.

    Sorry. Same goes for shotacon bs too not just lolis

    These people don't actually care about CSAM. They only care about using it for whataboutism to deflect from the main point that jacking off to depictions of toddlers is still inherently pedophilic and needs to be called out. They need to get help or else they'll move on to real children (which they fucking have)

    Yep. Dont know why people let the gas lighting work. Its logical fallacy. The deflection dies not somehow make jerking it to depictions of kids okay.

    Fictional or not. They get off to the idea of fucking a kid. The deflection and gas lighting and circular logic and justifications do not change this.

    Edit: And lets be honest. They get off to loli stuff because they cant get laid irl They have to imagine raping someone much smaller and weaker than them.

    Yes, jacking off to depictions of toddlers is inherently pedophilic.

    You are feeding your paraphilia when you should be getting help. You assume we don't care about "real" CSAM when we report both lolicon and CSAM subreddits. What have you done besides use it for whataboutism?

    you’re using the word “you” a lot toward someone who doesn’t have this paraphilia. i’m going to assume you remembered i said i don’t ingest this content and mean the hypothetical “you”.

    yes, i can agree that pedophilia and being a lolicon/whatever go hand in hand. i’m not defending pedophilia. you would know this if you actually read what i was saying, so let me write it plain:

    i dislike people calling drawn or animated art, that includes a character that looks like, is implied to be, or is stated to be underage, “child porn”.

    it is not.

    saying it is, however unintentional it may be, only serves to a) demonise people who need therapy, and b) negatively impact Real CSA Victims, who are now having their abusers, by proxy, defended by people who masturbate to art.

    i never said or implied you don’t care about csam. i wholeheartedly believe you do. i’m just saying that using terms like “child porn” to refer to victimless, fictional art harms real victims.

    you also can’t call me out on whataboutism using whataboutism. i’ve been subbed here for a short while, i’ve seen and reported a few real csam subreddits that have popped in here. i also believe you either have also done so, or would if you had the opportunity.

    i wanna end this by saying something i’d be very disappointed if you disagreed with me on.

    having a paraphilia doesn’t make somebody deserving of being witch hunted and demonised, nor does viewing art of said paraphilia. it is a mental illness, and people cannot choose what they are attracted to. however, with therapy, they can be deprogrammed and lose those paraphilias.

    it is those who act on those paraphilias in real life that deserve to be demonised.

    Lolicon by definition is child porn. what

    lol ok buddy. You don't think looking at depictions of child rape is acting on the pedophilia?

    Cya I'm not gonna argue why a term that literally translates to child porn is infact still CSAM and can be indirectly harmful to real life children by way of normalization and feeding the users paraphilia and make them look for the real deal.

    Edit: Alright now this is either your alt or you're all in a discord server how the fuck did you reply that fast

    this is getting ridiculous

    Perhaps they should get therapy instead of looking at CSAM?

    The only reason you're so obssessed with wanting minors to "explore themselves" by shipping child characters sexually with adults is to groom them and make them think its okay.

    Lolicons have been proven over and over to be using the same dogwhistles as actual pedophiles (because the drawn child porn isn't enough proof) like r/cuteandsmallyoutube did with "small and funny" and "cute and small" while they were posting real little girls. What do you have to say to that?

    Proven? Seriously? Dogwistle fits for the actual bad people. Do you say that every mlp fan is pedophiles? Or everyone who makes cartoons a pedophile? Because they are literally pedophile that do make cartoons, but nobody says that every who does make cartoons is a fucking pedophile, hell ,r/fuckmap is crawling with pedophiles ,have you ever read what I say? Do you think that every mlp fan are pedophiles? No. I have a lot of links

  • Certified Fresh®
    Subreddit banned 2 years ago or more recently.

  • Petite/Loli is fine

    But children = 1000 deaths

  • "petite" feels like a lolicon/pedo dogwhistle at this point

    I wish it wasn’t, to be honest.

    because it pretty much is

    How? It literally fits for characters like naragato or uzaki chan. Hell, the subbreddit wasn't banned for something bad

  • Ah someone you gives context in the title how nice