Anti Marijuana Propaganda is almost entirely rooted in racism - before I put forward my argument I've tried to be as objective as possible considering I am a strong believer in world wide legalisation. Anti-marijuana propaganda is best understood as a product of racialized social control rather than proportionate assessment of harm particularly when contrasted with the treatment of alcohol. Cannabis attracted little public concern until the early twentieth century, when its use became associated with Mexican immigrants and Black communities; the deliberate adoption of the term “marihuana” and the rhetoric promoted by officials such as Harry Anslinger framed the drug as a threat linked to racialized populations rather than to demonstrable risk. This framing persisted despite the absence of evidence that cannabis produced levels of violence, addiction, or social harm comparable to alcohol, a substance that remains legally and culturally normalized despite substantially higher associations with mortality and interpersonal violence. The endurance of punitive cannabis policy, alongside racially disproportionate enforcement outcomes despite similar usage rates across racial groups, suggests that opposition to marijuana has been shaped less by public health considerations than by historically contingent racial anxieties. While contemporary discourse increasingly acknowledges the relative harms of different substances, the legacy of racially selective moral panic continues to structure attitudes and enforcement, indicating that anti-marijuana narratives remain embedded within broader patterns of structural racism. Let me know you're thoughts!
u/NationalGovernment26, there weren't enough votes to determine the quality of your post...
Historically yes, I agree.
I think we are in a day and age where we can drop the propaganda and have an honest discussion about the pros and cons of marijuana and responsible use. The same way we do alchohol.
In the American south its still the devils lettuce to a lot of people lol. Texas for example has been trying to roll back their progress on weed as of late.
depends where you are tbh - USA is more open but in the UK completely closed conversation among most parties (and those parties are the ones that usually win) the only parties that are open are green a lib dems
Lol you're funny.
How so?
"The same way we do alchohol." for real made me laugh.
I know a broad a spectrum of AA guys, hard drinkers, religious drinkers, (think jews on Shabat and Passover), alcohol enthusiasts enthusiastically drinking themselves to death, and relatively responsible healthy alcohol users. I live in a state with a few insane puritanical laws about alcohol, America has lots of states with those. I don't think I know two people who feel the same about alcohol.
"and responsible use"
there was nothing to criticize about their comment
Usually, people don't feel criticized when a stranger says they are funny, then goes on to elaborate on why their comment was thoughtful and amusing.
People usually do feel criticized when somebody calls them funny during a serious conversation in which they were not attempting to be humorous.
Sorry, but I don't find your comments amusing or interesting.
Please feel free to interpret that as criticism.
Don't care. Didn't ask.
Ummm .... You were the one who brought this up.
You don't care about my reply to YOUR comments .... but this thread started because your white knighting "defending" someone I complimented.
I agree, just meant in terms of “legalize it, share the risks, guidelines for recommended healthy or safe use and leave it up to the individual to decide”
period
I think an important part of humor is saying a lot with a few words. There's a lot of amusing similarities in the odd things people say and do around recreational alcohol and weed.
i never thought about how divisive? alcohol can be in conversations, but reflecting back, i can't recall being a part of or hearing of many/any emotionally neutral conversations about it. i guess it is the one form of addiction we all have an immediate relationship with, or with the consequences of it's consumption.
there was racism but that was a tool and not the source. the original source was hemp being a competitor for paper and one of the top producers of paper didn't want to create/change his production to hemp so created the narrative to scare people as racism was common at the time in the early 1900s. Today it is root in pharmacuticals as weed is a major competitor and legalizing it would make a lot of companies lose a lot of money.
Gun control is also rooted in racism
can u elaborate on this? or do you think that despite being rooted in racism, it’s kind of shifted due to mass shootings and school shootings?
So to start at post civil war, many southern states passed laws specifically preventing black people from owning guns. Creating things such as “good moral character” and also the permit system which had few, if any, black permit holders. Later on Reagan, while being governor of California at the time, signed the Mulford Act into law in direct response to the armed protest of the Black Panther Party. During the signing of the Mulford Act firearms were not shown in the same light as we have today with mass shootings and mental illness. Even the NRA supported it. The Mulford Act had a strong support due to restricting black Americans from being able to protest while armed.
The Mulford Act - Wiki
As for the second part of your question I feel as that I would have a biased answer as I am a supporter of the 2nd amendment and oppose all gun restrictions. So at this time I don’t really want to debate that with anyone but I thought I’d share some of the racial gun laws since that was my original comment.
agreed
I always heard DuPont played a large role in making it illegal as well
I thought this was common knowledge honestly
Man , i feel like i can say this about like 90 percent of american things. 😭
how is weed American and clearly this has spread beyond America
It's not, but anti-marijuana propaganda is something that has been massively prevalent in America, and had a lasting impact on how several aspects of our legal system and economy was developed.
What isn’t racist nowadays?
And the alcohol lobbyist
if the lobbyist would just switch their motto to "liquor before weed makes a good night indeed" everyone would be
This isn't an unpopular opinion, this is just the truth
Anslinger.
I would've fully agreed with this post decades ago
Historically yeah but not any more
Legalisation changes the law, not the legacy
Ok?
Agreed!
Haha! 😂
Marijuana is bad for users. It’s addictive and its dependence forming.
This is the where the argument starts now.