Look for its not that hard, in fact just scroll Twitter for a few seconds (depends on your feed of course))

So could you cite real people doing this on both sides? Because I only see the right calling for violence.

Don't put words in my mouth

Which ones?

Also you're forgetting the fact that I said they call anyone who's not on the left or has a different opinion a Nazis. That includes people who may agree with them in some areas but not in others so no they're not just hating on "bigoted nationalists"

But they're hating on white nationalist supporters?

Could you cite where this is happening, (any of what you're saying) just one example, of a real life leftist doing this?

I said the meaning of the word changed. It used to mean being aware /conscious of social injustices and governmental abuse but the extremists now use it to encompass everything under the leftist ideology which I admit is majority of which is generally woke but not all of it.

So... it's the same meaning. Got it. Which parts aren't "woke" that galls under this?

Edit: "white nationalist"

The shit loads of I’m idiots assaulting and stalking homeland security

There isn’t any evidence of a broad, organized left-wing campaign targeting DHS agents. What you do see every few years are the same kinds of scattered protest clashes that have existed for decades, usually tied to specific events, specific cities, and specific moments of police escalation. Those are individual incidents, not a coordinated effort, and DHS’s own public reporting has never shown anything close to “loads” of assaults by a particular political faction.

As for the legal side, assaulting a federal officer is already a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 111. That statute covers physical attacks or attempts to impede an officer in the course of their duties. If someone actually does that, they can be charged with a felony. But that is a simple criminal violation, not treason, not sedition, and not a political offense. It is treated the same way regardless of whether the person is left-wing, right-wing, or apolitical.

Stalking federal officers is also already covered under general federal stalking and threat statutes. Again, if an individual did this, the charge would match the act. It would not magically become “treason” because the target works for the government.

which DHS report they’re referring to or which case numbers show this supposed pattern?

DHS publishes annual statistics on attacks against personnel, and they’re not reporting any surge. Without that, you are repeating a narrative rather than describing real events.

What you are doing is moving the goalposts from “the extreme left is openly discussing harming government agents,” which you could not substantiate, to a vague accusation about people attacking DHS.

When someone jumps from rhetoric to an accusation of widespread criminal conduct without details, it’s usually because they don’t have evidence for the first claim and are hoping the second one sounds scary enough that you won’t ask for specifics.

Is that what you're doing here?

Damn. What reason is there to hate?

Edit: their comment before it was deleted said “their culture”