Where is the peer review file that is associated with this paper? I know that Nature has an opt-in/opt-out and anonymous review, however all this paper has is references.
They're citing self published papers. SELF PUBLISHED! Anybody can self publish a paper, that's not a reliable source and instantly diminishes the entire credibility of the paper.
An hour in.. pretty good episode.
I think they have been observing us for a long time.
They're beautiful, aren't they, the stars :)
Well, the evidence is there and the world keeps spinning. Granted we don't know what they are, or their origins, but we know it's not us.
The kinda proof you'd think would be in every paper and in the news cycles, but as always, nothing.
Just goes to show, you can find solid evidence, but in the grand scheme of thong it will have little societal impact.
I dont really believe aliens visit the earth because of the lack of evidence but I'm definitely here for the grand scheme of thong.
Yeah, this isn’t solid enough evidence.
Here is some additional analysis of the data.
https://youtu.be/5_Pw_rY04sI?si=v1PaJ3i8zzlCs9PK
https://youtu.be/qFGiDyAx0F4?si=DBHEC_Vjzpt-IhCm
And the actual paper?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-21620-3
Where is the peer review file that is associated with this paper? I know that Nature has an opt-in/opt-out and anonymous review, however all this paper has is references.
That's NOT what the paper says. It's just unknown what those objects were
Sorry about your ontological state
jesus coming back confirmed prepare for rapture
Plus the paper is bad.
So they're making assumptions on assumptions.
Absolutely terrible research.
I looked at the paper, it's terrible.
It wouldn't stand a chance under scrutiny.
They're citing self published papers. SELF PUBLISHED! Anybody can self publish a paper, that's not a reliable source and instantly diminishes the entire credibility of the paper.
Zoo theory is an answer to the Fermi paradox but everything else is pure farts.